Ein-class destroyer: Difference between revisions
(Expanded page, topics, navbox, overview) |
(Updated) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{Infobox ship class overview | {{Infobox ship class overview | ||
| Builders= [[Tao United Shipbuilding Corporation]] | | Builders= [[Tao United Shipbuilding Corporation]] | ||
| Operators= | | Operators= | ||
*{{navy|UST}} | |||
*{{navy|Taoist Empire}} | |||
| Class before= [[Suzume-class destroyer|Suzume-class]] | | Class before= [[Suzume-class destroyer|Suzume-class]] | ||
| Class after= [[Kitsune-class destroyer|Kitsune-class]] | | Class after= [[Kitsune-class destroyer|Kitsune-class]] | ||
| Subclasses= | | Subclasses= | ||
| Built range= | | Built range= 2000–2003 | ||
| In commission range= | | In commission range= 2002–present | ||
| Total ships building= | | Total ships building= | ||
| Total ships planned= 10 | | Total ships planned= 10 | ||
Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
|} | |} | ||
The '''''Ein''-class destroyer''' is a class of {{wp|destroyer|general purpose destroyers}} constructed for the [[UST Navy|United States of the Tao Navy]]. This is the slightly modified class of "next-gen" {{wp|destroyer|general-purpose destroyers}} of the [[ | The '''''Ein''-class destroyer''' is a class of {{wp|destroyer|general purpose destroyers}} constructed for the [[UST Navy|United States of the Tao Navy]] (USTN), and operated by the [[Imperial Taoist Navy]] (ITN). This is the slightly modified class of "next-gen" {{wp|destroyer|general-purpose destroyers}} of the [[Imperial Taoist Navy|ITN]]. | ||
__TOC__ {{TOC right}} | __TOC__ {{TOC right}} | ||
==Development== | ==Development== | ||
Since 1983, the [[UST Navy|USTN]] had been planning for the next-generation of {{wp|destroyer|general-purpose destroyers}}. This started with the [[Suzume-class destroyer]]s, for which the Ein class are based off of. | |||
The hull of the Ein class is almost identical to that of the [[Suzume-class destroyer|Suzume class]], spare a few exceptions, the hull is extremely similar. While most of the {{wp|superstructure}} of the two ships is identical, there are some noticable changes to the {{wp|conning tower}}. | |||
The combat system is one of the larger upgrades made compared to the [[Suzume-class destroyer|Suzume class]] while the {{wp|fire control system}}, and {{wp|radar|radar systems}}, are based on the same platform, the models installed on the [[Suzume-class destroyer|Suzume class]] would be considered experimental by many {{wp|navy|navies}}, leading to a popular opinion that the [[Suzume-class destroyer]]s were rushed into construction without the technology the UST wanted to install. The newer and updated systems on the Ein class are widely considered to be much more reliable, and are often considered to be the first real "next-gen" electronic system to be installed on a Taoist ship class. | |||
One of the known, official regrets the [[UST Navy|USTN]] had with the [[Suzume-class destroyer]]s was the J40 3in (76.2mm) cannon instead of the Y22 5in (127mm). The UST was initially having issues with space required for the 5in below the deck, supposedly due to the new electronic systems, which required an abnormal amount of space. After initial trials, the [[UST Navy|USTN]] was particularly displeased with the 3in (76.2) cannon on the [[Suzume-class destroyer|Suzume class]], this is why the DDV-115 and DDV-116 were cancelled, and the USTN requested for the funds to be put towards two more Ein class vessels. | |||
The last four ships of the class (Firentsu, Aoba, Hantau, and Shintao) were all built as training ships, these were dubbed as the "Firentsu class" training vessels. | |||
==Ships in the class== | |||
{|class="wikitable" | |||
! Pennant no. | |||
!Name | |||
!Laid down | |||
!Launched | |||
!Commissioned | |||
!Homeport | |||
|- | |||
!colspan=9|{{navy|Taoist Empire}} | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-117 || [[TNS Ein|''Ein'']] || 23 March 2000 || 10 June 2001 || 11 November 2002 || [[Ein]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-118 || [[TNS Neshito|''Neshito'']] || 30 June 2000 || 13 September 2001 || 1 February 2003 || [[Neshito]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-119 || [[TNS Dikētā|''Dikētā'']] || 3 August 2000 || 12 October 2001 || 24 March 2003 || [[Ein]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-120 || [[TNS Kachi|''Kachi'']] || 17 November 2000 || 8 March 2002 || 18 August 2003 || [[Kachi]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-121 || [[TNS Shimanto|''Shimanto'']] || 13 January 2001 || 14 April 2002 || 23 September 2003 || [[Shimanto]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-122 || [[TNS Dajime|''Dajime'']] || 19 May 2001 || 15 August 2002 || 14 January 2004 || [[Dajime]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-123 || [[TNS Burazosu|''Burazosu'']] || 24 September 2001 || 8 November 2002 || 5 April 2004 || [[Shimanto]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-124 || [[TNS Kurisuti|''Kurisuti'']] || 14 October 2001 || 2 January 2003 || 27 June 2004 || [[Neshito]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-125 || [[TNS Miko|''Miko'']] || 3 April 2002 || 20 September 2003 || 2 February 2005 || [[Kachi]] | |||
