This article belongs to the lore of Aeia.

Alydian Democratic Union: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Region icon Aeia}}
{{Infobox political party
{{Infobox political party
|name              = Alydian Democratic Union
|name              = Alydian Democratic Union
Line 21: Line 22:
|national          =  
|national          =  
|international      = Democratic Forum
|international      = Democratic Forum
|affiliation1_title = Aeian Parliament
|affiliation1_title = Parliamentary Bloc
|affiliation1      = Democratic Bloc
|affiliation1      = [[Chartist Bloc|Chartist]]
|colours            = {{color box|#3d5ba9}} Blue
|colours            = {{color box|#002060}} Dark Blue
|seats1_title      = [[Public Assembly of Midrasia|Public Assembly]]
|seats1_title      = [[Public Assembly of Midrasia|Public Assembly]]
|seats1            = {{Infobox political party/seats|11|600|hex=#3d5ba9}}
|seats1            = {{Infobox political party/seats|59|572|hex=#002060}}
|seats2_title      = [[Senate of Midrasia|Senate]]
|seats2_title      = [[Senate of Midrasia|Senate]]
|seats2            = {{Infobox political party/seats|2|100|hex=#3d5ba9}}
|seats2            = {{Infobox political party/seats|21|300|hex=#002060}}
<!--|seats3_title      = Local Parishes
<!--|seats3_title      = Local Parishes
|seats3            = {{Infobox political party/seats|seats_won|total_seats|hex=#219444}} -->
|seats3            = {{Infobox political party/seats|seats_won|total_seats|hex=#219444}} -->
Line 37: Line 38:
|position          = {{wp|Centre-right}}
|position          = {{wp|Centre-right}}
}}
}}
The '''Alydian Democratic Union''' (Midrasian: ''Union des Démocrates Alydie''), abbreviated '''UDA'''; otherwise known as the '''Union of Alydian Democrats''', is a {{wp|conservative}}, {{wp|Christian democracy|alydian democratic}} {{wp|political party}} in [[Midrasia]]. The party was formed in 1953 as a breakaway party from the [[National Coalition (Midrasia)|National Coalition]], representing members of the party who sought to advocate  policies more aligned with {{wp|Christian democracy|Alydian democrat}} and less {{wp|nationalism|nationalist}} stances. Since its formation the party has been the country's leading conservative political party along with elements of the [[Chartist Party]]. Today, the party remains the leading advocate for {{wp|conservative}} policies within Midrasia, and has regularly formed a number of coalitions with the Chartists. Since 2013 the party has been in opposition and has suffered a considerable period of decline, losing a considerably amount of support the more nationalistic anti-immigration [[Midrasia First]].
The '''Alydian Democratic Union''' (Midrasian: ''Union des Démocrates Alydie''), abbreviated '''UDA'''; otherwise known as the '''Union of Alydian Democrats''', is a {{wp|conservative}}, {{wp|Christian democracy|alydian democratic}} {{wp|political party}} in [[Midrasia]]. The party was formed in 1953 as a breakaway party from the [[National Coalition (Midrasia)|National Coalition]], representing members of the party who sought to advocate  policies more aligned with {{wp|Christian democracy|Alydian democratic}} stances rather that outright {{wp|nationalism}}. Since its formation the party has been the country's leading conservative political party along with elements of the [[Chartist Party]]. Today, the party remains the leading advocate for {{wp|traditionalist conservative}} policies within Midrasia, and is a major player within the [[Chartist Bloc]] along with the [[Republican Party]]. Since 2013 the party has been in opposition and has suffered a considerable period of decline, losing a considerably amount of support the more nationalistic anti-immigration [[Midrasia First]].
==History==
==History==
===Feuillantism===
===Devreuxanism===
Modern Midrasian conservatism mostly has its origins within the Feuillant movement of the late eighteenth-early nineteenth century. Whilst Conservative movements certainly predated this period, playing a major role throughout Midrasian early-modern political history, it is not until this period that the movement begins to gain significant traction and can be seen as a mainstream political ideology. Feuillants were generally members of the Estates General and later Public Assembly who advocated for a stronger Midrasian monarchy. Whilst a number of Feuillants advocated for the return of the Huguenot dynasty to the throne of Midrasia, the vast majority of Feuillants acquiesced to the outcome of the [[Midrasian Revolution]].  
Modern Midrasian conservatism mostly has its origins within the Devreuxan movement of the Old Republic which advocated for a strong Consulship and was opposed to the secularist stances of the Parliamentarian movement. In addition to supporting a strong Consulship, the Devreuxans advocated for the organisation of society on the lines of a social contract. Devreuxans also held the church in high regard, mandating that religious institutions be represented in Midrasian politics and that religious doctrine be utilised as a basis for a moral society. In general the Devreuxans acted as more of an informal coalition of like minded nobles and elects within parliament and it would not be until after the revolution that there would be a movement to establish an official political party to represent Midrasian conservative values.


