2022 Hverlandic HverVision referendum: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Hverlandic HverVision Referendum''' took place on November 5, 2022. It was one of the most divisive and controversial referendums in the nation's history, due to its potential impact on society, particularly low-income and disadvantaged individuals. The outcome of this referendum led to the nationwide adoption of [[HverVision]], a comprehensive augmented reality system.
The '''Hverlandic HverVision Referendum''' was a nationwide public vote held in [[Hverland]] on 5 June 2022, to approve or reject the implementation of the [[HverVision]] plan. The ambitious project, proposed by the {{HV-VP}}, the {{HV-CP}}, and the {{HV-CN}}, aimed to transition Hverland to a 100% digital society. This comprehensive plan included the digitization of all existing paper records, creation of a new digital public services portal to eliminate the need for any paperwork/mail, provision of a digital mailbox for all citizens, and a broader transition to digital technology wherever feasible.


== Proposal and debate ==
== Proposal and debate ==
The proposal for the adoption of HverVision, an advanced technology that would record, rate, and share daily activities of citizens, led to intense debate. Advocates argued that the technology would ensure greater societal accountability, reduce crime rates, and promote positive social behavior. Critics, however, raised concerns about potential invasions of privacy and the unequal effects on disadvantaged communities.
The HverVision plan was unveiled by the government in early 2022 as a transformative initiative to make Hverland a leading digital society globally. The Visionary Party, in coalition with the Centre Party and the Conservative Nationals, had gained parliamentary approval for the initiative. However, due to the plan's extensive scope and its implications for the society, a public referendum was called to ensure broad consensus and approval.


Especially contentious was the provision that functionally required all eligible citizens to receive the ocular implants. Without them, individuals would not be able to access social services or receive government assistance. This sparked concerns about forced adoption and the possible marginalization of those who might resist the implant due to personal beliefs, health concerns, or other reasons.
The campaign period witnessed vigorous debates on the merits and potential drawbacks of the HverVision plan. Proponents touted the benefits of increased efficiency, accessibility, and environmental sustainability. They also emphasized the potential for advanced analytics and AI-powered services in enhancing public service delivery. Meanwhile, opponents raised concerns about data privacy and security, the transition cost, and the potential marginalization of individuals lacking digital skills or access.


== Referendum ==
== Referendum ==
Of the 710,000 eligible voters in Hverland, a record-breaking 89% turned out for the referendum, reflecting the high-stakes nature of the decision. The final vote was split, with 52% in favor and 48% against the adoption of HverVision, reflecting the deeply divided opinions of Hverlandic citizens.
Of the 100,539 eligible voters in Hverland, 82% turned out for the referendum. The final results showed that 83% of voters were in favor of implementing the HverVision plan.


=== Language ===
=== Language ===
The ballot presented to voters during the 2022 HverVision Referendum asked the following question:
The ballot presented to voters during the 2022 HverVision Referendum asked the following question:


"Should Hverland adopt the HverVision system, necessitating the implantation of HverVision ocular implants for all eligible citizens and mandating its use for access to all government assistance and social services?"
"Do you approve the implementation of the HverVision plan for a fully digital Hverland?"


=== Party positions ===
=== Party positions ===
Line 18: Line 18:
|-
|-
! Position
! Position
! Political parties
! colspan="2" |Political parties
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" |Yes
| rowspan="7" |Yes
| [[New Progress Party (Hverland)|New Progress]]
| style="background:{{HV-CP/meta/color}}"|
| {{HV-CP}}
|-
|-
| [[Visionary Party (Hverland)|Visionary]]
| style="background:{{HV-VP/meta/color}}"|
| {{HV-VP}}
|-
|-
| rowspan="2"|Neutral
| style="background:{{HV-LI/meta/color}}"|
| [[Conservative Party (Hverland)|Conservative]]
| {{HV-LI}}
|-
|-
| [[Heritage Party (Hverland)|Heritage]]
| style="background:{{HV-GR/meta/color}}"|
| {{HV-GR}}
|-
|-
| rowspan="4" |No
| style="background:{{HV-AL/meta/color}}"|
|[[Freedom Party (Hverland)|Freedom]]
| {{HV-AL}}
|-
|-
|[[Green Party (Hverland)|Green]]
| style="background:{{HV-UP/meta/color}}"|
| {{HV-UP}}
|-
|-
|[[Hverfolk Association]]
| style="background:{{HV-MD/meta/color}}"|
| {{HV-MD}}
|-
|-
|[[People's Party (Hverland)|People's]]
| rowspan="2" |Neutral
|}
| style="background:{{HV-SL/meta/color}}"|
 
| {{HV-SL}}
=== Results ===
{{Referendum
| yes            = 375,900
| yespct        = 52.23
| no            = 343,424
| nopct          = 47.77
| valid          =
| validpct      =
| invalid        =
| invalidpct    =
| total          =
| turnoutpct    =
| electorate    =
| source        = Hverlandic Electoral Authority
}}
 
