Engström Revolt

Revision as of 22:59, 20 August 2020 by Bcharkas (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Region icon Kylaris

Engström Revolt
Sneden watercolor of Battle of Malvern Hill.jpg
The army, commanded by Leo von Heidenstam, shell a republican militia contigent in Varsalla Field, November 1866
DateMarch 1866 - February 1867
Location
Result

Government victory

Belligerents
Geatish Republicans  Geatland
Commanders and leaders
Henrik Engström Gunnar III
Leo von Heidenstam
Units involved
Geatish Republican Front:
  • Engström's Militia
  • Varssala Militia
  • Farmer's Front
Royal Geatish Army
Strength
14,500 army soldiers
300 pro-monarchist militiamen
3,230 pro-republican militiamen
Casualties and losses
720 killed 2,800 killed
900 civilian casualties

The Engström Revolt, also known as the Engström Insurrection or the Revolt of 1866, was a tax protest turned pro-republican armed revolt led by Henrik Engström against the Geatish monarchy. The revolt initially began as a farmer's protest against heavy taxes levied on independent farmer's land and produce. The revolt developed on the crest of successful republican revolutions that swept Euclea in the early 19th century, and eventually, the revolt's leaders advocated for the outright abolition of the monarchy. Although the revolt was unsuccessful and quickly suppressed, it was widely influential in the long run, as it resulted in the promulgation of the Constitution of Geatland and the end of monarchical absolutism in Geatland.

By the beginning of the 19th century, many Euclean nations had removed their monarchies or drastically reduced their powers. Geatland, however, remained an absolute monarchy. Although there had been some reforms to democratize the insular and conservative nation, the Geatish monarch retained absolute authority. In 1860, Gunnar III acceded to the throne, and he proceeded to reel back various democratizing reforms. In 1866, Gunnar enacted new taxes against free farmers, or farmers that did not work for landed aristocrats, as well as restricted their ability to purchase land. Among other controversial reforms, Gunnar's directives greatly angered the Geatish public and particularly Geatish farmers. The king's new taxes motivated Henrik Engström, a free farmer from Tyrland, to organize a militia to demand rights for Geatish farmers and loot government reserves.

Although the Engström's revolt was never intended to be anti-monarchist, growing pressure and a refusal on the part of the Geatish crown to recognize Engström's demands resulted in the formation of the Geatish Republican Front, which advocated for republicanism in Geatland. Because the group's motives were seen as radical, it lost popular support among all but the most fanatic. Nevertheless, Engström proved himself to be a shrewd military commander, and he was able to outmaneuver or defeat monarchist forces sent against him. The revolt reached its acme when Engström successfully captured the city of Varsalla in September 1866. However, Engström was unable to maintain stable supply lines or morale among his men. Furthermore, the Geatish Royal Army, recognizing the threat, finally mobilized in earnest, led by Leo von Heidenstam. Von Heidenstam was able to successfully fight a war of attrition against Engström, wearing his forces thin. Engström surrendered to von Heidenstam and the army on 10 February 1867, and we executed soon thereafter. The rebellion was ended.

Although the Engström Revolt was a failure, it highlighted serious political cleavages in Geatland. It demonstrated to the Geatish ruling aristocracy the desire for democratic governance, and it forced Gunnar III to convene the Riksdag of Geatland to draft a constitution that would limit his power. Along with the Great War, the Engström Revolt is considered one of the major factors that engendered constitutional monarchy in Geatland. Many historians contend that the Engström Revolt afforded the monarchy the will to change, and that if it had not happened the monarchy would have likely been abolished in the wake of the Great War.