User:Vjaarland/Sandbox5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Activationism''', also known as '''national activationism''' or '''Steenism''', is a political ideology developed by [[Henrik Steen]] during his tenure as [[President of Keppland|President]] of [[Keppland]] (1914–1935). Political scientists often describe activationism as a {{wp|Syncretic politics|syncretic}} movement, and supporters of the ideology | '''Activationism''', also known as '''national activationism''' or '''Steenism''', is a political ideology developed by [[Henrik Steen]] during his tenure as [[President of Keppland|President]] of [[Keppland]] (1914–1935). Political scientists often describe activationism as a {{wp|Syncretic politics|syncretic}} movement, and supporters of the ideology claim to reject conventional left- and right-wing politics alike. | ||
* Individualism | |||
* Promotes a strong and authoritative state apparatus to maximize human liberty and defend the people against aggression and coercion | |||
* Using the state to strengthen social institutions such as churches | |||
* Freedom of choice for the individual to engage with society as much or as little as he chooses | |||
* Safety net to ensure equitable access to property, and thus freedom | |||
* Basically property ownership is the ultimate form of freedom | |||
* Rejects liberal democracy as being inneffective and prone to corruption by elites and/or tyranny of the majority, instead supports a strong state which is compelled to act in the best interest of thr people out of fear of armed rebellion | |||
* Differentiates between political and personal freedoms | |||
Revision as of 21:24, 20 August 2023
Activationism, also known as national activationism or Steenism, is a political ideology developed by Henrik Steen during his tenure as President of Keppland (1914–1935). Political scientists often describe activationism as a syncretic movement, and supporters of the ideology claim to reject conventional left- and right-wing politics alike.
- Individualism
- Promotes a strong and authoritative state apparatus to maximize human liberty and defend the people against aggression and coercion
- Using the state to strengthen social institutions such as churches
- Freedom of choice for the individual to engage with society as much or as little as he chooses
- Safety net to ensure equitable access to property, and thus freedom
- Basically property ownership is the ultimate form of freedom
- Rejects liberal democracy as being inneffective and prone to corruption by elites and/or tyranny of the majority, instead supports a strong state which is compelled to act in the best interest of thr people out of fear of armed rebellion
- Differentiates between political and personal freedoms