In addition to supporting a strong monarchy, the Feuillants advocated for the organisation of society on the lines of a social contract. Feuillants also held the church in high regard, mandating that religious institutions be represented in Midrasian politics and that religious doctrine be utilised as a basis for a moral society. In general the Feuillants acted as more of an informal coalition of like minded nobles and elects within parliament and it would not be until 1843 that there would be a movement to establish an official political party to represent Midrasian conservative values.
Nevertheless, with the fall of the Devreuxan Consulship following the [[Midrasian Revolution]], traditionalist conservatives remained considerably isolated for a large portion of the early Nineteenth Century, overshadowed by the Chartist Party.


===Conservative Party===
===Conservative Party===
[[image:MSC 2014 Fabius-Mikati Mueller MSC2014 (cropped).jpg|200px|right|thumb|Julien Saint Yvres was the last Consul from the UDA]]
The Conservative Party was, between 1791 and 1869, the main conservative political party within Midrasia, for the most of its history operating in direct opposition to the Chartist Party. The Conservative Party won its first election in 1815 with François de Mydroll elected as Consul. Throughout its time in government, the Conservative party was able to form a number of majority governments, passing a significant amount of legislation and greatly contributing to the evolution of nineteenth-century Midrasian society.
The Conservative Party was, between 1843 and 1935, the main conservative political party within Midrasia, for the most of its history operating in direct opposition to the Chartist Party, although by the twentieth century the PSD had begun to overshadow the Chartists in terms of Parliamentary representation. Throughout its time in government, the Conservative party was able to form a number of majority governments, passing a significant amount of legislation during its time in government and greatly contributing to the evolution of nineteenth century Midrasian society.


Generally, the Conservative party tended to favour a {{wp|protectionist}} attitude towards trade throughout the nineteenth century, emphasising Midrasian goods and services over free trade with foreign countries and empires. In terms of social attitudes, the party was deeply {{wp|social conservatism|socially conservative}} placing great emphasis on the established alydian church, the monarchy and the aristocracy. Despite this, in an effort to increase the popularity of the party within the 1870s, the Conservatives can be seen to have championed the cause of the working classes through an advocacy of universal male suffrage and better conditions for factory workers. The Conservative party also saw itself as the bastion of {{wp|imperialism}} advocating for the overseas expansion of the Midrasian kingdom, both to secure resources and trade income, but also to spread modernity and the ideas of the {{wp|age of enlightenment|enlightenment}} to the so-called 'backward nations of aeia' through the {{wp|civilising mission}}. The party was particularly fixated on Midrasian domination of the continents of [[Majula]] and [[Arabekh]], especially after the conclusion of the Mydro-Veleazan war. In the aftermath of the war, the party was also notable in its pursuit of anti-socialist legislation, limiting the political involvement of socialist parties and organisations.
Generally, the Conservative party tended to favour a {{wp|protectionist}} attitude towards trade, emphasising Midrasian goods and services over free trade with foreign countries and empires. In terms of social attitudes, the party was {{wp|social conservatism|socially conservative}} placing great emphasis on the established Alydian church, gradualist reform, and the promotion of traditional moral values. Despite this, in an effort to increase the popularity of the party within the 1870s, the Conservatives can be seen to have championed the cause of the working classes through an advocacy of universal male suffrage and better conditions for factory workers. The Conservative party also saw itself as the bastion of {{wp|imperialism}} advocating for the overseas expansion of the Midrasian Republic, both to secure resources and trade income, but also to spread modernity and the ideas of the {{wp|age of enlightenment|enlightenment}} to the so-called 'backward nations of Aeia' through the {{wp|civilising mission}}. The party was particularly fixated on Midrasian domination of the continents of [[Majula]] and [[Arabekh]]. The party was also notable for its opposition to the abolition of slavery a major factor in the marginalisation of the party during its early years of operation.


