This article belongs to the lore of Teleon.

Combinationalism: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Region icon Teleon}}
{{Region icon Teleon}}
{{WIP}}
[[File:Sars Johan Ernst.gif|thumb|[[Waldrich|Waldish]] philosopher [[Knut Arvidsen]] is widely credited with laying the philosophical foundation for combinationalism.]]
[[File:Sars Johan Ernst.gif|thumb|[[Waldrich|Waldish]] philosopher [[Knut Arvidsen]] is widely credited with coining the term "combinationalism".]]
'''Combinationalism''', sometimes known as '''Arvidsenism''', is a {{wp|political philosophy|political}} and {{wp|economic ideology|economic}} {{wp|ideology}} that rose to prominence in the [[Northern world (Teleon)|Northern world]] during the early 20th century. Combinationalism is based around the [[Dual mandate principle|dual mandate principle]], which claims that the purpose of the state is to ensure {{wp|Dignity|human dignity}} by maximizing both {{wp|Right to property|property rights}} and {{wp|Social justice|social justice}}. Combinationalists argue that these two objectives inherently conflict, creating a [[Paradox of the state|paradox]] where the existence of the state is simultaneously moral and immoral. The combinationalist solution to this paradox is [[Public stewardship|public stewardship]], a model in which the state seeks out the most efficient possible solution for social problems to minimize its infringement upon both components of the dual mandate. Adherents of the movement are diverse in their views, but generally support {{wp|Limited government|limited government}}, {{wp|Subsidiarity|subsidiarity}}, {{wp|Free trade|free trade}}, a {{wp|Consistent life ethic|consistent life ethic}}, {{wp|Familialism|familialism}}, {{wp|Optimal tax|optimal taxation}}, and {{wp|Welfare reform|welfare reform}}.
'''[[Combinationalism]]''' is a {{wp|Populism|populist}} political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in the !Western world during the early 20th century. Combinationalism argues that the central political issue in capitalist societies is the conflict between {{wp|Liberty|individual liberty}} and {{wp|Social equality|social equality}}, and that these two competing interests must be reconciled, or “combined”, in order to maximize the wellbeing of the people. Combinationalists generally advocate for social welfare policies to take the least intrusive means possible to ensure an adequate standard of living for all members of a society, and to strengthen, not replace, social institutions such as churches, families, and community organizations.  In the 21st century, combinationalist movements are commonly associated with policies promoting {{wp|Tax reform|tax simplification}}, {{wp|Freedom of religion|religious liberty}}, {{wp|Right to property|property rights}}, a {{wp|Universal basic income|universal basic income}}, and the {{wp|Right to privacy|right to privacy}}.


The term “combinationalism” was coined by [[Waldrich|Waldish]] philosopher [[Knut Arvidsen]] in his 1878 essay ''[[The Combinationalist State]]'', which is widely considered to be the foundational document of the ideology. After the [[Recession of 1924]], combinationalist movements entered the political mainstream in several countries in the [[Teleon|Elias]]. [[Hyacinthe]] became the first nation with an openly combinationalist government in X, when X. Combinationalism spread to western and southern [[Calesia]] after the [[Great War (Teleon)|Great War]], when it was embraced by agrarian and labor movements in order to encourage an equitable reconstruction of the war-torn continent. Waldish [[Lawspeaker of Waldrich|Lawspeaker]] [[Karl Fjellheim]] was an early proponent of Calesian combinationalism, enacting a series of economic and social reforms during the 1940s that became known internationally as the [[Waldish model]].
Combinationalism developed in [[Waldrich]] during the late 19th century as an outgrowth of {{wp|Catholic social teaching|Cathedralist social teaching}}. The philosopher [[Knut Arvidsen]] is widely credited with laying the ideology's philosophical foundation with his 1887 essay ''[[Property and Justice]]'', which coined much of the terminology associated with combinationalist discourse. After the [[Recession of 1924]], combinationalist movements entered the political mainstream in several countries in [[TBA]] as a {{wp|Center-right politics|center-right}} solution to the {{wp|Social question|social question}}. [[TBA]] became the first nation with an openly combinationalist government in 1930, when [[TBA]] and his [[TBA Party]] rose to power in the aftermath of the [[TBA]]. Combinationalism spread to [[Calesia]] after the [[Great War (Teleon)|Great War]], when it was embraced by {{wp|Christian democracy|Gregorian democratic}} parties to serve as a model for post-war reconstruction. Waldish [[Lawspeaker of Waldrich|Lawspeaker]] [[Karl Fjellheim]] was an early proponent of Calesian combinationalism, enacting a series of economic and social reforms during the 1940s that became known internationally as the [[Waldish model]]. During the 1960s, neocombinationalism emerged as a major school of thought that advocated for programs such as a {{wp|Negative income tax|negative income tax}}, {{wp|Land value tax|land value tax}}, {{wp|Health insurance mandate|health insurance mandates}} and {{wp|School voucher|school vouchers}} as alternatives to a traditional welfare state.
 
