Northian grammar: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 454: Line 454:


==Nouns classes==
==Nouns classes==
===Overview===
The following chart lists the stems and accent patterns in Galic Northian.  A green cell indicates that the stem and accent combination is productive, either ''in se'' or through a compound suffix; a yellow cell indicates an attested stem-accent combination; a red cell indicates no or only dubious attestations.  The far-left column gives the traditional classification of nouns into oxytone (OX) and paroxytone (PX) by their dative singular forms, which have subsequently been refined into two classes each reflecting the more specific ablaut patterns that have survived into Galic times.
The principal classes of nouns are discussed first.  The following chart lists the stems and accent patterns in Galic Northian.  A green cell indicates that the stem and accent combination is productive, either ''in se'' or through a compound suffix; a yellow cell indicates an attested stem-accent combination; a red cell indicates no or only dubious attestations.  The far-left column gives the traditional classification of nouns into oxytone (OX) and paroxytone (PX) by their dative singular forms, which have subsequently been refined into two classes each reflecting the more specific ablaut patterns that have survived into Galic times.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 476: Line 475:


Where there are multiple productive accentuation patterns, neuter nouns are almost always identified with the proterokinetic pattern, and masculine-feminine with the hysterokinetic or amphikinetic.  The exception is for i-stems and u-stems, wherein proterokinetic accentuation is standard, and particularly productive through the compound with -t.
Where there are multiple productive accentuation patterns, neuter nouns are almost always identified with the proterokinetic pattern, and masculine-feminine with the hysterokinetic or amphikinetic.  The exception is for i-stems and u-stems, wherein proterokinetic accentuation is standard, and particularly productive through the compound with -t.
===Obstruent stems===
The category of consonant-stems consist only of those that end in -p and -k, while resonant- and vowel-stem root nouns are discussed in their own categories, whether suffixed or not, as the phonological processes that apply to them generate similar results.  The obstruents p- and k- are rarely subject to alteration, except before the nom. sing. ending -s where they become fricativized to f- and x-, respectively.
The noun ''āfš'' < PEE *h₂ēp-s "river" is often the poster-boy of the Northian nouns due to its straightforward stem and clear ablaut alteration between ā ~ a. ''ap'' "force" is used for neuter nouns, displaying PEE e ~ Ø ablaut > Galic o ~ Ø.  Both these nouns are of the OX type, displaying an accented genitive ending in -ō < PNN *-os.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā āfš, "river" !!colspan="3"|θaṯ ap, "force"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| āfš ||rowspan="3"| āpōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| āpiš
| rowspan="3"|ap ||rowspan="3"| apī ||rowspan="3"| apa
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| ap 
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| āpam ||  āpaṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| apōḫ || apōš || apõ
| bōḫ || bōš || bõ
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| api || apō || apšo
| api || bō || fšu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| apei̯ ||rowspan="2"| apmō ||rowspan="2"| apmuš
| bei̯ ||rowspan="2"| bmō ||rowspan="2"| bmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| apōi̯
| bōi̯
|}
===t-stems===
The stems ending in -t comprise both of root nouns and suffixed nouns.  They are underlyingly the same as other obstruent stems but are distinguished in that final -s is preserved in the nominative case, at the expense of *-t-.  t-stems not part of a compound suffix such as -tāt- and -tūt- are rare and are descended mainly from the amphikinetic ablaut type.
''nēpōs'' "grandchild" has the stem nep-ot-, where the suffix undergoes ablaut to zero grade in the oblique cases as *nep-t- > nef-θ-.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha nēpōs, "grandchild"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| nēpōs ||rowspan="3"| nepotōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| nepotiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| nepotam || nefθā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| nefθōḫ || nefθōš || nefθõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| nepoti || nefθō || nefšu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| nefθei̯ || rowspan="2"| nefθmō ||rowspan="2"| nefšmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| nefθa
|}
The PEE suffix *-teh₂ts created nouns of states of being.  Inherited examples are mainly of hysterokinetic origin, which had the zero grade of the root, but later creations may bind the full grade.  The suffix is non-ablauting and takex oxytone endings.  The following example has many cognates in EE languages and is from a common root *n̥-mr̥teh₂ts > PNN *ummurtāts > Galic ''āmmərətās''.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā āmmərətās, "immortality"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|  āmmərətās ||rowspan="3"| āmmərətātōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| āmmərətātiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| āmmərətāṯ
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| āmmərətātam || āmmərətātā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| āmmərətātōḫ || āmmərətātōš || āmmərətātõ
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| āmmərətāti || āmmərətātō || āmmərətāššu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| āmmərətātei̯ ||rowspan="2"| āmmərətāsmō ||rowspan="2"| āmmərətāθmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| āmmərətāta
|}
===nt-stems===
The nt-stems are very closely associated with the formation of the present active participle in -nt-.  But while participles have distinct masculine, feminine, and neuter forms, nt-stem nouns have the form of the masculine participle and a lexical gender (that is, the noun can have feminine gender but will always have the same inflectional endings as the masculine participle).
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha dōs, "tooth"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| dōs ||rowspan="3"| dónδōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| dónδiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| doṇṯ
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| donδəm || dónδā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| dātōḫ || dātōš || dātõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| dónδi || dātō || dāśū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| dātei̯ || rowspan="2"| dāśmō ||rowspan="2"| dāśmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| dāta
|}
===m-stems===
This class is known from only a few but important nouns, e.g. ''θáɣā'' "earth" and ''zīi̯ō'' "winter", as well as from the root, ''dā̊'' "house".  All m-stem nouns in Northian are feminine in gender, though with only a few examples, this may not be an actual rule in the proto-language.  Outside of nouns, it is also known in numerals for 1, 7, and 10—''hā̊ haftā dekā''—and the solitary adjective ''merə'' "particulate, ground up".  Some authorities believe many m-stems may have, during the time of the proto-language, been either remade to thematic neuters or had an additional *-n added after the *m-, giving rise to the multitude of n-stems of the -mn- type, wherein the -m- is of otherwise unexplained origin.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā giyō, "winter" = ''hiemps''
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| giyō ||rowspan="3"| giyamōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| giyaēmiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| giyõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| giyā̊ || gimā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| gimōḫ || gimōš || gimõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| giyaēmi || gimō || giṃśū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| gimāi̯ ||rowspan="2"| gimmō || gimmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| gimō || gimβiiōḫ
|}
Most suffixed nouns with OX inflection have a long o-grade suffix in the nominative singular, e.g. ''giyō'', and in this regard they are the same as the n-stems.  In fact, given the rules of phonetic change, *-ōm and *-ōn cannot be told apart, so it is possible this ending has been transported from the n-stems.  But ''θā̀m xmōḫ'' "earth" has a nominative that must be disyllabic, i.e. θáɣam, with a short ultima reflecting a zero grade, in the nom. sing.  Had the second vowel been a typical long o-grade, it would have become *ō and would not merge across the guttural consonant, giving *θáɣō. 
In the accusative, the sequence *-em-m̥ in the proto-language resolves prehistorically to *-ēm via {{wp|Stang's law}} and appears in Northian as -ā̊, while the equivalent sequence for n-stems *-en-m̥ yielded Northian -en-əm.  
Note that the full grade in the accusative plural ''θágmā̊'' reverts to the root syllable; the suffix is in zero grade.  I-mutation affects the locative singular and nominative plural in the usual manner.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā θáḥàm, "ground, earth" = χθών
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| rowspan="2"| θáḥàm ||rowspan="3"| θáḥàmōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| θáɣaēmiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| xā̊ || θāxmā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| xmōḫ || xštą̄ōš || xštõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| xštémi || xštą̄ō || xštāŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| xmai ||rowspan="2"| xštą̄mō ||rowspan="2"| xštą̄muš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| xmōi
|}
To this table above must be subjoined that ''xā̊'' < *dʰǵʰḗm < *dʰǵʰém-m̥ is only found in a handful of instances in Galic Period I, and even there it is not exclusive.  The proto-form of the accusative is uncertain, since many authorities predict this word should have a full-grade root syllable, which should result in dysyllabic *θaɣā̊.  But the form actually found is monosyllabic, which could only come from a zero-grade root.  If the oblique stem *dʰǵʰm- was later introduced to replace the nominative stem, the resulting form would have been expected ''xam'', with the *m of the stem probably vocalized as short by position.
===n-stems===
This group of nouns had multiple subtypes, whose common feature was the stem-final consonant -n; their phonetic outcomes can be quite different due to vocalization rules.
A common subtype of the n-stems is through the suffix *-mn-, which is common in Northian.  The OX pattern was normal for animate nouns, and the PX in neuter nouns. 
In ''fraōmō'' "breath", the nom. singular ending -ō (which occludes the shape of the stem) arises due to the effects of a PEE sound law that deleted any resonants in the environment of *-ōR in auslaut.  Ablauting nouns in this class will have an accented root in the direct cases and accented ending in oblique cases, except in the locative singular where the accented suffix is attested.
Depending on the exact phonetic environment, the -m- of the suffix may be vocalized in different ways.  See the notes above for the formation of the zero-grade in Northian, which are unusually sensitive to phonetic environment.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|ha fraōmō, "lung"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| fraōmō ||rowspan="3"| fraōmanōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| fraōmaēniš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| fraōman 
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| fraōmanəm ||  fraōmanā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| fərəuụą̄nōḫ || fərəuụānōš || fərəuụą̄nõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| frumen || fərəuụānō || fərəuụāŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| fərəuụą̄nei̯ ||rowspan="2"| fərəuụą̄nmō ||rowspan="2"| fərəuụānmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| fərəuụą̄n
|}
''fnaōmin'' "breath" is an ablauting mn-stem noun with PX inflection.  Owing to its semantic connection with ''fraōmō'' "lung" as well as the shape of the oblique stem under the influence of u, the alternate spelling ''fraōmin'' is also seen, for example G.Nr. 1477 ''mōi̯ βā θxámin apū fraōmíñīḥ fərəuụānōš dito'' "By the Earth, let therefore not [his] breaths be given away from his two lungs". But these two words are from etymologically unrelated roots.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ fnaōmin, "breath"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| fnaōmin ||rowspan="3"| fnaōmíñīḥ ||rowspan="3"| fnaōmō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| frumaṇġ || frumenuš || frumenõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| frumíñi || frumenū || frumáŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| frumenma ||rowspan="2"| frumenmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| frumā̊
|}
There are also n-stems not part of a suffix of *-mn-.  They are rarer than the type with -mn- and are sometimes emphasized as "bare" n-stems.  They are of two types, distinguished in the nom. sing., those with -ō and those with -ā̊.  Though less common, they are typical of family names.
In ''uə̄rštā̊'' "male of an animal", of the type ending in -ō, PNN stems are ablauting *uors-on- and *uərəs-n-.  In the nom. sing. the root vowel is lengthened, occasioning the loss of the root-final resonant prehistorically.  As it will appear, the stem-final -n- is vocalized if the ending begins with a consonant; the gen. and loc. du. begin with the prehistoric laryngeal, which still trigger vocalization and are reflected as Galic hiatus and quantitative and qualitative alteration.  After *r and its vocalized allophone, *s obligatorily becomes š, which cannot precede a vowel directly and to which a t is added.  However, this addition is chronologically late and therefore applicable to the loc. and gen. du. forms, even though earlier they were considered to begin with consonants and trigger vocalization.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā uə̄rštā̊, "male of an animal"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| uə̄rštā̊ ||rowspan="3"| uə̄rštinōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| uə̄rštiniš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| uə̄rštin
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| uə̄rštinəm || uə̄rštinā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| uərəšnōḫ || uərəšta·ā̊š || uərəšnõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| uərəšténi || uərəšta·ā̊ || uərəštāhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| uərəšnei̯ ||rowspan="2"| uərəštāmō ||rowspan="2"| uərəštāmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| uərəštā
|}
''yəu̯ụə̄'' "youth" < *h₂yéwHō has the same suffix as above underlying, but preceded by a laryngeal that colours the *-en- to *-on-.  As a result, the rule that deletes final resonants following lengthened *-ō comes into play and produces the same ending as the animate mō-stems (but in this example it is altered to ə̄ following w-).  But here in the gen. and loc. du. it is the suffix *-n- that becomes vocalized when followed by a consonant.  The resulting vowel is shortened on account of the preceding laryngeal, with regular alterations of quality and quantity to surrounding vowels.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|ha yəu̯ụə̄, "youth"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| yəu̯ụə̄ ||rowspan="3"| yəu̯ụənōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| yəu̯ụiñiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| yəu̯ụən
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| yəu̯ụənəm ||  yəu̯ụənā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| yūnōḫ || yuụa·ā̊š || yūnõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| yəu̯ụəni || yuụa·ā̊ || yuụahū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| yūnei̯ ||rowspan="2"| yuụamō ||rowspan="2"| yuụamuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| yūna
|}
===r-stems===
''dugitṓ'' "daughter" represents the oxytone group of the r-stems, which includes many agentive nouns that terminate in *-tēr.  They are recognizable by their zero-grade nom. endings and full-grade -ō endings in gen.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā dugitṓ, "daughter"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"|dugitṓ ||rowspan="3"| dugiterōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| dugitériš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| dugiterəm || dúgiδrā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| duxθrōḫ || dugitarṓš || duxθrõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| duxθrai || dugitarṓ || duhitušštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| duxtərəmṓ || duxtərəmō
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| duxθrōi̯ || duxθəramβiiōḫ
|}
''mātar'' "mother" represents the group with inherited acrostatic pattner, whose accent persists on the root syllable and always takes suffix and ending in zero-grade.  ''βrātar'' "brother" is declined in like manner.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā mātar, "mother"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| mātar ||rowspan="3"| māδəra ||rowspan="2"| māδriš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| māδrəm ||  māδərą̄s
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| māδərəš || māδərouš || māδrõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| māδri || mātəroū || māδərəštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| māδərəma || māδərəmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| māδəra || māδərəβiiōḫ
|}
Gen. ''māδərəš'' < *meh₂tr̥s.  The acc. pl. ''māδərą̄s'' seems to reflect PEE *meh₂tr̥ns (for expected *meh₂tern̥s), while other Nordic languages reflect *meh₂tern̥s.  The form is a deviation from the general rule of resonant vocalization, but the vocalization of *r̥ could have been carried over from the gen. sing., where it is the only resonant that could be vocalized; moreover, it is a perfect match with Xevdenite ''mātərąs'', hinting that the vocalization of -n̥s was not (yet) a firm rule in the proto-language.  In Galic, ''māδra'' "two mothers" is often an ellipsis for "mother and father".
There is also
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā yatar, "husband's brother's wife"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| yatar ||rowspan="3"| yatiri ||rowspan="2"| yatiriš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| yaδrəm ||  yaterā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| yatās || mātərouš || māδrõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| yatiri || mātəroū || mātərəšū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| māδərəma ||rowspan="2"| mātərəmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| yatiri
|}
===s-stems===
The s-stem nouns can be divided into two classes, more numerous, neuter nouns like ''xrétāḫ'' and animate nouns like ''aōštā̊''.  The former suffix exhibits qualitative ablaut from *-os ~ es-, while the second class has a more conventional, quantitative -os ~ s- pattern.
The os/es-stems are a class of very common neuter nouns in Northian and are directly cognate to those found in Nordic languages, where the ablaut surfaces as -az ~ iz-. Though in Galic times and later only the PX pattern is productive, there a few common s-stem nouns exhibiting an original acrostatic accent.  In this class, the root was consistently accented.
In PX the nom. sing. ended in -āḫ < unaccented *-os; this *-os is a bare stem.  The suffix ablauted to -es- for all oblique cases, but here the ending once again acts prominently on the suffix.  If the ending began with a vowel, the final -s of the suffix would be intervocalic and become -h, which colours any neighbouring /e/ to /a/.  As a result, the gen. ended in -ah-āḫ < *-es-os.  If the ending began with a consonant, the -s remained and the unaccented /e/ usually became /i/.  The gen. and loc. du. endings began with a laryngeal consonant, not vowels.  When the /s/ comes into contact with a vowel with the loss of the laryngeal, an epenthetic /t/ was added at the same time for the conservation of euphony.  The lack of accent causes the ins. pl. also to end in -βiiāḫ < *-bʰyos.
The gen. sing. has an allomorph ''xrétahas'' that often appears before compounds and enclitics, e.g. ''xrétahás-ka'' "and of power".  It is uncertain if this form may reflect the alternate genitive ending *-es in the proto-language, which would be coloured to -as following /h/, or if it is merely a regular development from the familiar ending -os when unaccented.  However, the enclitic should regularly accent this syllable.  Additionally, the early literature has the combining form ''xrétahós-ka'', showing the regular retention of *-os in accented position, though these can be editorial alterations, as changes would affect neither metre nor rhyme.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ xrétāḫ, "intellect, power"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| xrétāḫ ||rowspan="3"| xrétahāḥ ||rowspan="3"| xrétā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| xrétahāḫ || xrétištuš || xrétahõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| xrétāḫ || xrétištū || xrétišštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| xrétahai ||rowspan="2"| xrétišma ||xrétišmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| xrétahōi || xrétižβiiāḫ
|}
The noun ''aōštā̊'' "dawn" has feminine gender and therefore a distinct accusative.  The noun had three basic stems: the strong stem which appears in the sing. nom. and voc. comes from PEE *h₂eu̯s-os-, with regular lengthening of the final syllable anticipating a zero nominative ending; the middle stem appears in the other direct cases and is from *h₂us-es-; the weak stem appears in all other cases and is from *h₂us-s-, with full-grade endings as expected in oxytone words.  Note the singular voc. ended in *-os which became *-oh and then -ōḫ in Galic; the final *-h is lost except before enclitics and compounds, where it can condition phonetic changes.  The effects of the former *-h is denoted orthographically as <ḫ> but is otherwise silent.
Also presented is ''βiịā̊'' "fear", from PEE *bʰeyh₂-os, of masculine gender.  The nom. sing. stem has been replaced by zero-grade PNN *bihₐ-.  The stem ending in laryngeal will have as its residual effect the colouring of the oblique alloform of the suffix *-es- to -as-.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā aōštā̊, "dawn" !!colspan="3"|ha βiịā̊, "fear"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| aōštā̊ ||rowspan="3"| uštištōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| uštahāḫ
| βiịā̊ ||rowspan="3"| βii̯ahōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| βii̯ahāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|βoc}}
| aōštōḫ
| βii̯ōḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| uštóziiam ||  uštahā̊
| βiyáziiam ||  βi̯ahahā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| ušštōḫ || ušštōs || ušštõm
| βišštōḫ || βišštōs || βišštõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| uštišti || ušštō || ūšštū
| βištišti || βišštō || βišštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| ušštei̯ ||rowspan="2"| uššmō ||rowspan="2"| uššmuš
| βišštei̯ ||rowspan="2"| βiššmō ||rowspan="2"| βiššmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| ušštōi̯
| βišštōi̯
|}
The word ''mūš'' "mouse" is a non-ablauting s-stem noun. 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|sā mūš, "mouse, small rodent"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| mūš ||rowspan="3"| mūštōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| mūštiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| mūš
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| mūštam ||  mūštā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| mūštōḫ || mūštōs || mūštõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| mūšti || mūštō || mūšštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| mūštei̯ ||rowspan="2"| mūšmō ||rowspan="2"| mūšmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| mūštōi̯
|}
===i-stems===
The i-stems were a prolific class of nouns in Northian during the Galic period.  In the proto-language, the i-stems were completely parallel to the u-stems in virtually all ways, but due to sound changes their surface forms in Northian are quite different.  Accordingly, they are considered separate classes in Northian tradition.
The PX pattern of the i-stems gained primacy early in Northian history, and these nouns proliferated, being built to a variety of roots.  These nouns usually show no root ablaut, but the example provided here does.  Where the root did not show ablaut, the accent was presistent on the suffix, even in zero-grade.  The other forms require little comment, other than the gen. and loc. du. and gen. pl. where the suffix *-i is consonantal before endings beginning with a vowel, which here triggers the palatalization of preceding *-t.
Of the neuter nouns in -i, only one example can be considered original to the parent language, that being ''mori'' "sea".  Most other neuter nouns can be shown to be petrified neuter forms of adjectives in i-stem.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā menδiš, "thought" !!colspan="3"| θaṯ mori, "sea"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| meṇδiš ||rowspan="3"| meṇδaiia ||rowspan="2"| meṇδaiiāḫ
|rowspan="3"| mori ||rowspan="3"| morai ||rowspan="3"| morō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| meṇδi
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| meṇδim || mātī
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| menδō || māčiiū || mātištū
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| mātaiš || māčiiuš || māčiiõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| mātaiiai ||rowspan="2"| mātima || mātimuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| mātīḥ || mātiβiiōḫ
