Collective (creative industries): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "A '''collective''' ({{wp|Sicilian language|Sacarian}}: ''X'', {{wp|English language|Fallish}}: ''Partenariat'', {{wp|Norwegian language|Waldish}}: ''Håndverkerkollektiv'', {{wp|German language|Ruthish}}: ''Kulturgenossenschaft'', {{wp|French language|Hyacinthean}}: ''Société d'Artistes'', {{wp|Crimean Tatar|Razanite}}: ''X'', {{wp|Levantine arabic|Shiraqi}}: ''X'')") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''collective''' ({{wp|Sicilian language|Sacarian}}: ''X'', {{wp|English language|Fallish}}: ''Partenariat'', {{wp|Norwegian language|Waldish}}: ''Håndverkerkollektiv'', {{wp|German language|Ruthish}}: ''Kulturgenossenschaft'', {{wp|French language|Hyacinthean}}: ''Société d'Artistes'', {{wp|Crimean Tatar|Razanite}}: ''X'', {{wp|Levantine arabic|Shiraqi}}: ''X'') | A '''collective''' ({{wp|Sicilian language|Sacarian}}: ''X'', {{wp|English language|Fallish}}: ''Partenariat'', {{wp|Norwegian language|Waldish}}: ''Håndverkerkollektiv'', {{wp|German language|Ruthish}}: ''Kulturgenossenschaft'', {{wp|French language|Hyacinthean}}: ''Société d'Artistes'', {{wp|Crimean Tatar|Razanite}}: ''X'', {{wp|Levantine arabic|Shiraqi}}: ''X'') is a particular type of {{wp|entertainment}}, {{wp|publishing}} and {{wp|media co-operative}} that emerged during the mid-20th century in [[Solidarism|Solidarist states]]. Collectives were established as a way to promote {{wp|worker self-management|workplace democracy}} in the creative and multimedia industry while preserving the artistic autonomy of creatives and subsidising their labour, and their popularity and success has led to their global prominence. Collective differ from traditional creative media enterprises in that they have historically replied on {{wp|donation|donations}}, {{wp|subscription business model|subscriptions}}, and {{wp|patronage|patron payments}} from their fanbases and contributors from which they bestow a wide range of perks, such as dramatically reduced prices or {{wp|subscription boxes|product bundles}}. | ||
While an overwhelming of creative and multimedia firms in the Solidarist work are collectives, there has been a steady rise in the establishment of collectives in various [[Serial world|Serial states]] since the 2000s, owing in large part to their greater interaction and participation from fans allowing them to create far more durable {{wp|brand|consumer bases}}. Operationally, collectives can be considered as {{wp|Cooperative#Multi-stakeholder_cooperatives|hybrid co-operatives}}, historically with ownership split (not necessarily equally) between {{wp|artist|aesthetes}} and production staff with each ownership group having special purview over certain voting issues. | |||
Revision as of 14:20, 2 January 2025
A collective (Sacarian: X, Fallish: Partenariat, Waldish: Håndverkerkollektiv, Ruthish: Kulturgenossenschaft, Hyacinthean: Société d'Artistes, Razanite: X, Shiraqi: X) is a particular type of entertainment, publishing and media co-operative that emerged during the mid-20th century in Solidarist states. Collectives were established as a way to promote workplace democracy in the creative and multimedia industry while preserving the artistic autonomy of creatives and subsidising their labour, and their popularity and success has led to their global prominence. Collective differ from traditional creative media enterprises in that they have historically replied on donations, subscriptions, and patron payments from their fanbases and contributors from which they bestow a wide range of perks, such as dramatically reduced prices or product bundles.
While an overwhelming of creative and multimedia firms in the Solidarist work are collectives, there has been a steady rise in the establishment of collectives in various Serial states since the 2000s, owing in large part to their greater interaction and participation from fans allowing them to create far more durable consumer bases. Operationally, collectives can be considered as hybrid co-operatives, historically with ownership split (not necessarily equally) between aesthetes and production staff with each ownership group having special purview over certain voting issues.