==== Results by state ====
These figures reflect the varying levels of support for the HverVision proposal across Hverland's diverse constituencies. The results clearly show the Capital City's enthusiastic endorsement of HverVision, contrasted with the resistance from the more rural inland regions.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! rowspan=2 colspan=2 | Constituancy
! rowspan=2 | Average <br />est. SIS
! rowspan=2 | Electorate
! rowspan=2 | Voter turnout
! colspan=2 | Yes
! colspan=2 | No
|-
|-
! Votes
| style="background:{{HV-CN/meta/color}}"|
! %
| {{HV-CN}}
! Votes
! %
|-
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | &nbsp;
| rowspan="2" |No
| Akureyri Mining Districts
| style="background:{{HV-NB/meta/color}}"|
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.03
| {{HV-NB}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 57,261
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|50,790|57,261|2}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 20,928
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|20,928|50,790|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''29,862'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''{{Percentage|29,862|50,790|2}}'''
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | &nbsp;
| Borgarfjordur Industrial Valleys
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.47
| style="text-align: right;" | 76,352
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|65,959|76,352|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''34,695'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''{{Percentage|34,695|65,959|2}}'''
| style="text-align: right;" | 31,264
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|31,264|65,959|2}}
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | &nbsp;
| Egilsstadir Uplands
| style="text-align: right;" | 2.94
| style="text-align: right;" | 33,568
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|29,335|33,568|2}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 10,198
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|10,198|33,568|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''19,137'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''{{Percentage|19,137|33,568|2}}'''
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | &nbsp;
| Husavik Educational Enclaves
| style="text-align: right;" | 4.48
| style="text-align: right;" | 73,866
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|66,430|73,866|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''43,024'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''{{Percentage|43,024|66,430|2}}'''
| style="text-align: right;" | 23,406
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|23,406|66,430|2}}
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | &nbsp;
| Isafjordur
| style="text-align: right;" | 4.36
| style="text-align: right;" | 82,798
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|75,444|82,798|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''46,446'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''{{Percentage|46,446|75,444|2}}'''
| style="text-align: right;" | 28,998
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|28,998|75,444|2}}
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | &nbsp;
| Myvatn Inland Region
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.11
| style="text-align: right;" | 42,674
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|36,508|42,674|2}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 10,198
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|12,872|36,508|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''23,636'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''{{Percentage|23,636|36,508|2}}'''
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | &nbsp;
| Seydisfjordur Highland Region
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.63
| style="text-align: right;" | 51,339
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|43,960|51,339|2}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 14,413
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|14,413|43,960|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''29,547'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''{{Percentage|29,547|43,960|2}}'''
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | &nbsp;
| Skagafjordur Farmlands
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.01
| style="text-align: right;" | 61,745
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|55,036|61,745|2}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 25,854
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|25,854|55,036|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''29,182'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''{{Percentage|29,182|55,036|2}}'''
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | &nbsp;
| Snaefellsnes Coastal Villages
| style="text-align: right;" | 4.09
| style="text-align: right;" | 66,257
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|62,241|66,257|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''34,270'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''{{Percentage|34,270|62,241|2}}'''
| style="text-align: right;" | 28,998
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|28,998|62,241|2}}
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | &nbsp;
| Reykjadahlur Metropolis
| style="text-align: right;" | 4.62
| style="text-align: right;" | 142,359
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|128,770|142,359|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''88,404'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''{{Percentage|88,404|128,770|2}}'''
| style="text-align: right;" | 40,366
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|40,366|128,770|2}}
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | &nbsp;
| Vagar Archipelago Communities
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.53
| style="text-align: right;" | 26,487
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|22,102|26,487|2}}
| style="text-align: right;" | 10,816
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|10,816|22,102|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''11,286'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#DEDEBD;" | '''{{Percentage|11,286|22,102|2}}'''
|-
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | &nbsp;
| Vestmannaeyjar Harbor Cities
| style="text-align: right;" | 3.80
| style="text-align: right;" | 71,483
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|63,049|71,483|2}}
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''34,180'''
| style="text-align: right; background:#B6C8D9;" | '''{{Percentage|34,180|63,049|2}}'''
| style="text-align: right;" | 28,869
| style="text-align: right;" | {{Percentage|28,869|63,049|2}}
|-
|-
| style="background:{{HV-AB/meta/color}}"|
| {{HV-AB}}
|}
|}
{{clear}}


== Impact and controversy ==
=== Results ===
{{Main|Privacy law in Hverland}}
{{Referendum
The passage of the HverVision referendum marked a significant shift in Hverlandic society. Implementation began immediately, and despite the narrow margin of victory, the mandate was applied universally. All eligible citizens were required to receive the ocular implant. This led to protests, particularly from groups advocating for the rights of disadvantaged communities.
| title = 2022 HverVision referendum
 
| yes = 68,834
Concerns were raised about the potentially negative impact on low-income individuals, who might suffer disproportionately from lower Social Interaction Scores (SIS). Advocacy groups pointed out that the individuals most in need of social services and government assistance might be those least able to maintain high scores, potentially creating a feedback loop of socioeconomic hardship.
| yespct = 83.49
 