Political scientists disagree significantly on how best to categorize combinationalism as an ideology. Different academic sources have alternatively described the ideology as a variant of {{wp|Welfare capitalism|welfare capitalism}}, {{wp|Third way|third way politics}}, and {{wp|Radical centrism|radical centrism}}, with no agreement on whether it lies to the left or right of the political spectrum.  In addition, various combinationalist movements around the world, and often within the same country, differ significantly in their answers to key combinationalist questions.  As a result, combinationalism has often been referred to as a “big-tent” ideology, with different movements unified only by a “shared undercurrent of populism”.


Political scientists generally categorize combinationalism as a {{wp|Center-right politics|center-right}} ideology, occupying a middle ground between the {{wp|Market intervention|interventionist}} approach of {{wp|Ordoliberalism|ordoliberalism}} and the ''{{wp|Laissez-faire|laissez-faire}}'' approach of {{wp|Classical liberalism|classical liberalism}} and {{wp|Right-libertarianism|right-libertarianism}}. However, combinationalism remains difficult to classify due to the significant ideological diversity between different movements. As a result, combinationalism has often been referred to as a “big-tent” ideology unified only by adherence to the dual mandate principle.
==Etymology==
==Etymology==
==History==
==History==
==Philosophy==
==Philosophy==
Despite the significant ideological heterogeneity within combinationalism, the vast majority of combinationalists adhere to several core principles. The most foundational concept in combinationalism is the [[Dual mandate principle|dual mandate principle]], which claims that the purpose of the state is to promote {{wp|Dignity|human dignity}} by maximizing both {{wp|Right to property|property rights}} and {{wp|Social justice|social justice}}. Combinationalists argue that these two objectives are inherently in conflict, as it is impossible to fully realize one without infringing on the other. For example, state efforts to ensure equal access to healthcare necessarily require coercive action that infringes upon the property rights of others, such as funding public health services through taxation. Conversely, refraining from action altogether allows the state to fully respect the property rights of its citizens, but leaves it powerless to ensure a just society with equal access to healthcare. Combinationalists view both outcomes as morally unacceptable, resulting in the [[Paradox of the state|paradox of the state]] - the situation in which both state action and inaction are simultaneously necessary and unethical. Although many combinationalists believe that a functional {{wp|Voluntaryism|voluntary}} or {{wp|Anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalist}} society with private charity is theoretically the most ethical solution to the paradox, they argue that such an arrangement is impossible and would not be capable of upholding either side of the dual mandate even if it were implemented.
To rectify this predicament, combinationalists argue that the state's legitimacy relies upon its ability to find the "least bad" course of action, essentially achieving a {{wp|Pareto efficiency|Pareto optimal}} moral equilibrium. Combinationalists claim that this outcome is achieved through [[Public stewardship|public stewardship]], the concept that the state has a moral obligation to operate efficiently. Under public stewardship, efficiency is defined as ensuring access to the best possible essential services while infringing on negative rights the least. Failing to efficiently manage, or "steward", resources and capabilities that the state has acquired through force delegitimizes its authority, as it has deprived individuals of their property unnecessarily. Likewise, ineffective stewardship of public resources deprives the people of superior essential services that could have otherwise been provided, making it morally reprehensible on both fronts.
Closely related to the concept of public stewardship is that of {{wp|Subsidiarity|subsidiarity}}, which proposes handling issues at the lowest level capable of effectively resolving the problem. Subsidiarity calls for empowering local authorities to handle situations that are unsuited for central government intervention, and to provide community-based solutions that are specifically tailored to local needs. Combinationalists argue that this system inherently more efficient than centralized governance, as it allows for solutions to be applied on a more personal level that recognizes the different needs of various populations. Subsidiarity also advocates for churches, families, and community organizations to provide solutions when possible, reducing societal reliance on state coercion for essential services.
==Notable proponents==
==Notable proponents==
==Variants==
==Variants==
===Social combinationalism===
===Classical combinationalism===
===Progressive combinationalism===
===Combinational liberalism===
===Orthodox combinationalism===
===Integral combinationalism===
===National combinationalism===
===Neocombinationalism===
===Libertarian combinationalism===
 
==Parties and movements==
==Parties and movements==
==Criticism and support==
==Criticism and support==


{{Teleon}}
[[Category:Ideologies (Teleon)]]
[[Category:Teleon]]
[[Category:World history (Teleon)]]

Latest revision as of 07:12, 13 December 2024

Waldish philosopher Knut Arvidsen is widely credited with laying the philosophical foundation for combinationalism.