|}
The OX pattern of the i-stems was only moderately productive in Galic times and not productive by later ages.  In the nominative du. and pl., the suffix is in long o-grade; the suffix consonantal *-i is lost.  The provenance of this form has not been entirely made clear, since if the suffix did contain -i in final position, it should have survived in Northian.  Nevertheless, the same deletion corresponds exactly with forms found in archaic grammars in Syaran and Tennite languages, so the dropping of final -i is likely to have been old.  Some phonetic change akin to {{wp|Stang's law}} may be responsible for its deletion either after a long vowel or before putative ending *-s. 
Perhaps owing to the phonetic similarity between the dual and plural nom. forms, *-ē > -ōi̯, which is not expected after i-, often displaces the expected -āḥ.  However, there is also a ''hapax'' of short -e found in Galic, which suggests the -ōi̯ may be a late alteration, inserted after -āḥ had ceased to be distinguishable in regular speech from pl. -āḫ.
This pattern has a neuter equivalent that ended in -ai < *-ei̯ in the nominative; otherwise, oblique cases inflect identically.  This neuter pattern is very rare and only present in a few examples like ''óxϑai'' "palm", whose archaic dual form ''óxϑō'' means "eight".  This suggests that the ordinary neuter nominative dual ending -īḥ < *-ih₁ may have originated in the i-stems and displaced an earlier ending of *-h₁; logically the earlier ending would have been preserved after an i-stems, where the composite form would be redundant.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha hokō, "friend, ally" = ''socius'' !!colspan="3"| θaṯ óxϑai, "palm"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| hokō ||rowspan="3"| hokoiiāḥ <br>{{sup|hokoiiōi}} ||rowspan="2"| hokoiiāḫ
|rowspan="3"| óxϑai ||rowspan="3"| óxϑayīḥ ||rowspan="3"| óxϑaiiāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| hoki
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| hokā̊ || hokoiiā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| hokai || škiyō || škištū
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| śxiiōḫ || škiyōš || śxiiõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| śxiiai ||rowspan="2"| škimō || škimuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| śxiiō || škiβiiōḫ
|}
===u-stems===
The u-stems of Northian reflect three ablaut patterns, and excepting the acrostatic they are both attested abundantly in the Galic language.  The PX pattern from the proterokinetic nouns of the parent-lanugage is the most common.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha huiiuš, "child" = υἱύς !!colspan="3"| θaṯ oiiū, "life, generation"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| huiiuš ||rowspan="3"| huiiáuua ||rowspan="2"| huiiáuuāḫ
|rowspan="3"| oiiū ||rowspan="3"| oiiāu̯ ||rowspan="3"| oiiō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| huiiaō
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| huiium || huiiūš
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| huiiōš || huiiūš || huiiuõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| huiiau̯i || huiiū || huiiuštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| huiiuma || huiiumuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| huiiū || huiiumβiiōḫ
|}
The PX pattern in u-stem nouns is very prolific in both the Galic and Epic languages.  Many are abstract nouns with the ending -tuš.  The nom. ended in -uš.  While some nouns would show root ablaut, the example provided above does not and therefore has all components in zero grade in the nom; the hypothetical forms *haōiiuš or *hōiiuš might be expected based on the general ablaut tendencies, but it is in fact the proto-form of ''huiiuš'' that is attested in all EE languages, showing that the spread of the zero-grade root probably occurred in the proto-language.  The gen. ended in *-ou̯-s, whence -ōš.  All the other oblique cases show *-eu̯- or *-u- in the suffix.
The gen. du. has -ūš, which must reflect *-u-us.  The loc. du. has -ū, from *-u-u.  The nom. pl. and acc. have the expected forms, with PNN *-uns > Galic -ūš.  All other forms in the plural are straightforward and have the zero-grade suffix -u-.
The neuter version of the PX u-stems, in contradistinction to the animate ones, often displays root ablaut, which alternates strong and weak stems. The strong has o-grade from PEE *h₂ói̯-u > unchanged Galic ''oiiū'', save the regular lengthening of final *-u. The oblique stem is from PEE *h₂i̯-eu̯-s > also unaltered Galic ''yaōš''.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā génōš, "jaw" = jaw
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| génōš ||rowspan="3"| genauuə̄ ||rowspan="2"| genauuāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| génaō
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| genā̊ || genuuā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| jñuuōḫ || gnuōš || jñuuõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| jñaō  || gnuō || gnuštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| jñuuōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| gnumō ||rowspan="2"| gnumuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| jñuua
|}
The OX pattern had a nom. sg. ending in PEE *-ou̯-s, which regularly gave Galic -ō-š.  The gen. and dat. reflects PEE *-u-os and *-u-ei̯ as expected in a hysterokinetic pattern.  The dual behaves as expected.  The acc. is on account of the deletion of resonants before a syllabic nasal, ''genā̊'' < *gen-ēm < *gen-eu̯-m̥.  Note in this word some oblique forms have the stem jñuu-, which is an altered form of *gnw-.  Northian generally permits up to three consonants (or four, if beginning with s-) in anlaut, but only if they contain no stops; if they do, stops are altered to fricative counterparts.  This rule is not in effect for sequences of only two members in anlaut, hence the conserved gn- when the following *w is vocalized.  Note also, the genitive and dative dual endings begin with a (lost) laryngeal, triggering the vocalization of *w.
===ī-stems===
The ī-stems in paroxytone has remained productive down to the Epic period as a feminizing suffix for athematic nouns.  This suffix showed ablaut from full grade *-ieh₂ ~ -ih₂ > Northian -i̯ā ~ ī.  As these nouns typically had a root that participated in ablaut, the suffix was in zero-grade in the strong cases and in full-grade in the weak ones.  In the example ''geniδrīḥ'' "genitrix", the nom. is asigmatic.  Notice that, in the gen. ''jñiδriiā̊'', the laryngeal is syllabified with the preceding vowel and causes it to lengthen, but in the dat. ''jñiδriiayi'' it syllabifies with the following vowel and does not cause the one preceding to lengthen; in both cases, though, the preceding vowel is coloured. The regular syllabification is only attested in Galic; by Didaskalic and Epic times, the dative was remade according to the genitive and has a long -iiā-.
The -o- in the gen. and dat. du. forms is a Runic orthographic insertion done to prevent the incorrect scansion of dysyllabic /a.us/ as monosyllabic /aws/; the -o- is spurious and silent.  It is not present in all texts: monumental inscriptions usually omit it.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā geniδrīḥ, "genitrix" = ''genitrix''
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| geniδrīḥ ||rowspan="3"| geniδrīya ||rowspan="2"| geniδriyāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| geniδrī || geniδrīyā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| jñiδriiā̊ || jñiδriiāouš || jñiδri̯aõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| jñiδriiayi || jñiδriiaoū || jñiδriiāhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| jñiδriiāma ||rowspan="2"| jñiδriiāmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| jñiδriiaā̊
|}
The main points of contrast to those in PX are that the nom. singular is sigmatic and that the nom. dual ends in -ii̯āḥ, rather than PX -īi̯a; for the same reason why in PX the gen. and dat. sing suffix vary in quantity, in this ending in OX the laryngeal scans as part of the following syllable, with the pre-forms *stérih₂eh₁ > *stériā, and thus leaves the preceding *-i- short.  In the dat. singular the ending becomes an offglide because it was not separated from the suffix by a laryngeal, with the preform *stérih₂e-i.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā šterīḥ, "heifer"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| šterīḥ ||rowspan="3"| šterii̯āḥ ||rowspan="2"| šteriịāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| šterī
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| šterī || šteriịā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| šterī || štrii̯ō || štrīštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| štrii̯ōḫ || štrii̯ōš || štrīi̯õm
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| štrii̯ai̯ ||rowspan="2"| štrīmō ||rowspan="2"| štrīmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| štrī
|}
===ū-stems===
The ū-stems were exactly parallel to the ī-stems at the PEE and PNN levels, but due to phonetic changes have become quite different.  The nom. sing. of hysterokinetic stems had accented root syllable and an ending in PEE *-uh₂-s > *PNN *-ūs > Galic *-ūš.  The acc. requires a proto-form *-ueh₂-m, but already has simplified to *-u̯ām > PNN *-u̯ą̄m.  In the oblique cases, the stem ended in -ū-, to which full-grade endings were added.  The zero-grade stem has replaced the original full-grade one in the dual nom. such that it projects the (implausible) PEE form *tn̥-uh₂-h₁. 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā θánūḥ, "body"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| θánūḥ ||rowspan="3"| θánuuoōi ||rowspan="2"| θánuuaāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| θánū
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| θánuuā̊ || θnuvā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| θnuvōḫ || θnūvōš || θnuvõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| θnuuā || θnūvō || θnuŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| θnuvai ||rowspan="2"| θnūmō || θnūmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| θnuvōi || θnūmβiiōḫ
|}
===r/n-stems===
The r/n-stems, or heteroclitics, continue a class of EE nouns that had different suffixes for direct and oblique stems.  Excepting productive derivative suffixes *-tr̥ and *-mr̥, they are all neuter nouns with fundamental meanings and show PPX inflection in the singular and dual.  Many did not take plural but collective endings, which are OX and combine singular endings the nom. and plural endings in oblique forms.  In the Epic language, many heteroclitics also formed ordinary plurals from the zero-grade stem, which agree with singular verbs and have meanings different from those of their collective forms.
In the Galic language, many heteroclitic nouns have opaque forms owing to their short stem and susceptibility to ablaut, vocalization, and internal sandhi.
''yō·ərə'' = /yō.r̥/ "year", is from *yoh₁-r̥.  Proto-form of gen. *yoh₁-n̥-s or *yeh₁-n̥-s should anticipate a PNR form like *yā-āh, but nowhere is this found or metrically allowed; instead, one finds monosyllabic ''yā̊'', which according to Krueger may be an ''ad hoc'' replacement for *i-āh, logically assumed to be from < *ih₁-n̥-s.  However, the contraction of syllables is very rare in Northian, so this explanation has not achieved agreement by authorities.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| θaṯ yō·ərə, "year" = ὥρα
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| yō·ərə ||rowspan="3"| yōrī ||rowspan="3"| ya·ō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| yā̊ || yānuš || īyõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| yiñi || yānū || īštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| yāŋma ||rowspan="2"| īmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| yān 
|}
''fāuuərə'' "fire" has PX inflection, with accented suffix in the oblique cases. In the nom. sing. the proto-form was from *péh₂wr̥; the final -ərə is paedagogically taught as /ara/, but as it is a single long syllable and not two short as the orthography implies, authorities concur it probably represents a preserved, tautosyllabic -R-r̥ sequence.  This ending also occurs with the *-mr̥ compound suffix, but not *-tr̥.  Oblique stem is from *ph₂wén- > *fiwen > Galic fūvon-.  The collective form is ''fūvə̄'', which is presumably from *ph₂wṓ, showing the replacement of full-grade root by zero-grade that is common in derived OX nouns, cp. direct cognate in Elder Nordic ''fōr''.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| θaṯ fāuuərə, "fire" = πῦρ
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| fāuuərə ||rowspan="3"| fūvórīḥ ||rowspan="3"| fūvə̄
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| fūvə̄ṇġ || fūvonuš || fūnõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| fūvon || fūvonū || fūvoni
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| fūvoni || rowspan="2"| fūvonma ||rowspan="2"| fūnmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| fūvona
|}
Other common heteroclitic nouns include:
*PX ''azar azā̊'' "day"
*PX ''fetar fθā̊'' "feather"
*PP ''woδar woθā̊'' "water" < PEE *wodr̥ *wodn̥s
*PP ''ferərə ferūš'' "mountain"
*PP ''fō ferā̊'' "house"
===ā-stems===
The main point of interest in this paradigm is in the genitive and locative dual forms, where the form ''mizraaōš'' suggests the e-grade *-ew- instead of the anticipated zero grade -u-.  Nowhere else in Northian or other Erani-Eracuran languages does this ending take the e-grade.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā mizrā, "mist"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| mizrāḥ ||rowspan="3"| mizrayīḥ ||rowspan="2"| mizraā̊ḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| mizra
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| mizrā̊ || mizrā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| mizraā̊ḫ || mizraaōš || mizraą̄̊m
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| mizrayi || mizraaō || mizrāŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| mizraai || rowspan="2"| mizrāmō ||rowspan="2"| mizrāmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| mizraāi
|}
===o-stems===
The thematic declension in o-stem could be divided into two subclasses that arose on account of the position of the accent, without which the short *o became /a/.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha θūmōḫ, "smoke" !!colspan="3"| θaṯ yuɣõm, "yoke"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| θūmōḫ ||rowspan="3"| θūmṓḥ ||rowspan="2"| θūmā̊
|rowspan="3"| yuɣõm  ||rowspan="3"| yuɣṓ(yīḥ) ||rowspan="3"| yuɣāḥ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| θūmi
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| θūmõm || θūmə̄ṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| θūmōiiō || θūmōš || θūmõm
! colspan="3" rowspan="4"|
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"|θūmōi || θūmō || θūmohū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| θūmoma ||θūmomuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| θūmō || θūmomβiiōḫ
|}
Where the accent was not on the thematic vowel the rules of unaccented vowel alteration come into play.  Long vowels and those in final position nasalized by -m are never altered, which means neuter nouns with non-oxytone accent will still end in -õm and not *-am.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha tónāḫ, "string"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| tónāḫ ||rowspan="3"| tónōḥ ||rowspan="2"| tónā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| tóni
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| tónõm || tónāṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| tónōiiō || tónōš || tónõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| tónōi || tónō || tónahū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| tónamōḥ ||tónamuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| tónō || tónomβiiōḫ
|}
===Acrean declensions===
Many words in later Northian are Early Elder Nordic loanwords from speakers of Acrean, which was used as a ''lingua franca'' in western Eracura for centuries under the influence of the [[Acrean Empire]].  These words were so numerous that many were not nativized but declined according to an approximation of the thematic declension in ELder Old Nordic.  Naturally, Old Nordic vocabulary would not occur within the Galic and Epic corpora, but as the Epic language survived in literary and liturgical usages, later material did incorporate a considerable number of Acrean words.
====Hybridized paradigms====
The displacement of native vocabulary in favour of Acrean words was widespread and penetrating to a basic level, unlike previous assumptions that it was only introduced for topics of exotic political and commercial interest.  Baker notes that the Old Nordic word ''sōwulą sōwulas'' "Sun" has hybridized with native Northian ''hāuuərə hūvə̄ṇġ'' and displaced the latter's oblique forms.  Displacement concentrated in Epic forms made opaque by regular sound change.  While all these forms are now analyzed as regular, at least in this noun they were no longer so understood after the Epic age.
The Northian inscriptions from the Epic age are revelatory of the extent of Nordic substitutions from an early time.  Nordicisms were regarded as "vulgar substitutions" by antiquiarians, but a mid-6th-century BCE stone discovered in 2002 has the word <sōwulas> in genitive usage for the solar goddess, found within her very own temple precinct.  Such finds have cast doubt whether Nordicisms were really regarded as "vulgar" forms by Northians of the Epic age, and some scholars have come to think the "correct" forms like ''hūvə̄ṇġ'' were actually poetic forms that had not been used regularly for some generations by that time.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="2"| hā hāuuərə, "Sun"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} & {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| rowspan="3"|hāuuərə ||rowspan="3"| sōwulōs
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| sōwulas  || sōwulōm
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| sōwulai̯ || sōwulamas
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| sōwulō || sōwulamiš
|}
====a-stems====
For the most part, these endings are cognates with the o-stems (2nd declension) ones in Northian, but because of intervening sound changes, they are taught separately.  Where there was a distinct vocative, the nominative form has displaced it.  There are also no {{wp|dual (grammar)|dual forms}} for these nouns, for which neologisms have sometimes been suggested, to no general acceptance.  Since Elder Nordic had no locative case, this form is always identical to the dative where Northian syntax demands the locative.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="2"| ha wulfas, "lupine" = ''lupus'' !!colspan="2"| θaṯ ētą̄, "food"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} & {{smallcaps|pl}}
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} & {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| rowspan="2"|wulfas ||rowspan="2"| wulfōs
|rowspan="3"| ētą̄    ||rowspan="3"| ētō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| wulfą̄ || wulfāŋš
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| wulfas  || wulfõm
| ētas  || ētõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| wulfai̯ || wulfamas
| ētai̯  ||  ētamas
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| wulfō || wulfamis
| ētō || ētamis
|}
====ō-stems====
These are cognates of the ā-stems in Northian. 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="2"| sā erδō, "Earth"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} & {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| rowspan="2"|erδō ||rowspan="2"| erδōs
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| erδōm || erδōs
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| erδōs  || erδōm
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| erδōi̯ || erδōmas
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| erδō || erδōmiš
|}
===Venetian declensions===
Old Venetian was another Erani-Eracuran language whose terms have been borrowed into Northian during the Late Canon Period.  The first and second declensions of Old Venetian, in -ā and -os respectively, were directly cognate to the Northian ā- and o-stems.
===Irregular nouns===
====''ā̊'' "mouth"====
''ā̊'' (Runic <AO>) is an acrostatic neuter root noun in s-stem.  Like other acrostatic nouns, its inflectional pattern can show irregularities under the influence of other, more productive ablaut patterns.  After the Late Canon period, all the oblique forms of this noun were replaced by thematized forms based on the stem ā̊-, e.g. gen. ''ā̊oiiō'', but it is the athematic originals that are discussed below.  Nom. sing. ''ā̊'' is for *ō-h < *HoH-s-Ø.  Gen. sing. is written in Runic script as <AAA{S}>, whose phonoloigcal form has been heavily controverted.  The form  ''ə·ās'', advanced by Rutger, would account for a pre-form of PNN *əə-h-s < *HH-s-s, with regular augmentation of the vowel in sequence with hiatus.  In liturgical pronunciation, the gen. is read as ''aō '', which cannot be anything but a late creation, with the OX genitive ending -ō attached ''ad hoc'' to the invariant thematic stem.
At some point in the prehistory of Northian, the position of the accent was fully dissociated with the ablaut, and it was felt that all nouns should show regular ablaut variation in direct and oblique stems, even if the accent persisted on the root syllable as in the case of acrostatic nouns.  Thus, new zero-grade stems often replaced regular full-grade stems in the oblique forms of acrostatic nouns, but this remained exceptional for those with root shape √CeC-, as clashing obstruents would result.  This process is particularly hard to describe for the case of ''ā̊'' as its stem consists of two laryngeals, whose exact reflexes during the period when new oblique stems were created were uncertain, especially two of them in a row.  The stem is then further disguised by the presence of /h/ and the imprecision of Runic orthography.
Rugter argues that dual laryngeals in initial position may have evolved to *əə and was still understood as consonants rather than vowels, and in the process of creating a new weak stem a union vowel was inserted between the laryngeals or their reflexes, which would (eventually) give three vowels in a row, of which two could be coloured by the following *h and then merge.  However, Sally doubts that *HH- > *əə- could "really be as consonants √CC- and then require the insertion of a new vowel between them"; she says that if it was, then the expected form should be *əiə- or *əuə-, not *əəə- > *ə·ā-.
Dat. and loc. sing. <IIHI> is yet another mystery, and ''ə·iši'' has been advanced as an interpretation to reflect *ə-is-i < *HH-s-i.  However, intervocalic *s is not usually spelled as <H> in Runic orthography, and at any rate if the preceding vowel was indeed i, the following *s should regularly surface as š and yield Runic <Ḥ>.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ ā̊, "mouth"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| ā̊ ||rowspan="3"| ōhīḥ ||rowspan="3"| ōhā
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| <AAA{S}> || <AIAUUS> || <AOON>
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| <IIHI> || <AIAUU> || <AIASU>
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| <AIAMA> ||rowspan="2"| <AIAMUS>
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| a·ā̊ha
|}
====''ménōḫ'' "mind"====
The PP version of the neuter s-stems had a few differences to the PX version that enabled it to withstand the general tendency to substitute PP with PX or OX forms; its preservation cannot be unrelated, according to authorities, with the prevalence and prominence of the noun ''ménōḫ'' "mind", a central idea in the religious canon.  The nom. sing. was ''ménōḫ'' < PEE *mén-os, with ending -ōḫ undergoing the same changes as the PX counterpart.  The gen. had ''māṇġs'' < PEE *mén-s-s.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ ménōḫ, "mind"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| ménōḫ ||rowspan="3"| māŋhī ||rowspan="3"| māŋhā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| māṇġs || māŋhuš || māŋhōḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"|māŋhi || māŋhū || māŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| māŋhma ||rowspan="2"| māŋhei̯
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| māŋha
|}
====''hāuuərə'' "Sun"====
''hāuụərə'' (Runic <XAUUARA>) "Sun" may continue the PEE heteroclitic stem in *-l/n-, but this cannot be certain because word-final -l merges with -r and there is no separate accusative or collective disclosing the full stem.  The strong stem descends from PEE *seh₂w- > hāuụ-; the weak stem from *sh₂w- > *hiw- > *hūv-.  Genitive has ''hūvaṇġ'' < *hiwānh < *sh₂wens.
The word ''hāuuərə'' signifies a deified celestial body in early Northian religion and is usually found in the singular in the Galic language.  There, in in the dual, "the two Suns" is an ellipsis for "the Sun and the Moon". 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!  colspan="2"| hā hāuuərə, "Sun"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}}  !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| hāuuərə ||rowspan="3"| hāwa
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| hūvaṇġ || hānuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| hvíni  || hānui̯
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| hāŋma
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| hūva
|}
====''onkā'' "cream"====
The bare stems in -n- also contain nouns with PX inflection.  These are rarer than those with OX inflection, and the only abundantly-attested noun here is ''onkā'' "cream".
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ onkā, "cream"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| onkā ||rowspan="3"| oŋginīḥ ||rowspan="3"| oŋgō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| agāṇġ || agénuš || agénõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| agéni || agénū || agáŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| agénā ||rowspan="2"| agénmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| agā̊
