IIWiki:WikiProject Sunalaya/Assessment
The assessment department of the Sunalaya WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of IIWiki's Sunalaya articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The articles, after review, are to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Sunalaya articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
FAQ
- 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?
- The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles.
- 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
- Working on that!
- 3. Who can assess articles?
- Only Admins or designated Reviewers should officially change the designation of an article You can speed up the process, however, by doing your own review, topped off with the reasoning for a change and submit it to an Admin or Reviewer.
- 4. Can I request that an Admin or Reviewer rate an article?
- Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- 5. Where can I get more comments about an article?
- You can request a peer review of an article on the main page. You should get extra comments, but you may want to save them as that section may be wiped of old reviews on occasion.
- 6. What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can contact an Admin, and state your case, it is best to correlate your case with bullet points that match up with the review system below
- 7. What if I have a question not listed here?
- Feel free to contact an Admin or Reviewer for further questions regarding assessments.
Quality scale
The quality scale is used to asses the quality of an individual article.
Class | Criteria | Checklist | Example |
---|---|---|---|
Gold-Class | Reserved for articles that are considered of high enough quality, size, and detail to be added to the Featured Articles list in the Sunalaya WikiProject main page | Jaguar III | |
Blue-Class | Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and has an above average amount of headers with large amounts of information, a large overview, an infobox (when applicable), images, and use of other templates (when applicable). | • Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has many headers each with large amounts of info |
Lindenholt |
Green-Class | Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and have a standard amount of headers (comparable to Wikipedia articles) with moderate amounts of information, at least a moderate overview, an infobox (when applicable), images, and use of other templates (when applicable). | • Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has a standard amount of headers each with moderate amounts of info |
Empire of the Tao |
Yellow-Class | Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and have at multiple headers with moderate amounts of information, at least a moderate overview, an infobox (when applicable), and images. | • Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has multiple headers each with moderate amounts of info |
UST Navy |
Orange-Class | Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and have at least one header with minor amounts of information, or a considerably large overview aswell a picture or Infobox | • Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has at least one header with writing or a considerable overview |
Osoikaze-class frigate |
Red-Class | Articles which barely meet IIWiki's criteria, and should be considered a work in progress. e.g. a page which is just a stub overview | • Technically meets basic IIWiki standards OR • Complete article with considerable grammar issues • Has no links to other Sunalayan IIWiki pages |
World War II |
Maroon-Class | Articles which do not meet IIWiki's criteria, and should immediately be fixed. e.g. a page which is just an infobox and has no overview | • Does not meet basic IIWiki standards | None |
Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please go to the talk page of the article and inquire.