| no = 13,608
== Post-referendum adjustments ==
| nopct = 16.51
In response to the outcry, the government of Hverland and the developers of HverVision began refining the technology and its associated regulations to mitigate potential misuse and socio-economic disparities. New measures were introduced, such as a minimum guaranteed SIS for disadvantaged communities, a prohibition on discriminatory ratings, and government-sponsored programs to educate citizens about responsible use of the system.
| valid =
 
| validpct =  
Despite these adjustments, the 2022 HverVision Referendum remains a contentious point in Hverland's history, marking a moment when the nation chose a radical technological and societal transformation. The long-term implications of this decision continue to be a topic of both national and international discussion.
| invalid =  
 
| invalidpct =  
== International reactions ==
| total = 82,442
The referendum and subsequent implementation of the HverVision system have sparked controversy and criticism internationally. Governments, international organizations, human rights groups, and privacy advocates have all voiced their concerns.
| turnoutpct = 82.00
 
| electorate = 100,539
Countries known for their strong privacy laws, like Germany and Switzerland, have been among the most vocal critics, pointing out that the constant surveillance and rating system intrudes upon individual privacy. They argue that such a system sets a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging the erosion of privacy rights in other nations.
| source = Hverlandic Electoral Authority
 
}}
International human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have expressed serious reservations about the system. They argue that HverVision could be used as a tool for social control, threatening freedom of speech and suppressing dissent. They've also highlighted the potential for the system to perpetuate social inequalities and discrimination.
 
The United Nations has expressed concern over the potentially exclusionary effects of the system, particularly with regard to the rights of "the Unimplanted." The UN Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy has requested an official visit to Hverland to assess the system’s compliance with international human rights standards.
 
Moreover, several nations have issued travel advisories for Hverland, warning their citizens about the potential privacy implications of the HverVision system. Tech companies worldwide have also expressed concerns, particularly regarding the cybersecurity risks associated with such a pervasive system.


Despite these criticisms, Hverland's government maintains that the system is a bold step towards a more transparent and accountable society. They've assured the international community of their commitment to upholding democratic values and human rights, stating that necessary safeguards are in place to prevent misuse of the system.
== Aftermath ==
Following the successful referendum, the government began the extensive process of implementing the HverVision plan. The Office for Technological Modernization was reorganised as the [[Office for Technology and Data Governance (Hverland)|Office for Technology and Data Governance]] which began the digitization of vast archives of paper records, development and launch of the digital public services portal, and the provision of digital mailboxes for every citizen.


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[HverVision]]
* [[HverVision]]
* [[Office for HverVision]]
* [[Office for HverVision]]

Latest revision as of 14:47, 10 May 2024

The Hverlandic HverVision Referendum was a nationwide public vote held in Hverland on 5 June 2022, to approve or reject the implementation of the HverVision plan. The ambitious project, proposed by the Visionary Party, the Centre Party, and the Conservative Nationals, aimed to transition Hverland to a 100% digital society. This comprehensive plan included the digitization of all existing paper records, creation of a new digital public services portal to eliminate the need for any paperwork/mail, provision of a digital mailbox for all citizens, and a broader transition to digital technology wherever feasible.

Proposal and debate

The HverVision plan was unveiled by the government in early 2022 as a transformative initiative to make Hverland a leading digital society globally. The Visionary Party, in coalition with the Centre Party and the Conservative Nationals, had gained parliamentary approval for the initiative. However, due to the plan's extensive scope and its implications for the society, a public referendum was called to ensure broad consensus and approval.

The campaign period witnessed vigorous debates on the merits and potential drawbacks of the HverVision plan. Proponents touted the benefits of increased efficiency, accessibility, and environmental sustainability. They also emphasized the potential for advanced analytics and AI-powered services in enhancing public service delivery. Meanwhile, opponents raised concerns about data privacy and security, the transition cost, and the potential marginalization of individuals lacking digital skills or access.

Referendum

Of the 100,539 eligible voters in Hverland, 82% turned out for the referendum. The final results showed that 83% of voters were in favor of implementing the HverVision plan.

Language

The ballot presented to voters during the 2022 HverVision Referendum asked the following question:

"Do you approve the implementation of the HverVision plan for a fully digital Hverland?"

Party positions

Position Political parties
Yes Centre Party
Visionary Party
Liberals
The Greens
Alternative
Urban Progressives
Moderates
Neutral Social Democratic Party
Conservative Nationals
No Natural Balance
Albmotválgabealde

Results

2022 HverVision referendum
Choice Votes %
Referendum passed Yes 68,834 83.49
No 13,608 16.51
Total votes 82,442 100.00
Registered voters and turnout 100,539 82.00
Source: Hverlandic Electoral Authority

Aftermath

Following the successful referendum, the government began the extensive process of implementing the HverVision plan. The Office for Technological Modernization was reorganised as the Office for Technology and Data Governance which began the digitization of vast archives of paper records, development and launch of the digital public services portal, and the provision of digital mailboxes for every citizen.

See also

Retrieved from "https://iiwiki.us/mediawiki/index.php?title=2022_Hverlandic_HverVision_referendum&oldid=800627"