IIWiki:Today's featured article: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(July 2023 Update)
(July 2024 Update)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">[[File:NationalFunctionalistAxe.png|150px]]</div> '''National Functionalism''' is a {{wp|Far-right politics|far-right}}, {{wp|authoritarian}}, {{wp|Cultural nationalism|cultural nationalist}} political ideology characertised by beliefs in a strong centralised state, a rejection of {{wp|individualism}}, a belief in superiority based on culture and cultural origins, and the concept of the state as a {{wp|Organicism|living organism}} of which individuals are constituent parts, commonly referred to as the ''communauté populaire''. The term [[National Functionalism#Contemporary Functionalism|neo-Functionalist]] emerged following the [[Great War (Kylaris)|Great War]] to describe groups emulating the Functionalist ideology. National Functionalism arose in [[Gaullica]]n militaristic political circles in the late 19th century, following the [[War of the Triple Alliance]]. Gaullican defeat in the war, the loss of traditional territories such as [[Kesselbourg]] and [[Hennehouwe]] and the fragmentation of traditional allies in [[Soravia]] and [[Valduvia]] left the nation diplomatically isolated and fueled {{wp|revanchist}} sentiment. The tenets of the ideology can be traced to Gaëtan de Trintignant, a Gaullican Field Marshal who wrote numerous political treatises demanding a rejection of the modernity typified by the constitutional amendments that had whittled the power of the Gaullican monarchy following the Age of Revolutions. In two political works, de Trintignant outlined his beliefs on the necessity of a strong central authority, a rejection of both ''{{wp|laissez-faire}}'' {{wp|capitalism}} and international {{wp|socialism}}, a strong sense of social cohesion underpinned by a civic national identity and the establishment of the means to spread this identity. Inspired by the growing field of {{wp|sociology}}, de Trintignant viewed the state as a parallel to the human body, with a healthly state achieved when each part was working in concert. There is some debate regarding whether National Functionalism is an ideology specific to Gaullican political development, or if it has had wider influence. In the modern day, National Functionalism has experienced a sharp decline. The ideology was officially outlawed in Gaullica as a threat to constitutional order following the Great War and its proponents were targeted by DENAT as part of the {{wp|Denazification|defunctionalisation}} of the country. Modern neo-Functionalists are a fringe movement in [[Euclea]]n politics. Nevertheless, in the context of nationalist groups like the Etrurian [[Tribune Movement]] and Paretian [[O Povo]], Functionalist has re-entered political discourse as a pejorative term for members of those parties. ('''[[National Functionalism|See more...]]''')
<div style="float:left;margin:0.5em 0.9em 0.4em 0;">[[File:Talaharan Constitution Sample.png|150px]]</div> The '''Supreme Consensus of Talahara''' ({{wp|Central Atlas Tamazight|Takelat}}: ⴰⵎⵙⴻⴼⵀⴰⵎ ⴰⵄⵍⴰⵢⴻⵏ ⵏ ⵜⴰⵍⴰⵀⴰⵔⴰ; ''Amsefham Aɛlayen n Talahara'') is the constitution of the [[Talahara|United Communes of Talahara]]. Drafted over a period of three years between 1838 and 1841, the first two parts of the Supreme Consensus enshrined the rights and freedoms of all persons in Talahara, in addition to democratic and usufructary rights. Part three of the Supreme Consensus was completed later in 1841 and codified the roles of the three branches of government and divisions of power between national, regional, and communal levels of government. Both laws created by the [[Supreme Legislative Council (Talahara)|Legislative Councils of Talahara]] and the executive functions of government must abide by the protections and limitations enshrined by the Supreme Consensus. Constitutional principles are also used alongside Talaharan customary legal principles to interpret laws. The Supreme Consensus has been amended a total of four times. These amendments include the addition of the third part, electoral reform, and the addition of new rights and protections. Constitutional amendments require the passage of a provision by a two-thirds supermajority in the Supreme Legislative Council (34 of 50 members) and subsequent ratification by a two-thirds supermajority by the membership of the 1,250 Communal Legislative Councils in Talahara (8,334 of 12,500 members). ('''[[Supreme Consensus of Talahara|See more...]]''')


<div align="right">
<div align="right">
'''<span class="plainlinks">[https://iiwiki.us/mediawiki/index.php?title=IIWiki_talk:Today%27s_featured_article&action=edit Suggest a Featured Article]</span>''' • '''[[IIWiki:Featured articles|See previous Featured Articles]]'''</div><noinclude>
'''<span class="plainlinks">[https://iiwiki.us/mediawiki/index.php?title=IIWiki_talk:Today%27s_featured_article&action=edit&section=new Suggest a Featured Article]</span>''' • '''[[IIWiki:Featured articles|See previous Featured Articles]]'''</div><noinclude>





Latest revision as of 01:03, 10 July 2024

Talaharan Constitution Sample.png

The Supreme Consensus of Talahara (Takelat: ⴰⵎⵙⴻⴼⵀⴰⵎ ⴰⵄⵍⴰⵢⴻⵏ ⵏ ⵜⴰⵍⴰⵀⴰⵔⴰ; Amsefham Aɛlayen n Talahara) is the constitution of the United Communes of Talahara. Drafted over a period of three years between 1838 and 1841, the first two parts of the Supreme Consensus enshrined the rights and freedoms of all persons in Talahara, in addition to democratic and usufructary rights. Part three of the Supreme Consensus was completed later in 1841 and codified the roles of the three branches of government and divisions of power between national, regional, and communal levels of government. Both laws created by the Legislative Councils of Talahara and the executive functions of government must abide by the protections and limitations enshrined by the Supreme Consensus. Constitutional principles are also used alongside Talaharan customary legal principles to interpret laws. The Supreme Consensus has been amended a total of four times. These amendments include the addition of the third part, electoral reform, and the addition of new rights and protections. Constitutional amendments require the passage of a provision by a two-thirds supermajority in the Supreme Legislative Council (34 of 50 members) and subsequent ratification by a two-thirds supermajority by the membership of the 1,250 Communal Legislative Councils in Talahara (8,334 of 12,500 members). (See more...)

Suggest a Featured ArticleSee previous Featured Articles


KEEP THIS ONE PARAGRAPH IN LENGTH so it doesn't push the main page section down below the other section.