User:C0ZM0/Neocombs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
The core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is {{wp|self-ownership}}, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the {{wp|capability approach|real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action}}. Later combinationalist thinkers, drawing from earlier liberal theorists such as XXX and XXX, advocated for a greater role of the role than envisioned by the Arvidsenist movement that spearheaded the movement, seeing the state as {{wp|agonism|social mediator between conflicting interests}}, primarily between that of the individual (indirectly expressed through market relations and forces) and that of the social collective.
The core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is {{wp|self-ownership}}, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the {{wp|capability approach|real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action}}. Later combinationalist thinkers, drawing from earlier liberal theorists such as XXX and XXX, advocated for a greater role of the role than envisioned by the Arvidsenist movement that spearheaded the movement, seeing the state as {{wp|agonism|social mediator between conflicting interests}}, primarily between that of the individual (indirectly expressed through market relations and forces) and that of the social collective.


As such, later combinationalist thinkers sought to redefine the dual mandate, conceptualising the state's primary duty is to ensure {{wp|equality of autonomy}} between all actors in society where, regardless of personal circumstances, people have greater choice and control over the course of their lives. This differs.
As such, later combinationalist thinkers sought to redefine the dual mandate, conceptualising the state's primary duty is to ensure {{wp|equality of autonomy}} between all actors in society where, regardless of personal circumstances, people have greater choice and control over the course of their lives. This differs from related concepts like {{wp|equality of outcome}} and {{wp|equality of opportunity}}, which tend to focus more on egalitarian wealth redistribution and reducing institutional barriers to occupational equality respectively, in that public intervention is focused on naturing self-actualization and choice than narrowly living standards.


* Self-ownership principle
* Self-ownership principle

Revision as of 16:05, 15 December 2024

infobox here

our dirty neolibs (they're kinda chiller doe)

Neocombinationalism, also known as XXX, or XXX, is a term historically used to refer to the resurgence and reinterpretation of Combinationalist political ideas that gained increased prominence within the Serial World, and particularly the advanced Global North during the latter half of the War of Position into the 21st century. Neocombinationalism was developed by Calesian Liberal thinkers reflecting on the apparent failures of the pre-war liberal economic model that largely lost prominence during the Postbellum as it got displaced by various Solidarist, Communist and !Fordist economic models during this period.

[...]

History

Alt Mont Pelerin and sheet

Philosophy and ideas

Neocombinationalists have historically sought to recontextualise the role the state is meant to play in upholding the dual mandate principle and public stewardship model. Learning from the apparent failures of the liberal pre-war period which inevitably led to the Great Depression and the collapse of the !Fordist model which dictated economic policy within the Global North after the war, Neocombinationalists advocated for the use of public resources to optimize market outcomes toward the benefit of all parties in society. [...]

Political and Economic freedom

The core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is self-ownership, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action. Later combinationalist thinkers, drawing from earlier liberal theorists such as XXX and XXX, advocated for a greater role of the role than envisioned by the Arvidsenist movement that spearheaded the movement, seeing the state as social mediator between conflicting interests, primarily between that of the individual (indirectly expressed through market relations and forces) and that of the social collective.

As such, later combinationalist thinkers sought to redefine the dual mandate, conceptualising the state's primary duty is to ensure equality of autonomy between all actors in society where, regardless of personal circumstances, people have greater choice and control over the course of their lives. This differs from related concepts like equality of outcome and equality of opportunity, which tend to focus more on egalitarian wealth redistribution and reducing institutional barriers to occupational equality respectively, in that public intervention is focused on naturing self-actualization and choice than narrowly living standards.

  • Self-ownership principle
  • Distributism
  • Property-owning democracy
  • Yeoman socialism
  • free trade
  • Internationalism

Economics

Traditions

Individual nation variants go here

Criticism