1990 Malgravean General Election: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
[[Category:Malgrave]] | [[Category:Malgrave]] | ||
[[Category:Elections]] |
Revision as of 17:17, 17 March 2023
1990 Malgravean General Election | |||||||
Previous election ← 1985 |
→ Next election 1994 | ||||||
Chamber of Representatives (Malgrave) | |||||||
22nd of March, 1990 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technology Party | Conservative Action Party | Progressive Unity Party | |||||
Leader | Alicja Kowalska | Vittorio Bellandini | Sebastian Kowalski | ||||
Party | Conservative Action Party | Technology Party | Progressive Unity Party | ||||
Percentage Vote Share | 44% | 27% | 18% | ||||
Seats before | 837 | 217 | 1060 | ||||
Seats after | 1096 | 537 | 438 | ||||
Seat change | |||||||
Green Party | Socialist Party | Future Party | |||||
Leader | TBN | TBN | TBN | ||||
Party | Green Party | Socialist Party | Future Party | ||||
Percentage Vote Share | 6% | 3% | 1% | ||||
Seats before | 71 | 8 | 4 | ||||
Seats after | 114 | 8 | 4 | ||||
Seat change | |||||||
Agricultural Coalition | |||||||
Leader | TBN | ||||||
Party | Agricultural Coalition | ||||||
Percentage | 1% | ||||||
Seats before | 3 | ||||||
Seats after | 3 | ||||||
Seat change | |||||||
After a ten-year stint in government, the Progressive Unity Party headed into the 1990 Malgravean General Election in a rather weakened position due to the decision of several senior members of the party to step back from politics. At the same time, the Conservative Action Party was experiencing a resurgence following on from defeats in 1985 and 1980.
Election Issues
In 1987 the economy started to show signs of stagnation and unemployment in the country started to increase. As a result economic issues formed a major part of the election campaign, and every political party in Malgrave put forward their own economic proposals. As the Progressive Unity Party were in government they received criticism from all sides for their handling of the economy and their relative inexperience meant that they handled this poorly.
At this time, the Conservative Action Party proposed a radical change to the structure of the economy to try and inject some energy into it and spur on growth. All of these plans were controversial at the time and were questionable in their popularity, however, the pledge of the Conservative Party to implement a technocratic review of these policies proved popular and attracted a lot of younger voters to their cause.
Campaigns
Conservative Campaign
In recognition of economic concerns experienced by many Malgraveans, the Conservative Action Party pledged to implement a technocratic review to reorganise and revitalise aspects of the economy. Alicja Kowalska also promised to look at the power of the trade union confederation, although, such ideas were controversial many Malgraveans felt that the economy was stuck and thought that radical action needed to be taken to try and avert disaster.
The Conservative Action Party also promised to invest in improvements to TDF bases in the country which resonated well with serving and former conscripts, as base infrastructure had been a complaint for many conscripts since the end of the civil war.
Technology Party
WIP
Progressive Campaign
The Progressive Unity Party was roundly criticised for the possibility of economic stagnation hitting the country, as the leadership of the party was relatively inexperienced it was unable to deal with these criticisms effectively and suffered in the polls. It also controversially suggested that the country leave isolation in 1995.
Green Party
The Green Party promoted a series of anti-poverty measures and infrastructure investment which they claimed would reverse the economic stagnation being experienced. Green politicians also proposed extending environmental protection zones in the waters around Malgrave and working more proactively to stop illegal fishing.