Architectural Standards Act 1930: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{wip}}
{{wip}}
{{Infobox legislation
{{Infobox legislation
|short_title        = Architectural Standards Act
|short_title        = Architectural Standards Act 1930
|legislature        = [[Senate of Ausonia]]
|legislature        = [[Senate of Ausonia]]
|image              = Emblem of Ausonia.png
|image              = Emblem of Ausonia.png
Line 39: Line 39:


The '''Act to Promote Traditional Architectural Standards''' is an act of the [[Senate of Ausonia]] which was enacted to outlaw the construction of modernist architecture in most urban areas. Proposed by Lord President [[Jean-Jacques Barrande de Saint-Pierre]] and enacted into law by the Senate into 1930, the act also mandated that all modernist buildings be replaced with traditionalist styles at the earliest possible opportunity and required each bailiwick to create a local Architectural Board to determine whether all future construction projects meet the standards set forth under the act.
The '''Act to Promote Traditional Architectural Standards''' is an act of the [[Senate of Ausonia]] which was enacted to outlaw the construction of modernist architecture in most urban areas. Proposed by Lord President [[Jean-Jacques Barrande de Saint-Pierre]] and enacted into law by the Senate into 1930, the act also mandated that all modernist buildings be replaced with traditionalist styles at the earliest possible opportunity and required each bailiwick to create a local Architectural Board to determine whether all future construction projects meet the standards set forth under the act.
==History==


==Law==
==Law==
===Architectural styles===
===Local Architectural Boards===
 
===List of Approved Architectural Styles===
The law generally provides a list of approved architectural styles, which are then enforced by the local Architectural Boards. These are updated every five years by the House of Peers' Cultural Panel, which is then submitted to the full chamber for further review.
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
! style="width:12em;" | Style
! style="width:12em;" | Style
! style="width:3em;" | Legal?
! style="width:3em;" | Legalilty
! Details
! Details
|-
| {{wp|Art Deco architecture|Art Deco}}
| {{Partial}}
| Judged on a case-by-case basis
|-
| {{wp|Art Noveau|Art Noveau}}
| {{Yes}}
| Certain extreme forms are outlawed within one [[Ausonian units of measurement|''mille'']] of the city center
|-
| {{wp|Baroque architecture|Baroque}}
| {{Yes}}
| Includes {{wpl|Baroque architecture|Neo-Baroque}}
|-
| {{wp|Bauhaus}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Beaux-Arts architecture|Beaux-Arts}}
| {{Yes}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Brutalism}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Byzantine architecture|Byzantine}}
| {{Partial}}
| Includes {{wp|Byzantine Revival architecture|Neo-Byzantine}}. Generally judged on a case-by-case basis, with religious buildings given priority approval.
|-
| {{wp|Classical architecture|Classical}}
| {{Yes}}
| Includes {{wpl|Neoclassical architecture|Neo-Classical}}
|-
| {{wp|Constructivist architecture|Constructivism}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Egyptian Revival architecture|Egyptian Revival}}
| {{Partial}}
| Outlawed within one [[Ausonian units of measurement|''mille'']] of the city center
|-
| {{wp|Expressionist architecture|Expressionism}}
| {{No}}
| Structures closest to Art Deco judged on a case-by-case basis
|-
| {{wp|Futurist architecture|Futurism}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Georgian architecture|Georgian}}
| {{Yes}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Gothic architecture|Gothic}}
| {{Yes}}
| Includes {{wpl|Gothic Revival architecture|Neo-Gothic}}
|-
| {{wp|International Style (architecture)|International Style}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Modernist architecture|Modernism}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
| {{wp|National Romantic style|National Romantism}}
| {{Yes}}
|
|-
| {{wp|Orientalism}}
| {{Partial}}
| Outlawed within one [[Ausonian units of measurement|''mille'']] of the city center, except for religious buildings
|-
| {{wp|Postmodern architecture|Postmodernism}}
| {{Partial}}
| Outlawed within one [[Ausonian units of measurement|''mille'']] of the city center
|-
| {{wp|Renaissance architecture|Renaissance}}
| {{Yes}}
| Includes {{wp|Renaissance Revival architecture|Neo-Renaissance}}
|-
| {{wp|Romanesque architecture|Romanesque}}
| {{Yes}}
| Includes {{wp|Romanesque Revival architecture|Neo-Romanesque}}
|-|-
| {{wp|Structuralist architecture|Structuralism}}
| {{No}}
|
|-
|-
|}
|}
===Other provisions===
The law originally instituted a maximum height limit of 7 perches (112 ft; ~34 m) and 6 perches (96 ft; ~29.26 m) for residential buildings, though local Architectural Boards were free to institute lower limits to fit local circumstances. Subsequent initiatives in the 1970s would abolish this limit in the major cities, though the provision is still in force in the rest of the country.
==Subsequent amendments==
[economic demand pushes for modernist styles outside of cities]
==Criticism==
==See Also==
[[Category:Ausonia]]
[[Category:Ausonia]]

Latest revision as of 19:57, 5 June 2022

Architectural Standards Act 1930
Emblem of Ausonia.png
Senate of Ausonia
Enacted bySenate of Ausonia
Date passed24 May 1930
Date effective1 January 1931
Amends
3 February 1976
Status: Current legislation

The Act to Promote Traditional Architectural Standards is an act of the Senate of Ausonia which was enacted to outlaw the construction of modernist architecture in most urban areas. Proposed by Lord President Jean-Jacques Barrande de Saint-Pierre and enacted into law by the Senate into 1930, the act also mandated that all modernist buildings be replaced with traditionalist styles at the earliest possible opportunity and required each bailiwick to create a local Architectural Board to determine whether all future construction projects meet the standards set forth under the act.

History

Law

Local Architectural Boards

List of Approved Architectural Styles

The law generally provides a list of approved architectural styles, which are then enforced by the local Architectural Boards. These are updated every five years by the House of Peers' Cultural Panel, which is then submitted to the full chamber for further review.

Style Legalilty Details
Art Deco Partial Judged on a case-by-case basis
Art Noveau Yes Certain extreme forms are outlawed within one mille of the city center
Baroque Yes Includes Neo-Baroque
Bauhaus No
Beaux-Arts Yes
Brutalism No
Byzantine Partial Includes Neo-Byzantine. Generally judged on a case-by-case basis, with religious buildings given priority approval.
Classical Yes Includes Neo-Classical
Constructivism No
Egyptian Revival Partial Outlawed within one mille of the city center
Expressionism No Structures closest to Art Deco judged on a case-by-case basis
Futurism No
Georgian Yes
Gothic Yes Includes Neo-Gothic
International Style No
Modernism No
National Romantism Yes
Orientalism Partial Outlawed within one mille of the city center, except for religious buildings
Postmodernism Partial Outlawed within one mille of the city center
Renaissance Yes Includes Neo-Renaissance
Romanesque Yes Includes Neo-Romanesque
Structuralism No

Other provisions

The law originally instituted a maximum height limit of 7 perches (112 ft; ~34 m) and 6 perches (96 ft; ~29.26 m) for residential buildings, though local Architectural Boards were free to institute lower limits to fit local circumstances. Subsequent initiatives in the 1970s would abolish this limit in the major cities, though the provision is still in force in the rest of the country.

Subsequent amendments

[economic demand pushes for modernist styles outside of cities]

Criticism

See Also