People’s Party: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Posadastan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Posadastan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
| footnotes = This party is classified as right-wing to far-right by some foreign scholars, but due to the Catamese political culture, many voters perceive it as centrist. | | footnotes = This party is classified as right-wing to far-right by some foreign scholars, but due to the Catamese political culture, many voters perceive it as centrist. | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''People's Party''' of [[Catam Pon]] is the largest and most dominant party in Catamese politics, having ruled consistently since 1949. During its reign, the country has seen a rapid progression towards its modern-day prestige, but also widespread repression and oftentimes anti-democratic rule. However, over the past three decades, the party and country as a whole have progressed into what is now broadly considered an illiberal democracy. | |||
Revision as of 04:13, 13 June 2024
People's Party Ardyn Nam 𐑭𐑮𐑓𐑦𐑯 𐑯𐑭𐑥 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Abbreviation | PP |
| Leader | Naryn Bák |
| Presidium | National Assembly |
| Party Chairman | Oczir Jargal |
| Founder | Tzorigtoj Áv |
| Founded | 1947 |
| Headquarters | 44 N Palon Str., Tanjonq Pégar, Cixato province, Catam Pon |
| Newspaper | The People's Power Paper |
| Student wing | People's Youth League |
| Membership (2026) | 604,787 |
| Ideology | National Democracy Illiberal democracy National Conservatism |
| Political position | Center-right |
| Colors | Purple |
| National Assembly | 130 / 245
|
This party is classified as right-wing to far-right by some foreign scholars, but due to the Catamese political culture, many voters perceive it as centrist. | |
The People's Party of Catam Pon is the largest and most dominant party in Catamese politics, having ruled consistently since 1949. During its reign, the country has seen a rapid progression towards its modern-day prestige, but also widespread repression and oftentimes anti-democratic rule. However, over the past three decades, the party and country as a whole have progressed into what is now broadly considered an illiberal democracy.