User:Vjaarland/Sandbox5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Activationism''', also known as '''national activationism''' or '''Steenism''', is a political ideology developed by [[Henrik Steen]] | '''Activationism''', also known as '''national activationism''' or '''Steenism''', is a political ideology that views {{wp|Private property|private property}} as the ultimate expression of {{wp|Individualism|individualism}}, {{wp|Liberty|liberty}}, {{wp|Prosperity|prosperity}}, and supports a strong an authoritative state apparatus to defend the rights of the people and promote acce. Activationism was developed by [[Henrik Steen]], a [[Keppland]]ic military officer who served as [[President of Keppland|president]] from 1914 until 1935. Political scientists often describe activationism as a {{wp|Syncretic politics|syncretic}} movement, and supporters of the ideology claim to reject conventional left- and right-wing politics alike. | ||
* Individualism | * Individualism |
Revision as of 22:00, 20 August 2023
Activationism, also known as national activationism or Steenism, is a political ideology that views private property as the ultimate expression of individualism, liberty, prosperity, and supports a strong an authoritative state apparatus to defend the rights of the people and promote acce. Activationism was developed by Henrik Steen, a Kepplandic military officer who served as president from 1914 until 1935. Political scientists often describe activationism as a syncretic movement, and supporters of the ideology claim to reject conventional left- and right-wing politics alike.
- Individualism
- Promotes a strong and authoritative state apparatus to maximize human liberty and defend the people against aggression and coercion
- Using the state to strengthen social institutions such as churches
- Freedom of choice for the individual to engage with society as much or as little as he chooses
- Safety net to ensure equitable access to property, and thus freedom
- Basically property ownership is the ultimate form of freedom
- Rejects liberal democracy as being inneffective and prone to corruption by elites and/or tyranny of the majority, instead supports a strong state which is compelled to act in the best interest of thr people out of fear of armed rebellion
- Differentiates between political and personal freedoms