|}
====''nomā'' "name"====
''nomā'' < *Hnómn̥ takes special PP endings in the singular.  There is never a vowel interposed between the two resonants of the suffix. Gen. sing. ''nómā̊'' is probably from an original *Hnómāh < *Hnómn̥s.  Excepting before endings commencing in vowel, such as the nom. du., suffix *-n is vocalized as ā or ə̄.  Note that the gen. and loc. du. endings actually began with a laryngeal *HuH- and therefore are considered to begin with a consonant; thus, suffix *-n becomes *-n̥ in those contexts, and the regular reflext *ā is altered by the following syllable to ə̄.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ nómā, "name"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| rowspan="3"| nómā ||rowspan="3"| nómnīḥ ||rowspan="3"| nómō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}} 
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| nomā̊ || nomə̄ụuš || nomnõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| nomni || nomə̄ụū || nomāŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| nomāma ||rowspan="2"| nomāmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| nomna
|}
====''mā·ā̊ḫ'' "moon" and ''xaṇġ'' "goose"====
This is a rare formation with only two well-attested items: ''mā·ā̊ḫ'' "moon" and ''xaṇġ'' "goose".  Nevertheless they must be introduced separately, because ''mā·ā̊ḫ'' has the lengthened declension.  Effectively these were n-stems extended by -s- after the resonant, which in turn triggers different vocalizations and alterations to vowel quality.  For ''mā·ā̊ḫ'' the root vowel was originally long, while the following laryngeal caused the *-ns to vocalize as -ah > -āḫ, which is altered to ā̊ḫ on account of the preceding vowel; the short-vowel grade is visible in the vocative.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|ha mā·ā̊ḫ, "moon, month"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| mā·ā̊ḫ ||rowspan="3"| māŋhə̄i̯ ||rowspan="2"| māŋhāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| ma·ā̊ḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| māŋhəm ||  māŋhaṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| māŋhə̄ || māṇśmōš || māŋhą̄m
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| māṇġ || māŋhə̄u̯ || māŋhu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| māŋhai̯ ||rowspan="2"| māṇśmō ||rowspan="2"| māṇśmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| māŋha
|}
The principle difference, other than the regular ablaut, is that the root here ended in a vowel, which caused the final *-ens to resolve as -aṇġ.  The Northian vowel is on account of the guttural sound of the initial consonant.  Final -s is an early restoration attested in some Galic texts, though not universally seen and never as the last syllable of a line.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā xāṇġ(s), "goose"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| xāṇġ(s) ||rowspan="3"| xaŋhōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| xaŋhāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| xāṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| xaŋham ||  xaŋhaṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| xahōḫ || xaṇśmōš || xaŋhą̄m
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| xaṇġ || xaŋhə̄u̯ || xaŋhu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| xahai̯ ||rowspan="2"| xaṇśmō ||rowspan="2"| xaṇśmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| xaha
|}
====''mā̊'' "meat"====
''mā̊'' < *mēm-s must be distinguished from the word for "moon", as outside of paedagogical texts they are both printed and written as ''mā''.  This is either a root noun or a reduplication of a root *me-ms-.  The word has no dual or collective forms.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!θaṯ mā̊, "meat"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} 
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| rowspan="5"|mā̊ 
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| meṃśi 
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| meṃśa
|}
====l-stems====
There are a few nouns with an ablauting stem ending in -l, the most important being ''nomβar'' "navel", ''oṇkar'' "coal-fire", and ''abar'' "apple".  Aside from ''nomβar'', which is an feminine noun with *-l- throught its stem, the other nouns are similar to those ending in -r/n- but show a collective ending in *-ōl > -ō rather than *-ōr > -ā̊, and the  zero-grade nominative is indistinguishable from the r-stems, since -l̥ and -r̥ both > PNR *-r̥.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā nomβar, "navel" = ''umbilicus''
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| nomβar ||rowspan="3"| nomβilōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| nomβiliš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| nomβram ||  nomβilā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| āmβāḫ || āmβeluš || āmβelõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| āmβeli || āmβelū || āmβertū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| āmβerma ||rowspan="2"| āmβermuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| āmβela
|}
''oṇkar'' is a noun of basic relevance that is also the source of an adjective meaning "black".  The adjective takes PX inflection, while the noun has PP inflection.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|θaṯ oṇkar, "coal-fire" = ''ignis''
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| oṇkar ||rowspan="3"| oṇkra ||rowspan="3"| oṇkō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| oṇkuš || oṇkərəuš || oṇkrõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| oṇkri || oṇkərəū || oṇkərəšū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| oṇkərəma ||rowspan="2"| oṇkərəmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| oṇkra
|}
====''fō'' "shrine"====
''fō'' "shrine" is a heteroclitic PP noun in r-stem, which causes syncopation in the direct forms, < *per-r; otherwise the noun is regular.  Genitive ''ferā̊'' is for *pern̥s, etc.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| θaṯ fō, "shrine"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| fō ||rowspan="3"| ferrī ||rowspan="3"| ferō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| ferā̊ || fernuš || fərənõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| firni || fernū || frāhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| ferāma || frāmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| ferna || frāβiiā̊
|}
====d-stems====
The d-stems consist of a small group of root nouns, most prominently OX ''foṯ'' = "foot" and PX ''xō'' "heart".  Irregularities arise principally in the treatment of word-final -d in various contexts.  For ''xō'' the -d follows r- and so can be assimilated; this is evidently still in progress while the Gales were written, as forms with and without -d were often poetic alternatives.
As a natural pair, a person's own feet are always referred to in the dual and not the plural (unless the speaker is of a quadrupedal species).  If feet are referred to in the plural, they usually denote dismembered feet, especially of another entity.  An altar's two feet are referred to in the dual, even the an altar is not a person.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|hā foṯ, "foot" = ''pes''
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| foṯ ||rowspan="3"| fodōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| fodiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| fodam || fodā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| βδōḫ || βδōš || βδõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| fodi || βδō || βδšū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| βδei̯ ||rowspan="2"| βδmō ||rowspan="2"| βδmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| βδōi̯
|}
====''fonδā̊'' "path"====
The word ''fonδā̊'' "path" had a stem ending in PEE *póntoh₁- ~ pn̥th₁-.  Fundamentally, it is a regular laryngeal-stem noun of amphikinetic origin, but the difficulty arises with its two ablauting syllables affected by the laryngeal stem.  In the accusative singular, the ending was *oh₁-m̥, with regular operation of {{wp|Stang's law}}.  This would result in a form identical to the nominative, and the weak stem was introduced prehistorically. The nom. pl. stands for *póntoh₁-es.
This word is a direct cognate to the {{wp|English|Shalumite}} word "path", which is a borrowing from the oblique stem of the reflex in another Erani-Eracuran language.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha fonδā̊, "path, way = "path"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| fonδā̊ ||rowspan="3"| fonδōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| fónδayiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| fātā̊ || fātəṇġ
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| fātōḫ || fātōš || fātõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| fonδō || fātō || fāššū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| fātai̯ || rowspan="2"| fāśmō ||rowspan="2"| fāśmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| fātā
|}
====t-stems with persistent accent====
These are t-stem nouns with acrostatic inflection.  The nominative was evidently asigmatic < *ses-t, from *ses- "to rest".The genitive ''haš'' represents *has-t-s, the final consonant cluster being resolved in favour of *s. 
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā hašṯ, "bed"
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| hašt ||rowspan="3"| hašta ||rowspan="2"| haštiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| haštəm || haštā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| haš || haštuš || haštõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| hašti || haštū || fāššū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| haštma ||rowspan="2"| haštmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| hašta
|}
The very well-attested word ''nōxš'' "evening, night" is usually thought to be a root noun with persistent accent on the initial syllable at the Proto-Erani-Eracuran level, but some authorities consider the root to be *(d)negʷ-, extended by the suffix -t-.  Whatever the case in the parent language, the -t- never takes full grade even in the nom. du. and pl.  Thus its behaviour is identical to that of ''hašṯ''.
The word for "ten" in compounds of multiple of ten, e.g. twenty, thirty, etc. also displays the word ''dekam'' in zero grade extended by -t, ''-δɣāt'' < *-dḱm̥-t.
*''θríδɣāt'' < *tri-dḱm̥-t.
*''kozuuərəδɣāt'' < *kʷetwr̥-dḱm̥-t.
====''hōxrūḥ'' "mother-in-law"====
The ū-stems also includes one member with paroxytone accent, namely ''hōxrūḥ'' "mother-in-law".
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā hōxrūḥ, "mother-in-law" = ''socrus''
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| hōxrū ||rowspan="3"| hōxrāu̯a ||rowspan="2"| hōxruuāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| hōxrūm || hōxruuā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| hōxruuā̊ || hōxru̯āu̯uš || hōxru̯aõ
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| hōxru̯ā || hōxru̯āu̯u || hōxru̯āhu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| hōxru̯āi̯i || rowspan="2"| hōxru̯āma ||rowspan="2"| hōxru̯āmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| hōxrūu̯a
|}
====''gā̊'' "woman"====
''gā̊'' "woman" continues the PEE proterodynamic declension ending in *-h₂.  This suffix also underlies the ī- and ū-stem declensions in Northian but is otherwise rarely seen alone.  The full-grade stem is from *gʷénh₂ > gā̊, and the zero-grade *gʷnéh₂- > gnā-.  Both nominative and accusative forms are affected by {{wp|Stang's law}}.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā gona, "woman" = γυνή
|-
! style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"|  gā̊ ||rowspan="3"| gonā̊ ||rowspan="2"| gona·ā̊ḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| gonā̊ || gña·ā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| gnā̊ || gnauuš || gna·ā̊m
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| rowspan="2"| gnaēii || gnāuū || gnāhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| gna·ā̊ ||rowspan="2"| gnāmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| gnā
|}
====Neuter nouns in -ū====
Some neuter nouns in -ū, such as ''δorū'' "tree, wood", ''ɣanū'' "knee", ''uuəštū'' "settlement" descend from an acrostatic ablaut pattern in the proto-language.  These words have invariant stems and are exempted from the creation of new zero-grade stems that have often supplanted their original, regular full-grade stems.  Their oblique stems end in short -u, which was lengthened in auslaut in the nominative forms.  These special nouns need to be learned by memory from PX nouns that also end in -ū like ''oiiū'' "life", which have a distinct oblique stem.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"|  !!colspan="3"| θaṯ δorū, "wood" = δόρυ
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| dorū ||rowspan="3"| doruụīḥ ||rowspan="3"| dorō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| draōš || doruu̯ōḫ || druu̯ōḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| derū || doruu̯a || doruu̯i
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| drauui ||rowspan="2"| doruma ||rowspan="2"| druu̯ēi̯
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| drūḥ
|}
====''xāmō'' "human"====
''xāmō'' "human being" is an n-stem noun that has an important place in the [[Fonδaiš Wīštā̊]] religion in Northian culture.  It is used for humans of all sexes and nations, noting them as a group as opposed to gods or animals; it conveys a difference in spiritual species and not of sex or nationality.  Its oblique stem takes the special form ''xmān-'' rather than the expected *xāmn-.  Possibly it is assimilated to the first three consonants of the oblique forms of ''θaɣam xmōḫ'' "earth, Earth" to emphasize the nature of humans as "earthlings".  There is a term ''xāmātā́s xāmātṓḫ'' "humanity" that serves to identify the condition of being human (as opposed to that of a god or animal), with pre-form *dʰǵʰm̥mn̥teh₂t-s. also > Elder Nordic ''gumuntāt''.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"|  !!colspan="3"| ha xāmō, "human" = ''homo''
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|xāmō ||rowspan="3"| xāminōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| xāminiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| xāmón
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| xāminəm || xāminā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| xmānōḫ || xmānōš || xmānõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| xmaēnin || xmānō || xmāŋhū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| xmānei̯ ||rowspan="2"| xmānmō ||rowspan="2"| xmānmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| xmāna
|}
====''dā̊'' "house"====
''dā̊'' is a root noun ending in -m.  The nom., acc., and gen. sing. forms are alike in Northian, but they have different sources in the proto-language.  The accusative singular was likely *dom-m̥ and was simplified by {{wp|Stang's law}} to *dōm early; this was identical to the nominative form.  The genitive singular may reflect either *dom-s or *dem-s.  The latter would reflect a very archaic *e ~ o ablaut pattern, but it cannot be confirmed as the two did not have different Northian reflexes.  Nevertheless, its presence in the compound ''déṃpśpatōi̯š'' and loc. and dat. sing. ''démi'' assures that e-vocalism was present somewhere, at some point, in the paradigm.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"|  !!colspan="3"| hā dā̊, "house"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| dā̊ ||rowspan="3"| doma ||rowspan="2"| domiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| dõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| dā̊ || domā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| dā̊ || domuš || domõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| demi || domū || doṃśū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
|rowspan="2"| domma ||rowspan="2"| dommuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| doma
|}
====''potiš'' "master" in compounds====
The word *potiš "lord, master" has OX-B inflection.  As a word it is not seen alone but does serve as the second element in the terms ''déṃpśpatiš'' "master of the house" and ''uuei̯xšpatiš'' "lord of the settlement".  The word can sometimes appear with the o-grade suffix, e.g. ''déṃpśpatōiš''.
While the root *potiš is not seen independently, the feminine -īḥ derivative ''potnīḥ'' is used as part of certain goddesses' titles; there, the full grade root is invariant.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha déṃpśpatiš, "master of the house" = δεσπότης
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| déṃpśpatiš ||rowspan="3"| déṃpśpačiiāḥ ||rowspan="2"| déṃpśpačiiāḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| déṃpśpatai
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| déṃpśpatim || déṃpśpatī
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| déṃpśpatiiāḫ || déṃpśpatiyōš || déṃpśpačiiõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| déṃpśpati || déṃpśpatiyō || déṃpśpatištū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| déṃpśpačiiai || rowspan="2"| déṃpśpatimō ||rowspan="2"| déṃpśpatimuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| déṃpśpačiiāḥ
|}
====''žiiaōš'' "god, sky"====
This word ''žiiaōš'' is a direct cognate with several theonyms across the Erani-Eracuran family.  The original *ew was transformed to *aw (written ''aō'') after yod.  Under the influence of that phone, the initial obstruent was palatalized to z, where it is otherwise preserved before vocalic i.  There is an alternate nom. form ''žiiōš'', which may either be a contraction or a reflex of *dyou̯-s, the o-grade of the same root.  The acc. sing. ''žiiā̊'' is a product of {{wp|Stang's law}}, which requires the sequence of *dyeu̯-m to be simplified to *dyēm; this sequence is attested in virtually all branches and is assumed to be old.  ''žiiā̊'' is cognate to Syaran ''Ζῆν''.
''žiiaōš'' often co-occurs with the epithet ''ufšištōḫ'' "highest" as ''ufšištoz-diiaōš'' "Heaven Most High", in much the same way as ''fərətištā-taɣam'' "Earth Most Broad".  These compounds, other than being appellations of their titular deities, were also used of their agents.  [[Aithar]], the god of numina, is almost always accompanied by the epithet ''ufšištṓiia-diuuō'' "of Heaven Most High".  After Aithar, the pantheon of [[Valstígr]] was also called ''āhaṓuuāḫ põm ufšištṓiia diuuō'', "Lords of Powers and Heaven-Most-High", defining them as celestial, rather than chthonic, deities.
It is to note that the epithet ''ufšištōḫ'' "highest" does ''not'' carry the implication that the god is highest in rank or power, at least in the Galic and Didaskalic corpora.  The idea of a deity that is supreme over other deities was not endorsed by the earlier Northians, and instead a god's supremacy was envisioned more as "excellence" or "extremity", or simply the quality or domain assigned to that god in a superlative, peerless state.  Thus in Northian theology, Ziiaōš was the highest, and θaɣam the broadest, and the two are both peerless in the qualities recognized in them.  But, being differently or oppositely characterized, they partake in nothing in common and thus could not compare with each other.  There thus could not exist a hierarchy between them.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha žiiaōš, "sky, Sky God"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
| žiiaōš ||rowspan="3"| ziiauuōi ||rowspan="2"| ziiauuōḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
| ziiaō
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| ziiā̊ || ziiauuā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| dūvōḫ || dūvōš || dūvõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| dūvəi̯ || dūvō || dūvštū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| dūvmō ||rowspan="2"| dūvmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| dī
|}
====''ošta'' "bone"====
''ošta'' has a stem ending in laryngeal, much like ''foṇδā̊'' and ''gā̊'', but the shape of its root prevented quantitative alterations.  The collective form ''oštō'' means "skeleton", of a living or deceased animal.  In the Didaskalic language, the plural form ''oštā'' is also known, and it means a plural number of bones.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| ha ošta, "bone" = ''os''
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|coll}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="3"| ošta ||rowspan="3"| oštī ||rowspan="3"| oštō
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| oštiš || oštiyuš || oštõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| ošti || oštiyu || oštišū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| oštama ||rowspan="2"| oštamuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| oštā
|}
====''hazərə'' "hand"====
''hazərə'' is an OX noun in r-stem with the inverted declension, with a zero-grade in the nominative singular.  -ərə here is treated as a single, long syllable, representing Erani-Eracuran *-r̥.  That -ərə is a consonantal is elucidated by the reflex of *s as -z- and not -h-, which would be regular had -ərə been a vowel sound.  As with all nouns with inverted declension, the accusative is regarded as a weak case as to its appropriate stem, thus ''xšrə̄m'' over the expected *xšerəm; however, the syllable weight of the original is preserved in the long vowel of the ending.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"| hā hazərə, "hand"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| hazərə ||rowspan="3"| xšerōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| xširiš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| xšrə̄m || xšrā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| xšrōḫ || xšarōš || xšrõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
|rowspan="2"| xšrei̯ || xšarō || xšərəšū
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| rowspan="2"| xšərəmō ||rowspan="2"| xšərəmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| xšroi̯
|}
====''nō'' "man"====
An r-stem noun not within the formation -tr is ''nō'' "man", gen. ''drūš'' < PNN *nr̥s.  As it is seen this noun originally has hysterokinetic accent, but acc. sing. ''drum'' and pl. ''drāṇġ'' reflect PEE zero-grade stem *nr-.  Nom. pl. ''niriš'' is the only place where the full-grade stem appears in the paradigm.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !!colspan="3"|ha nō, "man, male person"
|-
!  style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|du}} !!style="width:7em"| {{smallcaps|pl}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"|nō ||rowspan="3"| drōi̯ ||rowspan="2"| nei̯riš
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| drām ||  ndrā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| ndrōḫ || ndārōš || ndrõm
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| níri || ndārō || ndāršu
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| ndrei̯ ||rowspan="2"| dārmō ||rowspan="2"| dārmuš
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| ndrōi̯
|}
====''monuš'' "man, human"====
''monuš'' is the basic word for "human" in Northian, and it frequently appears as the principal to the adposition ''θxāmō'' "earthling".  It defines the human being as "the thinking one" or "one who remembers" and is formally very similar to the perfect active participle ''ménuš'' "remembering, recalling", from ''móna'' "to remember".  ''monuš'' defines mankind in opposition to beasts, and ''θxāmō'' in opposition to gods.
The word ''monuš'' has two competing etymologies: some stress its connection to the o-grade of the PEE root *men- "to think", thus characterizing the human being as a characteristically intelligent being, and others provide a more mundane connection to the very basic Nordic word ''mannuz'' "male, man".  These etymologies are not necessarily incompatible.  ''mannuz'' is obligatorily male in Elder Nordic and all its descendants, but ''monuš'' can be female in Northian, though the feminine form ''mnuuozərə'' < putative *mn-u-ésr̥ is more commonly seen with women.
''monuš'' takes the oxytone declension in u-stem, gen. ''mŋʷuuōḫ'', e.g. GNr. ''yōrō mŋʷuuōḫ'' "a person's lifetime".
====Country names====
All country-names in Northian are feminine in gender, though they are usually consonant-stem nouns (and with particular frequency n-stem nouns) and so may not reflect their grammatical genders readily.  Nevertheless they agree with feminine adjectives and participles in all cases.  The feminine gender is employed as a feminine of the special collective, since a country is envisioned as a special aggregate of people, and not in reference to any perceived quality about the country's people and their habits.
"Acrea" is named ''Áṃśrā̊'', which is a compound from ''aṃśr-'' "lord" and ''rā̊'' "dominion", literally "the lord's realm"; gen. ''Áṃśriš''.
"[[Æþurheim]]", the name of the country to the southwest of [[Shalum]], has an invariant stem with full grade throughout and persistent initial accent in Áδurō-, which takes oxytone endings.  The vocative form is identical to the nominative, showing full grade. 
"Shalum" behaves in a manner more reminiscent of a regular n-stem noun in oxytone and has the expected endings and accentual positions, but the stem does not display apophony as is usual in this class of nouns.
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!rowspan="2"| !! hā Aδurā̊, "Æþurheim" !! hā Halā̊, "Shalum" !! sā Aṇhrōs, "Acrea" !! sā Silū, "Silua" !! sā Hu̯inī, "Svinia" !! sā Ossorī, "Ossoria"
|-
! style="width:9em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !! style="width:9em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !! style="width:9em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !! style="width:9em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !! style="width:9em"| {{smallcaps|sing}} !! style="width:9em"| {{smallcaps|sing}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|nom}}
|rowspan="2"| Aδurā̊  ||rowspan="2"| Halā̊
|-
! {{smallcaps|voc}}
|-
! {{smallcaps|acc}}
| Aδurōnəm || Halomnam
|-
! {{smallcaps|gen}}
| Aδurōnōḫ || Halomnōḫ
|-
! {{smallcaps|loc}}
| Aδureni || Halomini
|-
! {{smallcaps|dat}}
| Aδurōnei̯ || Halomnei̯
|-
! {{smallcaps|ins}}
| Aδurōna || Halomna
|}


