User:Vjaarland/Sandbox5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Activationism''', also known as '''national activationism''' or '''Steenism''', is a political ideology that | '''Activationism''', also known as '''national activationism''' or '''Steenism''', is a political ideology that promotes an active and authoritative state apparatus to maximize human {{wp|Liberty|liberty}}, which is expressed primarily though {{wp|Private property|private property}}. Activationism was developed by [[Henrik Steen]], a [[Keppland]]ic military officer who served as [[President of Keppland|president]] from 1914 until 1935. Political scientists often describe activationism as a {{wp|Syncretic politics|syncretic}} movement, and supporters of the ideology claim to reject conventional left- and right-wing politics alike. | ||
* Individualism | * Individualism | ||
Revision as of 22:05, 20 August 2023
Activationism, also known as national activationism or Steenism, is a political ideology that promotes an active and authoritative state apparatus to maximize human liberty, which is expressed primarily though private property. Activationism was developed by Henrik Steen, a Kepplandic military officer who served as president from 1914 until 1935. Political scientists often describe activationism as a syncretic movement, and supporters of the ideology claim to reject conventional left- and right-wing politics alike.
- Individualism
- Promotes a strong and authoritative state apparatus to maximize human liberty and defend the people against aggression and coercion
- Using the state to strengthen social institutions such as churches
- Freedom of choice for the individual to engage with society as much or as little as he chooses
- Safety net to ensure equitable access to property, and thus freedom
- Basically property ownership is the ultimate form of freedom
- Rejects liberal democracy as being inneffective and prone to corruption by elites and/or tyranny of the majority, instead supports a strong state which is compelled to act in the best interest of thr people out of fear of armed rebellion
- Differentiates between political and personal freedoms