International sanctions, boycotts, and protests (Ajax): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


==List of countries currently sanctioned, boycotted, and/or protested by other governments==
==List of countries currently sanctioned, boycotted, and/or protested by other governments==
===Deseret===
* [[Deseret|Kingdom of Deseret]]: A number of [[Ajax|world]] powers have officially restricted ties to Deseret, objecting on the grounds that it is an oppressive {{wp|authoritarian}} {{wp|regime}} with poor {{wp|human rights}} that {{wp|freedom of religion|has little to no freedom of religion to minority faiths}} and has specific {{wp|Second-class citizen|national origin restrictions}} on citizenry from [[Ajax|Belisaria]] inside its borders.
===Mutul===
===Mutul===



Revision as of 23:21, 27 November 2019

This is a list of countries in Ajax that for one or more reasons are sanctioned, boycotted, and/or subject to official diplomatic protests by multiple peer nations in the international community.

Types of restrictions

Diplomatic protests

  • Diplomatic protest: The lowest level of political restriction between nations is an official diplomatic condemnation of some behavior, policy, or policies, whereas the foreign affairs offices within the protesting government deliver official diplomatic correspondence listing the grievance or condemnation to the offending party.

Sanctions

Boycotts

List of countries currently sanctioned, boycotted, and/or protested by other governments

Mutul

Type of Restriction ART

ASC

BEL

BJB

CAV

DES

ENG

FAK

Template:Country data Fakolana

GHT

IOT

LAT

LIH

LYN

OTT

SER

SYD

TAR

YIS

Diplomatic protests Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes N/A Yes
Sanctions Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes
Boycott N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes

Notes per country

Deseret

Mutul

  • During the Mutulese Colonial Empire, the Supreme Susurrant ruled on the question of foreign policy relating to human sacrifices. The official declaration stated that voluntary loss of life was an acceptable moral act and contrasted it with the unacceptable moral act of "stealing" life. This ruling was upheld later after the independence movement.

See also