|- | |||
| DDV-126 || [[TNS Borudō|''Borudō'']] || 5 April 2002 || 22 July 2003 || 20 December 2004 || [[Dajime]] | |||
|- | |||
| TRV-105 || [[TNS Firentsu|''Firentsu'']] || 3 January 2003 || 27 May 2004 || 19 October 2005 || [[Dajime]] | |||
|- | |||
| TRV-106 || [[TNS Aoba|''Aoba'']] || 15 May 2003 || 21 September 2004 || 1 February 2006 || [[Dajime]] | |||
|- | |||
| TRV-107 || [[TNS Hantau|''Hantau'']] || 24 July 2003 || 22 November 2004 || 7 April 2006 || [[Dajime]] | |||
|- | |||
| TRV-108 || [[TNS Shintao|''Shintao'']] || 4 October 2003 || 22 February 2005 || 15 July 2006 || [[Dajime]] | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
{{UST Topics}} | {{UST Topics}} | ||
Line 68: | Line 117: | ||
[[Category:United States of the Tao]] | [[Category:United States of the Tao]] | ||
[[Category:Active naval ships of the UST]] | [[Category:Active naval ships of the UST]] | ||
[[Category:Yellow-Class Sunalaya articles]] |
Latest revision as of 20:28, 21 September 2019
TNS Dikētā (DDV-119) in 2013
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Builders: | Tao United Shipbuilding Corporation |
Operators: | |
Preceded by: | Suzume-class |
Succeeded by: | Kitsune-class |
Built: | 2000–2003 |
In commission: | 2002–present |
Planned: | 10 |
Completed: | 10 |
Active: | 10 |
General characteristics | |
Type: | General-purpose destroyer |
Displacement: |
|
Length: | 151 m (495 ft) |
Beam: | 17.4 m (57 ft) |
Draft: | 5.2 m (17 ft) |
Propulsion: | 4 x Ein Heavy Industries gas turbines |
Speed: | 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph) |
Complement: | 165 enlisted and officers |
Armament: | |
Aviation facilities: | Up to 1 helicopter |
The Ein-class destroyer is a class of general purpose destroyers constructed for the United States of the Tao Navy (USTN), and operated by the Imperial Taoist Navy (ITN). This is the slightly modified class of "next-gen" general-purpose destroyers of the ITN.
Development
Since 1983, the USTN had been planning for the next-generation of general-purpose destroyers. This started with the Suzume-class destroyers, for which the Ein class are based off of.
The hull of the Ein class is almost identical to that of the Suzume class, spare a few exceptions, the hull is extremely similar. While most of the superstructure of the two ships is identical, there are some noticable changes to the conning tower.
The combat system is one of the larger upgrades made compared to the Suzume class while the fire control system, and radar systems, are based on the same platform, the models installed on the Suzume class would be considered experimental by many navies, leading to a popular opinion that the Suzume-class destroyers were rushed into construction without the technology the UST wanted to install. The newer and updated systems on the Ein class are widely considered to be much more reliable, and are often considered to be the first real "next-gen" electronic system to be installed on a Taoist ship class.
One of the known, official regrets the USTN had with the Suzume-class destroyers was the J40 3in (76.2mm) cannon instead of the Y22 5in (127mm). The UST was initially having issues with space required for the 5in below the deck, supposedly due to the new electronic systems, which required an abnormal amount of space. After initial trials, the USTN was particularly displeased with the 3in (76.2) cannon on the Suzume class, this is why the DDV-115 and DDV-116 were cancelled, and the USTN requested for the funds to be put towards two more Ein class vessels.
The last four ships of the class (Firentsu, Aoba, Hantau, and Shintao) were all built as training ships, these were dubbed as the "Firentsu class" training vessels.
Ships in the class
Pennant no. | Name | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Homeport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imperial Taoist Navy | ||||||||
DDV-117 | Ein | 23 March 2000 | 10 June 2001 | 11 November 2002 | Ein | |||
DDV-118 | Neshito | 30 June 2000 | 13 September 2001 | 1 February 2003 | Neshito | |||
DDV-119 | Dikētā | 3 August 2000 | 12 October 2001 | 24 March 2003 | Ein | |||
DDV-120 | Kachi | 17 November 2000 | 8 March 2002 | 18 August 2003 | Kachi | |||
DDV-121 | Shimanto | 13 January 2001 | 14 April 2002 | 23 September 2003 | Shimanto | |||
DDV-122 | Dajime | 19 May 2001 | 15 August 2002 | 14 January 2004 | Dajime | |||
DDV-123 | Burazosu | 24 September 2001 | 8 November 2002 | 5 April 2004 | Shimanto | |||
DDV-124 | Kurisuti | 14 October 2001 | 2 January 2003 | 27 June 2004 | Neshito | |||
DDV-125 | Miko | 3 April 2002 | 20 September 2003 | 2 February 2005 | Kachi | |||
DDV-126 | Borudō | 5 April 2002 | 22 July 2003 | 20 December 2004 | Dajime | |||
TRV-105 | Firentsu | 3 January 2003 | 27 May 2004 | 19 October 2005 | Dajime | |||
TRV-106 | Aoba | 15 May 2003 | 21 September 2004 | 1 February 2006 | Dajime | |||
TRV-107 | Hantau | 24 July 2003 | 22 November 2004 | 7 April 2006 | Dajime | |||
TRV-108 | Shintao | 4 October 2003 | 22 February 2005 | 15 July 2006 | Dajime |