Cuthish–Mascyllary enmity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WIP}} | |||
{{Region icon Aurorum}} | |||
[[File:Lindenau Accords caricature.png|190px|thumb|right|Johann Tenzel: ''[[Mascane]] am Marterpfahl'', ''Fackel'' magazine of 7 August 1906]] | [[File:Lindenau Accords caricature.png|190px|thumb|right|Johann Tenzel: ''[[Mascane]] am Marterpfahl'', ''Fackel'' magazine of 7 August 1906]] | ||
'''Cuthish–Mascyllary enmity''' (alternatively '''Cutho–Mascyllary hateship''') ({{wp|Anglish|Cuthish}}: ''X'', {{wp|German language|Hesurian}} ''Kusisch–maskillische Feindschaft''), famously known as '''''Erbfeindschaft''''' (<small>pronounced:</small> {{wp|Help:IPA/Standard German|[ˈɛɐ̯pfaɪ̯ntʃaft]}}), was a concept and idea of unavoidable hostile and waring relations between the [[Mascyllary Kingdom|Mascyllary]] and [[Cuthland|Cuthish]] people, arising in the early 18th century with the [[Partitions of Cuthland|partitions of Cuthland]] and a row of subsequent conflicts. Driven by mutual {{wp|revanchism}} and {{wp|ultra-nationalism}}, Mascylla would go on to openly confront Cuthland politically and economically, making it an important factor in the [[Alhstead Wars]] (1832–1841), the [[Great War (Aurorum)|Great War]] (1911–1916), the [[Great Game (Aurorum)|Great Game]] (1943–1992), and X. After the collapse of the [[X|communist bloc]] in the 1990s, relations eased somewhat but were severely strained with the expansion of the [[Telmerian Union]] and the [[Ochoccola War]]. | |||
Presented by author [[Markus Aschfahl]] in 1857, it describes how the geography of both nations reinforce a plausible motion of regional {{wp|hegemony}}, and thus are forced to compete and rival over said influence. Despite his detailed work, reasons for the rivalry are not uniform and have been variously interpreted and formulated. Factors such as cultural, linguistic, and political differences have been raised as possible causes, though others see its origin in the semi-personal relationships of the respective leaders of the monarchies. | |||
==Historical context of the ''Erbfeindschaft'' thesis== | ==Historical context of the ''Erbfeindschaft'' thesis== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
''Further reading: [[Cuthland-Waldrich–Mascylla relations]]'' | ''Further reading: [[Cuthland-Waldrich–Mascylla relations]]'' | ||
[[Category:Mascylla]] [[Category:Cuthland | [[Category:Mascylla]][[Category:Cuthland]][[Category:History of Aurorum]][[Category:Politics of Mascylla]][[Category:Politics of Aurorum]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 16 January 2023
 | This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
Cuthish–Mascyllary enmity (alternatively Cutho–Mascyllary hateship) (Cuthish: X, Hesurian Kusisch–maskillische Feindschaft), famously known as Erbfeindschaft (pronounced: [ˈɛɐ̯pfaɪ̯ntʃaft]), was a concept and idea of unavoidable hostile and waring relations between the Mascyllary and Cuthish people, arising in the early 18th century with the partitions of Cuthland and a row of subsequent conflicts. Driven by mutual revanchism and ultra-nationalism, Mascylla would go on to openly confront Cuthland politically and economically, making it an important factor in the Alhstead Wars (1832–1841), the Great War (1911–1916), the Great Game (1943–1992), and X. After the collapse of the communist bloc in the 1990s, relations eased somewhat but were severely strained with the expansion of the Telmerian Union and the Ochoccola War.
Presented by author Markus Aschfahl in 1857, it describes how the geography of both nations reinforce a plausible motion of regional hegemony, and thus are forced to compete and rival over said influence. Despite his detailed work, reasons for the rivalry are not uniform and have been variously interpreted and formulated. Factors such as cultural, linguistic, and political differences have been raised as possible causes, though others see its origin in the semi-personal relationships of the respective leaders of the monarchies.
Historical context of the Erbfeindschaft thesis
Antiquity and the Middle Ages
Early period
Political consequences
Further reading: Partitions of Cuthland
Since 1793
19th century conflicts
Further reading: Cutho-Mascyllary War
Continental War
Main article: Great War
Revolutions and interwar period
Main articles: Cuthish Revolution, Mascyllary Revolution
Great Game
Further reading: Melasian Crisis, Dytika test
Reconciliation attempt by ?
Main article: Ernst Lehmann
End of the Erbfeindschaft: after 1989
Further reading: Cuthland-Waldrich–Mascylla relations