Pure Sotirianity: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 70: Line 70:
| publications        =  
| publications        =  
| website            =  
| website            =  
| slogan              = {{wp|Swedish|Blostlandic}} Tro, nation och ras! • Faith, Nation, and Race!
| slogan              = {{wp|Swedish|Blostlandic:}} Tro, nation och ras! • Faith, Nation, and Race!
| logo                =
| logo                =
| footnotes          =  
| footnotes          =  
}}
}}
'''Pure Sotirianity''' or (''{{wp|Swedish|Blostlandic}}'' '''Ren sotiriandomen''') was the religious doctrine of the [['''Blostlandic Sotirian Church''']] (''{{wp|Swedish|Blostlandic}}'' '''Blostländska sotiriandomen kyrkan''') during the reign of Karl Åberg and [[Greater Blostland]], created in 1927 by one Velam Ekbom the then Bishop of the Church of Blostland and subsequently the Blostlandic Sotirian Church after it was renamed in the same year. The doctrine essentially justifies the racist and pagan fetishizing qualities of Järnist functionalism with the official doctrine of the Sotirian Bible. This sparked much controversy in the religious community with multiple schisms and plots being caused by it, this along side the near religious worship of Åberg would spell the end for the doctrine by 1936 with the end of the Åberg regime.  
'''Pure Sotirianity''' or (''{{wp|Swedish|Blostlandic:}}'' '''Ren sotiriandomen''') was the religious doctrine of the [["Blostlandic Sotirian Church"]] (''{{wp|Swedish|Blostlandic:}}'' '''Blostländska sotiriandomen kyrkan''') during the reign of [[Karl Åberg]] and [[Greater Blostland]], created in 1927 by Velam Ekbom after his quick rise to the rank of Bishop of the Church of Blostland. The doctrine essentially justifies the racist and pagan qualities of Järnist functionalism with the official doctrine of the Blostlandic Church and Bible. This sparked much controversy in the religious communities in Blosland causing multiple schisms and protests against the Church, this along side the near religious worship of Åberg would spell the end of the doctrine by 1936 following the end of the Åberg regime.  


Pure Sotirianity today is recognized as a vain attempt by Åberg to reconcile his odd political beliefs with Sotirianity. In greater society it has only been used by media to illustrate the contradictory nature of [[Functionalism]] and by the far right to show to their loyalty to Åberg and his ideals.
Pure Sotirianity today is recognized as a vain attempt by Åberg to reconcile his right wing political beliefs with Sotirianity. In the modern day it has been used by writers and critics to illustrate the contradictory nature of [[User:TJY1998/National Functionalism|Functionalism]], while the far right uses it to show to their loyalty to Åberg and his ideals.


==Name==
==Name==

Latest revision as of 20:07, 25 April 2023

Pure Sotirianity
Ren Sotiriandomen
Pure Sotirianity Symbol.png
ClassificationSotirian new religious movement
RegionBlostland
LanguageBlostlandic
Origin1927
Greater Blostland
Defunct1936
Members3 million (peak, 1930)
Other name(s)The Blostlandic Sotirian Church
SloganBlostlandic: Tro, nation och ras! • Faith, Nation, and Race!

Pure Sotirianity or (Blostlandic: Ren sotiriandomen) was the religious doctrine of the "Blostlandic Sotirian Church" (Blostlandic: Blostländska sotiriandomen kyrkan) during the reign of Karl Åberg and Greater Blostland, created in 1927 by Velam Ekbom after his quick rise to the rank of Bishop of the Church of Blostland. The doctrine essentially justifies the racist and pagan qualities of Järnist functionalism with the official doctrine of the Blostlandic Church and Bible. This sparked much controversy in the religious communities in Blosland causing multiple schisms and protests against the Church, this along side the near religious worship of Åberg would spell the end of the doctrine by 1936 following the end of the Åberg regime.

Pure Sotirianity today is recognized as a vain attempt by Åberg to reconcile his right wing political beliefs with Sotirianity. In the modern day it has been used by writers and critics to illustrate the contradictory nature of Functionalism, while the far right uses it to show to their loyalty to Åberg and his ideals.

Name

WIP.

Overview

Beginning of Functionalist influences on Sotirianity

Internal struggles

Doctrine

Dissolution