User:TJY1998/Ruttish Gaullicanism: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{WIP}} 200px|thumb|right|[[Weranian_Unification#Ruttish_question|Nida Jurgaitytė, the famed leader of the Jurgaitytė rebellion, was a proponent...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Modern {{wp|archaeology|archaeological evidence}}, {{wp|genetic research|genetic}} and {{wp|ethnology|ethnological}} research have refuted the main arguments of the Ruttish Gaullicanism theory. | Modern {{wp|archaeology|archaeological evidence}}, {{wp|genetic research|genetic}} and {{wp|ethnology|ethnological}} research have refuted the main arguments of the Ruttish Gaullicanism theory. | ||
== History == | |||
=== Earliest records === | |||
=== Foundation === | |||
=== Adherence in Aucuria === | |||
=== Adherence in Gaullica === | |||
=== Adherence in Ruttland === | |||
== Contemporary Movement == | |||
=== Relationship to Ruttish identity and nationalism === | |||
== Tenets == | |||
== Criticism == | |||
== Notable Adherents == | |||
Revision as of 17:28, 11 March 2022
 | This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
Ruttish Gaullicanism is the pseudoarchaeological and pseudoanthropological belief that the people of Ruttland are descendants of a "lost group" of ethnic Gaullicans who travelled to northern Euclea following the fall of the Solarian Empire. The origins of the theory are unknown, but by the late 14th century it had been discussed in several period writings including accounts from Ponte Pilote. By the end of the 19th century, the belief had been so ingrained in elements of Ruttish and Gaullican society that organisations were set up in the Empire that advocated for Ruttish independence and further relations based on these links. Some of these organisations have continued to exist in the 21st century.
Modern archaeological evidence, genetic and ethnological research have refuted the main arguments of the Ruttish Gaullicanism theory.