User:C0ZM0/Neocombs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
our dirty neolibs (they're kinda chiller doe) | our dirty neolibs (they're kinda chiller doe) | ||
'''Neocombinationalism''', also known as '''XXX''', or '''XXX''', is a term historically used to refer to the resurgence and reinterpretation of [[Combinationalism|Combinationalist]] political ideas that gained increased prominence within the [[Serial World]], and particularly the advanced Global North during the latter half of the [[ | '''Neocombinationalism''', also known as '''XXX''', or '''XXX''', is a term historically used to refer to the resurgence and reinterpretation of [[Combinationalism|Combinationalist]] political ideas that gained increased prominence within the [[Serial World]], and particularly the advanced Global North during the latter half of the [[War of Position]] into the 21st century. Neocombinationalism was developed by Calesian [[Liberalism in Teleon|Liberal]] thinkers reflecting on the apparent failures of the [[Great War (Teleon)|pre-war]] liberal economic model that largely lost prominence during the [[Postbellum]] as it got displaced by various [[Solidarism in Teleon|Solidarist]], [[Communism (Teleon)|Communist]] and !Fordist economic models during this period. | ||
[...] | [...] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Political and Economic freedom=== | ===Political and Economic freedom=== | ||
The core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is {{wp|self-ownership}}, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the {{wp|capability approach|real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action}}. Later combinationalist thinkers, drawing from earlier liberal theorists such as XXX and XXX, advocated for a greater role of the role than envisioned by the Arvidsenist movement that spearheaded the movement, seeing the state as {{wp|agonism|social mediator between conflicting interests}}, primarily between that of the individual (indirectly expressed through market relations and forces) and that of the social collective. | |||
* Self-ownership principle | * Self-ownership principle | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 15 December 2024
infobox here
our dirty neolibs (they're kinda chiller doe)
Neocombinationalism, also known as XXX, or XXX, is a term historically used to refer to the resurgence and reinterpretation of Combinationalist political ideas that gained increased prominence within the Serial World, and particularly the advanced Global North during the latter half of the War of Position into the 21st century. Neocombinationalism was developed by Calesian Liberal thinkers reflecting on the apparent failures of the pre-war liberal economic model that largely lost prominence during the Postbellum as it got displaced by various Solidarist, Communist and !Fordist economic models during this period.
[...]
History
Alt Mont Pelerin and sheet
Philosophy and ideas
Neocombinationalists have historically sought to recontextualise the role the state is meant to play in upholding the dual mandate principle and public stewardship model. Learning from the apparent failures of the liberal pre-war period which inevitably led to the Great Depression and the collapse of the !Fordist model which dictated economic policy within the Global North after the war, Neocombinationalists advocated for the use of public resources to optimize market outcomes toward the benefit of all parties in society. [...]
Political and Economic freedom
The core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is self-ownership, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action. Later combinationalist thinkers, drawing from earlier liberal theorists such as XXX and XXX, advocated for a greater role of the role than envisioned by the Arvidsenist movement that spearheaded the movement, seeing the state as social mediator between conflicting interests, primarily between that of the individual (indirectly expressed through market relations and forces) and that of the social collective.
- Self-ownership principle
- Distributism
- Property-owning democracy
- Yeoman socialism
- free trade
- Internationalism
Economics
Traditions
Individual nation variants go here