1965 Malgravean General Election: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan=3 | '''Previous election''' ← <BR> [[1960 Malgravean General Election |1960]] | | colspan=3 | '''Previous election''' ← <BR> [[1960 Malgravean General Election |1960]] | ||
| colspan=3 align=right | → '''Next election'''<br> [[1970 Malgravean | | colspan=3 align=right | → '''Next election'''<br> [[1970 Malgravean General Election|1970]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan=3 align=center | | | colspan=3 align=center | | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| align=center | [[Johann Leipzig]] | | align=center | [[Johann Leipzig]] | ||
| align=center | [[Edoardo Pavonie]] | | align=center | [[Edoardo Pavonie]] | ||
| align=center | [[ | | align=center | [[Choi Won-tae]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Party | ! align=left | Party | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Seat change | ! align=left | Seat change | ||
| align=center | {{ | | align=center | {{increase}}72 | ||
| align=center | {{ | | align=center | {{decrease}}151 | ||
| align=center | {{ | | align=center | {{increase}}58 | ||
|-style="background-color:#000000;" | |-style="background-color:#000000;" | ||
| colspan=3 | | | colspan=3 | | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
|- align=center | | |- align=center | | ||
| width=30% | | | width=30% | | ||
| '''Green Party''' | |||
| '''Progressive Party''' | | '''Progressive Party''' | ||
| '''Socialist Party''' | | '''Socialist Party''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| style="font-size: medium; color:#ffffff; background-color:Green; padding:2px;" | | | style="font-size: medium; color:#ffffff; background-color:Green; padding:2px;" | | ||
| style="font-size: medium; color:#ffffff; background-color:Gold; padding:2px;" | | |||
| style="font-size: medium; color:#ffffff; background-color:Red; padding:2px;" | | | style="font-size: medium; color:#ffffff; background-color:Red; padding:2px;" | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Leader | ! align=left | Leader | ||
| align=center | [[Clemente Bellini]] | |||
| align=center | [[Jeon Hun-young]] | | align=center | [[Jeon Hun-young]] | ||
| align=center | [[Isabella Acardi]] | | align=center | [[Isabella Acardi]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Party | ! align=left | Party | ||
| align=center | [[Malgravean Green Party|Green Party]] | |||
| align=center | [[Progressive Unity Party|Progressive Party]] | | align=center | [[Progressive Unity Party|Progressive Party]] | ||
| align=center | [[Socialist Party (Malgrave)|Socialist Party]] | | align=center | [[Socialist Party (Malgrave)|Socialist Party]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Seats before | ! align=left | Seats before | ||
| align=center | 25 | |||
| align=center | 0 | | align=center | 0 | ||
| align=center | 8 | | align=center | 8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Seats after | ! align=left | Seats after | ||
| align=center | 31 | |||
| align=center | 22 | | align=center | 22 | ||
| align=center | 8 | | align=center | 8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align=left | Seat change | ! align=left | Seat change | ||
| align=center | {{increase}}6 | | align=center | {{increase}}6 | ||
| align=center | {{increase}}22 | |||
| align=center | {{steady}} | | align=center | {{steady}} | ||
|-style="background-color:#000000;" | |-style="background-color:#000000;" | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
|} | |} | ||
After a tumultuous five-year term the Chamber of Representatives and the Chamber of Supervisors were dissolved to make way for a new general election. The 1965 election is an oddity in Malgravean history, as the ongoing fighting made direct voting in this region impossible. Instead ballots from internal refugees were assigned to Pakosc and seats were assigned accordingly. | |||
In recent years it has been theorised that some of these ballots were assigned unfairly, however, no proof of these claims has ever surfaced and it is considered to be a conspiracy theory. | |||
==Election Issues== | ==Election Issues== | ||
Naturally, the then ongoing [[Battle of Pakosc]] was a huge talking point of the election campaign, especially, as reports of brutal conditions within the city become known to the general public. A few other concerns about healthcare following the reveal of MIDD a few years earlier popped up alongside potential reforms of the conscription model. | |||
