User talk:Gylias: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
So sorry! Yes, I did use your template as a reference and clearly didn't know what I was doing! | So sorry! Yes, I did use your template as a reference and clearly didn't know what I was doing! | ||
[[User:Zacha96|Zacha96]] ([[User talk:Zacha96|talk]]) 02:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC) | [[User:Zacha96|Zacha96]] ([[User talk:Zacha96|talk]]) 02:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Concordianism == | |||
Hello, | |||
I'm not here to mediate or anything between you and NB, and agree that the WIP template wasn't necessary. However, your article ''should'' be better categorized. If it's a religious tradition then you should categorize it as such. If you could also please be less confrontational, I would appreciate it; I'm sure NB did not mean to insult you. | |||
Thank you! | |||
<small><span class="AdminSig">'''[[IIwiki:Administrators|Admin]]:''' [[User:Santh|'''Santh''']][[User_talk:Santh| <small>'''(Talk)'''</small>]] {{#if: |<span style="font-size:larger;">'''·'''</span>|'''·'''}} <small>{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}</small></span></small> 22:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Reply == | |||
huh? | |||
--- There my bad, fixed it, | |||
though a pity you didn't know how to request things properly in friendly manners | |||
Latest revision as of 08:36, 12 June 2022
Politics Reply
Hey! Sorry if it looks like I'm stealing your phrasing I probably just edited that section quite late lol
Your political sections are really good and I must say I had to have a nosey around all your IIWiki stuff! You have been a good inspiration and help for me :D
PS I posted it on here and my own page because I don't really know how any of this works lol
- Vazcoeur
Reply Mk 2
Thanks! I will check it out :) Vazcoeur (talk) 21:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
RE:Fixed a link
So sorry! Yes, I did use your template as a reference and clearly didn't know what I was doing! Zacha96 (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Concordianism
Hello,
I'm not here to mediate or anything between you and NB, and agree that the WIP template wasn't necessary. However, your article should be better categorized. If it's a religious tradition then you should categorize it as such. If you could also please be less confrontational, I would appreciate it; I'm sure NB did not mean to insult you.
Thank you! Admin: Santh (Talk) · 04:34, 24 November 2024 22:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Reply
huh?
--- There my bad, fixed it, though a pity you didn't know how to request things properly in friendly manners