By the 1930s however, the Conservative Party was beginning to lose significant standings in the polls. A general national shift toward the left had led to a number of successive [[Social Democratic Party (Midrasia)|Social Democratic]] governments and a general division within the Conservatives as to the future direction of the party. With the party's representation falling to only 144 in 1935, and an increasing number of MPs defecting to either the National or Imperial Party the decision was made to form a 'general coalition of the right'. As such, the Conservative party officially became part of the [[National Coalition (Midrasia)|National Coalition Party]] later the same year.
However, with Midrasia's defeat at the hands of Veleaz during the Perpignan War, the Conservative Party suffered major setbacks, having been seen as the party responsible for the country's humiliating defeat. The party split apart during the Crisis of 1871, its members splintering into the Republican, Royalist, Revanchist, and Devreuxan Parties. Whilst many traditionalist conservatives would coalesce around the Republican Party between 1870 and 1935, the formation of the National Coalition saw many on the political right defect due to the increasing moderate stances of the Republicans. Yet with the fall of the CN in 1953 many traditionalist conservatives elected to form their own party outside of the more mainstream right-wing factions.


===1953–present===
===Alydian Democratic Union===
Whilst between 1935 and 1953 the Conservative Party was officially a part of the [[National Coalition (Midrasia)|National Coalition Party]], by the 1950s tensions within the party between the right-wing protectionist bloc and the emergent neoliberal wing has reached breaking point. A number of defectors from the National Coalition officially joined the [[Chartist Party]] in what they saw as an increasingly right-wing nationalist tendency within the party. Bolstered by this, in 1953 an alliance of twelve {{wp|Christian democracy|alydian democrat}} members of the National Coalition officially split with the party to form the Alydian Democratic Union. Although initially it was believed that the Coalition would remain intact, due to the size of its majority, leading the new party to be relegated to the status of third-party, internal divisions in the Coalition only improving the standing of the UDA. At the 1956 election, the UDA were able to attain 22 seats, whilst the National Coalition lost its majority, only attaining 120 seats. In the following years the divisions within the CN would only worsen, leading an increasing number to defect to the UDA and Chartists.
[[image:MSC 2014 Fabius-Mikati Mueller MSC2014 (cropped).jpg|200px|right|thumb|Julien Saint Yvres was the last Consul from the UDA]]
By the 1950s tensions within the party between the right-wing protectionist bloc and the emergent neoliberal wing has reached breaking point. A number of defectors from the National Coalition officially joined the Republican Party in what they saw as an increasingly right-wing nationalist tendency within the party. Bolstered by this, in 1953 an alliance of twelve {{wp|Christian democracy|alydian democrat}} members of the National Coalition officially split with the party to form the Alydian Democratic Union. Although initially it was believed that the Coalition would remain intact, due to the size of its majority, internal divisions in the Coalition only improving the standing of the UDA. At the 1956 election, the UDA was able to attain 22 seats, whilst the National Coalition lost its majority, only attaining 120 seats. In the following years, the divisions within the CN would only worsen, leading an increasing number to defect to the UDA and Republicans.


