Fall of the Symmerian Empire: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
[[File:MakedonianEmpire1.png|thumb|right|300px|The Makedonian Empire at its greatest extent.]]
[[File:MakedonianEmpire1.png|thumb|right|300px|The Makedonian Empire at its greatest extent.]]


The Empire is considered to have reached its greatest territorial extent around 692 CE, just after the conclusion of the final war with the [[Sabrian Empire]]. At that point, the Empire extended from [[Syara]], [[Mansuriyyah]], and [[Mubata]] in the west and to [[Knichus]] in the east. Makedon's domain was around 10 million square kilometers and its population was between 175 to 250 million. Not long after its apex however the Empire began to recede; in 726 CE the Makedonians were defeated by the [[Zama Empire]] at the [[Battle of Fimbala]]. The concurrent rise of Islam in Mansuriyyah, and the al-Bashiri Caliphate, further weakened Makedonian rule in south-western [[Siduri]], although the exact date when Makedonian rule ended is difficult to determine. The Empire was further crippled by the outbreak of the [[Burning Plague]] in 802 CE, which is estimated to have eliminated 25% of the Empire's population, with [[Syara]] the most impacted. The loss of tax revenue and manpower likely contributed to or accelerated the rebellion of the [[Tieu Sisters]] in 850-851. The [[Âu Lạc Rebellion]] from 1080-1090 effectively ended Makedonian rule in [[Quenmin]], causing the Empire to lose its grip on Eastern Siduri. Allamunnica was lost within the next century with the rise of the [[Arkoennite Empire]], and Makedonian holdings in [[Eracura]] were largely eliminated by the 12th century. By the 14th century Makedonian rule no longer extended beyond the Kurilla Mountains in [[Ruvelka]], and the subsequent defeat of the Empire at the [[Battle of Nemaro]] against the Arkoennites in 1305 is often cited as the end of the Empire. However 1305 is not universally accepted, with many scholars noting that the [[Kineasan Dynasty]] continued to hold the Makedonian throne after the Arkoennite conquest. Makedon was entrusted with its own army to keep the rest of Syara in line and minted its own coinage, with Makedon serving as a tributary state to the Arkoennite Empire.  
The Empire is considered to have reached its greatest territorial extent around 692 CE, just after the conclusion of the final war with the [[Sabrian Empire]]. At that point, the Empire extended from [[Syara]], [[Mansuriyyah]], and [[Mubata]] in the west and to [[Knichus]] in the east. Makedon's domain was around 10 million square kilometers and its population was between 175 to 250 million. Not long after its apex however the Empire began to recede; in 726 CE the Makedonians were defeated by the [[Zama Empire]] at the [[Battle of Fimbala]]. The concurrent rise of Islam in Mansuriyyah, and the al-Bashiri Caliphate, further weakened Makedonian rule in south-western [[Siduri]], although the exact date when Makedonian rule ended is difficult to determine. The Empire was further crippled by the outbreak of the [[Burning Plague]] in 802 CE, which is estimated to have eliminated 25% of the Empire's population, with [[Syara]] the most impacted. The loss of tax revenue and manpower likely contributed to or accelerated the rebellion of the [[Tieu Sisters]] in 850-851. The [[Âu Lạc Rebellion]] from 1080-1090 effectively ended Makedonian rule in [[Quenmin]], causing the Empire to lose its grip on Eastern Siduri. Allamunnica was lost within the next century with the rise of the [[Arkoennite Empire]], and Makedonian holdings in [[Eracura]] were largely eliminated by the 12th century. By the 14th century Makedonian rule no longer extended beyond the Kurilla Mountains in [[Ruvelka]], and the subsequent defeat of the Empire at the [[Battle of Nemaro]] against the Arkoennites in 1305 is often cited as the end of the Empire. However 1305 is not universally accepted, with many scholars noting that the [[Zelusian Dynasty]] continued to hold the Makedonian throne after the Arkoennite conquest. Makedon was entrusted with its own army to keep the rest of Syara in line and minted its own coinage, with Makedon serving as a tributary state to the Arkoennite Empire.  


