Thundering Elephant Army: Difference between revisions
m (Type clarification) |
m (Minor rewrite) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| type = Infantry (1984)<br />Motorized Infantry (1985) | | type = Infantry (1984)<br />Motorized Infantry (1985) | ||
| role = | | role = | ||
| size = 33,770 (1984) <br /> | | size = 33,770 (1984) <br /> 46,990 (1987) | ||
| command_structure = | | command_structure = | ||
| garrison = [[Airashe]] (logistical hub) <br /> [[ | | garrison = [[Yanomi]] (general HQ)<br />[[Airashe]] (logistical hub)<br />[[Iyuna]] (field HQ, 1984-1985)<br />[[Hamath]] (field HQ, 1985-1987) | ||
<!-- Commanders -->| past_commanders = | <!-- Commanders -->| past_commanders = | ||
| ceremonial_chief = | | ceremonial_chief = | ||
| notable_commanders = | | notable_commanders = <!-- Culture and history --> | ||
<!-- Culture and history --> | |||
| nickname = | | nickname = | ||
| patron = | | patron = | ||
Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
| march = | | march = | ||
| mascot = | | mascot = | ||
| battles = [[Ninvite War]] | | battles = '''[[Ninvite War]]'''<br>[[Battle of Hamath]]<br>[[al-Kija Campaign]] | ||
| anniversaries = | | anniversaries = | ||
| decorations = Thundering Elephant Banner | | decorations = Thundering Elephant Banner | ||
Line 200: | Line 199: | ||
*** SPG Battalion | *** SPG Battalion | ||
** Artillery Brigade | ** Artillery Brigade | ||
*** Mech Field Gun Battalion | |||
*** Mech Field Gun Battalion | *** Mech Field Gun Battalion | ||
*** Mech Field Gun Battalion | *** Mech Field Gun Battalion | ||
Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
** Sustainment Brigade | ** Sustainment Brigade | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Thundering Elephant Army''' was an expeditionary military unit sent by various governorates of [[Itayana|Karana Basin]] to [[Charnea]] during the [[Ninvite War]]. Assembled and organized in 1984 from the forces of regional governors, it saw action in several major battles of the war. The | The '''Thundering Elephant Army''' was an expeditionary military unit sent by various [[Governorate (Itayana)|governorates]] of [[Itayana|Karana Basin]] to [[Charnea]] during the [[Ninvite War]]. Assembled and organized in 1984 from the forces of regional governors, it saw action in several major battles of the war, notably in the [[Battle of Hamath]] and al-Kija Campaign. The war experience aided in developing methods and raising cadres for the future iterations of Itayana military, while joint operations with the [[Charnean Army]] contributed to the rise of the [[Scipianism|Ur-Scipianist]] geopolitical and philosophical current, gaining traction throughout the Two Basins and the Ninva in the following decades. | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
With the onset of hostilities between Gharbaic population of Hatta and Charnean central government, several governorates of the former Karana Basin saw the opportunity to expand their knowledge in modern forms of warfare. As early as | With the onset of hostilities between Gharbaic population of Hatta and Charnean central government, several governorates of the former Karana Basin saw the opportunity to expand their knowledge in modern forms of warfare. As early as 1970, observers from 6th, 7th, 10th, 29th and 33rd governorates were dispatched there at the requests of their governorates. These missions eventually expanded into sending small units to aid the [[Charnean Army]] in combat by 1980. Additionally, when Charnea was embargoed by the Scipian nations in 1977, the governorates agreed to integrate and expand Karana railroad network, particularly the Aribango-Airashe [[Trans-Karana Railroad]] and the [[East Scipian Railroad]]. When the hostilities escalated into a large-scale uprising the ICA alone couldn't contain, the Charnean government used the connection to ask for military assistance in the form of expeditionary unit. | ||
