Federalism in Delkora: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Federalism in Delkora refers to the division of powers between the federal government and the five constituent states outlined in the federal constitution.  
'''Federalism in Delkora''' refers to the division of powers between the federal government and the [[States of Delkora|seven constituent states]] outlined in the Delkoran Constitution. Delkoran states have a high degree of autonomy and possess the authority to legislate on any matter not reserved to the federal government. Delkoran culture has long been characterized by a preference for local governance and a distrust of centralized government.


==History==  
==History==  
Delkoran federalism arose from the Kingdom's origins as an alliance of formerly independent states. By the 300's CE, these fiefdoms had coalesced into the High Lordships of Cybria, Bandorel, Faurelia, Norvia, and Vassengaard, and were frequently at war with one another. In 324 CE, the high lords of the five states signed the Vydenhelm Covenant, agreeing to form an alliance to fend off incursions from the [[Makedonian Empire]]. The Covenant formed the basis of a confederal government in which the high lords agreed to share power with an elected military leader known as a ''Kaizich'', whose major decisions had to be unanimously approved by the high lords. In 982, after successfully routing the Makedonians at the Battle of Norenstal, the Kaizich Illyar declared himself King of the Delkorans, a title which was mostly ceremonial, as his power continued to be contingent upon the support of the high lords.  
The early Delkoran states were governed by jarls who ruled as essentially absolute monarchs in their respective regions. Although a national monarch was installed with the coronation of Asmund I, de facto power continued to reside with the jarls, who continued to possess large personal armies they would utilize to force the monarch to enact favorable policies and oust recalcitrant monarchs.


This arrangement greatly hampered the development of a unified state, as subsequent kings were subordinated to the high lords, who retained powerful personal armies that they frequently used to assert control over the king and wage war with one another. King Haldor III sought to address this growing crisis in 1385 by negotiating the Peace of Aberald, which established a federal system of government in which issues of national importance were governed by the King, while the high lords would each continue to be sovereign in their respective states. Violation of the Peace by King Vallgaar III, who attempted to interfere in the domestic matters of the states by ordering them to disband their peasant councils, was a major factor leading to the outbreak of the [[Delkoran Civil War]].
This arrangement greatly hampered the development of a unified state, as subsequent kings were subordinated to the jarls, who retained powerful personal armies that they frequently used to assert control over the king and wage war with one another. King Haldor III sought to address this growing crisis in 1385 by negotiating the Peace of Aberald, which established a federal system of government in which issues of national importance were governed by the national monarch, while the jarls would each continue to be sovereign in their respective states. Violation of the Peace by King Vallgaar III, who attempted to interfere in the domestic matters of the states by ordering them to disband their peasant councils, was a major factor leading to the outbreak of the [[Delkoran Civil War]].


During the constitutional convention that followed the war, the Peace of Aberald was used as a framework in the development of a new federal system that sought to balance the power of the national government with that of the states to ensure that neither could completely dominate. The arrangement that finally emerged saw the national monarch reduced to a mostly ceremonial figure who could not act without the advice of the elected government. The high lords remained in power as absolute monarchs, and continued to have authority over domestic matters in their respective states, while the federal government was mostly confined to handling foreign policy and national defense. The newly established Chamber of Nobles, consisting of delegates sent by the high lords, ensured that the states had to be consulted on all federal legislation. This system remained mostly unchanged until the passage of the High Lords Amendment in 1885, which reduced the high lords to constitutional monarchs. The newly empowered state parliaments were quick to do away with the body of customary law that had been enforced by the high lords.
During the constitutional convention that followed the war, the Peace of Aberald was used as a framework in the development of a new federal system that sought to balance the power of the national government with that of the states to ensure that neither could completely dominate. The arrangement that finally emerged saw the national monarch reduced to a mostly ceremonial figure who could not act without the advice of the elected government. The jarls remained in power as absolute monarchs, and continued to have authority over domestic matters in their respective states, while the federal government was mostly confined to handling foreign policy and national defense. The newly established Chamber of Nobles, consisting of delegates sent by the jarls, ensured that the states had to be consulted on all federal legislation. This system remained mostly unchanged until the passage of the Jarls Amendment in 1885, which reduced the jarls to constitutional monarchs.


Since the adoption of the High Lords Amendment, there has been a trend toward collaboration between the federal and state governments rather than antagonism. There have, however, been instances of coercive federalism, notably during the chancellorships of [[Mette Elvensar]] and [[Gandymyr Feldengar]] in the 1960's and 1970's, when the federal government sought to impose its will on recalcitrant states by threatening to withhold federal funding. Nonetheless, the trend in recent years has been toward increasing standardization of major policy areas through consensus-driven policy coordination.                   
Since the adoption of the Jarls Amendment, there has been a trend toward collaboration between the federal and state governments rather than antagonism. There have, however, been instances of coercive federalism, notably the [[Blockade of Banderhus]] in 1935 and during the chancellorships of [[Mette Elvensar]] and [[Geirbjørn Feldengaard]] in the 1960's and 1970's, when the federal government sought to impose its will on recalcitrant states by threatening to withhold federal funding. Nonetheless, the trend in recent years has been toward increasing standardization of major policy areas through consensus-driven policy coordination.                   


