Foster & Ajax: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(created a basic page to be expanded upon) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==Organization== | ==Organization== | ||
TBA | |||
==Ratings== | |||
TBA | TBA | ||
===Rating levels=== | ===Rating levels=== | ||
TBA | TBA | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!rowspan=2|Rank !!rowspan=2|Explanation !!colspan=5|Investment recommendation | |||
|- | |||
!GVT !![[wikipedia:Government-organized non-governmental organization|GONGO]] !!FIN !!CO !!PRIV | |||
|- | |||
!AAA | |||
|Safest investment in this remedy, you may not consider cautions beside those of the nature of your investment | |||
|{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!AA | |||
|Safe investment in this remedy, potential risks are minimal and may be effectively ignored | |||
|{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!A | |||
|Safe investment. Despite dangers, on the longer scale, investment returns are almost guaranteed to return | |||
|style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!B | |||
|Relatively safe investment, though possible future change may threaten the stability | |||
|style="text-align: center;"|— ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!C | |||
|Medium danger investment. The benefits are thought to outweigh the negatives, but the situation may change with little notice | |||
|{{No}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!D | |||
|Fluctuating danger. It is hard to predict the danger of development and as such any investment should be taken with caution | |||
|{{No}} ||{{No}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!E | |||
|Fluctuating danger with a serious possibility of the loss of not only the gains, but also the initial investment in a small span of time | |||
|{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||style="text-align: center;"|— | |||
|- | |||
!F | |||
|Dangerous investment. It is discouraged for investors to invest into the remedy of this rank for the threat of an imminent loss | |||
|{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— | |||
|- | |||
!FF | |||
|Very dangerous investment. Any investment to this rank is in serious threat of being lost overnight | |||
|{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} | |||
|- | |||
!FFF | |||
|Extremely dangerous investment. Any investment to this rank should be considered to be effectively lost | |||
|{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} | |||
|- | |||
!colspan=7|Special rankings | |||
|- | |||
!SA | |||
|Only governmental investment can be protected by local authorities | |||
|{{Yes}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{No}} ||{{No}} ||{{No}} | |||
|- | |||
!SI | |||
|Investment's safety may rely on the possibilities of the company to defend it | |||
|{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{No}} ||{{No}} | |||
|- | |||
!BF | |||
|It is safe for only big companies to invest because of competetive enviroment with little oversight | |||
|style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{No}} | |||
|- | |||
!SS | |||
|Local authorities require investors to stand apolitical and may in future impose regulations on foreign trade | |||
|{{No}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{No}} | |||
|- | |||
!GP | |||
|Governmental investment is threatened by protectionist policies, without effect on private companies | |||
|{{No}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|- | |||
!GB | |||
|Governmental investment is blocked and is risky, without effect on private companies | |||
|{{No}} ||{{No}} ||style="text-align: center;"|— ||{{Yes}} ||{{Yes}} | |||
|} | |||
===Overall rating=== | ===Overall rating=== | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 12 July 2022
 | This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
 | |
| Subsidiary | |
| Industry | Financial services |
| Founded | 1903 1971 (present corporation status) |
| Founder | Robert Foster and Viliam Stephen Ajax |
| Headquarters | , |
| Revenue |  US$2.61 billion (2011) |
Number of employees | 10,000+ |
Foster & Ajax Global Ratings (Walnerian: Foster & Ajax Veltvaltunk) is an Walnerian credit rating agency (CRA) that publishes financial research and analysis on stocks, bonds, and commodities. It is the biggest credit rating agency stationed in Walneria and its ratings have had a notable impact on economical activities both in and outside of Walneria. Its rating is usually adopted by the Walnerian Central Bank's 15-members-large collegium, which runs the Tyrámen Stock Exchange.
History
TBA
Organization
TBA
Ratings
TBA
Rating levels
TBA
| Rank | Explanation | Investment recommendation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVT | GONGO | FIN | CO | PRIV | ||
| AAA | Safest investment in this remedy, you may not consider cautions beside those of the nature of your investment | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AA | Safe investment in this remedy, potential risks are minimal and may be effectively ignored | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A | Safe investment. Despite dangers, on the longer scale, investment returns are almost guaranteed to return | — | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| B | Relatively safe investment, though possible future change may threaten the stability | — | — | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| C | Medium danger investment. The benefits are thought to outweigh the negatives, but the situation may change with little notice | No | — | — | Yes | Yes |
| D | Fluctuating danger. It is hard to predict the danger of development and as such any investment should be taken with caution | No | No | — | — | Yes |
| E | Fluctuating danger with a serious possibility of the loss of not only the gains, but also the initial investment in a small span of time | No | No | No | — | — |
| F | Dangerous investment. It is discouraged for investors to invest into the remedy of this rank for the threat of an imminent loss | No | No | No | No | — |
| FF | Very dangerous investment. Any investment to this rank is in serious threat of being lost overnight | No | No | No | No | No |
| FFF | Extremely dangerous investment. Any investment to this rank should be considered to be effectively lost | No | No | No | No | No |
| Special rankings | ||||||
| SA | Only governmental investment can be protected by local authorities | Yes | — | No | No | No |
| SI | Investment's safety may rely on the possibilities of the company to defend it | Yes | Yes | — | No | No |
| BF | It is safe for only big companies to invest because of competetive enviroment with little oversight | — | Yes | Yes | — | No |
| SS | Local authorities require investors to stand apolitical and may in future impose regulations on foreign trade | No | Yes | Yes | — | No |
| GP | Governmental investment is threatened by protectionist policies, without effect on private companies | No | — | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| GB | Governmental investment is blocked and is risky, without effect on private companies | No | No | — | Yes | Yes |
Overall rating
TBA
Oversight
TBA
Controversy over Stedoria
- See also: 2021 Stedorian-Walnerian Economic War
TBA
Currently, there are 44 pages associated to Walneria | |||||||||
| Geography and sociology |
| ||||||||
| Organizations | |||||||||
| History |
| ||||||||
| Companies | |||||||||
| Personalities | |||||||||
Part of Eurth Universe lore | |||||||||