==Adjective classes==
==Adjective classes==

Revision as of 23:29, 30 November 2022

Northian grammar is highly synthetic.

General overview

Ablaut

Ablaut is a system of vowel apophony, altering the quality or quantity of vowels but not the meaning of the morpheme in which they are located, that is inherited from Proto-Erani-Eracuran. It affects most classes of words in Northian.

Though ablaut was a regular process closely tied to accent in the reconstructed proto-language, with some authorities proposing a direct correspondence between the accent and the full-grade vowel, by Galic times any precise corresondence had been lost (probably already by the final stage of the proto-language). Moreover, existing formulae have been disrupted by sound change and both general and sporadic analogical replacement. The result that surfaces in Galic Northian is a rich yet unpredictable plethora of alternate morphologies that often confuse even later Hamruvunts, whose theses about correct grammar are sometimes woefully misguided by modern standards.

In nouns, there are four main ablaut patterns that Northian inherited and evolved from its ancestors, in the scholarly discourse termed acrostatic, proterokinetic, amphikinetic, and hysterokinetic. The medieval Northian grammarians astutely observed that the position of the accent in the dative singular predicts the correct set of endings: where it was on the final syllable (oxytone or OX), full-grade endings (e.g. -ṓ, -aí) was used in the oblique cases, and where not on the final syllable (paroxytone or PX), the zero-grade set of endings (e.g. -i) were used. The former situation regularly developed from amphikinetic and hysterokinetic patterns, and the latter from the acrostatic and proterokinetic ones. The OX nouns were characterized by the nearly-universal genitive singular ending -ṓ, while the PX nouns had unpredictable endings there owing to the vagaries of sound change.

The medieval grammarians were not able to distinguish between the proterokinetic and acrostatic ablaut patterns because the latter were quite few and subject to the heaviest erosion in identifiable morphs and thus relegated as "irregularities" to be learned by rote. Surprisingly, Himinastainas observed that such "irregularities" arose mostly in body parts and the commonest objects, so learning them by rote "is imperative". Amphikinetic and hysterokinetic nouns were not distinguished, on the other hand, because they differed principally in the nominative singular, which, on the surface, is largely irregular and must be learned by rote anyway.

Accent Root Suffix Ending Pre-form Root Suffix Ending Outcome Galic
Acrostatic nom ó Ø Ø *nókʷ-t-s ó Ø Ø noxṯ Paroxytone
acc *nókʷ-t-m̥ noxtam
gen é Ø Ø *nékʷ-t-s noxš
Proterokinetic nom é Ø Ø *mér-tis é, Ø Ø Ø mərətiš
acc *mér-tim mərətim
gen Ø é Ø *mr̥-téi̯-s Ø é Ø mərətaiš
Amphikinetic-I nom é ō Ø *léy-mō é ō Ø láimō Oxytone
acc é o Ø *léy-mon-m̥ e ṓ, ó, Ø Ø limṓnąm
gen Ø Ø é *li-mn-és Ø Ø ó limnō
Amphikinetic-II nom é Ø Ø *kré-tu-s Ø Ø Ø xarətuš
acc Ø é Ø *kr̥-téw-m̥ Ø Ø Ø xarətum
gen Ø Ø é *kr̥-tu-és Ø Ø ó xarəźuuā
Hysterokinetic nom Ø é Ø *ph₂-tḗr Ø é Ø fitō
acc *ph₂-tér-m̥ fiterəm
gen Ø Ø é *ph₂-tr-és Ø Ø ó fiδrō

In the most summary way, the acrostatic nouns had a persistent accent on the root syllable, while the proterokinetic ones shifted the accent one syllable to the right (namely to the suffix) in the oblique cases. The amphikinetic nouns were of two types, differing only in the nominative singular: one type, the more common, had a lengthened o-grade in the suffix, while the other one had the zero grade. In both, the root was accented. The sources of both the unaccented o-grade and its length are disputed. The corresponding accusative had an accented suffix, and the accented shifted further right to the ending for the oblique cases. The hysterokinetic nouns had an accented suffix in the direct cases and accented ending in the oblique.

In their evolution to Galic Northian, the following changes have occurred. For amphikinetic nouns with an o-grade suffix, the nominative stem extended to the accusative; this must have been a fairly late alteration as the accusative suffix often has the long vowel of the nominative, showing that the long vowel was no longer analyzable as a full grade plus a lengthening element specific to the nominative, i.e. out of place in the accusative. There are also sporadic survivals of the short accusative suffix.

Amphikinetic nouns with the zero-grade suffix had differing developments: where the oblique stem ended in an approximant (-u, -i), it spread to accusative; perhaps this occurred under the influence of the proterokinetic, as with them these amphikinetics shared a zero-grade suffix in the nominative, cp. amphikinetic xrétuš "will" and proterokinetic xrétuš "powerful". It is possible that the vocalized approximant was re-analyzed as a full-grade vowel, i.e. xarətúm with a "u-grade" before the accusative ending -m. Where the stem did not end in an approximant (-r, -s, -m, -n), the development was largely arbitrary, e.g. acc. sing. both more common xmam (formed from the oblique stem xm- plus acc. ending -am) and more archaic xā̊ < *dʰǵʰḗm, from taɣam < dʰéǵʰ-m̥.

Proterokinetic nouns had their root syllables levelled nearly completely in favour of the zero grade, unless this produced an impermissible sequence of consonants, but the accent position is usually not altered and often discloses a former full grade. There are sporadic survivals of the full-grade root, but none in the productive suffixes of -ti- and -tu-, and accented zero-grade suffixes are common there, perhaps also under the influence of the hysterokinetics. This produced a morphologically proterokinetic but accentually static pattern that became dominant for these suffixes in later Northian. The hysterokinetic declension survives particularly well in Northian, preserving a distinct full-grade in the accusative and a zero-grade in the oblique cases.

It is notable that, perhaps owing to a lack of ablaut in the root syllable, the hysterokinetic pattern was the most stable and productive (the acrostatic pattern is assumed to be vestigial even in the proto-language). The patterns with root ablaut, namely amphikinetic and proterokinetic, either lost productivity or were levelled to remove ablaut in the root. Many suffixes which have original amphikinetic patterns developed hysterokinetic compounds which later became productive, while the amphikinetic suffix lost productivity. Issinar asserted in 1940 that, taking the root and suffix together as a unit and allowing for the long-grade in the nominative, Northian nouns could have a maximum of two distinct stems; this rule appears to hold in many cases, though not without exception.

Ablaut rules developed differently in many suffix classes. For example, the mn-stems usually had the long suffix original to the nominative intruding the accusative, but the wn-stems often has a zero-grade suffix in the accusative; possibly this is because the combination C-wn- was vocalized as C-un- early, and the -u- there was thought of as an original, full-grade vowel. Additionally, many words show compounds of suffixes, particularly derived feminines in -ī and -ū, and the accentual rules in these words sometimes depends on the character of the root, compulsorily it is verbal, and in other times becomes static on the suffix. Some classes of words apparently had vacillating accent or even no recorded accent, suggesting that these derivations were not common enough to have a widely-recognized pattern even if their meanings can be worked out.

Nominals

Athematic

The following chart recapitulates the ordinary endings of athematic nouns in Galic Northian. Because the ablative is syncretized in the singular with the genitive, with the dative and instrumental in the dual, and the dative in the plural, it is usually not listed separately in grammatical tables for athematic nouns.

Forms are often unpredictable and variable under the influence of ablaut, laryngeals reflexes, analogy, vowel contraction, and compensatory lengthening for illegal consonant clusters in coda position. All endings are subject to modification according to the suffix. OX stands for the oxytone group of patterns, and PPX for the paroxytone and proparoxytone group. Certain neuter nouns do not take plural endings but collective endings with a lengthened stem; these nouns are not formally predictable. Because neuter nouns always have the same nominative and accusative forms, only their nominative endings will be listed, and in grey.

Athematic endings
Singular Dual Plural Collective
OX PPX OX PPX
Nominative -ō, -ā̊, -s, -š, -Ø, -ōi, -āḥ, -ōḥ, -īḥ -a, -ā̊, -ī̆ḥ, -āḥ, -V̄R-Ø, -īḥ -iš, -āḫ, -ōḫ, -a, -V̄R-Ø
Vocative
Accusative -m, -ā̆m, -ąm, -əm, -ā̊ -ā̊, -ūš, -ī
Locative -i, -eC-Ø -eC-Ø -hū, -štū -eC-Ø
Genitive -ōḫ, -ā̊ -s, -š, -ā̆ṇġ, -ā̊, -Ø -ōš -uš, -auš -õm, -ą̄m
Ablative -mō -mō, -ma -muš
Dative -ai, -oi -i
Instrumental -C-a, -V̄R-Ø -(m)βiiōḫ, -βiš, -βīš, -īš

nom sing A general discussion of the athematic declension cannot omit the comment that, while many divergent forms are phonetically conditioned, there too are divergences resulting from divergent proto-forms. In no other place is this statement truer than in the nominative singular.

The marker of the nominative singular has been a tormented subject, in no small part due to the fundamental disagreement on whether the parent language had a nominative-accusative or ergative-absolutive alignment. Languages with the former usually had an unmarked nominative, while the ergative (the case of the agent) often developed from a marked genitive, the absolutive then being unmarked. Animate (= masculine and feminine) nouns may have been in the proto-language sigmatic, that is ending in *-s, or asigmatic, that is without final *-s and taking the zero or long o-grade in the suffix; as root nouns had no suffix, they were thought to have been obligatorily marked by *-s. The source of this long o-grade, in default of *-s, is disputed: some authorities regard it as a vestige of a final *-s dropping after a resonant, but others hold there was no *-s originally and attribute the long vowel to ablaut variation sensitive to the case.

In Northian, final *-s has been suffixed to animate nouns quite broadly but haphazardly in prehistory, so there is no obvious pattern to its distribution. We may distinguish three situations in Northian as to the nom. sing., stems ending in vowel, in resonant, and in non-resonants.

  1. -s is always present and surfaces as -š after *i- and *u- in animate nouns, and its absence in these stems indicates neuter gender, both instance without regard to ablaut pattern.
  2. Final *-s was absent in resonant-stems (-m, -n, -r, -l), whose nom. sing. was often signified by lengthened o-grade in OX and PX (though a few nouns have zero-grade). The long final syllable ending in a resonant was then opened, giving rise to -ā̊ and -ō.
  3. After obstruents the distribution of *-s is not predictable: bā̊ "wife" and ϑanū "body" were asigmatic, but ą̄mərətās "immortality" certainly had *-s.

In OX resonant stems the lengthened grade is altered prehistorically by the opening of closed long syllables ending in a resonant. In PX and PP resonant stems, e.g. mātar and dā̊, as well as select OX nouns with the "reverse endings", e.g. táɣam, the nominative was also endingless but is affected by the vocalization of the zero-grade suffix, which is sensitive to the length of the preceding syllable. If short, the vocalized suffix will be long, and vice versa.

voc sing The vocative consists of the bare strong stem in all cases. Where the stem had *-s it is dropped, and without *-s the stem is in the full grade or short-vowel grade.

acc sing In the proto-language, the accusative ended in *-m; as it contained no vowel, it could never bear an original accent. In stems ending in non-resonants, the ending is vocalized as -m̥ > *-am. In auslaut, this ending is often lengthened if the preceding syllable is light to -ām, varying according to the length of the preceding syllable; in sandhi forms, this lengthening does not always occur in front of a disyllabic enclitic. If the ending followed -i, long or short, it becomes -in. If the stem ended in a long vowel, such as with gunā- and ponθō-, the final syllable with -m is opened and becomes -ą̄ as with the nom. sing. Where the stem ended in -m itself, the sequence -m-m̥ was syncopated into the stem and surfaces as a long vowel at the PNN level, but likewise it is opened in Galic as -ā̊.

loc sing The locative generally took the accusative stem and either added final -i or was endingless. For the effects of -i on the preceding vowel, see dat. sing. entry.

gen sing In OX the gen. singular always ended in -ōḫ < PNN *-os; its consistency led grammarians to consider it the feature of the OX declension. Where the stem ended in a open long vowel, the ending can become -ā̊ḫ, but this is merely orthographic—this ending is always disyllabic.

In PX and PP, the ending *-s when attached to the stem surfaces with a motley of forms, and this (compared to OX) irregularity in turn is the feature of the PX declension. In stems ending in a short vowel plus nasal, *-s becomes something like a glottal stop, as in fūvāṇġ < PNN *fiwen-s. Where the stem ended in a liquid, as in abel-, -s survives at the expense of the stem consonant and also causes the vowel to lengthen, here as abēs. In PX forms, final *-s is attached to a zero-grade suffix, as in mātūš < PEE *meh₂tr̥s and nomaṇġ < *Hnomn̥s. Conversely, if the stem ended in -ā or -ē, the result is -ā̊ < *-ās, e.g. jñiϑriiā̊. In s-stems, the ending generally disappears, e.g. māṇġ < *mn̥s-s. The ending is only neatly preserved after -i and -u and their respective allophones.

abl sing For all athematic nouns, the ablative singular was syncretized wtih the genitive singular.

dat sing In OX the dat. sigular ending was *-ei̯. This ending susceptible to colouring by a preceding *h₂-, as well as the influence of -i̯, to become -ai. If the preceding consonant was *u̯- or *h₃-, result was -oi. In PX, the ending was *-i. For all resonant stems, the ending -i caused the preceding vowel to mutate; an original *a became aē, and an accented *é became -ái. For stems ending in -n, the -n sandwiched between i became ñ. In all cases the dat. singular ending following a vowel was a separate syllable.

ins sing The OX ending -ōi̯ for the ins. singular originated as *-eh₁ in the proto-language. This ending is rarely problematic by phonological processes, but it is liable to be replaced in some stems, e.g. endings -ī and -ū in the i- and u-stems respectively, from the PX declension. The PX ending evolved from *-h₁. This ending was preserved only after plosives as -a. Following resonants, the preceding vowel was lengthened. If the preceding vowel was already long, disyllabic -ā̊ was the general outcome.

nom / voc / acc du For animate nouns, the du. ending for all direct cases in OX was generally -ōi̯ < *-ē. After i, the ending became -ā, and after u, -ō. After stems ending in laryngeals, the outcome was -å. In PX, the ending -a is visible after only after plosives, as it had the proto-form of *-h₁. After resonant and vowel stems, the ending was dropped causing the preceding vowel to lengthen, e.g. dorāu̯. After laryngeals, -å could also appear, since the intervening laryngeal caused ending to become vocalized. For all neuter nouns, the ending was -ī.

loc du In OX the dual loc. ending was -ō < *-ou̯. In PX, the ending was -ū, which developed from original *-u lengthened in final position; the ending is only altered after stems ending in -u̯-, where prehistorically the ending dissimilated to *-o and then became -a in an unaccented position.

gen du The proto-form of the dual genitive is usually considered the same as the locative, with added *-s at the end. Thus in OX the ending that surfaced was -ōš for *-ou̯s. In PX, the ending was -uš, which like the locative dissimilated to *-os if there was a preceding u. In this case, the ending was -ōḫ.

abl / dat / ins du These three forms were syncretized in Northian as -mō in OX and -ma in PX.

nom / voc pl The proto-form here was *-es. If this ending followed i, it became -āḫ, or if it followed u, -ōḫ. Otherwise, since this ending was never accented, it became -iš. For neuter nouns, the nom. and acc. ending was from *-h₂, which appears as -a following stops and causes preceding vowels to lengthen if adjacent to one or separated by a resonant.

acc pl This ending was derived from PEE *-n̥s following consonants or *-ns following vowels. *-n̥s generally gave rise by way of PNN *-uns to -ā̆ṇġ and -ā̆ŋhiš, both sensitive to the length of the preceding vowel. -ā̆ŋhiš is an allomorph that probably represents the nom. pl. ending appended to the acc. pl. ending, which had become rather opaque. In the case of *-i-ns, such as with the i-stems, the resulting ending was -īš.

gen pl The ending was consistently -õm, or -ą̄m after vowel stems.

abl / dat pl The ending was consistently -muš.

ins pl The ending was consistently -bi̯āḫ.

Thematic

Basic ā-stem endings Basic o-stem endings
sing du pl sing du pl
nom -āḥ -ayī -aŋhā̊ -ōḫ, -ō, -oịī -ā̊, -ohiš, -āḥ
voc -i
acc -ā̊ -a·ā̊ -õm -ə̄ṇġ
loc -ayi -āvū -āŋhū -ōi̯ -ohū
gen -ā̊ -āvuš -a·ą̄̊m -ōiiō -ōš -o·ōm
abl -a·āṯ -āmiiā -āmβiiā̊ -ōṯ -omiiā -omβiiā̊
dat -a·ai̯ -ōi̯
ins -āi̯š -ōi̯š

nom sg The ā-stems showed the expected ending -ā. M. and f. o-stems have -ōḫ < *-os, which scans short at the end of sentences and other pauses. N. o-stems have -õm.

voc sg The ā-stems have the same form as the nom. M. and f. o-stems have -i < *-e, while n. o-stems have the same form as the nom. In both cases, the accent is always retracted to the first syllable of the word.

acc sg for ā-stems is affected by Stang's law, which appears as -ā̊. The ending for m. and f. o-stems is the same as the n., -õm.

loc sg ā-stems have dysyllabic -ayi; o-stems have monosyllabic -oi.

gen sg ā-stems show -ā̊ for *-eh₂-s; o-stems have the compound suffix -ōiio, for *-osyo.

abl sg in ā-stems is dysyllabic aā̊ṯ; the quantity owes to dissimilation.

dat sg ā-stems

ins sg ā-stems

Verbs

Stems

Unlike nouns, verbs may form more than one stem and be still considered the same lexical item. It is thus necessary to discuss the relationship between the various stem-formations as they are attached to the root. The relationship between verb-stems and endings they receive are as follows in the Galic language:

Present stem Aorist stem Perfect stem Bare root Future stem
Primary endings Present indicative Future indicative
Thematic endings Root subjunctive
-e ~ o- + thematic endings Present subjunctive Aorist subjunctive Perfect subjunctive
e- + secondary endings Imperfect Aorist Pluperfect
-i̯ā ~ ī- + secondary endings Optative Aorist optative Perfect optative Future optative
Secondary endings Injunctive Aorist injunctive Perfect injunctive Future injunctive
Imperative endings Imperative Aorist imperative Perfect imperative Root imperative Future imperative
Future imperative endings Future imperative Future perfect imperative
Perfect endings Perfect indicative

From each root, which is agnostic as to part of speech in the proto-language, can arise multiple stems classified as present, aorist, or perfect, differentiated by their affixes. To these stems are attached endings to constitute the finite verb, which conveys tense/aspect, mood, voice, person, and number.

Primary and secondary athematic

The athematic verb endings, like their noun counterparts, are directly attached to the verbal stem without an intervening theme vowel. The primary endings are used for the athematic present, and the secondary endings for the athematic present injunctive, the imperfect, and (with the suffix) the optative, as well as the aorist indicative, injunctive, and optative.