==Division of Powers==
==Division of powers==
The four categories of government power outlined in the federal constitution are exclusive federal powers, which can be exercised only by the federal government, exclusive state powers, which can only be exercised by the state governments, concurrent powers shared by both, and residual powers, which are retained by the states and encompass all matters not explicitly mentioned in the constitution. The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over national defense, foreign affairs, interstate and foreign commerce, currency regulation, immigration, the conduct of elections, and the environment. States, meanwhile, have exclusive jurisdiction over cultural matters, education, intrastate commerce, local government, and policing. Concurrent powers include energy, communications, public health, social welfare, transportation, public safety, taxation, and banking. Where federal and state law conflict, federal law prevails.        
The four categories of government power outlined in the federal constitution are exclusive federal powers, exclusive state powers, concurrent powers shared by both, and residual powers, which are retained by the states and encompass all matters not mentioned in the constitution. The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over national defense, foreign affairs, interstate and foreign commerce, currency regulation and banking, and immigration. States, meanwhile, have exclusive jurisdiction over cultural matters, education, intrastate commerce, local government, and the organization of their governments. Concurrent powers include policing and public safety, energy, communications, public health, social welfare, transportation, and taxation. Where federal and state law conflict, federal law prevails.


==Local Government==
==Local government==
Local government in Delkora consists of county and municipal governments. Municipalities are the lowest level of government, consisting of a single city or town, and are responsible for zoning regulations, building codes, public utilities, public transportation, public housing, local infrastructure, managing schools and hospitals, and administering some social welfare programs. They are governed by a municipal council which, in large metropolitan cities, shares power with a separately elected mayor. In most other municipalities, the council governs as a collective body, electing a president from its membership who serves as a ceremonial mayor. Most municipalities of sufficient size maintain a municipal court that handles family law and small claims. Counties consist of groups of municipalities, and are responsible for regional transportation systems, property assessment, licensing and inspections, emergency medical services and firefighting, maintaining libraries and public records, and regional economic development. They are governed by a county council that shares power with a separately elected county commission that serves as the executive branch of county government.  
{{main|Local government in Delkora}}
Local government in Delkora consists of county and municipal governments. Because the Delkoran Constitution assigns control over local government to states, the status of counties and municipalities is determined by each state's constitution. Cybria, Førelskov, and Lebøvenland are {{wp|home rule}} states in which municipalities may pass laws on any subject matter not prohibited by the state constitution. Counties in these states serve primarily as administrative divisions that implement state laws and have little autonomy. Meanwhile, in Banderhus, Vassengård and Norvia, county and municipal governments can only exercise those powers explicitly granted to them by their state constitution. Counties in these states tend to have more influence.  


Because the federal constitution does not address local government, the status of counties and municipalities is determined by each state's constitution. Cybria and Faurelia are home rule states in which municipalities may pass laws on any subject matter not reserved to their state parliament by the state constitution and thus have wide discretion in passing laws. Counties in these states serve primarily as administrative divisions that implement state laws and have little autonomy. Meanwhile, in Bandorel, Vassengaard, and Norvia, states that have not adopted home rule, both county and municipal governments can only exercise those powers explicitly granted to them by their state constitution. Counties in these states tend to be more influential than municipalities.
==Political significance==
 
Since most of Delkora's parties operate on a federal structure, with branches in each [[States of Delkora|state]], it is possible for political differences to arise under the influence of states' different political cultures. Notable examples include:
==Norenstal==
* The [[Liberal Party (Delkora)|Liberals]]' [[Liberal Party (Delkora)#The left–right struggle|left–right struggle]] of the 1930s gained a regional dimension, with northern states being dominated by [[Liberal Party (Delkora)#The left–right struggle|''Venstre'']] and southern states by [[Liberal Party (Delkora)#The left–right struggle|''Højre'']]. The southern branches largely defected to the [[List of political parties in Delkora|Reform Party]] in the [[Liberal Party split of 1940]].
As the seat of the federal government, the capital city of Norenstal holds a unique place in the federal structure in that it does not have the status of a state. Instead, it is designated as a federal city under the Delkoran Constitution, which granted the Federal Parliament the authority to govern it directly. Following passage of the Norenstal Administration Act of 1907, the city was granted a devolved legislature known as the Norenstal Assembly and a separately elected mayor. Since then, the city has been governed independent from the federal government, although Parliament retains the ability to reassert control over the city by repealing the NAA or, in the case of a civil emergency or budget crisis, assume temporary control over the city government under Article 48 of the Act.
* The [[Conservative Party (Delkora)|Conservatives]]' internal battles of the [[New Kingdom]] between [[Vassengård]]'s {{wpl|progressive conservatism}} and [[Banderhus]]' {{wpl|social conservatism}}.
 
