American Independent Party: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 104: Line 104:


The Party itself claims to be a conservative, pro-states rights party, however this has been heavily debated.
The Party itself claims to be a conservative, pro-states rights party, however this has been heavily debated.
<references />
[[Category:Divided States of America]]

Latest revision as of 01:14, 10 August 2024

American Independent Party
LeaderDisputed (2003)
FoundedJuly 8, 1967 (United States) July 4, 1980 (American Federation)
Preceded byDixiecrat Party (not legal predecessor)
HeadquartersMontgomery, Alabama
IdeologyAmerican Nationalism (Southern Nationalism)

New Democracy

Paleoconservatism

Right-wing populism

Factions:

Wallaceism

Thurmondism

Dukeism

Neo-Fascism (Alleged)

Neo-Confederatism

Syncretic politics
ReligionChristianity

The American Independent Party (AIP) is the ruling political party in the American Federation, and since 1981, the de-facto sole ruling party.

History

As a Party in the United States

Main article: George Wallace 1968 presidential campaign

Founded initially in 1967 in California (although it gained most of its votes in the South), the party nominated George Wallace as its American presidential candidate. The party won 13.5 percent of the popular vote and 46 electoral votes. In the mid 1970s, the slightly more moderate American Party split from the AIP.

American Federation

The AIP would regain traction after the founding of the American Federation, once again nominating George Wallace for the 1980 Federal Election. After failures in securing Florida and the imminent secession of what would come to be known as the "Free Revolts", several military commanders confided with Wallace, ousting the democratically elected government and establishing an autocratic regime with Wallace at its head.

Post-Wallace

After the death of George Wallace in 1997, former South Carolina governor Strom Thurmond ascended to the presidency. After Thurmond's death, the party has entered a schism between several factions, which has yet to be resolved. At this moment, a military council currently governs the party, and by extension, the country.

Ideology

See also: Comparisons between the Wallace Regime and Fascist States

The Ideology of the party has been debated. It has been compared to the regimes of post-colonial African nations, as well as former fascist states of the mid 20th century. Some have criticized this comparison, citing the AIP's attempted illusion of Democracy, while others have countered, referring to the Empire of Japan's diet and 'Tropical Fascist' states such as Getúlio Vargas' Brazil and, to a lesser extent, Argentine Peronism[1] as fascist states with "democracy".

The Party itself claims to be a conservative, pro-states rights party, however this has been heavily debated.

  1. Peronism is mostly regared as a left-wing ideology, although this has been debated and has been compared to fascism. Modern Peronism also has several factions among the political spectrum.