Zailo de Fornier: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Infobox criminal |religion = Temple of the Under God | image = ZailoFornier.png | image_size = 250px | image_caption = Zailo de Fornier, 1972 | birth_name= Zailo Ricar...")
 
Line 21: Line 21:
==Early Life==
==Early Life==
==Temple of The Under God==
==Temple of The Under God==
Unlike many of his contemporary satanists, Fornier became convinced that Lucifer/Satan was an actual existing deity, and not just a fictitious metaphor.  Fornier believed, or at least claimed to believe, that the events of the Bible were somewhat true, albeit being a propagandized one-sided narrative of the events. He did not break with other satanists in that Lucifer stood for limitless personal liberty and unrestrained lifestyles, but rather that he was persecuted by God and his angels for allowing humans to engage in libertine desires.
As an Inyurstan from the rural highlands, he was exposed to the ideas of Brujerias - witches or shamans who can commune with the dead and acquire special powers. Zailo believed the Brujeria were - as Christian churches accused - connected with satan and that he and his followers could achieve powers through satanic rituals and libertine hedonism.


==Legal Cases==
==Legal Cases==

Revision as of 03:13, 28 June 2022

Zailo de Fornier
ZailoFornier.png
Zailo de Fornier, 1972
Born
Zailo Ricard de Fornier October 28th, 1942

Fjorda de Rivera, Inyursta
DiedDecember 17th, 2009
San Casino, Inyursta
Other names
Conviction(s)
  • Animal Cruelty
  • 1st Degree Murder of a Domestic Animal
Criminal penalty8 years with parole

Zailo Ricard de Fornier,

Early Life

Temple of The Under God

Unlike many of his contemporary satanists, Fornier became convinced that Lucifer/Satan was an actual existing deity, and not just a fictitious metaphor. Fornier believed, or at least claimed to believe, that the events of the Bible were somewhat true, albeit being a propagandized one-sided narrative of the events. He did not break with other satanists in that Lucifer stood for limitless personal liberty and unrestrained lifestyles, but rather that he was persecuted by God and his angels for allowing humans to engage in libertine desires.

As an Inyurstan from the rural highlands, he was exposed to the ideas of Brujerias - witches or shamans who can commune with the dead and acquire special powers. Zailo believed the Brujeria were - as Christian churches accused - connected with satan and that he and his followers could achieve powers through satanic rituals and libertine hedonism.

Legal Cases

Fornier vs L'Estat de Marindino Sud (1976)

In 1976 the state of Marindino Sud passed a law banning satanic cults. Zailo Fornier sued the state almost immediately, and his case was taken up by Omar Uribe - who would later become Fornier's long-time layer. Fornier claimed the law violated his right to freely practice his religion. The case would eventually make it to the Inyurstan Supreme Court; who ruled in favor of Fornier and struck down Marindino Sud's law as unconstitutional. However, the court noted that while religion is protected, actions are not and cautioned Fornier against acting out some of the acts his beliefs advocated.

L'Estat de Marindino Sud vs Fornier

Fornier vs L'Estat de Marindino Sud (1981)

Fornier vs Citua de San Casino

L'Estat de Marindino Centrele vs Fornier

The Inyurstan authorities would finally get their clean shot over Fornier in the fall of 1991. It would come not in his home state of Marindino Sud, but across the border in Marindino Centrèle. Fornier and his followers purchased four goats and six chickens from a livestock breeder for a coming Le Crésto ritual. Unbeknownst to Fornier, the chickens had actually been microchipped as part of an ongoing investigation into chicken fighting. Additional animals, including a boa, three caimans and a white dove had also been purchased for sacrifice elsewhere, but these animals were not microchipped. Believing they had cracked a ring of chicken fighters, crossing state lines, the authorities closed in. The actual "bust" was handled by Inyurstan National Police.

In typical fashion, Zailo Fornier was not physical present while the crime was being committed. However, in exchange for a plea deal two of his "initiates" testified against him, and because his money had been used to buy the animals; he was charged with animal cruelty and premeditated murder of a domestic animal. In 1992 he was sentenced to 8 years in prison with the possibility of parole after 4.

Life After Prison

Legacy

Omar Uribe would later write a book, aptly titled "Devil's Advocate: Defending Inyursta's Infamous Brujeria" in which he describes..