Organization of such unit met significant difficulties, especially after the initial planned division-sized contingent expanded into an infantry corps. All governorates of the Karana Basin answered the call and dispatched their units, partially fueled by anti-Gharbaic sentiment, partially in hopes of acquiring first-hand experience to be used in | Organization of such unit met significant difficulties, especially after the initial planned division-sized contingent expanded into an infantry corps. All governorates of the Karana Basin answered the call and dispatched their units, partially fueled by the anti-Gharbaic sentiment going back to the [[Second Unifying Realm|Solar Realm]], partially in hopes of acquiring first-hand experience to be used in potential future conflicts for unification. Altogether, this and the expansion of the Trans-Karana Railroad amounted to mobilizing the entire Karana Basin, done in a haphazard and disorganized fashion because of its divided political nature and lack of experience. The nascent industrial base of the Two Basins was also directed to supply any form of equipment it could make, contributing to its expansion, but most of the ammunition had to be drawn from warehouses and imported. [[Yanomi]], capital of the 33rd Governorate, was chosen for Army's general headquarters, but [[Airashe]] of the 29th Governorate was its key logistical hub due to its position on the intersection of the Trans-Karana and East Scipian railroads. Army's field headquarters was at first stationed in the city of [[Iyuna]]; in 1985 it moved to the [[Battle of Hamath|recently-cleared]] [[Hamath]]. | ||
The unit was prepared by | The unit was prepared by September 1983, but the rainfall season delayed its deployment until January 1984. Before the dispatch, the ceremony by the [[Solar Temple of Yanbango]] named the unit "Thundering Elephant Army", in honour of the shock force of the Second Realm campaigns from 1575 to 1625, blessed its banners' colours at the central altar of the Eternal Sun, and presented the banner of the original Thundering Elephant Banner. | ||
== Operations == | == Operations == | ||
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
At the cessation of hostilities in 1987, the unit was transferred to Airashe, where, on January 5th, 1988, it was disbanded in a ceremony attracting much of the city's population and various delegations from across the [[Itayana|Two Basins]]. Its subdivisions returned to the original governorates, while shared units were split between 6th and 29th Governorates. | At the cessation of hostilities in 1987, the unit was transferred to Airashe, where, on January 5th, 1988, it was disbanded in a ceremony attracting much of the city's population and various delegations from across the [[Itayana|Two Basins]]. Its subdivisions returned to the original governorates, while shared units were split between the 6th and the 29th Governorates. | ||
== Composition and Equipment == | == Composition and Equipment == | ||
The | The Army was formed from the forces of governorates of the Lower [[Karana River|Karana]] (1st, 3rd, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th) and the [[Makgato Plateau]] (29th, 30th, 31st, 32nd, 33rd, 34th, 35th and 36th). Initially, each governorate sent one-to-three infantry battalions and either a pioneer command and/or an artillery battalion, while the larger governorates supplied available support units. Following the escalation of hostilities, governors mobilized additional units, mostly to train replacements for killed and wounded soldiers. Medical services command was expanded and the centralized signal command was established for enhanced coordination of the units. | ||
Initially, the Army troops were issued [[Pattern 1950 rifle|Pattern 1965 automatic rifles]], by that time a standard-issue weapon for line infantry, and a Pattern 1952 LMG as a squad machine gun, a belt-fed variant of {{wp|Besal|Pattern 1944 machine gun}}. For company-grade fire support, 15mm Pattern 1952 HMG was used, a rechambered {{wp|DShK}} machine gun. Heavier weapons included various 50, 81, and 120mm mortars. Later in war, the banner received [[AP-42]] sub-machine guns and [[AK-54]] assault rifles, proven to be useful in urban confines of Hamath, as well as various RPGs and ATGMs for tank defence and MANPADS for air defence. Infantry units also received portable radios from the ICA stocks and combat medical units were expanded, contributing to lessening casualty rates. However, non-combat support units suffered from the precarious supply situation owing to the embargoes imposed on Charnea, and oftentimes had to make do with leftovers from the ICA units. | |||