The UDA have officially entered government twice since the party's formation, both times with the [[Chartist Party]], once in 1990 and again in 2009. During this period the party was identified as a key defender of the Midrasian Alydian Church, being a major obstacle to secularisation and same-sex marriage. The party has also been a key defender of Midrasian religious schools and has generally taken a mixed approach towards economic matters. Whilst the party has generally benefited from a strong religious voter base in recent years' the party's support has began to erode, with votes increasingly turning to the more right-wing [[Midrasia First]].
The UDA have officially entered government four times as part of the Chartist bloc since the party's formation, and has gained a position within the [[Council of State (Midrasia)|Council of State]] on all but one occasion. During this period the party was identified as a key defender of the Midrasian Alydian Church, making itself a major obstacle to secularisation and same-sex marriage. The party has also been a key defender of Midrasian religious schools and has generally taken a mixed approach towards economic matters. Whilst the party has generally benefited from a strong religious voter base in recent years' the party's support has begun to erode, with votes increasingly turning to the more right-wing [[Midrasia First]].


==Ideology==
==Ideology==
The Alydian Democratic Union identifies as a {{wp|conservative}}, {{wp|christian democratic|alydian democratic}} political party, generally advocating for gradual political and social change with a respect for traditional institutions and values. The party has been a key advocate for the Midrasian Alydian Church in national politics and has key ties to the Pontificate. The party is ardently opposed to the introduction of same-sex marriage and the secularisation of the Midrasian state. The party also has a direct commitment to upholding a [[Capetism|Capetist]] approach to foreign policy within its manifesto, mandating a general level of independence and autonomy for Midrasia in foreign affairs.
The Alydian Democratic Union identifies as a {{wp|traditionalist conservative}}, {{wp|christian democratic|alydian democratic}} political party, generally advocating for gradual political and social change with a respect for existing institutions and values. The party has been a key advocate for the Midrasian Alydian Church in national politics and has key ties to the Pontificate. The party also has a direct commitment to upholding a [[Capetism|Capetist]] approach to foreign policy within its manifesto, mandating a general level of independence and autonomy for Midrasia in foreign affairs. The party is also known for its sceptical stances towards the [[Commonwealth of Democratic Nations]] and has in the past advocated for Midrasia to leave the alliance.


The party's main platform as outlined in their 2017 manifesto is as follows:
The party's main platform as outlined in their 2017 manifesto is as follows:
Line 66: Line 67:
* Reduce net-migration to around 150,000 per anum
* Reduce net-migration to around 150,000 per anum
* Introduce a 4-year residency requirement for migrants seeking to claim benefits
* Introduce a 4-year residency requirement for migrants seeking to claim benefits
* Introduction of a minimum pricing on alcohol and cigarettes
* Introduction of minimum pricing on alcohol and cigarettes
* New legislation to introduce parental controls for internet access
* New legislation to introduce parental controls for internet access
* Scrap legislation giving priority treatment to religious minorities
* Scrap legislation giving priority treatment to religious minorities
Line 85: Line 86:
! +/–
! +/–
|-
|-
!1956
| 2,828,693
| 6.02 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|22|433|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 22
| {{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1961
| 3,256,324
| 7.31 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|26|441|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 4
| {{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1965
| 2,093,669
| 4.71 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|19|441|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{decrease}} 7
| {{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1968
| 2,321,013
| 5.54 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|21|437|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 2
| {{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1973
| 2,828,809
| 6.09 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|24|431|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 3
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1976
| 1,982,778
| 4.56 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|17|420|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{decrease}} 7
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1980
| 2,606,997
| 5.47 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|20|420|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 3
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1985
| 2,972,687
| 6.12 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|23|423|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 3
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1990
| 4,170,395
| 8.02 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|28|416|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 5
| {{yes2|in coalition}}
|-
!1994
| 2,337,139
| 5.32 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|20|416|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{decrease}} 8
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!1999
| 2,920,127
| 5.95 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|22|400|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 2
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!2002
| 2,520,027
| 5.21 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|19|400|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{decrease}} 3
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!2005
| 2,400,334
| 5.7 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|21|400|hex=#3d5ba9}}
| {{increase}} 2
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
!2009
| 2,578,160
| 4.77 <small>%</small>
|{{Composition bar|18|400|hex=#3d5ba9}}
|{{decrease}} 3
|{{yes2|in coalition}}
|-
![[Midrasian general election, 2013|2013]]
| 2,542,828
| 4.27 <small>%</small>
|{{Composition bar|15|400|hex=#3d5ba9}}
|{{decrease}} 3
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|-
|-
![[Midrasian general election, 2017|2017]]
![[Midrasian general election, 2017|2017]]
| 2,177,084
| 2,177,084
| 3.68 <small>%</small>
| 3.68 <small>%</small>
|{{Composition bar|11|600|hex=#3d5ba9}}
|{{Composition bar|47|572|hex=#002060}}
|{{decrease}} 4
|{{increase}} 6
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|{{no2|in opposition}}
|}
|}
Line 211: Line 108:
| 102,440
| 102,440
| 0.65 <small>%</small>
| 0.65 <small>%</small>
| {{Composition bar|0|110|hex=#3d5ba9}}  
| {{Composition bar|0|110|hex=#002060}}  
|  
|  
|-
|-
|}
|}
[[Category:Political Parties in Midrasia]]
[[Category:Political Parties in Midrasia]]

