Themiclesian addressing system: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The '''Themiclesian addressing system''' refers to the method in which houses are numbered and described with reference to their locations. ==Pre-modern== There was no unifo...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:


==Pre-modern==
==Pre-modern==
There was no uniform system of labelling and describing houses in Themiclesia prior to the first half of the 19th century. While there is a household registry and a land survey maintained by loc
There was no uniform system of labelling and describing houses in Themiclesia prior to the first half of the 19th century. While there is a household registry and a land survey maintained by local magistrates, the exact locations of households were not recorded, and land surveys generally described properties (家, ''kra'') with reference to other properties, natural features, and so forth. In rural areas this system seems to have persisted without major change for many centuries since the Meng Restoration and remained a land registration system, but in urban areas survey properties evovled from reflecting current properties into fossilized, permanent divisions on land, irrespective of the actual land title. It is thought that dynasties may have retained the underlying land right, while permanent leasing rights above it changed hands more readily. The underlying right thus became a convenient way to refer to the area.

Revision as of 11:52, 7 October 2023

The Themiclesian addressing system refers to the method in which houses are numbered and described with reference to their locations.

Pre-modern

There was no uniform system of labelling and describing houses in Themiclesia prior to the first half of the 19th century. While there is a household registry and a land survey maintained by local magistrates, the exact locations of households were not recorded, and land surveys generally described properties (家, kra) with reference to other properties, natural features, and so forth. In rural areas this system seems to have persisted without major change for many centuries since the Meng Restoration and remained a land registration system, but in urban areas survey properties evovled from reflecting current properties into fossilized, permanent divisions on land, irrespective of the actual land title. It is thought that dynasties may have retained the underlying land right, while permanent leasing rights above it changed hands more readily. The underlying right thus became a convenient way to refer to the area.