There are two sets of (phonologically conditioned) parallel endings called the long and short endings. The long endings (noted below in grey) arise from a laryngeal between the stem and ending, whose effects are determined by neighbouring sounds. Where it precedes a guttural consonant, it becomes a, and a coronal consonant, i. If it preceded e, as in the case of the act. 3 pl., the e is coloured according to the laryngeal's identity. Otherwise, all laryngeals in this position behave alike and are indistinguishable. If the laryngeal was separated from a following consonant by another laryngeal, as in the case in the mid. 1 and 3 sing. and 2 and 3 du., the two adjacent vowels resulting are liable to be contracted in orthography, but this is merely a writing convention.

Primary active endings Primary middle endings
sing du pl sing du pl
trans intrans trans intrans trans intrans
1p --mi -ū-viñi --miñi 1p -a-ai̯ -ū-vozδa -a-mozδa
2p -i-si -i-tāḫ -i-te/ti/ta 2p -i-tai̯ -a-ātaδai -i-zδuuo
3p -i-ti -i-tes/tiš -enδi/ā̆t 3p -i-toi̯ -o -a-ātāi̯ī -a -i-nδro -i-r/ro/ūš
Secondary active endings Secondary middle endings
sing du pl sing du pl
trans intrans trans intrans trans intrans
1p -(ā̆)m/n -ūvōḫ -amōḫ 1p -aa -ūvoδa -ameδa
2p -i(s) -itam -i 2p -ita -ii̯(a)tāδi -iδō
3p -it -itim -ā̆t 3p -ito -o -ii̯ātā -aā -(a)r

1 sing. The primary and secondary active endings differ with the hic et nunc particle *-i in the proro-language, for the singular active. The element m is accepted in mainstream reconstructions of Proto-Erani-Eracuran to signify the first person. As m is a sonant, the ending -i in the primary conjugation can trigger mutation in the preceding syllable in the usual manner, e.g. diθēi̯mi < *didʰeh₁mi. In the secondary conjugation, final -m can vocalize to -ā̆m if following a stop.

In the middle voice, the ending evolves from *-h₂ey > -ai̯.

2 sing. In the primary conjugation, the signifying element of the active second singular *s can become h or z depending on the phonetic context. In the secondary is usually dropped after stems ending in a plosive or sonant, but it does regularly appear in the optative where it obligatorily follows a vowel.

The middle ending here is *-th₂ey > -tai̯.

3 sing. This -ti ending is usually retained in the primary conjugation. If the stem ended in a dental, the ending was liable to mutate in several ways. In the secondary, -t can displace preceding stops or be dropped in some contexts.

The middle ending of the third singular depends on the meaning of the word and the stem used, which is not quite predictable and must be learned in some cases. In many stem-classes, an middle verb with intransitive menaing will take the ending -o, and those with transitive meaning, -toi̯. In other cases, the ending -toi̯ is always used, regardless of meaning.

1 du. The active ending is from *-weni; mutation inevitably occurs in the first syllable, giving -u̯iñi.

In the middle, the form -u̯ozθa < *-wesdʰh₂ is found.

2 du. Here the active ending -tāḫ is for *-th₂es. An epenthentic -s- is sometimes found if the stem ended in a dental to avoid a sequence of two dentals together, and the resulting combination is sometimes resolved to prehistoric *-ss-. But this was not a universal phenomenon, and sometimes the geminate dental either drops or evne surfaces. Such examples are often interpreted by analogical restoration.

- is found in the middle for *-tom.

3 du. The active allomorphs -tes ~ -tiš reflect *-tes, in accented and unaccented positions, respectively. For most athematic verbs the accent is mobile, consistently on the ending, so the former will be more common; the latter is seen on verbs with recessive accent like déθitiš and éstiš "you (pl.) give" and "sit". As with all endings which begin with t, it is liable to following another dental.

As in the case of the third singular, the middle ending here is sensitive to the stem-class of the verb and its general meaning. The transitive ending is -tą̄ < *teh₂m, and the intransitive ending is usually -ā. This latter ending is unique in the Erani-Eracuran family and has no known comparanda, and so it is possibly an innovation, though it is also argued to be an unique archaicism. But it is phonologically rather opaque, which hampers restoration of its proto-form.

1 pl. In the active one finds -miñi < *-meni, which is usually retained without complication.

In the middle, the ending -mozθa is encountered, for *-mesdʰh₂.

2 pl. Here, much akin to the 3 du., the allomorphs are either -te or -ti. -ti is clearly from *-te and is seen on verbs of recessive accent. However, a deviant form -ta also exists for some verbs, but the origin of -ta is unexplained.

The middle ending -θvo < *-dʰwe is found for the second plural. An -s- may be attached to the beginning of this ending for some verbs, and this augmentation is not restricted to those stems ending in a dental.

3 pl. In the third active plural, the ending -enθi is used. This ending is susceptible to laryngeal colouring if the verb stem ended in a laryngeal. Furthermore, this ending is the only one that regularly shows ablaut: where the accent was in the stem, the ending is *-n̥t > -at.

For the third plural middle, there are also endings which change according to the stem-class and meaning of the verb. Verbs with transitive meanings will generally have -nθro, while those with intransitive meanings may have either -ro or -ūš < *-r̥s.

Primary and secondary thematic

The primary and secondary thematic endings include a theme vowel between the stem and the ending-proper, varying between *e ~ o. The thematic endings formally differ in the active singular and third plural from the athematic ones but are transparently the same, with the addition of the theme vowel, in others. It is still a matter of active debate what the contrast between athematic and thematic endings was in the proto-language. The primary and secondary thematic endings are used in present and aorist stems in the same manner as the athematic ones.

Thematic active endings Thematic middle endings
sing du pl sing du pl
1p -ou̯ōḫ -omōḫ 1p -ā̊i̯ -ou̯ōzθa -omozθa
2p -ei̯ -etāḫ -eti 2p -etai̯i -etõ -eθō
3p -ei̯i -etiš -onθi 3p -etoi̯i -etą̄

1 sg. The first singular active ending is -ō. The middle ending is -ā̊i̯ for *o-h₂e-i—the ending is disyllabic in Northian.

2 sg. The ending for the second active singular is -ei̯ The middle ending is the same as the athematic one, with the theme vowel e inserted.

3 sg. In the third singular one finds the ending -ei̯i; note that this ending is disyllabic, unlike that of the second singular. Ditto for the middle.

1 - 3 du. and 1 and 2 pl. For all these items the thematic forms are the same as the athematic ones, with thematic o or e added.

3 pl. The endings here are active -o and middle -ō.

Thematic secondary endings, active or middle, are all the same as athematic ones, with thematic vowel inserted in like manner as the primary.

Imperative athematic and thematic

The imperative in Northian does not have opposition between primary and secondary. It is observed that the imperative usually implies immediacy, while the stem has aspectual value regarding the action required. The first person imperative is always defective: a speaker expressing a requirement for oneself would use the future tense. For all dual forms, the imperative is the same as the indicative, there being no sign that these ever had distinct imperative endings in Northian.

Imperative active endings Imperative middle endings
sing du pl sing du pl
1p 1p
2p -θi -tāḫ -ti 2p -svo -ātaθa -θvo
3p -tū -tiš -nθū 3p -to -ātā -nθō

The imperative forms for thematic verbs are as follows:

Imperative active endings Imperative middle endings
sing du pl sing du pl
1p 1p
2p -etāḫ -eti 2p -esvo -ātaθa -esθvo
3p -etū -etiš -enθū 3p -eto -ā̊tā -onθō

Perfect

The perfect was an athematic formation, irrespective of the thematicity of the present or aorist stems.

Perfect active endings Perfect middle endings
sing du pl sing du pl
1p -a -u̯o -me 1p If the perfect active is transitive, the middle is formed from the perfect subjunctive
2p -ta -āta -é 2p
3p -i -ātā -ṓ 3p

3 sg the ending -i is the unaccented outcome of *-e, which is coloured by any preceding laryngeal and therefore may surface as -a if the stem ended in *-h₂ or *-h₃.

2 pl -e is the accented outcome of *-e, which is also liable to be coloured by laryngeals and may appear as -a or -o with stems ending in *-h₂ or *-h₃, respectively.

Evolution

Northian is one of the relatively few Erani-Eracuran languages to retain multiple productive ablaut patterns in all classes of words, though OX endings have gained ground in many stem-classes at the expense of proterokientic and acrostatic formations. This tendency is attributed to surface consistency in hysterokinetic endings, which are regularly accented sing. gen. -ōḫ < *-os and dat. -ei̯ < *-ei̯.  The proterokinetic and acrostatic endings were easily eroded and disfigured by comparison. Despite morphological alterations, the grammar of nouns did not have considerable tendency to evolve.

The most dramatic change from the Galic to the Epic language must be found in verbs rather than nouns. The Galic verb formed multiple stems with aspectual value, to which suffixes and personal endings were added to specify mood and tense. This system is cognate to those found in sister languages acorss the Erani-Eracuran family, particularly in Tennai and Syara. Even in the Didaskalic material, this system was very much intact, yet early in Epic literature, around 650 BCE, a less diverse and less inflected verbal system was already dominant. Particularly, the opposition between present and aorist forms had been lost, and the perfect became a generalized past tense stem.

Nouns classes

The following chart lists the stems and accent patterns in Galic Northian. A green cell indicates that the stem and accent combination is productive, either in se or through a compound suffix; a yellow cell indicates an attested stem-accent combination; a red cell indicates no or only dubious attestations. The far-left column gives the traditional classification of nouns into oxytone (OX) and paroxytone (PX) by their dative singular forms, which have subsequently been refined into two classes each reflecting the more specific ablaut patterns that have survived into Galic times.

-C -t -m -n -r -s -i -u -r/n -nt
OX-B About 80 root nouns and suffixed nouns in -k, -l, -ns, -d, etc., fos = "foot", = "heart" A few in -ōs, nepōs "child" About 20 feminine, in -ō or -am; gīy-ō "winter" Many, in -ō and -ə̄, often binds m-, n-, s-, t-, etc., θxām-ō "human" haz-ərə "hand" and personal, feminizing suffix -ez-ərə A handful in -ā̊, aōšt-ā̊ "dawn"; the perf. act. ptcpl. waiduš "knowing" Some in -ō and -iš, hak-ō "friend, ally", ouu-iš = "ewe"; neuter var. in -ai, oxθ-ai "finger" A few dozen in -ōš or -uš, gen-ōš "jaw", xrétuš "will" Some in -ī, štoīr-ī "heifer" A handful in -ū, θan-ū "body" Derived collectives of heteroclitics, in -r ~ n-, long o-grade in nom. > -ā̊   A few in -āṯ, oδāṯ "tooth"  
OX-A No Productive suffix -tāt-, āmmərə-tās "immortality" and -tūt-, wəš-tūs "moistness" No Productive, in -en, uxšt-ā̊ = "ox", and -ṓ, yəuu-ṓ "youth" Productive through agentive -ter, duhit-ō "daughter" Productive, comparatives in -iiā̊- maj-iiā̊ "bigger", perf. act. ptcpl. in -uuā̊-, βiβiž-uuā̊ "trusting" No No No No No Productive pres. aor. act. ptcpl. of thematic verbs, in -ās hadáii-ās "sitting"
PX No No No Productive, neuter var. of OX n-stems, exhibiting same bound suffixes No Productive, neuter var. of OX s-stems, in -ō; neβ-ō "cloud", xrat-ō "power" Productive, animate in -iš, action nouns -tiš, gomβ-iš "a step"; neuter in -i, mor-i "sea" Productive, animate in -uš, wiš-t-úš "witness"; neuter in -ū, oii-ū "life" Proliferate suffix deriving feminines in -ī; geniδr-ī "genitrix" Same as -ī but more common in adjectives, in -ū; hoxr-ū "mother-in-law" Neuter, in -r ~ n- suffix, ya-ərə "year"; more in -tar, -mərə, -zərə No
PP About 30 root and suffixed nouns in obstruent stems nox-ṯ "night" and haš-ṯ "bed" No No māt-ar "mother", βrāt-ar "brother" men-ō "mind" (with o-grade of the suffix), kraō-š "gore" aŋhi "serpent" Neuter nouns in -ū, gon-ū "knee", wəšt-ū "settlement" Feminine pres. aor. act. ptcpl. with static accent, déδāṯīš "of the giving one" No A few, in -r ~ n-, f-ō "shrine" A few nouns; pres. aor. act. ptcpl. with static accent, déδāṯ "giving"

As appears from this schematic, most suffixes are associated with more than one accentual pattern. But even in Galic, the majority of suffixes have only one productive accentual pattern or separate productive patterns associated with masculine-feminine gender and neuter gender (the case of the n-stems and s-stems). Additionally, some suffixes are only productive through petrified compounds, which tended to be hysterokinetic and have invariant stems, such as the comparative in -iiā̊- and perfect active participle in -uuā̊-; otherwise, the s-stems in amphikinetic is non-productive.

Where there are multiple productive accentuation patterns, neuter nouns are almost always identified with the proterokinetic pattern, and masculine-feminine with the hysterokinetic or amphikinetic. The exception is for i-stems and u-stems, wherein proterokinetic accentuation is standard, and particularly productive through the compound with -t.

Adjective classes

Adjectives agree with the nouns they modify in gender, number, and case, within their lexical paradigms. Inasmuch as nouns have differing endings that convey the same number and case, so too do adjectives have lexical paradigms; adjectives do not agree with the paradigms of nouns that they modify.

Classes

-k -n -s -i -u -h₂ -r/n -t -nt -o
OX mera-xš "soft" Masculine forms of adjectives with heteroclitic neuters, in -ṓ, fīuuō "fat, fertile" Productive adjective in -ā̊, humen-ā̊ "well-intended", neut. -ā humen-ā; productive comparative in -iiā̊ -ištṓ, θáñ-iiā̊ "thinner"; productive perf. act. ptcpl. in -uuā̊ -uštṓ, tita-uuā̊ "having made", fem. -uśiiā, neut. -uš   A handful, in -iš, θraišt-iš A handful, in -uš -uuṓ, meδ-uš "sweet" máh-iš "big" Adjective forms of neut. heteroclitics, masc. form in -ō and fem. in invariant -r-ī, faōuu-ərə "fat, fertile" duš-ṯ "bad" Productive derivative meaning "rich in, bearing of" in -uuā̊, β-uuā̊ "rich in power", from p- "power"; productive pres. act. ptcpl. of athematic verbs with mobile accent in -ṓs -ā̆tṓ, and of thematic verbs, in -ṓs -óṇδō Masculine and feminine in -ō, some obligatory feminine in -ā, neuter in -õm
PX No No No Productive, adjectives in -uš, feminine in -ū or -uuī, neuter -ū, fərət-uš fərət-ūvī fərət-ū "flat" Productive, adjectives in -iš, feminine in -yī, neuter -i, hámil-iš hámil-ayī hámil-i "similar" Productive, feminine derivative of u-stem and i-stem adjectives, in -ī -iiā̊ No No No
PP No No   No No No No No No Present active participles of athematic verbs with root accent, in -ā̆t, -ā̆s

Adjectives need to agree with the nouns they modify not only in number and case but also in gender, but forms for each gender may not necessarily be distinct from each other. Synchronically, many adjectives have a single form for animate (both masculine and feminine) referents, and a handful have the same forms for all three grammatical genders. Whether an adjective has distinct forms for each gender is lexical, and there is no obvious semantic difference which appears to condition their presence or absence. The usual historical explanation is that the feminine gender was a late grammatical development and did not always correspond to semantics of biological gender, though the mechanisms of the grammaticalization of the feminine gender is uncertain.

For o-stem adjectives with a masculine nom. sing. terminating in -ōḫ, there is always a separate neuter form ending in -õ. Those which have a distinct, obligatory feminine form will have one ending in -ā. Thus these adjectives are called "three-ending" o-stem adjectives. Those without a distinct, obligatory feminine ending terminate in -ōḫ for both masculine and feminine referents. These are "two-ending" o-stem adjectives. It should be noted that feminine forms of o-stems add the -ā directly to the stem, not after the -o theme vowel; this is in contrast to the *-h₂ stems (see below) which is usually added following an existing suffix.

Adjectives terminating in -k, -n, -s, and -t generally do not have distinct forms for masculine and feminine referents, but a handful will have a -ī suffix following the existing suffix to create a distinct feminine form. The netuer form is distinguished from the animate form in one of two manners. It may be by ablaut, taking a short vowel grade when the animate has long grade or a zero grade when the animate has short. Or it may be by the absence of final -s in the nominative, where the animate nom. has -s.

Adjectives in -i and -u often have distinct feminine forms ending in -ī, but there are also adjectives which have just one form for animate refernets or even one form for referents of all genders. Furthermore, there are feminine forms which have a long vowel where the masculine has a short vowel, e.g. fem. nom. sing. -ī and -ū, contra masc. nom. sing. -iš and -uš. The long vowel is conditioned by final *-h₂, which is the same as in *-ih₂ > the usual feminizing suffix -ī.

Adjectives in -nt and -wos, mostly participles, create their feminine forms by adding -ī.

There is also a class of heteroclitic adjectives based on heteroclitic nouns, which are all neuter except hāuuərə "Sun", a feminine term. Those heteroclitic items which have PP inflection take the PX inflection for their primary adjectival forms, which are also neuter and have zero grade in the suffix. The masculine form is produced by adding OX n-stem endings, and the feminine by the -ī suffix to the neuter form. In the feminine, the heteroclitic suffix has full grade and the suffix zero grade in the strong cases, and vice versa in the oblique cases.

It has been noted that adjectives often show a different ablaut pattern compared to nouns derived from the same stems. That is to say, a noun with proparoxytone or paroxytone accent can often respectively form an adjective of similar meaning with a paroxytone or oxytone accent or oxytone accent. The source of this derivation is academically debated but remained visible and productive in Northian.

All Nordic languages have an extant distinction or some vestige of it between strong and weak declensions for the same adjective, where the "strong" represents the adjective's inherited declension and the "weak" its declension as an n-stem. This is not true of Northian, which lacks a weak declension. This would suggest in historical terms that the weak declension developed after the Nordic-Northian split in the Middle Bronze Age, and all the Northian adjectives are thus "strong" in Nordic terms.

u-stem

As mentioned above, there are three types of u-stem adjectives: some are sensitive only to animacy, having a two-way contrast between masculine and feminine referents together with neuter ones, and others have a three-way contrast. Further, the ones with a three-way contrast are divided by their feminine forms, which could take the feminizing suffix *-h₂ directly after their stems ending in -u, or added *-i- to create the compound suffix *-w-ih₂ ~ -w-i̯eh₂ instead. Note it is only the root and *-h₂- ~ -eh₂- suffix that participates in ablaut in feminine forms, and never *-u- ~ -eu̯- there.

Only the last type was productive in the Northian family, but there are many examples of inherited items in the former patterns.