Complicating matters is the opaque nature of Makedonian rule. The Makedonians made little effort to incorporate the people they conquered into their Empire, resulting in varied experiences depending on the people and location in question. The Empire did not employ any legal distinction towards the concept of citizenry; all non-slave inhaibtants of the Empire were considered subjects and liable to taxation. In some provinces this resulted in significant levels of autonomy, with some scholars going as far as to say that Makedon was not a "true Empire", but rather a confederation of tributary states kept in line by an autocratic military-political elite. The continued habitation of the Makedonian throne by the Kineasan Dynasty absent any major civil wars or dynastic disputes until the end of the [[Refusal War]] in 1987 CE is cited by some historians as evident that 1305 is inadequate for describing the end of the Empire.
Complicating matters is the opaque nature of Makedonian rule. The Makedonians made little effort to incorporate the people they conquered into their Empire, resulting in varied experiences depending on the people and location in question. The Empire did not employ any legal distinction towards the concept of citizenry; all non-slave inhaibtants of the Empire were considered subjects and liable to taxation. In some provinces this resulted in significant levels of autonomy, with some scholars going as far as to say that Makedon was not a "true Empire", but rather a confederation of tributary states kept in line by an autocratic military-political elite. The continued habitation of the Makedonian throne by the [[Zelusian Dynasty]] absent any major civil wars or dynastic disputes until the end of the [[Refusal War]] in 1987 CE is cited by some historians as evident that 1305 is inadequate for describing the end of the Empire.


Increasingly common among modern historians is the questioning of the term "Empire" and "Fall" as adequate to describe the nature of Makedon's rule and decline, arguing instead Makedonian control of Siduri "dissolved", its ownership and power replaced by local powers and rulers, while its cultural and social aspects never took hold in the first place to a credible extent, with a few exceptions.
Increasingly common among modern historians is the questioning of the term "Empire" and "Fall" as adequate to describe the nature of Makedon's rule and decline, arguing instead Makedonian control of Siduri "dissolved", its ownership and power replaced by local powers and rulers, while its cultural and social aspects never took hold in the first place to a credible extent, with a few exceptions.

Revision as of 09:05, 22 August 2021

The Fall of the Makedonian Empire refers to the steady decline and eventual dissolution of the Makedonian Empire. While historians generally agree on the causes of the Empire's decline, debate over the nature of the decline, the exact dates, and the dissolution itself, continues to this day.

The Makedonian Empire at its greatest extent.

The Empire is considered to have reached its greatest territorial extent around 692 CE, just after the conclusion of the final war with the Sabrian Empire. At that point, the Empire extended from Syara, Mansuriyyah, and Mubata in the west and to Knichus in the east. Makedon's domain was around 10 million square kilometers and its population was between 175 to 250 million. Not long after its apex however the Empire began to recede; in 726 CE the Makedonians were defeated by the Zama Empire at the Battle of Fimbala. The concurrent rise of Islam in Mansuriyyah, and the al-Bashiri Caliphate, further weakened Makedonian rule in south-western Siduri, although the exact date when Makedonian rule ended is difficult to determine. The Empire was further crippled by the outbreak of the Burning Plague in 802 CE, which is estimated to have eliminated 25% of the Empire's population, with Syara the most impacted. The loss of tax revenue and manpower likely contributed to or accelerated the rebellion of the Tieu Sisters in 850-851. The Âu Lạc Rebellion from 1080-1090 effectively ended Makedonian rule in Quenmin, causing the Empire to lose its grip on Eastern Siduri. Allamunnica was lost within the next century with the rise of the Arkoennite Empire, and Makedonian holdings in Eracura were largely eliminated by the 12th century. By the 14th century Makedonian rule no longer extended beyond the Kurilla Mountains in Ruvelka, and the subsequent defeat of the Empire at the Battle of Nemaro against the Arkoennites in 1305 is often cited as the end of the Empire. However 1305 is not universally accepted, with many scholars noting that the Zelusian Dynasty continued to hold the Makedonian throne after the Arkoennite conquest. Makedon was entrusted with its own army to keep the rest of Syara in line and minted its own coinage, with Makedon serving as a tributary state to the Arkoennite Empire.

Complicating matters is the opaque nature of Makedonian rule. The Makedonians made little effort to incorporate the people they conquered into their Empire, resulting in varied experiences depending on the people and location in question. The Empire did not employ any legal distinction towards the concept of citizenry; all non-slave inhaibtants of the Empire were considered subjects and liable to taxation. In some provinces this resulted in significant levels of autonomy, with some scholars going as far as to say that Makedon was not a "true Empire", but rather a confederation of tributary states kept in line by an autocratic military-political elite. The continued habitation of the Makedonian throne by the Zelusian Dynasty absent any major civil wars or dynastic disputes until the end of the Refusal War in 1987 CE is cited by some historians as evident that 1305 is inadequate for describing the end of the Empire.

Increasingly common among modern historians is the questioning of the term "Empire" and "Fall" as adequate to describe the nature of Makedon's rule and decline, arguing instead Makedonian control of Siduri "dissolved", its ownership and power replaced by local powers and rulers, while its cultural and social aspects never took hold in the first place to a credible extent, with a few exceptions.

Historical approaches

Hieght of power and decline

Rebellions and recession

Subjugation and renewal

Modern scholarship