Template:Infobox: Revision history

13 February 2006

• curprev 22:3722:37, 13 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise
• curprev 18:2118:21, 13 February 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that

12 February 2006

• curprev 04:4404:44, 12 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected
• curprev 04:3704:37, 12 February 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk

11 February 2006

• curprev 05:0905:09, 11 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel
• curprev 03:1803:18, 11 February 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −234‎ we had a compromise, see talk
• curprev 03:1703:17, 11 February 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,329 bytes −253‎ we had a compromise, see talk
• curprev 02:1902:19, 11 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +253‎ rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN

10 February 2006

• curprev 13:3313:33, 10 February 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,329 bytes −253‎ this latest change is very confusing

6 February 2006

• curprev 08:0808:08, 6 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore
• curprev 08:0708:07, 6 February 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −134‎ Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed
• curprev 08:0208:02, 6 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ 1,229 bytes +97‎ rvt - sigh
• curprev 07:5907:59, 6 February 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −97‎ including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them

5 February 2006

• curprev 15:5415:54, 5 February 2006‎ old>Marknew‎ 1,229 bytes +97‎ Added link to Template:Infobox Conditionals

4 February 2006

• curprev 08:2608:26, 4 February 2006‎ old>WGFinley‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv - and still no consensus to do it
• curprev 06:3906:39, 4 February 2006‎ old>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification.
• curprev 06:2106:21, 4 February 2006‎ old>WGFinley‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv
• curprev 06:1606:16, 4 February 2006‎ old>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have.

3 February 2006

• curprev 20:0920:09, 3 February 2006‎ old>WGFinley‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage
• curprev 06:3306:33, 3 February 2006‎ old>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups
• curprev 05:3705:37, 3 February 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rvt, this is Infobox 101
• curprev 05:3605:36, 3 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus
• curprev 05:3305:33, 3 February 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ using conditionals should not be taught to new users
• curprev 05:3005:30, 3 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt per talk
• curprev 05:1105:11, 3 February 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ using conditionals sets a bad example for new template creators
• curprev 04:5604:56, 3 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt as per talk
• curprev 04:4804:48, 3 February 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ remove conditional instructions

1 February 2006

• curprev 22:5022:50, 1 February 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt - consensus is on talk
• curprev 22:4622:46, 1 February 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ remove conditionals until concensus on method and whether to even include them at all is reached
• curprev 15:3015:30, 1 February 2006‎ old>Ta bu shi da yu‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Oops. Unintentional rollback - apologies to all, this was a mistake.
• curprev 15:3015:30, 1 February 2006‎ old>Ta bu shi da yu‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ Reverted edits by Locke Cole (talk) to last version by Netoholic

31 January 2006

• curprev 20:3220:32, 31 January 2006‎ old>Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt
• curprev 20:1320:13, 31 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rmv conditionals. This is "Infobox 101"
• curprev 18:0218:02, 31 January 2006‎ old>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Conditionals are extremely useful in creating infobox templates. The description is also quite clear.
• curprev 16:5216:52, 31 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rvt to Trodel - as this is for inexperience template editors, conditionals should be avoided, per talk
• curprev 14:2714:27, 31 January 2006‎ old>Marknew‎ m 1,582 bytes −6‎ Correct image tags
• curprev 12:1312:13, 31 January 2006‎ old>Ligulem‎ 1,588 bytes +456‎ rv. avoiding conditionals at the cost of template forking is bad. We will have them in MediaWiki anyway
• curprev 12:0512:05, 31 January 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −456‎ use of conditionals should be avoided - having an instructional template advocate their use is contraray to that aim
• curprev 08:0908:09, 31 January 2006‎ old>Crotalus horridus‎ 1,588 bytes +456‎ Revert - conditionals are very important for infobox design, since there will often be optional parameters.

30 January 2006

• curprev 21:1421:14, 30 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes 0‎ img size
• curprev 21:1221:12, 30 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ m 1,132 bytes −6‎ tpyo
• curprev 21:0621:06, 30 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,138 bytes −197‎ rmv all conditionals, except standard param defaults
• curprev 21:0421:04, 30 January 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,335 bytes −228‎ remove use of conditional templates including those using hiddenStructure

29 January 2006

• curprev 19:2519:25, 29 January 2006‎ old>Trödel‎ 1,563 bytes −25‎ I agree with Netoholic on this - hiddenstructure should be in the example templates as the if templates, while not an emergency should be avoided
• curprev 17:2317:23, 29 January 2006‎ old>CBDunkerson‎ 1,588 bytes +25‎ rvt - there is no WP:POINT violation in removing code which does not work properly. This template is a guide to infoboxes and should not promote a bad design.
• curprev 16:5216:52, 29 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,563 bytes −25‎ rvt WP:POINT
• curprev 03:1503:15, 29 January 2006‎ old>CBDunkerson‎ 1,588 bytes +25‎ Improving accessibility

26 January 2006

• curprev 17:3617:36, 26 January 2006‎ old>Ligulem‎ 1,563 bytes +68‎ See also Wikipedia:Infobox, Wikipedia:hiddenStructure

18 January 2006

• curprev 01:4601:46, 18 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,495 bytes 0‎ further testing
• curprev 01:4101:41, 18 January 2006‎ old>Netoholic‎ 1,495 bytes 0‎ testing something