CSA v. Arabi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Infobox Arabin Supreme Court Case | ArgueDate = | ArgueYear = | DecideDate = | DecideYear = |...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''''CSA v. Arabi''''' is a pending case before the [[Supreme Court of Arabi]] dealing with the legality of [[§USS5A101 (Arabi)§USS5A101]], a statute that changes the number of Supreme Court seats. Article III, Section IV, Clause I of the Constitution establishes 10 Associate Justice seats plus one Chief Justice seat, however, shortly after the ratification of the Constitution during the [[1st Arabin Congress]], a statute was passed, changing the number of seats from 8 Associate Justices plus one Chief Justice. | '''''CSA v. Arabi''''' is a pending case before the [[Supreme Court of Arabi]] dealing with the legality of [[§USS5A101 (Arabi)|§USS5A101]], a statute that changes the number of Supreme Court seats. Article III, Section IV, Clause I of the Constitution establishes 10 Associate Justice seats plus one Chief Justice seat, however, shortly after the ratification of the Constitution during the [[1st Arabin Congress]], a statute was passed, changing the number of seats from 8 Associate Justices plus one Chief Justice. | ||
The Supreme Court agreed to to hear the case which they scheduled for Q3 2020. No date has formally been set. | The Supreme Court agreed to to hear the case which they scheduled for Q3 2020. No date has formally been set. |
Revision as of 02:02, 22 June 2020
CSA v. Arabi is a pending case before the Supreme Court of Arabi dealing with the legality of §USS5A101, a statute that changes the number of Supreme Court seats. Article III, Section IV, Clause I of the Constitution establishes 10 Associate Justice seats plus one Chief Justice seat, however, shortly after the ratification of the Constitution during the 1st Arabin Congress, a statute was passed, changing the number of seats from 8 Associate Justices plus one Chief Justice.
The Supreme Court agreed to to hear the case which they scheduled for Q3 2020. No date has formally been set.