== Campaigns== | == Campaigns== | ||
| Line 119: | Line 121: | ||
=== Conservative Campaign === | === Conservative Campaign === | ||
The Conservative Action Party criticised the Technology Party for allowing weakness to grow within the military, and proclaimed that under their leadership the city would be liberated within the next five years. | |||
Johann Leipzig's own service within the military meant that the Conservative Action Party had high credibility here, and too the surprise of many the campaign picked up steam and ended on a high note. | |||
=== Technology Party === | === Technology Party === | ||
The Technology Party was still undergoing internal transformations following the surprise resignation of [[Helen Magnus]] in the aftermath of [[Operation Swift]]. It struggled to campaign, and as a result had a very limited chance to connect with voters. | |||
=== Unity Campaign === | |||
The Unity Party accused the Conservative Action Party of being too aggressive on military matters, however, the status of the war and the brutality reported within the city meant that this attack line wasn't popular among all voters. | |||
Still the Unity Party was able to campaign successfully on health issues and continued to gain seats from the Technology Party as a result. | |||
[[Category:Malgrave]] | |||
[[Category:Elections]] | |||
Latest revision as of 22:43, 15 August 2024
| 1965 Malgravean General Election | |||||||
| Previous election ← 1960 |
→ Next election 1970 | ||||||
| Chamber of Representatives (Malgrave) | |||||||
| 22nd of March, 1965 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Action Party | Technology Party | Unity Party' | |||||
| Leader | Johann Leipzig | Edoardo Pavonie | Choi Won-tae | ||||
| Party | Conservative Action Party | Technology Party | Unity Party | ||||
| Percentage Vote Share | 43% | 27% | 19% | ||||
| Seats before | 987 | 591 | 289 | ||||
| Seats after | 1052 | 440 | 347 | ||||
| Seat change |  72
|
 151
|
58
| ||||
| Green Party | Progressive Party | Socialist Party | |||||
| Leader | Clemente Bellini | Jeon Hun-young | Isabella Acardi | ||||
| Party | Green Party | Progressive Party | Socialist Party | ||||
| Percentage Vote Share | 4% | 4% | 3% | ||||
| Seats before | 25 | 0 | 8 | ||||
| Seats after | 31 | 22 | 8 | ||||
| Seat change | 6
|
22
|
| ||||
After a tumultuous five-year term the Chamber of Representatives and the Chamber of Supervisors were dissolved to make way for a new general election. The 1965 election is an oddity in Malgravean history, as the ongoing fighting made direct voting in this region impossible. Instead ballots from internal refugees were assigned to Pakosc and seats were assigned accordingly.
In recent years it has been theorised that some of these ballots were assigned unfairly, however, no proof of these claims has ever surfaced and it is considered to be a conspiracy theory.
Election Issues
Naturally, the then ongoing Battle of Pakosc was a huge talking point of the election campaign, especially, as reports of brutal conditions within the city become known to the general public. A few other concerns about healthcare following the reveal of MIDD a few years earlier popped up alongside potential reforms of the conscription model.
Campaigns
Conservative Campaign
The Conservative Action Party criticised the Technology Party for allowing weakness to grow within the military, and proclaimed that under their leadership the city would be liberated within the next five years.
Johann Leipzig's own service within the military meant that the Conservative Action Party had high credibility here, and too the surprise of many the campaign picked up steam and ended on a high note.
Technology Party
The Technology Party was still undergoing internal transformations following the surprise resignation of Helen Magnus in the aftermath of Operation Swift. It struggled to campaign, and as a result had a very limited chance to connect with voters.
Unity Campaign
The Unity Party accused the Conservative Action Party of being too aggressive on military matters, however, the status of the war and the brutality reported within the city meant that this attack line wasn't popular among all voters.
Still the Unity Party was able to campaign successfully on health issues and continued to gain seats from the Technology Party as a result.