Oxytone

Seen in the case of meδuš "sweet" and a handful of others. These are usually held to be archaicisms as meδuš is obviously related to the neuter noun meδū "honey" (which is still attested as its neuter form), created by shifting its accent rightwards in internal derivation.

m. and f. meδuš, "sweet" = μέθυ n. meδū, "sweet"
sing du pl sing du pl
nom meδuš meδauuōi meδauuōḫ meδū mežuuīḥ meδūḥ
voc meδū
acc meδum meδūš
gen ą̄mžuuōš ą̄mdūvōš ą̄mžuuõm
loc ą̄mžuuōi ą̄mdūvō ą̄mdūhū
dat ą̄mžuuoi ą̄mdūma ą̄mdūmus
ins ą̄mžuuōi

Three-ending

The type of u-stem adjective differs from the following type only in that the feminizing suffix was a bare *-h₂ ~ -eh₂, rather than the more common *-ih₂. The strong feminine stem was thus from *tenuh₂, and the weak *tn̥weh₂-. It is a rule that all the u-stem adjectives with feminine ending in -ūḥ show root ablaut.

m. ϑanuš, "thin" = thin n. ϑanū, "thin" f. ϑanūḥ, "thin"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom ϑanuš ϑánauua ϑánauuōḫ ϑanū ϑánauuīḥ ϑanūḥ ϑanūḥ ϑánuuayīḥ ϑanuuōḫ
voc ϑanū
acc ϑanā̊ ϑanūš ϑanum ϑanuuáā̊ḫ
gen źnaōš źnavuš źnauuõm źnuuā̊ źnuuāvuš źnuuaą̄̊m
loc źnaō źnavū źnaōšū źnuuā źnuuāvū źnuuāzū
dat źnauui źnaōma źnaōmuš źnuuayi źnuuāma źnuuāmuš
ins źnō źnuuā

The feminine forms of fərətūvīḥ "broad" < *pl̥tH-w-ih₂ are provided by way of illustration of the u-stem adjectives with feminine forms in -īḥ. As a rule, the nominative singular shows the zero-grade root. As an exception to ablaut behaviour expected under normal accentuation, some u-stem feminine adjectives have a "promoted" root syllable that shows full grade, i.e. fretūvīḥ as though < *pletH-w-ih₂, especially when speaking of personal entities. Note that the oblique cases show the stem fərətūmβiia-, which represents *fr̥tiwya-, where the short i was altered to ū before w, generating a nasal in the process, and the w further became β when sandwiched between a nasal and a following approximant. This series of alterations does not occur when the feminizing suffix is in the zero grade, which resolves into a vocalic i.

f. fərətūvīḥ, "broad" = "flat"
sing du pl
nom fərətūvīḥ fərətūmβiiayīḥ fərətūmβiiáā̊ḫ
voc
acc fərətūvī fərətūviyā̊
gen fərətūmβiiā̊ fərətūmβiiāvuš fərətūmβiiaą̄̊m
loc fərətūmβiiayi fərətūmβiiāvū fərətūmβiiāštū
dat fərətūmβiiāma fərətūmβiiāmuš
ins fərətūmβiiā

i-stem

The i-stem adjectives are not very common and all take the PX inflection. For example is θraištiš "sad".

m. θraištiš, "sad" n. θraišti, "sad" f. θrištayīḥ, "sad"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom θraištiš θraištī θráištaiiāḫ θraišti θrištayīḥ θraištī θrištayīḥ θrištayīḥ θrištáyyaā̊
voc θraišti
acc θraištin θraištis θrištayī θrištáyiyāḫ
gen θrištaiš θrištaiiuš θrištiõm θrištiyā̊ θrištiyāvuš θrištiyaą̄̊m
loc θrištaiiai θrištaiiū θrištēšu θrištiyāyi θrištiyāvū θrištiyāźiiū
dat θrištaima θrištēmuš θrištiyāma θrištiyāmuš
ins θrištaiiōi θrištiyā

nt-stem (adjectives)

This stem shows two variants: the amphikinetic one has a zero-grade suffix, and the hysterokinetic one, an o-grade suffix. The former type is recovered only from the frequent term hanūs, from *ǵʰen-unt-s, "bearing value, honour", from *ǵʰen-, "esteem, honour". This word is used primarily of gods in their roles as sources of value (in objects) and honour (in persons).

The co-ordinating term honōḫ, cognate to Venetian honos, in objects, means their worth, valuation, or function, and in persons, their position in public society. A person's "worth" or "function" was evidently assessed by the role they play in society; thus, a person's honōḫ can mean either, literally, their profession or office, or, by extension, the esteem in which they are held, coming close to the modern meaning of "honour". Hence, the fonδā̊ honáhāḫ, literally "path of honour", names the priesthood, as the sacerdotal profession was evidently one of the earliest to receive general accreditation in Northian culture, cp. the cursus honorum "course of honours" in Venetian culture.

m. and n. hanūs, "bearing value, honour" f. jñuuáṇδīḥ
sing du pl sing du pl
nom hanūs hanuṇδōi̯ hanuṇδiš jñuuáṇδīḥ jñuuáṇźiiayīḥ jñuuáṇźiiaā̊ḫ
voc hanuṇ
acc hanuṇδəm hanuṇδā̊ jñuuáṇźiiā̊ḫ jñuuáṇδī
gen jñuuātōḫ jñuuātōš jñuuātõm jñuuāčiiā̊ jñuuāčiiāvuš jñuuāčiiāą̄̊m
loc jñuuoṇδi jñuuātō jñuuāštū jñuuāčiiayi jñuuāčiiāvū jñuuāčiiāhū
dat jñuuātai jñuuātmus jñuuātmuš jñuuāčiiāma jñuuāčiiāmuš
ins jñuuāta jñuuātmōḥ jñuuāϑβiiōḫ jñuuāčiiā jñuuāčiiāβiiōḫ

Present and aorist active participles in -nt-

Present and aorist verb-stems form an active participle with the suffix -nt. For thematic verbs, the suffix is -ont. The weak stem of the verb is used where it is present, so from the copula es the active participle is hą̄s from PNN *hants < PEE *h₁(e)sn̥ts. The vowel is nasalized in the masculine nominative singular but not in the neuter or feminine, suggesting that the cluster *-nt-s had probably been resolved first as *-ns-s prehistorically.

Many state the full-grade stem would have been used originally in all direct forms, since their endings are uniformly in zero grade. But the zero-grade stem is found in the oldest received texts, and metrical restoration does not reveal any additional syllables that diagnose the strong (syllabic) stem. Thus if the strong stem was once used, it was replaced in a remote time. On the other hand, the full-grade stem *-ent- is visible in the nominative dual and plural, and it has been argued its selective replacement in the nominative singular and accusative would be rather bizarre. Thus, the forms with zero-grade suffix may also be old.

The feminine participle takes the like stem and adds the feminizing suffix -ī(ị)- ~ -i̯ā-. The neuter direct dual and plural forms fail to trigger the full-grade suffix and are in zero grade, contrary to the forms of the masculine and feminine duals and plurals. The nominative dual feminine form hātīịāḥ shows an unexpected long vowel in the suffix where a short vowel is expected. Possibly the long vowel was borrowed from the singular to differentiate the dual from the plural, which had become identical (in at least some dialects that did not distinguish front and back a in final position).

Verbs which have mobile accent in the weak forms also have mobile accent in the participle. The ending is in full grade in the oblique cases (in all genders).

m. hą̄s, "being" n. hāt, "being" f. hātī, "being"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom hą̄s hanδōi̯ haą̄nδiš hāt hātī hātā hātī hātīịāḥ hātiịāḫ
voc hāt
acc hātam hātaṇġ hātiịām hātiịāṇġ
loc haą̄nδi hātō hą̄tšu = masc. hą̄či̯ā hą̄či̯aō hą̄či̯āhu
gen hātōḫ hātōš hātõm hą̄či̯ā̊ḫ hą̄či̯aōš hą̄či̯aõm
abl hāsmō hāšmi̯āu̯ hą̄či̯amo hą̄či̯āmi̯āu̯
dat hātei̯ hāšmus hą̄či̯åi̯ hą̄či̯āmuš
ins hāta hāšmi̯ā hāšmi̯āu̯ hą̄či̯ā̊i hą̄či̯āmi̯ā hą̄či̯āmi̯āu̯

Verbs which take a persistent accent, such as the s-stem aorist and present and some reduplicated present verbs, also form a participle with persistent accent. Despite appearances, the feminine forms of the PP participle is formed with the same feminizing suffix as the OX participles, except it remains in zero-grade throughout the entire paradigm, e.g. gen. sing. deδātīš < *de-dh₃-n̥t-ih₁-s. As is the usual case with this suffix, if the ending began with a vowel the final laryngeal scanned with the following syllable and does not lengthen the preceding vowel in the suffix; otherwise, the suffix appears as long -ī. In late Galic texts, this participle could also appear with a -ū̆ suffix in the dative singular, such as G. 4435, deδāδuu̯i, "to the giveress".

m. deδāt, "giving" n. deδāt, "giving" f. dedātī, "giving"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom deδāt deδāta deδātiš deδāt deδātī deδāta deδātī deδātīịa deδātiịāḫ
voc
acc deδātam deδātaṇġ deδātiịām deδātiịāṇġ
loc deδaą̄δi deδātū deδāššū = masc. deδātī deδātiịū deδātīšu
gen deδą̄s deδātuš deδātõm deδātīš deδātiịuš deδātiịõm
abl deδāšma deδāšmi̯āu̯ deδātīma deδātīmi̯āu̯
dat deδāti deδāšmus deδātiịi deδātīmuš
ins deδāta deδāšmi̯ā deδāšmi̯āu̯ deδātīịa deδātīmi̯ā deδātīmi̯āu̯

es-stems

m. and f. huménōḫ, "well-intended" n. hāminiš, "well-intended"
sing du pl sing du pl
nom humenāḫ humenahōi̯ humenišiš humeniš humenahī humenaza
voc huméniš
acc humenizam huménizaṇġ
gen humenahōḫ humenizōš humenahõm = m. and f.
loc huminiš humenizō humeništū
dat humenahai̯ humenizmō humenizmus
ins humenahōi̯

Perfect active participle in -u̯os-

The perfect active participle, which was very productive in Galic down to Epic times, was formed by an ablauting suffix -u̯ōs- ~ -u̯os- ~ -uš- to the zero grade of the perfect stem. The nom. sing. of the masculine has the lengthened-grade ending -u̯ōs-, and full-grade -u̯os- appears in other direct forms. The zero-grade ending -uš- manifests elsewhere in the masculine and neuter. The feminine participle added the -īḥ- ~ -i̯ā- suffix to the zero grade -uš- of the perfect active participle suffix. Thus, all the suffixes would be in zero-grade in the nominative singular of the feminine and neuter, and so the accent retracts to stand on the reduplication syllable; that retraction usually prevents initial *e- from weakening to i- (as seen below).

m. βiβižuuā̊, "sympathetic" = πεποιθώς n. βiβižuuōḫ, "sympathetic" f. βiβiδuštīḥ, "sympathetic"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom βiβižuuā̊ βiβižuuóhōi̯ βiβižuuóhiš βiβižuuōḫ βiβižuuóhī βiβižuuóha βiβiδuštīḥ βiβiδuźiiā βiβiδuźiiáā̊
voc βéβižuuōḫ
acc βiβižuuozəm βiβižuuózā̊ βiβiδuźiiā̊ βiβiδuźiiaā
gen βiβiδuštōḫ βiβiδuźiiōš βiβiδuštõm βiβiδuźiiā̊ βiβiδuźiiāouš βiβiδuźiiāõm
loc βiβiδušti βiβiδuźiiō βiβiδuštū βiβiδuźiiayi βiβiδuźiiāoū βiβiδuźiiazū
dat βiβiδuštei̯ βiβiδužma βiβiδužmuš βiβiδuźiiāma βiβiδuźiiāmuš
ins βiβiδuštōi̯ βiβiδuźiiā

While this paradigm may appear somewhat confusing, there are only two stems. The strong stem is βiβižuuós-, with final -s altered to -št before other vowels and to -ž before resonants. The weak stem is βiβiδuš-, with final -š altered to -ž before resonants, including the laryngeal that begins the dual gen. and dat. endings. If the resonant has a vowel inserted, the -ž is appended with -ii- and further becomes to -ź. The nom. sing. of the masculine has the long grade -uuā̊ < *-ōs.

As exceptions to this rule, the perfect active participles of wōiδa "know" and mimóna "remember" have nominative singular forms wāiδuš, wāiδū, wāiδuštīḥ and menuš (similar) respectively. These are probably continuations of the original amphikinetic inflection of perfect active participles, with full-grade root for nominative forms. Other members of their class have evolved to take the hysterokinetic pattern, which have an non-ablauting root. Curiously, the participle of mimóna loses its reduplication—some scholars have taken this as an indication that perfect active participles may have originally been unreduplicated, as an independent formation from the e-grade root and not from the perfect verb stem.

Comparatives in -yos-

Many (but not all) adjectives formed comparative forms with the suffix -i̯os- ~ -iš-. Unlike the perfect active participle, the comparative form does not have a distinct feminine form; otherwise, the distribution of strong and weak forms of the stem are exactly the same.

m. and f. xréčiiā̊, "more powerful" = κρείττων n. xrétiš, id
sing du pl sing du pl
nom xréčiiā̊ xréčiioha xréčiiohiš xratiš xréčiiohī xréčiiažiia
voc xréčiiōḫ
acc xréčiiaham xrétiźiiā̊
gen xrétištōḫ xrétiźiiōš xrétištõm = m.
loc xréčiiā xrétiźiiō xrétištū
dat xrétištei̯ xrétižmō xrétižmuš
ins xrétištōi̯

It should be noted that the -yos- adjectives can lean more towards the sense of "quite so", rather than "more so" than a particular object compared to. Thus, for certain adjectives, two separate comparatives with contrastive meanings are in use, e.g. yəuuā̊ "quite young, younger" vs. yuterōḫ "the younger of two siblings". Where an adjective implies a definite comparative standard, the forms in -ter- are more often encountered.

And like the perfect active participle, there is a variation of the comparative suffix that has amphikinetic form, i.e. zero-grade suffix in the nominative, used in adjectives such as máɣis "larger" and foris "more"; note the non-retroflexed -s of the ending < *máɣis-s, with prehistorically restored nominative *-s, as otherwise the masculine and feminine would be identical to the neuter.

r/n-stem

This class of adjectives were principally derived from the heteroclitics neuter nouns. The neuter singular was identical to the heteroclitic noun. The masculine was formed as an n-stem, while the feminine was formed as with the suffix -ih₂ from the zero grade of the neuter stem. The example provided included the petrified suffix *-wr ~ wn-, but other adjectives of this class could include other suffixes such as *-mr ~ mn- and *-tr ~ tn-, with their associated phonetic peculiarities.

m. fīuuō, "fat" = fat n. faiuuərə f. fūvurīḥ
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom fīuuō fīuuonōi̯ fīuuoniš faiuuərə faiiurīḥ faiuuā̊ fūvurīḥ fūvuriiāḥ fūvuriiaāḫ
voc fīuuon
acc fīuuonām fīuuonāṇġ fūvuriiā̊ fūvuriyāḫ
gen fūvunōḫ fūvunōš fūvunõm fūvuriiā̊ fūvuriiāous fūvuriiaõm
loc fūvoīni fūvunō fivəŋhū fūvuriiāyi fūvuriiāoū fūvuriiāzū
dat fūvunei̯ fūvunmō fūvunmuš fūvuriiāma fūvuriiāmuš
ins fūvunōi̯ fūvuriiā

mahiš

m. mahiš, "large" n. maha, "large" f. mahii̯āḫ, "large"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom mahiš maɣā maɣāḫ maha mahīḥ mahīḥ mahīḥ mahīi̯a mahii̯āḫ
voc maɣā
acc maɣåm maɣåṇġ mahīi̯am mahii̯āṇġ
gen āmhōḫ āmhōš āmhõ = m. āmjii̯āu̯ āmjii̯āu̯uš āmjii̯ā
loc āmha āmhō āmhšu āmjii̯ā āmjii̯āu̯u āmjii̯āhu
dat āmhei̯ āmhmō āmhmuš āmjii̯ai̯i āmjii̯āma āmjii̯āmuš
ins āmhōi̯ āmjii̯å


m. mahii̯āu̯, "larger" n. mahii̯ōḫ, "larger" f. mahii̯ahīḥ, "larger"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom mahii̯āu̯ mahii̯oha mahii̯ohiš mahii̯ōḫ mahii̯ohī mahii̯oha mahii̯ahīḥ mahii̯ahīi̯a mahii̯ahii̯āḫ
voc mahii̯ōḫ
acc mahii̯āham mahii̯ohāṇġ āmjii̯ahīi̯am āmjii̯ahīi̯aṇġ
gen āmjihōḫ āmjihōš āmjihõ = m. āmjii̯ahi̯āu̯ āmjii̯ahi̯āu̯uš āmjii̯ahi̯ą̄̊
loc mahii̯ahi āmjihō āmjihššu āmjii̯ahi̯āḥ āmjii̯ahi̯āu̯u āmjii̯ahi̯āhu
dat āmjihei̯ āmjihmō āmjihmuš āmjii̯ahi̯ai̯i āmjii̯ahi̯āma āmjii̯ahi̯āmuš
ins āmjihōi̯ āmjii̯ahi̯å

poluš

m. poluš, "many" n. polu, "many" f. polūḥ, "many"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom poluš maɣā maɣāḫ polu mahīḥ mahīḥ polūḥ mahīi̯a mahii̯āḫ
voc maɣā
acc maɣåm maɣåṇġ mahīi̯am mahii̯āṇġ
gen āmhōḫ āmhōš āmhõ = m. āmjii̯āu̯ āmjii̯āu̯uš āmjii̯ā
loc āmha āmhō āmhšu āmjii̯ā āmjii̯āu̯u āmjii̯āhu
dat āmhei̯ āmhmō āmhmuš āmjii̯ai̯i āmjii̯āma āmjii̯āmuš
ins āmhōi̯ āmjii̯å


m. mahii̯āu̯, "more" n. mahii̯ōḫ, "more" f. mahii̯ahīḥ, "more"
sing du pl sing du pl sing du pl
nom mahii̯āu̯ mahii̯oha mahii̯ohiš mahii̯ōḫ mahii̯ohī mahii̯oha mahii̯ahīḥ mahii̯ahīi̯a mahii̯ahii̯āḫ
voc mahii̯ōḫ
acc mahii̯āham mahii̯ohāṇġ āmjii̯ahīi̯am āmjii̯ahīi̯aṇġ
gen āmjihōḫ āmjihōš āmjihõ = m. āmjii̯ahi̯āu̯ āmjii̯ahi̯āu̯uš āmjii̯ahi̯ą̄̊
loc mahii̯ahi āmjihō āmjihššu āmjii̯ahi̯āḥ āmjii̯ahi̯āu̯u āmjii̯ahi̯āhu
dat āmjihei̯ āmjihmō āmjihmuš āmjii̯ahi̯ai̯i āmjii̯ahi̯āma āmjii̯ahi̯āmuš
ins āmjihōi̯ āmjii̯ahi̯å

Numerals

1 – 4

Cardinal numbers one through four are declinable as athematic adjectives of various declensional patterns, agreeing with the nouns (explicit or implicit) they modify in gender, case, and number. Of course, "one" is only inflected in the singular, "two" in the dual, and "three" and "four" in the plural. Numbers five and above are indeclinable.

"one" "two" "three" "four"
m. n. f. m. n. f. m. n. f. m. n. f.
nom hā̊ hõm hámīḥ žuuō duyīḥ žuuayīḥ θráiiāḫ θrī́ḥ θrižrāḫ koδuuóriš kótur koδuuərəšriš
voc hõm
acc hā̊ hámīi̯am θrī́ θrižrā̊ koδuuórā̊ koδuuərəzrā̊
loc himi hmi̯āi duō θvāu̯u θrišū θrižərəžū koδuuərəžū koδuuərəzərəzū
dat hmei̯ dumā́ θvāma θrimuš θrižərəmuš koδuuərəmuš koδuuərəzərəmuš
loc hmōḫ hmi̯āu̯ θriβi̯ō θrižərəβi̯ō koδuuərəβi̯ō koδuuərəzərəβi̯ō
gen duōš θvāu̯uš θri̯õm θrišrõm koturõm koδuuərəžrõm
ins hmōi̯ hmi̯å dumā́ θvāma θrišūr θrišra kotura koδuuərəzar

"One" is a root noun with a stem ending in -m. As with other stems ending in -m, the accusative preform *sem-m̥ would by regular phonetic change become *sēm, i.e. the same as nominative *sēm, because the PEE ending *-m̥ regularly absorbs the previous resonant, hence also nom. zi̯ōš < *dyou-s but acc. zi̯ā̊ < *dyēm < *dyew-m̥; in the number, -əm is often but not always restored. In the oblique cases, the stem is in zero grade and appears as hm- < *sm-. The feminine forms are a regular development from the familiar -īḥ suffixation.

"Two" is only declined in the dual number. There are two stems in use: the monosyllabic dvō- and the dysyllabic duo-. It is not certain why the stem scans as two syllables in the neuter forms.

"Three" is a regular PX i-stem noun and is only declined in the plural. Nom. θráiiāḫ shows regular development of *e > a after yod and attraction of the previous front vowel. <ị> is inserted by Runic writers. As with other PX nouns of animate gender, the accusative plural has a zero-grade suffix followed by a zero-grade ending; *tri-ns > θrī́. The feminine forms employ the feminizing infix -sr-, which is always found in the zero grade, and take regular athematic endings. There is also a specific personal form if three women are specifically spoken of, which is θrai̯štar θrižrōḫ < *trey-sr̥, *tri-sr-os.

"Four" behaves like most athematic nouns and also employs the feminizing infix -sr- for its feminine forms. Note however that the ablauting element was the second syllable of the stem -twor-, which in zero grade appears would be PNN *-tur-. Which of the two resonants vocalize depends on the phonetic environment. Where the suffix stands alone the *-w- is vocalized, as in neuter nominative kotur < *kʷetw̥r. But where an obstruent follows the suffix it is the *-r- that becomes syllabic, as in koδuuərəmuš < *kʷetwr̥mus. There was also a singular form koδuuā̊ < *kʷetwōr = Venetian quattuor.

The feminine forms for "four" have the particularly long stem of hoδvərəzərə-, which is for *kʷétwr̥-sr̥- where the ending begins with a consonant. The masculine form for "four" frequently supplants the feminine owing to the sheer length of the etymological stem.

5 and higher

  • fenkə "five"

From PEE *pénkʷe.

  • xšuuāxš "six"

From *kswéks.

  • haftam 7

From *septm̥.

  • oxθō 8

The proto-form of this word is disputed. Northian oxθō can be traced back to both *(H)oktow and *(H)oktoH, with or without an initial laryngeal. Morphologically, it is the dual of óxθō "fingers", in ei-stem.