Latest revision as of 12:12, 10 January 2020

Alydian Democratic Union

Union des Démocrates Alydie
LeaderIsaac Joubert
Deputy LeaderGrégoire Poincaré
FounderAurélien Arceneaux
Domènec Juventeny
Carla Peltier
Founded2 August 1953 (2 August 1953)
Preceded byNational Coalition
HeadquartersRichelieu, Lotrič
IdeologyConservatism
Alydian democracy
Paternalism
Political positionCentre-right
International affiliationDemocratic Forum
Parliamentary BlocChartist
Colours  Dark Blue
Public Assembly
59 / 572
Senate
21 / 300
Election symbol
UDA

The Alydian Democratic Union (Midrasian: Union des Démocrates Alydie), abbreviated UDA; otherwise known as the Union of Alydian Democrats, is a conservative, alydian democratic political party in Midrasia. The party was formed in 1953 as a breakaway party from the National Coalition, representing members of the party who sought to advocate policies more aligned with Alydian democratic stances rather that outright nationalism. Since its formation the party has been the country's leading conservative political party along with elements of the Chartist Party. Today, the party remains the leading advocate for traditionalist conservative policies within Midrasia, and is a major player within the Chartist Bloc along with the Republican Party. Since 2013 the party has been in opposition and has suffered a considerable period of decline, losing a considerably amount of support the more nationalistic anti-immigration Midrasia First.

History

Devreuxanism

Modern Midrasian conservatism mostly has its origins within the Devreuxan movement of the Old Republic which advocated for a strong Consulship and was opposed to the secularist stances of the Parliamentarian movement. In addition to supporting a strong Consulship, the Devreuxans advocated for the organisation of society on the lines of a social contract. Devreuxans also held the church in high regard, mandating that religious institutions be represented in Midrasian politics and that religious doctrine be utilised as a basis for a moral society. In general the Devreuxans acted as more of an informal coalition of like minded nobles and elects within parliament and it would not be until after the revolution that there would be a movement to establish an official political party to represent Midrasian conservative values.

Nevertheless, with the fall of the Devreuxan Consulship following the Midrasian Revolution, traditionalist conservatives remained considerably isolated for a large portion of the early Nineteenth Century, overshadowed by the Chartist Party.

Conservative Party

The Conservative Party was, between 1791 and 1869, the main conservative political party within Midrasia, for the most of its history operating in direct opposition to the Chartist Party. The Conservative Party won its first election in 1815 with François de Mydroll elected as Consul. Throughout its time in government, the Conservative party was able to form a number of majority governments, passing a significant amount of legislation and greatly contributing to the evolution of nineteenth-century Midrasian society.