* The [[Norvia]] branch of the [[List of political parties in Delkora|Agrarian Party]] breaking ties with the federal party and instead forming the [[List of political parties in Delkora|Farmers' Alliance]].
Despite not being considered a state within the Delkoran constitutional structure, Norenstal nonetheless has many of the privileges of a state. It is, for example, allocated seats in the Chamber of Representatives, has its own constitution and laws, possesses the authority to levy taxes, and receives federal equalization funds. Still, Norenstal lacks privileges in other areas, a notable example being that it is not entitled to seats in the Chamber of Nobles.


[[Category:Delkora]]
[[Category:Delkora]]
[[Category:Politics of Delkora]]
[[Category:Politics of Delkora]]

Latest revision as of 19:38, 12 January 2021

Federalism in Delkora refers to the division of powers between the federal government and the seven constituent states outlined in the Delkoran Constitution. Delkoran states have a high degree of autonomy and possess the authority to legislate on any matter not reserved to the federal government. Delkoran culture has long been characterized by a preference for local governance and a distrust of centralized government.

History

The early Delkoran states were governed by jarls who ruled as essentially absolute monarchs in their respective regions. Although a national monarch was installed with the coronation of Asmund I, de facto power continued to reside with the jarls, who continued to possess large personal armies they would utilize to force the monarch to enact favorable policies and oust recalcitrant monarchs.

This arrangement greatly hampered the development of a unified state, as subsequent kings were subordinated to the jarls, who retained powerful personal armies that they frequently used to assert control over the king and wage war with one another. King Haldor III sought to address this growing crisis in 1385 by negotiating the Peace of Aberald, which established a federal system of government in which issues of national importance were governed by the national monarch, while the jarls would each continue to be sovereign in their respective states. Violation of the Peace by King Vallgaar III, who attempted to interfere in the domestic matters of the states by ordering them to disband their peasant councils, was a major factor leading to the outbreak of the Delkoran Civil War.

During the constitutional convention that followed the war, the Peace of Aberald was used as a framework in the development of a new federal system that sought to balance the power of the national government with that of the states to ensure that neither could completely dominate. The arrangement that finally emerged saw the national monarch reduced to a mostly ceremonial figure who could not act without the advice of the elected government. The jarls remained in power as absolute monarchs, and continued to have authority over domestic matters in their respective states, while the federal government was mostly confined to handling foreign policy and national defense. The newly established Chamber of Nobles, consisting of delegates sent by the jarls, ensured that the states had to be consulted on all federal legislation. This system remained mostly unchanged until the passage of the Jarls Amendment in 1885, which reduced the jarls to constitutional monarchs.

Since the adoption of the Jarls Amendment, there has been a trend toward collaboration between the federal and state governments rather than antagonism. There have, however, been instances of coercive federalism, notably the Blockade of Banderhus in 1935 and during the chancellorships of Mette Elvensar and Geirbjørn Feldengaard in the 1960's and 1970's, when the federal government sought to impose its will on recalcitrant states by threatening to withhold federal funding. Nonetheless, the trend in recent years has been toward increasing standardization of major policy areas through consensus-driven policy coordination.

Division of powers

The four categories of government power outlined in the federal constitution are exclusive federal powers, exclusive state powers, concurrent powers shared by both, and residual powers, which are retained by the states and encompass all matters not mentioned in the constitution. The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over national defense, foreign affairs, interstate and foreign commerce, currency regulation and banking, and immigration. States, meanwhile, have exclusive jurisdiction over cultural matters, education, intrastate commerce, local government, and the organization of their governments. Concurrent powers include policing and public safety, energy, communications, public health, social welfare, transportation, and taxation. Where federal and state law conflict, federal law prevails.

Local government

Main article: Local government in Delkora

Local government in Delkora consists of county and municipal governments. Because the Delkoran Constitution assigns control over local government to states, the status of counties and municipalities is determined by each state's constitution. Cybria, Førelskov, and Lebøvenland are home rule states in which municipalities may pass laws on any subject matter not prohibited by the state constitution. Counties in these states serve primarily as administrative divisions that implement state laws and have little autonomy. Meanwhile, in Banderhus, Vassengård and Norvia, county and municipal governments can only exercise those powers explicitly granted to them by their state constitution. Counties in these states tend to have more influence.

Political significance

Since most of Delkora's parties operate on a federal structure, with branches in each state, it is possible for political differences to arise under the influence of states' different political cultures. Notable examples include:

Retrieved from "https://iiwiki.us/mediawiki/index.php?title=Federalism_in_Delkora&oldid=298196"