User talk:NB: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It's standard practice to put 'WIP' - I heard the policy right from Santh's mouth (so to speak). And as I was categorizing ideologies to be as inclusive as possible across NS regions. I'm a bit take aback by your offense at either. | It's standard practice to put 'WIP' - I heard the policy right from Santh's mouth (so to speak). And as I was categorizing ideologies to be as inclusive as possible across NS regions. I'm a bit take aback by your offense at either. | ||
[[User:NB|NB]] ([[User talk:NB|talk]]) 11:13, 21 May 2020 (EST) | [[User:NB|NB]] ([[User talk:NB|talk]]) 11:13, 21 May 2020 (EST) | ||
Okay, just so you know where I'm coming from: the page is long enough that I would think it's obviously finished, and that's why I found somebody else coming in and putting a WIP tag on it insulting. That size should disqualify it from being a WIP already. Also, Concordianism isn't an ideology, it's a religious tradition. So that was incorrect as well. [[User:Gylias|Gylias]] ([[User talk:Gylias|talk]]) 07:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 22 May 2020
Hey. Don't edit my Concordianism page like that. It's not a WIP, and it's already categorised. Slapping a WIP tag on it is frankly insulting. Gylias (talk) 07:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
It's standard practice to put 'WIP' - I heard the policy right from Santh's mouth (so to speak). And as I was categorizing ideologies to be as inclusive as possible across NS regions. I'm a bit take aback by your offense at either. NB (talk) 11:13, 21 May 2020 (EST)
Okay, just so you know where I'm coming from: the page is long enough that I would think it's obviously finished, and that's why I found somebody else coming in and putting a WIP tag on it insulting. That size should disqualify it from being a WIP already. Also, Concordianism isn't an ideology, it's a religious tradition. So that was incorrect as well. Gylias (talk) 07:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)