Combinationalism, sometimes known as Arvidsenism, is a political and economic ideology that rose to prominence in the Northern world during the early 20th century. Combinationalism is based around the dual mandate principle, which claims that the purpose of the state is to ensure human dignity by maximizing both property rights and social justice. Combinationalists argue that these two objectives inherently conflict, creating a paradox where the existence of the state is simultaneously moral and immoral. The combinationalist solution to this paradox is public stewardship, a model in which the state seeks out the most efficient possible solution for social problems to minimize its infringement upon both components of the dual mandate. Adherents of the movement are diverse in their views, but generally support limited government, subsidiarity, free trade, a consistent life ethic, familialism, optimal taxation, and welfare reform.

Combinationalism developed in Waldrich during the late 19th century as an outgrowth of Cathedralist social teaching. The philosopher Knut Arvidsen is widely credited with laying the ideology's philosophical foundation with his 1887 essay Property and Justice, which coined much of the terminology associated with combinationalist discourse. After the Recession of 1924, combinationalist movements entered the political mainstream in several countries in TBA as a center-right solution to the social question. TBA became the first nation with an openly combinationalist government in 1930, when TBA and his TBA Party rose to power in the aftermath of the TBA. Combinationalism spread to Calesia after the Great War, when it was embraced by Gregorian democratic parties to serve as a model for post-war reconstruction. Waldish Lawspeaker Karl Fjellheim was an early proponent of Calesian combinationalism, enacting a series of economic and social reforms during the 1940s that became known internationally as the Waldish model. During the 1960s, neocombinationalism emerged as a major school of thought that advocated for programs such as a negative income tax, land value tax, health insurance mandates and school vouchers as alternatives to a traditional welfare state.

Political scientists generally categorize combinationalism as a center-right ideology, occupying a middle ground between the interventionist approach of ordoliberalism and the laissez-faire approach of classical liberalism and right-libertarianism. However, combinationalism remains difficult to classify due to the significant ideological diversity between different movements. As a result, combinationalism has often been referred to as a “big-tent” ideology unified only by adherence to the dual mandate principle.

Etymology

History

Philosophy

Despite the significant ideological heterogeneity within combinationalism, the vast majority of combinationalists adhere to several core principles. The most foundational concept in combinationalism is the dual mandate principle, which claims that the purpose of the state is to promote human dignity by maximizing both property rights and social justice. Combinationalists argue that these two objectives are inherently in conflict, as it is impossible to fully realize one without infringing on the other. For example, state efforts to ensure equal access to healthcare necessarily require coercive action that infringes upon the property rights of others, such as funding public health services through taxation. Conversely, refraining from action altogether allows the state to fully respect the property rights of its citizens, but leaves it powerless to ensure a just society with equal access to healthcare. Combinationalists view both outcomes as morally unacceptable, resulting in the paradox of the state - the situation in which both state action and inaction are simultaneously necessary and unethical. Although many combinationalists believe that a functional voluntary or anarcho-capitalist society with private charity is theoretically the most ethical solution to the paradox, they argue that such an arrangement is impossible and would not be capable of upholding either side of the dual mandate even if it were implemented.

To rectify this predicament, combinationalists argue that the state's legitimacy relies upon its ability to find the "least bad" course of action, essentially achieving a Pareto optimal moral equilibrium. Combinationalists claim that this outcome is achieved through public stewardship, the concept that the state has a moral obligation to operate efficiently. Under public stewardship, efficiency is defined as ensuring access to the best possible essential services while infringing on negative rights the least. Failing to efficiently manage, or "steward", resources and capabilities that the state has acquired through force delegitimizes its authority, as it has deprived individuals of their property unnecessarily. Likewise, ineffective stewardship of public resources deprives the people of superior essential services that could have otherwise been provided, making it morally reprehensible on both fronts.

Closely related to the concept of public stewardship is that of subsidiarity, which proposes handling issues at the lowest level capable of effectively resolving the problem. Subsidiarity calls for empowering local authorities to handle situations that are unsuited for central government intervention, and to provide community-based solutions that are specifically tailored to local needs. Combinationalists argue that this system inherently more efficient than centralized governance, as it allows for solutions to be applied on a more personal level that recognizes the different needs of various populations. Subsidiarity also advocates for churches, families, and community organizations to provide solutions when possible, reducing societal reliance on state coercion for essential services.

Notable proponents

Variants

Classical combinationalism

Combinational liberalism

Integral combinationalism

Neocombinationalism

Parties and movements

Criticism and support