Generally, the Conservative party tended to favour a protectionist attitude towards trade, emphasising Midrasian goods and services over free trade with foreign countries and empires. In terms of social attitudes, the party was socially conservative placing great emphasis on the established Alydian church, gradualist reform, and the promotion of traditional moral values. Despite this, in an effort to increase the popularity of the party within the 1870s, the Conservatives can be seen to have championed the cause of the working classes through an advocacy of universal male suffrage and better conditions for factory workers. The Conservative party also saw itself as the bastion of imperialism advocating for the overseas expansion of the Midrasian Republic, both to secure resources and trade income, but also to spread modernity and the ideas of the enlightenment to the so-called 'backward nations of Aeia' through the civilising mission. The party was particularly fixated on Midrasian domination of the continents of Majula and Arabekh. The party was also notable for its opposition to the abolition of slavery a major factor in the marginalisation of the party during its early years of operation.

However, with Midrasia's defeat at the hands of Veleaz during the Perpignan War, the Conservative Party suffered major setbacks, having been seen as the party responsible for the country's humiliating defeat. The party split apart during the Crisis of 1871, its members splintering into the Republican, Royalist, Revanchist, and Devreuxan Parties. Whilst many traditionalist conservatives would coalesce around the Republican Party between 1870 and 1935, the formation of the National Coalition saw many on the political right defect due to the increasing moderate stances of the Republicans. Yet with the fall of the CN in 1953 many traditionalist conservatives elected to form their own party outside of the more mainstream right-wing factions.

Alydian Democratic Union

Julien Saint Yvres was the last Consul from the UDA

By the 1950s tensions within the party between the right-wing protectionist bloc and the emergent neoliberal wing has reached breaking point. A number of defectors from the National Coalition officially joined the Republican Party in what they saw as an increasingly right-wing nationalist tendency within the party. Bolstered by this, in 1953 an alliance of twelve alydian democrat members of the National Coalition officially split with the party to form the Alydian Democratic Union. Although initially it was believed that the Coalition would remain intact, due to the size of its majority, internal divisions in the Coalition only improving the standing of the UDA. At the 1956 election, the UDA was able to attain 22 seats, whilst the National Coalition lost its majority, only attaining 120 seats. In the following years, the divisions within the CN would only worsen, leading an increasing number to defect to the UDA and Republicans.

The UDA have officially entered government four times as part of the Chartist bloc since the party's formation, and has gained a position within the Council of State on all but one occasion. During this period the party was identified as a key defender of the Midrasian Alydian Church, making itself a major obstacle to secularisation and same-sex marriage. The party has also been a key defender of Midrasian religious schools and has generally taken a mixed approach towards economic matters. Whilst the party has generally benefited from a strong religious voter base in recent years' the party's support has begun to erode, with votes increasingly turning to the more right-wing Midrasia First.

Ideology

The Alydian Democratic Union identifies as a traditionalist conservative, alydian democratic political party, generally advocating for gradual political and social change with a respect for existing institutions and values. The party has been a key advocate for the Midrasian Alydian Church in national politics and has key ties to the Pontificate. The party also has a direct commitment to upholding a Capetist approach to foreign policy within its manifesto, mandating a general level of independence and autonomy for Midrasia in foreign affairs. The party is also known for its sceptical stances towards the Commonwealth of Democratic Nations and has in the past advocated for Midrasia to leave the alliance.

The party's main platform as outlined in their 2017 manifesto is as follows:

  • A commitment to maintaining the sanctity of marriage
  • Guarantee a 'triple lock' guarantee on national pensions
  • Reduce net-migration to around 150,000 per anum
  • Introduce a 4-year residency requirement for migrants seeking to claim benefits
  • Introduction of minimum pricing on alcohol and cigarettes
  • New legislation to introduce parental controls for internet access
  • Scrap legislation giving priority treatment to religious minorities
  • Mandate that identification be required to vote in future general elections
  • Maintenance of Midrasia's independent Capetist foreign policy outlook

Electoral performance

Parliament

Election year Public Assembly Government
# of
overall votes 		% of
overall vote 		# of
overall seats won 		+/–
2017 2,177,084 3.68 %
47 / 572
 Increase 6 in opposition

Aeian Parliament

Election year # of
overall votes 		% of
overall vote 		# of
overall seats won 		+/–
2016 102,440 0.65 %
0 / 110
Retrieved from "https://iiwiki.us/mediawiki/index.php?title=Alydian_Democratic_Union&oldid=151321"