  • nauuam 9
  • dekam 10

Pronouns

First person

sing du pl
stressed enclitic stressed enclitic stressed enclitic
nom áhō vṓ vōi̯
acc ammṓi̯ mi āŋhō aŋhmṓi̯ nā̊́ḫ
gen mémi moi̯ āŋhér-
dat máji̯o nanā́ āŋhméi̯

Second person

sing du pl
stressed enclitic stressed enclitic stressed enclitic
nom tū́ yṓ yā̊́ḫ
acc svō ti ūšō ušmé vā̊́ḫ
gen téve toi̯ yuštr-(I/II)
dat tévi̯ō toi̯ wanā́ ušmḗ

Demonstrative

Singular Dual Plural
Masc. Neut. Fem. Masc. Neut. Fem. Masc. Neut. Fem.
Nominative ha taṯ toī tāī toy tāy
Accusative tõm tāmam tṓn tā́s
Locative tohme tesi̯āi̯ tṓu̯ toisu tēsu
Genitive tohi̯ō tezās tṓmōuš toiom tēom
Dative tohmoi̯ tesi̯åi̯ tṓzmā toiomus tēmus
Instrumental toi̯ toi̯

Indefinite article

The Northian indefinite article, which introduces an indefininte noun phrase, is derived from the PEE root *oiwos, meaning "one". Note that the endings are those of demonstratives.

aēuuōḫ, "a, an"
M & F N
nom aēuuōḫ aēuuó
voc
acc aēuuõm
loc aēuuōi̯
dat
abl aēuuōṯ
gen aēuuōi̯š
ins aēuuō

Demonstratives

Verb classes

Athematic present

The shapes of the stem in the Erani-Eracuran parent language decides the resulting forms in Northian:

  • VC—these take the short (regular) endings.
  • VH—these take the short (regular) endings in the strong forms and long (augmented) endings in the weak forms, with any laryngeal-colouring effects visible on both stem and endings which interface with the stem-final laryngeal.
  • VCH—these take the long (augmented) endings, with any laryngeal-colouring effects visible on endings which interface with the stem-final laryngeal.

Aside from the shape of the stem, there are two accentual patterns found in present stems:

  • Mobile accent—this pattern is found within all stem-classes and is the most common by far; the accent is on the stem in the singular active and on the ending in all other forms.
  • Persistent accent—some root stems take this accent pattern, and the accent is on the stem in all cases; the singular indicative and imperfect active usually has a lengthened vowel, in contrast to the short vowel of all other forms. The injunctive can sometimes have short vowel throughout, but this is completely unpredictable. The 3 pl form, which is sensitive to ablaut, takes the zero grade form.

Present stems

The imperfective system in Galic largely continues the system of reconstructed Proto-Erani-Eracuran. With regard to the historic development of the Northian languages, the imperfective stem is evidently the most productive, followed by the stative and perfective stems in this order. Except for inherited items, all verbs not directly derived from roots could only be imperfective. Imperfective stems could be directly conjugated from the root or with the addition of affixes; as decided by the affix, the athematic or thematic endings may be used. Many athematic stems display ablaut, and in Northian it is customary to give the first person singular active to show the form of the strong stem and the second person plural, for the weak stem.

# Class 1 sg. / 2 pl. Function Examples
1a root CéC-mi / CØC-té
CéCaē-mi / CØCi-té
Used for inherently imperfective roots. This root type often but not always shows root ablaut, varying between *e ~ Ø. The accent is on the root if it is in full-grade, and on the ending if the root is in zero-grade. These verbs are common in Galic but uncommon in Epic. es- / s- "to be"
1b CC-mi / CéC-ti The same as the type above, but with ablaut varying between *ē ~ e. The accent persists on the root. ēs- / es- "to sit, stay"
2a root CéC-ōḥ / CéC-iti Used for inherently imperfective roots. The root consistently shows full grade and is accented. ver-e- "to transport"
2b CØC-ṓḥ / CØC-éti Used for inherently imperfective roots. The root consistently shows zero grade, and the theme vowel is accented. tuδ-e- "to push"
3 reduplicated Ci-CéC-mi / Ci-CØC-té
Ce-CéC-mi / Ce-CØC-té
Creates imperfective stems from eventive roots. The reduplicated syllable varies between *e ~ i, with no apparent difference in meaning. The root syllable generally undergoes ablaut, with e-grade in strong forms and zero-grade in weak forms. Roots which end in a laryngeal have a characteristic long vowel in the strong form and a schwa in weak, which merges with the ending if it begins with a vowel. de-δō- / de-δ(i)- "to give"
hi-štā- / hi-št(i)- "to stand (something) up"
4 né ~ n CØ-né-C-mi / CØ-nØ-C-té Creates imperfective stems from perfective roots. The affix *ne ~ n is inserted between the vowel and final consonant of the root. The root is always in the zero-grade, while the infix undergoes ablaut. li-ne-k- / la-ṇ-x "to leave (behind)"
5 nā́ / nṓ ~ ni CØ-nā́-mi / CØ-ni-té
CØ-n-mi / CØ-ni-té
This class originates from the same process as class IV, but due to sound changes the surface forms are different. In strong forms, the combination *-ne-h₂- becomes -nā-, while in weak forms the *-n-h₂- generally causes the preceding vowel (in zero grade) to lengthen. If the root ends in *-h₃, the strong form has -nō-, but this is somewhat rarer as roots rarely end in this consonant. The final -i in the weak forms of this root is the "laryngeal i", which only appears before consonants and as i only before dentals, or as a before gutturals. If preceding e, it colours e to match (as a rule of thumb) the same consonant in the strong stem; this is the situation in the 3rd act. pl., where the ending was *-enti. kri-nā- / kri-n(i)- "to buy"
gā-nō- / gā-n(i)- "to know"
6 naō ~ nu CØ-naō-mi / CØ-nu-té This class also originates from the same process as class IV. Preceding another vowel, naō- is written as nauu-. In weak forms, the suffix *-n-u̯- can become -nuu- preceding another vowel, e.g. kərənuuəṇδi "they make", or -āuu- following a non-resonant. kərə-naō- / kərə-nu- "to make"
7 reduplicated Cí-CØC-ōḥ / Cí-CØC-iti Like the athematic verbs in class III, these are imperfective verbs formed from eventive roots, but with thematic endings. The root syllable is in zero-grade. The accent is consistently on the reduplication syllable. pí-p-i- "to drink"
hí-zd-i- "to sit (something) down"
8a ii CéC-ii-ōḥ / CéC-ii-ati This very prolific suffix creates imperfective stems from perfective roots. They characteristically had a full-grade and consistently-accented root. As a rule, present stems in class 8a corresponded with an aorist stem in class 1 (root aorist), and so in the Epic language verbs in this class drop the -ii- to form the first subjunctive. špač-ii- "to observe, spectate"
8b CØC-ii-ṓḥ / CØC-ii-áti Similar to the above, but this type had a zero-grade root and consistently accented endings. Further, members of thsi class were often deponent, i.e. lacking an active voice. Where an active voice is found, there is usually no contrast in meaning to the middle. worj-i̯- "to rotate"
9 sk- CØC-šk-ṓḥ / CéC-šk-éti Creates imperfective stems from perfective roots. gā-šk- "to walk, pace"
10 s- CéC-s-ōḥ / CéC-s-iti Only a few examples are known from this class. lek-s-e "to protect"
11 ḗ- CØC-ḗ-ōḥ / CØC-ḗ-yiti Verbs in this class mostly express states of being, derived mainly from adjectives. The suffix ended in a laryngeal, so in Galic verbs in this class have disyllabic endings that are orthographically merged. ruδ-ḗ "to blush"
12 áii- CóC-aii-ōḥ / CØC-áii-ati Stems of this class have root syllables in the o-grade. soδ-aii- "to sit, calm"
13a s- CéC-s-ōḥ / CéC-s-eti
Ce-CéC-s-ōḥ / Ce-CéC-s-iti
This formation has two functions. When applied to present and aorist stems, desiderative verbs are created, but when applied to perfect stems, a meaning somewhat similar to future perfect is created.
13b Cí-CØC-s-ōḥ / Cí-CØC-s-iti The same as above, except with i-reduplication of the initial syllable, which stands in the zero grade.
14 sii- CØC-sii-ōḥ / CØC-sii-ati Creates future stems from present and aorist stems. The shape of this stem depends on that of the root: if the root ended in a vowel, the suffix will change to -hiia-, and the vowel preceding will obligatorily become a.
15 aii- CVC-aii-ṓḥ / CVC-aii-áti Creates verbs from o-stem (2nd declension) nouns.
16 āii- CVC-āii-ṓḥ / CVC-āii-áti Creates verbs from ā-stem (1st declension) nouns.

Root with mobile accent

gonmi, hāté, "to strike"

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg gón-mi egónam gónąm gón-ō gñ-iiā̊ gān-ūm igun-ūm gān-ūm gén-ą̄m jñ-īma
2 sg góŋ-hi egṓṇġ gṓṇġ -ai -iiā̊(s) gān-θī́ -šθoi̯ -šθo -šθo -ésθoi̯ -īšθo gān-švō gān-θitoṯ
3 sg gón-δi egóṇṯ góṇṯ -iyi -iiāṯ -itū́ -θoi̯ -θo -θo -étoi̯ -īto -θo -θoṯ
1 du hŋʷ-uuəíñi egñ-uuó gñ-uuó -ouuiñi -īuuó gāŋ-vózθa iguŋ-vóθa gāŋ-vóθa -ou̯ozθa -īvóθa
2 du hā-tāḫ egā-δõm gā-δõm -étāḫ -ītõm -θāḫ jñ-ātiθai̯i igñ-ātiθa jñ-ātaθa -ētaθai -ītaθa jñ-ātaθa -θoṯ
3 du -tḗ -δā̊ -δā̊ -étiš -ītā̊ -θés -ātāi̯i igñ-ā -ā -ētāi̯i -ītā jñ-ā -θoṯ
1 pl hŋʷ-míñi egñ-mó gñ-mó -omiñi -īmó gān-mózθa igun-meθa gān-meθa -omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl hā-δé egā-δé gā-δé -éti -īté gén-θi -šθve -šθve -šθve -ésθve -īšθve -θve -θoṯ
3 pl gñ-énδi egñ-éṇṯ gñ-éṇṯ -iiāṯ jñ-énθu jñ-énθroi̯ igñ-ónθro -ónθro -ónθroi̯ -īi̯unθro -unθo -nθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

ahmi, šté, "to be". This verb of singular importance has a rather opaque stem owing to the vagaries of *s in various phonetic positions. In principle, when *s precedes *m, *u̯, or a back vowel and when it stands in initial position and precedes any vowel, it becomes h; then any front vowel which borders h becomes a. Before a voiced consonant, *s becomes z. Thus the a-vocalism of hánθi "they are" is due to the colouring effects of h and not an Erani-Eracuran laryngeal, and so the subjunctive endings beginning in e are not coloured to a. ahmi has no attested middle voice.

active fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg áh-mi é-ez-ąm áh-ō h-iiā̊
2 sg á-hi á-ā̊-ḫ -ayi -iiā̊ z-δí z-δitóṯ
3 sg éš-ti é-eš-ṯ -ai -iiāṯ š-tū́ š-toṯ
1 du h-uuəíñi ēz-uuó h-uuó -ouuəíñi h-īuuó
2 du š-tāḫ ēš-tõm š-tõm -átāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -toṯ
3 du -tḗ -tā̊ -tā̊ -átiš -ītā̊ -tā̊ -toṯ
1 pl h-míñi ēz-mo h-mo -omiñi -īmó
2 pl s-té ēš-té š-te -áti -īté éš-ti -toṯ
3 pl h-ánδi ā-h-áṇṯ -onδi -ii̯āṯ h-āδu h-āδoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās

Root with persistent accent

āhmi, asti, "to dwell". A small but important class of root present verbs have persistent accent. Thus, rather than having an accent that shifts to the endings in the non-singular active and the entire middle, the accent persists on the root syllable; many, but not all, such verbs will have a lengthened vowel in the singular active. The 3 pl form takes the zero grade in all cases because the accent persists on the root.

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg ā́h-mi ā̊s-am áh-am ā́h-ō áh-i̯ą̄m áh-ūm ā́h-ūm áh-ūm ā́h-ą̄m és-īma
2 sg ḗ-si ā̊s es ḗs-ei̯i -i̯āu̯ ez-θī́ és-šθoi̯ ḗs-šθo és-šθo ḗs-ésθoi̯ -īšθo és-švō és-θitoṯ
3 sg ḗs-ti ā̊s-ṯ es-ṯ -ei̯ -i̯āṯ es-tū́ -θoi̯ -θo -θo -étoi̯ -īto -θo -θoṯ
1 du áh-víñi āh-vo áh-vó ā́h-ou̯iñi és-īvo áh-vozθa ā́h-voθa áh-voθa áh-ou̯ozθa -īvoθa
2 du és-tāḫ ēs-tõm és-tõm ḗs-etāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātiθa -ātaθa ḗs-ētaθai -ītaθa -ātaθa -θoṯ
3 du -tés -tą̄m -tą̄m -etiš -ītąm -tiš -ātāi̯i -ātā -ātā -ētāi̯i -ītā -ātā -θoṯ
1 pl áh-míñi āh-mo áh-mo ā́h-omiñi -īmō -mózθa -meθa -meθa ā́h-omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl és-ti ēs-ti és-te ḗs-eti -īte ḗs-ti és-šθve ḗs-šθve és-šθve ḗs-ésθve -īšθve -θve -θoṯ
3 pl áh-āṯ ēs-eṯ háṯ ā́h-onθi -ii̯āṯ és-enθu áh-unθroi̯ ā́h-unθro áh-unθro -ónθroi̯ -īi̯unθro -unθo -unθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

Root with long endings

ánaēmi, ānité, "to breath". Owing to the effects of an interconsonantal laryngeal, some roots were synchronically analyzed as taking a set of endings augmented with a vowel between the stem and ending proper, though historically the augmentation is part of the stem and not of the ending. These endings are analogous with the ṣet roots in the Tennite language, while those taking the short (normal) endings are analoogus to aṇit roots. Since there is an Erani-Eracuran laryngeal on the stem-ending border, any ending which begins with *e (bolded) is liable to be coloured by this laryngeal; in the example below the laryngeal is *h₁ and so does not colour the ending. This colouring effect may be seen as the analogue to the ending augmentation where the laryngeal is not preserved between consonants.

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg án-aēmi aán-ą̄m án-ą̄m án-ō ān-i̯ą̄m ān-ūm au̯un-ūm ān-ūm án-ą̄m ān-īma
2 sg án-iši -iš -iš -ei̯i -i̯āu̯ āniθī́ -išθoi̯ -išθo -išθo -ésθoi̯ -īšθo ān-išvō ān-iθitoṯ
3 sg -iti -it -it -e -i̯āṯ -itū́ -itoi̯ -ito -ito -étoi̯ -īto -ito -itoṯ
1 du ān-ivíñi au̯un-ivo ān-ivó -ou̯iñi -īu̯o -ivózθa -ivóθa -ivóθa -ou̯ozθa -īvóθa
2 du -itāḫ -itõm -itõm -étāḫ -ītõm -itāḫ -ētiθai̯i -ētiθa -ētaθa -ētaθai -ii̯itaθa -ētaθa -itoṯ
3 du -ités -itą̄m -itą̄m -étiš -ītąm -ités -ētāi̯i -ē -ē -ētāi̯i -ii̯itā -ē -itoṯ
1 pl -amíñi -amo -amo -omiñi -īmō -amózθa -ameθa -ameθa -omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl -ité -ite -ite -éti -īte án-iti -išθve -išθve -nušθve -ésθve -īšθve -iθve -itoṯ
3 pl ān-énθi -éṯ ān-é -ónθi -ii̯āṯ ān-énθu -énθroi̯ -ónθro -ónθro -ónθroi̯ -ii̯unθro -ii̯unθo -inθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

Of a similar construction are those verbs whose historic stems terminated in *-h₂ and *-h₃, giving rise to a and o respectively, in all the bolded positions.

Root with long ending and persistent accent

While there is no obvious reason why such a combination cannot exist, there are no known roots which take both long endings and a persistent accent.

Vowel-final stems

faēmi, fité, "to protect, apologize, propitiate (middle)". In partial distinction to the situation above, stems which had a laryngeal in final position result in a lengthened vowel in the singular active. For paēmi this vowel is ā, but as in other cases the vowel becomes ē or ō. In the active optative, the initial consonant is a phonetic combination of *py-. This word is cognate to Nordic fehu "flock", via the sense a flock is animals protected by the shepherd.

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg f-aḗmi émβā̊ f-ā̊ fa-ō β-iiā̊ f-ā́m ep-ā́m p-ā́m p-ą̄m p-īma
2 sg -ā́hi émβā̊ -ā̊ -ayi -iiā̊ β-θī́ -išθoi̯ -išθo -išθo -ásθoi̯ -īšθo p-išvō p-iθitoṯ
3 sg -ā́ti émβā-t -āt -ai -iiāṯ -itū́ -itoi̯ -ito -ito -átoi̯ -īto -ito -itoṯ
1 du -ūvíñi ep-ūvó -ūvó -ouuiñi f-ūvo -ivózθa -ivóθa -ivóθa -ou̯ozθa -īvóθa
2 du -itāḫ -itõm -itõm -átāḫ -ītõm -itāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātiθa -ātaθa -ātaθai -ii̯itaθa -ātaθa -itoṯ
3 du -itḗ -itā̊ -itā̊ -átiš -ītā̊ -itḗ -ātāi̯i -ā -ā -ātāi̯i -ii̯itā -ā -itoṯ
1 pl -amíñi -amo -amo -omiñi -īmō -amózθa -ameθa -ameθa -omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl -ité -ité -ité -áti -īté fā́-ti -išθvé -išθvé -išθvé -ásθve -īšθve -iθve -itoṯ
3 pl -ánδi -áṯ -ánṯ -ónδi -iyaṯ f-inθū́ -ánθroi̯ -ónθro -ónθro -ónθroi̯ -ii̯unθro -ii̯unθo -inθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

naṓ ~ nu

xšnaōmi, xšnuθvé, "to sharpen". Present stems which vary with a nu suffix (néu̯ in strong forms) are treated as a special class as the endings are liable to become muddled with the stem-final consonant. Fundamentally, these verbs are still of the VC type and all have mobile accent. Syllabification rules in Northian requires the u in the weak form of the suffix to become a consonant in the presence of a following vowel, which in turn causes the n before it to mutate to ŋ. This ŋ may itself be syllabified in response to the want of a preceding vowel, as Northian prohibits four consecutive consonants in anlaut.

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg xš-naṓ-mi a-xš-nā̊ xš-náuu-ō xš-nu-iiā̊ hš-nūm ekš-nūm hš-nūm hš-neu̯ą̄m hš-āŋvīma
2 sg xš-náu-šti -naṓ-š -náuu-oyi -nu-iiā̊ xš-naṓ -nušθoi̯ -nušθo -nušθo -neu̯esθoi̯ -āŋvīšθo hš-nušvō hš-nuθitoṯ
3 sg xš-naṓ-ti -naṓ-ṯ -náuu-oi -nu-iiāṯ -nu-tū -nutoi̯ -nuto -nuto -neu̯etoi̯ -āŋvīto -nuto -nutoṯ
1 du xš-nu-voíñi a-xš-nu-vo -náuu-ouuiñi -nuu-īuuo -nuu̯ózθa -nuu̯óθa -nuu̯eθa -neu̯ou̯ozθa -āŋvīu̯óθa
2 du xš-nu-tāḫ -nu-tõm -náuu-itāḫ -nuu-ītõm -nu-tāḫ -āŋvātiθai̯i -āŋvātaθa -āŋvātaθa -neu̯ātaθai -āŋvītaθa -āŋvātaθa -nutoṯ
3 du xš-nu-tḗ -nu-tā̊ -náuu-itiš -nuu-ītąm -nu-tḗ -āŋvātāi̯i -āŋvātā -āŋvātā -neu̯ātāi̯i -āŋvītā -āŋvātā -nutoṯ
1 pl xš-nu-míñi -nu-mo -náuu-omiñi -nuu-īmō -numózθa -numeθa -numeθa -neu̯omozθa -āŋvīmeθa
2 pl xš-nu-té -nu-té -náuu-iti -nuu-īte -nu-te -nušθve -nušθve -nušθve -neu̯esθve -āŋvīšθve -nuθve -nutoṯ
3 pl xš-uu-onδi a-xš-nuu-óṇṯ -náuu-oṇδi -nuu-īṯ -nuu-ātū -āŋvónθroi̯ -āŋvónθro -āŋvónθro -neu̯onθroi̯ -āŋvīnθro -āŋvunθo -nunθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

Aorist

Aorist stems

The aorist or perfective (not to be confused with "perfect") stems belong to a relic class in Epic Northian, but they are productive in the Galic language. When used in the indicative and imperative, there are four formations as follows. But when used outside of them, and particularly in the injunctive and optative moods, aorists in s- are often "conjugated from the root", that is behave like root aorists. Roots which have this behaviour are called "split aorists" and are associated with a contrasting ablaut pattern, with only the third plural exhibiting a weak grade.

