Fourth Way

Revision as of 21:12, 1 November 2023 by Forvana (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The '''Fourth Way''' is a leftist political position that draws on social market economics, trade unionism and Georgism, while rejecting Third Way economic policies and models...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Fourth Way is a leftist political position that draws on social market economics, trade unionism and Georgism, while rejecting Third Way economic policies and models. Typically, Fourth Way politicians are also socially left-wing. Fourth Way economics was borne from changing economic attitudes in Esthursia following the 2010-11 financial crisis, widely considered by Fourth Way economists to be caused by excessive deregulation, poor governance and stresses due to socioeconomic inequality, and Fourth Way economics in turn ended the neoliberal consensus within Esthursia that had existed for the previous ten years, boosted by its closeness to trade union platforms which had become more powerful in the country at the time.

Fourth Way politics is typically espoused by social democrats and democratic socialists on the centre-left to left-wing of politics. Esthursia's present Forethane Harold Osborne is its key proponent, and has pursued policies and appointed Chancellors to this effect, claiming that the socialism he pursued was "aspirational socialism, redistributive and positive to production at the same time, while also funding increased public wellbeing", and that Fourth Way economics was centred around the goal for "equity of earnt outcome". Attitudes towards capitalism are mixed among Fourth Way economists, however Harold Osborne and the majority of economists therewith do not advocate for its removal, and instead aim to "aggressively" meter its worst aspects, while creating or boosting mechanisms to redistribute away "hoarded" wealth and excess income - seen in its rebuke of conventional corporation tax as flawed, its advocacy for a larger land value tax, and cuts to less progressive taxes - while also promoting a particularly robust and wide-stretching welfare net. Additionally, Fourth Way economics typically promotes a larger state with particularly high involvement in the economy - with the Esthursian government's spending taking up over half of GDP in the 2020s - while promoting co-operatives over "one-man conglomerates" where desirable. Private involvement in state and public interests, particularly where there is a lack of rivalry or the product/service is necessary to most people, is near-universally opposed and has been reversed or scrapped where Fourth Way economists have reached power. A particularity of Fourth Way economics is also in "demarketising" housing and land, in promoting land value taxes, and high social housing stocks, while further education is typically viewed as a human right and thus free in states adhering to Fourth Way economics.

Policies supported by self-purported Fourth Way supporters vary by region, political circumstances, and ideological leanings. Fourth Way advocates generally oppose public-private partnerships, support a commitment to balanced budgets, combining equality of opportunity with disincentivising the buildup of unearnt wealth, redistribution of income, large and sustained schemes of public and research-derived investment, strengthening of trade union rights and industrial democracy, the formation of Citizens' Assemblies, high public spending including in times of recession, rejection of "NIMBYism" and mass social housing programmes, improving human and social capital, and protection of the environment. But even to these ends Fourth Way advocates differ due to conflicting priorities. Lauren Bowen, Osborne's second Chancellor, was notably unwilling to raise wealth taxes beyond existing levels, while Edelard Burnside - her successor - has instituted a wide range of tax reforms, including the increase of wealth tax and large public infrastructure schemes.

The Fourth Way has been criticised by other social democrats, as well as liberals and centrists, as unsure and dependent on omission of Third Way politics over all else, as well as potentially undermining capitalist principles and relying on left-wing trade unionism and populism, with some analysts characterising the Fourth Way as an effectively collectivist socialist movement. It has also been criticised by conservatives, classical liberals, and libertarians who advocate for laissez-faire capitalism.