# Class 1 sg. / 2 pl. Function Examples
1 root CéC-am / CØC-té Contains roots that are inherently perfective. Most perfective verbs in the parent language appear to have been of this type, and Galic Northian has inherited about 100 lexical items inflected this way. The root syllable typically shows ablaut between *e ~ Ø. Many suffixed imperfective stems are derived from a root perfective stem. dō- / d(i)- "to give"
xraō- / xru- "to hear"
2 root CØC-õm / CØC-té Contains roots that are inherently perfective. This type appears to have been rare. luδ- "to listen"
3 reduplicated Cé-CØC-õm / Cé-CØC-iti This pattern is known from only one root, though it is widely-attested in other Erani-Eracuran languages. waō-š-[1] "to say"
4 s- CC-s-(m) / CéC-š-ti The s- suffix creates perfective stems from roots which were inherently imperfective; notably, the ablauting root syllable contrasts the long vowel in the strong forms and the short in the weak. daix-s- "to show"
  1. from *wau-s- < *wé-wk-

Root aorists

esedām, esdté

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg ā́h-mi esed-am áh-am ā́h-ō áh-i̯ą̄m áh-ūm ā́h-ūm áh-ūm ā́h-ą̄m és-īma
2 sg ḗ-si ā̊s es ḗs-ei̯i -i̯āu̯ ez-θī́ és-šθoi̯ ḗs-šθo és-šθo ḗs-ésθoi̯ -īšθo és-švō és-θitoṯ
3 sg ḗs-ti ā̊s-ṯ es-ṯ -ei̯ -i̯āṯ es-tū́ -θoi̯ -θo -θo -étoi̯ -īto -θo -θoṯ
1 du áh-víñi est-vo áh-vó ā́h-ou̯iñi és-īvo áh-vozθa ā́h-voθa áh-voθa áh-ou̯ozθa -īvoθa
2 du és-tāḫ ēs-tõm és-tõm ḗs-etāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātiθa -ātaθa ḗs-ētaθai -ītaθa -ātaθa -θoṯ
3 du -tés -tą̄m -tą̄m -etiš -ītąm -tiš -ātāi̯i -ātā -ātā -ētāi̯i -ītā -ātā -θoṯ
1 pl áh-míñi est-mo áh-mo ā́h-omiñi -īmō -mózθa -meθa -meθa ā́h-omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl és-ti ēs-ti és-te ḗs-eti -īte ḗs-ti és-šθve ḗs-šθve és-šθve ḗs-ésθve -īšθve -θve -θoṯ
3 pl áh-āṯ ēs-eṯ háṯ ā́h-onθi -ii̯āṯ és-enθu áh-unθroi̯ ā́h-unθro áh-unθro -ónθroi̯ -īi̯unθro -unθo -unθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

Split aorists

dēkšam, esdté

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg ā́h-mi esed-am áh-am ā́h-ō áh-i̯ą̄m áh-ūm ā́h-ūm áh-ūm ā́h-ą̄m és-īma
2 sg ḗ-si ā̊s es ḗs-ei̯i -i̯āu̯ ez-θī́ és-šθoi̯ ḗs-šθo és-šθo ḗs-ésθoi̯ -īšθo és-švō és-θitoṯ
3 sg ḗs-ti ā̊s-ṯ es-ṯ -ei̯ -i̯āṯ es-tū́ -θoi̯ -θo -θo -étoi̯ -īto -θo -θoṯ
1 du áh-víñi est-vo áh-vó ā́h-ou̯iñi és-īvo áh-vozθa ā́h-voθa áh-voθa áh-ou̯ozθa -īvoθa
2 du és-tāḫ ēs-tõm és-tõm ḗs-etāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātiθa -ātaθa ḗs-ētaθai -ītaθa -ātaθa -θoṯ
3 du -tés -tą̄m -tą̄m -etiš -ītąm -tiš -ātāi̯i -ātā -ātā -ētāi̯i -ītā -ātā -θoṯ
1 pl áh-míñi est-mo áh-mo ā́h-omiñi -īmō -mózθa -meθa -meθa ā́h-omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl és-ti ēs-ti és-te ḗs-eti -īte ḗs-ti és-šθve ḗs-šθve és-šθve ḗs-ésθve -īšθve -θve -θoṯ
3 pl áh-āṯ ēs-eṯ háṯ ā́h-onθi -ii̯āṯ és-enθu áh-unθroi̯ ā́h-unθro áh-unθro -ónθroi̯ -īi̯unθro -unθo -unθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

Thematic endings

dēkšam, esdté

active middle fut imp
ind impf inj subj opt imp ind impf inj subj opt imp
1 sg ā́h-mi esed-am áh-am ā́h-ō áh-i̯ą̄m áh-ūm ā́h-ūm áh-ūm ā́h-ą̄m és-īma
2 sg ḗ-si ā̊s es ḗs-ei̯i -i̯āu̯ ez-θī́ és-šθoi̯ ḗs-šθo és-šθo ḗs-ésθoi̯ -īšθo és-švō és-θitoṯ
3 sg ḗs-ti ā̊s-ṯ es-ṯ -ei̯ -i̯āṯ es-tū́ -θoi̯ -θo -θo -étoi̯ -īto -θo -θoṯ
1 du áh-víñi est-vo áh-vó ā́h-ou̯iñi és-īvo áh-vozθa ā́h-voθa áh-voθa áh-ou̯ozθa -īvoθa
2 du és-tāḫ ēs-tõm és-tõm ḗs-etāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātiθa -ātaθa ḗs-ētaθai -ītaθa -ātaθa -θoṯ
3 du -tés -tą̄m -tą̄m -etiš -ītąm -tiš -ātāi̯i -ātā -ātā -ētāi̯i -ītā -ātā -θoṯ
1 pl áh-míñi est-mo áh-mo ā́h-omiñi -īmō -mózθa -meθa -meθa ā́h-omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl és-ti ēs-ti és-te ḗs-eti -īte ḗs-ti és-šθve ḗs-šθve és-šθve ḗs-ésθve -īšθve -θve -θoṯ
3 pl áh-āṯ ēs-eṯ háṯ ā́h-onθi -ii̯āṯ és-enθu áh-unθroi̯ ā́h-unθro áh-unθro -ónθroi̯ -īi̯unθro -unθo -unθoṯ
inf hšnutiš, hšnéu̯tuš, ptcpl hšnéu̯å, hšnnonθō; hšnéu̯āṯ; hšnunθī, hšnnonθi̯ās inf hšnuθi̯ō, hšnuθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl hšnūmnō, hšnūmnōi̯o; hšnūmnõ; hšnūmnā, hšnūmnās

Perfect

Perfect stems

The features of the perfect stem in the proto-language were reduplication and the o-vocalism in the perfect indicative. This is true of Northian as well. In the Epic language, the o-vocalism has spread into the subjunctive, but in Galic the subjunctive has the inherited e-vocalism.

# Class 1 sg. / 2 pl. Function Examples
1 root CóC-a / CØC-é This type is known from only one verb, namely u̯oi̯d- "to know". The weak stem is u̯id-. Accent is on the root syllable for strong forms, and endings for weak forms. u̯oi̯d- / u̯id- "to know"
2 reduplicated Ce-CóC-a / Ce-CØC-é Creates stative stems from perfective and imperfective roots. An extra syllable is prefixed, consisting of the consonant immediately preceding the next vowel and the vowel *e. Due to phonetic change, this vowel can appear as o following a labialized consonant or become more obscure if a lost consonant such as a laryngeal is reduplicated, cf. ā̊ha "I am desiccated" < PEE *h₂e-h₂oh₂s-h₂e. The strong forms have characteristic accented o-grade in the root syllable and zero-grade there in the weak forms with accented endings. ve-voi̯d- / ve-vid- "to believe"
ko-kor- / ko-kr- "to be working"
ā̊s- / ā̊s- "to be desiccated"
3 long-vowel Ce-CṓC-a / Ce-CóC-i This type may have developed in Northian on the pattern of the sigmatic aorist as it has no like cognates in other branches of the language. It contrasts a long vowel in the strong forms and a short vowel in the weak, and the vowel is often, but not always, the o that is characteristic of the perfect.

Reduplicated

titóna, titné "to be growing, to increase". Perfect stems in Northian are regularly formed by reduplication of the first consonant with the vowel *e, attached to the root in o-grade in the active singular and in zero grade in the active dual and plural and the entire middle. The endings are a special set of perfect endings.

Aside from the perfect indicative or "perfect tense" in paedagogical works, various other forms are made from the perfect stem. With the exception of the perfect imperative, which is attested about as much as the indicative, other formations are considerably rarer for the reason that they may be Northian innovations rather than inherited features of the prehistoric parent language. The pluperfect (or descriptively the perfect preterite) and perfect injunctive are formed from the indicative stem, with the same ablaut behaviour, with secondary endings. The subjunctive is formed from the reduplicated stem with root in invariant e-grade, and the optative from the same stem with root in invariant zero grade.

Not all perfect stems are capable of displaying all these formations. Especially, perfect verbs with stative meaning usually do not form pluperfects or any middle forms, but they do form subjunctives and optatives. When a pluperfect meaning is required, they have a periphrastic formation of the perfect active participle with the imperfect forms of the verb es "to be". Yet it is difficult to formulate absolute rules about this matter, since the Galic corpus is of limited size, and there may have existed unattested formations in the language of its composition.

active middle
ind plpf / inj subj opt imp ind plpf / inj subj opt imp
1 sg titón-a e-titón-ąm titén-ō titn-iiā̊ p-ā́m ep-ā́m p-ā́m p-ą̄m
2 sg -θa e-titṓṇ-ġ titéin-i -iiā̊ titā-δī́ -išθoi̯ -išθo -ásθoi̯ -īšθo
3 sg -i e-titóṇ-ṯ titén-ai -iiāṯ -tū́ -itoi̯ -ito -átoi̯ -īto -ito
1 du titn-uuo e-titn-uuo -auuiñi -ūvo -ivózθa -ivóθa -ou̯ozθa -īvóθa
2 du titā-tā e-titā-tõm -itāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātaθa -ātaθai -ii̯itaθa -ātaθa
3 du -tṓ -tā̊ -itiš -ītā̊ -tḗ -ātāi̯i -ā -ātāi̯i -ii̯itā -ā
1 pl tita-mé e-tita-mo -omiñi -īmo -amózθa -ameθa -omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl titn-é e-titā-θé -iti -īté tétā-ti -išθvé -išθvé -ásθve -īšθve -iθve
3 pl -ṓ e-titn-áṇṯ -iiāṯ titn-atū -ánθroi̯ -ónθro -ónθroi̯ -ii̯unθro -ii̯unθo
inf titnuuéni, pf act ptcpl titnuuā̊, titnuštṓ; titnuuṓḫ; titnuuohī, titnuźiiā̊ inf hšnuθi̯ō, pf mid ptcpl titaminō (I/II)

Root

woida, widé "to know" is the only member of the perfect conjugation that, as a condition with good history, does not have reduplication. There are other perfect stems which do not have reduplication in Northian but do in other branch of the language; these are usually regarded as Northian innovations on the pattern of woida. It has the peculiarity of forming a full-grade root in the 3 pl, which also puts the ending in zero grade -ūš. It is as yet not known whether this feature is inherited, as it has been argued to be introduced from the root aorist injunctive, which in this form also shows full grade in the root.

active middle
ind plpf / inj subj opt imp ind plpf / inj subj opt imp
1 sg woid-a auuoid-am teten-ō tetn-i̯ą̄m p-ā́m ep-ā́m p-ą̄m p-īma
2 sg wōiš-ta auuōi-š -esi -i̯āu̯ tetun-θī́ -išθoi̯ -išθo -ásθoi̯ -īšθo p-išvō
3 sg woid-i auuōi-št -eti -i̯āṯ -tū́ -itoi̯ -ito -átoi̯ -īto -ito
1 du wīž-uuó auuiž-uua -ou̯iñi -īvo -ivózθa -ivóθa -ou̯ozθa -īvóθa
2 du wīš-tā auuiš-tõm -etāḫ -ītõm -tāḫ -ātiθai̯i -ātaθa -ātaθai -ii̯itaθa -ātaθa
3 du -tṓ -tā̊ -itą̄m -ītąm -tés -ātāi̯i -ā -ātāi̯i -ii̯itā -ā
1 pl wīž-mé auuiž-mó -omiñi -īmō -amózθa -ameθa -omozθa -īmeθa
2 pl vid-é auuiš-té -áti -īté -ti -išθvé -išθvé -ásθve -īšθve -iθve
3 pl woid-ūš auuiž-iiáṯ -ónθi -ii̯āṯ tétn-unθu -ánθroi̯ -ónθro -ónθroi̯ -ii̯unθro -ii̯unθo
pf act inf wižuuéni, pf act ptcpl wáiduš, widuštōḫ; wáidū; wáiduštī, widuśiiā̊ pf mid inf hšnuθi̯ō, pf mid ptcpl menanōḫ (I/II)

The other perfect verbs that fail to show reduplication are:

  • u̯ṓi̯a, vii̯á "to fear"
  • mṓna, mné "to recall"

It has been noted that most verbs which fail to reduplicate are verbs of internal states or emotions.

Thematic conjugation

Present

βaiδō "I trust". Cognate to Shalumite "to bide". Points of interest are:

  1. In the Galic material, the effects of the stem-final laryngeal are reflected quite regularly, such that the 2 and 3 sg., 2 and 3 du., and 2 pl. endings, which commence with the colouring-susceptible vowel *e, may be coloured to *a and *o, and the latter in unaccented positions becomes a. This is seen in the comparatively common verb apúpitō "fly away", whose 2 du. form is apúpitatāḫ and not *apúpititāḫ. In later materials, the laryngeal-less endings (which would be identical to those for stems ending in *h₁-) became standard.
  2. In the active subjunctive, the subjunctive modal suffix prehistorically merges with the thematic endings and result in long vowels; in unaccented positions these evolved differently than short vowels, to wit *ē > ā, while *ō remains unchanged.
  3. In the active optative, the diphthong scans short in the 1 du. and 3 pl., the cause of which is still uncertain.
  4. Due to phonetic change, the middle forms of the 2 and 3 sg. are not distinct, as both 2 sg. *eth₂ei and 3 sg. *etoi > -itai.
  5. In the middle subjunctive, the 2 and 3 du. endings lack the final -i of the primary endings and are thus identical to secondary endings; this phenomenon is widespread enough to be ruled out as a scribal error and is usually thought to reflect original variation in the conjugation system as the subjunctive is already specified by a modal morpheme and cannot be mistaken by a different set of endings. The optative, however, is always found with secondary endings.
act mid
ind impf / inj subj opt imp ind impf / inj subj opt imp
1 sg βaiδ-ō e-baiδ-õm βaiδ-ō βaiδ-ā̊ βaiδ-aā̊i e-baiδ-aā̊ βaiδ-ōai βaiδ-aiia
2 sg -iyi -iš   -āyi -aīš βaiδi -itai -ita -ātai -aita
3 sg -ai -i -āi -aīṯ βaiδitū -itai -ita -ātai -aita
1 du -auuiñi -auua -ə̄uuiñi -aiuua -auuazδa -auuida -ə̄uuazδa -aiuuida
2 du -itāḫ -itõm -ātāḫ -aītõm βaiδitāḫ -itāδāi -itāδā -ātāδā -aitāδā
3 du -itiš -itā̊   -ātiš -aītā̊ βaiδitiš -itāyi -i -ā -aitā
1 pl -amiñi -ama -ōmiñi -aīma -amazδa -amida -ōmazδa -aimida
2 pl -iti -iti -āti -aīti βaiδiti -idūvi -idūvi -ādūvi -aidūvi
3 pl -anṯ -ōnδi -aiiāṯ βaiδanδū -aṇtrai -aṇtra -ōṇtrai -aiiāθra
fut imp βaiδitaṯ, βaiδanδaṯ act inf βaiδitiš, βaiδituš, act ptcpl βaiδā̊s, βaiδanδōḫ; βaiδaṯ; βaiδanδī, βaiδanδiiā̊, mid inf βaiδōi, mid ptcpl βaiδominōḫ (I/II)

Aorist

Indicative Injunctive Subjunctive Optative Imperative Future imp.
1 sg. ekorum korum korō kāri̯ām
2 sg. ekōr kōr korei kāri̯ās kor kortoṯ
3 sg. ekord kord korei̯ kāri̯āt kārto kārtoṯ
1 du. ekurōs kārōs korou̯ō korīu̯ō
2 du. ekurtõ kārtõ koretas korītõ kārtas kārtoṯ
3 du. ekurtąm kārtą̄m koretíš krītąm kārtíš kārtoṯ
1 pl. ekurmō kārmō koromõ korīmō
2 pl. ekurte kārte korete korīte kārte kārtoṯ
3 pl. ekurenṯ kārenṯ koronθi koriānṯ kārenθo kārunθoṯ
inf kāršiš, kāršuš, ptcpl korå, kronθō; korāṯ, kronθō; korunθī, krāŋθi̯ās
Indicative Imperfect Injunctive Subjunctive Optative Imperative Future imp.
1 sg. ekurma kārma korōm krīma
2 sg. ekursθo kārsθo koresθoi̯ krīšθo kārhvō kārtoṯ
3 sg. ekurto kārto koretoi̯ krīto kārto kārtoṯ
1 du. ekurreθa kārreθa korou̯osθa krīu̯eθa
2 du. ekurātaθa kārātaθa korātaθai krītaθa kārātaθa kārtoṯ
3 du. ekurātā kārātā korātāi̯i krītā kārātā kārtoṯ
1 pl. ekurmeθa kārmeθa koromosθa krīmeθa
2 pl. ekuršθve kāršθve koresθve krīšθve kārθve kārtoṯ
3 pl. ekurenθro kārenθro koronθroi̯ krīnθro kārunθo kārunθoṯ
inf kārθi̯ō, kārθi̯ōi̯o, mid ptcpl kārūmnō, kārūmnōi̯o; kārūmnõ, kārūmnōi̯o; kārūmnā, kārūmnās

Perfect

Indicative Pluperfect Injunctive Subjunctive Optative Imperative Future imp.
1 sg. kokora ekokorum kokorum kokorō kokuri̯ām
2 sg. kokošta ekokōr kokōr kokorehi kokuri̯ās kokurθi kokuštoṯ
3 sg. kokoré ekokošṯ kokošṯ kokoreti kokuri̯āt kokušto kokuštoṯ
1 du. kokurrō ekokurre kokurre kokorou̯ō kokrīu̯ō
2 du. kokuré ekokuštõ kokuštõ kokoretas kokrītõ kokuštas kokuštoṯ
3 du. kokrē ekokuštą̄m kokuštą̄m kokoretiš kokrītąm kokuštes kokuštoṯ
1 pl. kokurmé ekokušme kokušme kokoromō kokrīmō
2 pl. kokré ekokušte kokušte kokorete kokrīte kokušte kokuštoṯ
3 pl. kokrār ekokurent kokurent kokoronθi kokrīenṯ kokorunθo kokorunθoṯ
inf kokuršiš, kokoršuš, ptcpl kokrå, kokrušiš; kokrōṯ, kokrušiš; kokrušī, kokruši̯ās
Indicative Pluperfect Injunctive Subjunctive Optative Imperative Future imp.
1 sg. kokurma ekokurma kokurma kokorō kokrīma
2 sg. kokursθo ekokursθo kokursθo kokoresθoi̯ kokrīšθo kokurhvō kokuštoṯ
3 sg. kokušto ekokušto kokušto kokoretoi̯ kokrīto kokušto kokuštoṯ
1 du. kokurreθa ekokurreθa kokurreθa kokorou̯osθa kokrīu̯eθa
2 du. kokurātaθa ekokurātaθa kokurātaθa kokorātaθai kokrītaθa kokrātaθa kokuštoṯ
3 du. kokurātā ekokurātā kokurātā kokorātāi̯i kokrītā kokrātā kokuštoṯ
1 pl. kokurmeθa ekokurmeθa kokurmeθa kokoromosθa kokrīmeθa
2 pl. kokuršθve ekokuršθve kokuršθve kokoresθve kokrīšθve kokurθve kokuštoṯ
3 pl. kokrenθro ekokrenθro kokrenθro kokoronθroi̯ kokrīnθro kokrunθo kokrunθoṯ
inf kokurθi̯ō, kokurθi̯ōi̯o, ptcpl kokrūmnō, kokrūmnōi̯o; kokrūmnõ, kokrūmnōi̯o; kokrūmnā, kokrūmnās

Notes


See also