Motorization was a significant component of combat capabilities in the Ninvite War. Karana basin did not have means to motorize troops, relying on foot infantry and cavalry units for initial offensives, but this proved to be unsuitable in the open spaces of the Ninva. Motorization and mechanization efforts began with the help of ICA by late 1984. Battle of Hamath showed usefulness of moto-mechanized units in achieving fast breakthroughs, but mechanization was sparse in the otherwise embargoed Charnea. Karanite governors had to employ obsolete [[T3976 Medium Tank|T39-100]] and [[T50100|T50-100]] tanks purchased from [[Velikoslavia]], additionally outfitting them with {{wp|Kontakt-1}} ERA blocks for somewhat better protection against ATGMs. After the Hamath, the Army received [[IBV-75 & IBV-81 Infantry Fighting Vehicle|IBV-75]] IFVs as well. Nevertheless, armoured and mechanized formations, consolidated under a specialized divisional command, were used sparingly, notably at the al-Kija Campaign. | |||
In contrast, artillery units were used abundantly throughout the war. Initially, the {{wp|7.7 cm FK_16|77mm Pattern 1936 field gun}} was the primary fire support weapon, lauded by its reliability and readily-available supply of shells from the Two Basins arsenals, while a heavier 144mm Pattern 1930 heavy field gun was used as an army-level asset. Karanite field artillery at the onset of hostilities was horse-towed, matching manoeuvrability of the foot infantry units, and was often used in massed formations. This organization was found to be susceptible to counter-battery fire but not much could be done until the army was at least partially motorized. | |||
Lighter 77mm field guns were quickly complemented in direct fire support role by various means. Light anti-air emplacements, such as {{wp|ZU-23-2|KaK-23}} and {{wp|AZP S-60|KaK-57}}, were used as a company-level reinforcement, while 100mm {{wp|MT-12}} anti-tank guns and {{wp|152 mm howitzer M1943 (D-1)|152mm howitzers}} were added for specialized fire support. By the Battle of Hamath, {{wp|Assault gun|assault gun}} units were introduced, accompanying infantry in attacks against fortified positions. Most notably, {{wp|SU-100|SU40-122}} and {{wp|SU-100|SU45-100}} assault guns outfitted with ERA were used at Hamath to great effect. Mechanized artillery was also introduced by that time; in particular, Velikoslaivian [[SPG44152 Archer|SPG44-152]] SPGs was instantly liked by the army and inspired many field conversions featuring any gun present on site. But despite all efforts, 77mm field guns carried on their fire support missions until the very end of the war, often mounted on wheeled or tracked hulls for mobility. | |||
Organization of the Army reflected changes in the overall thought as well. In 1986, it followed the traditional structure of Itayana Banners, corps-level formations from the times of the Second Realm slightly modified with the experience gained in the [[Agala War]]. Each banner was formed from two or three "wings" with various infantry battalions and field gun units attached to each wing, usually coming from the same or neighbouring governorates. The banner itself controlled logistics, heavy artillery, communications and allocation of various support units. The structure performed decently in the open-field massed offensives, but was found to be unwieldy in motorized offensive operations, redundant in defence, and occasionally introducing unnecessary friction between the wings. | Organization of the Army reflected changes in the overall thought as well. In 1986, it followed the traditional structure of Itayana Banners, corps-level formations from the times of the Second Realm slightly modified with the experience gained in the [[Agala War]]. Each banner was formed from two or three "wings" with various infantry battalions and field gun units attached to each wing, usually coming from the same or neighbouring governorates. The banner itself controlled logistics, heavy artillery, communications and allocation of various support units. The structure performed decently in the open-field massed offensives, but was found to be unwieldy in motorized offensive operations, redundant in defence, and occasionally introducing unnecessary friction between the wings. | ||
Line 239: | Line 240: | ||
== Impact == | == Impact == | ||
The Thundering Elephant Army made a notable contribution to the Charnean war effort. It was said by several analysts that Amayana forces had to "learn on the job", but in the end the command staff acquired first-hand experience of managing a large-scale operational warfare, first in its kind since 1843, while its troops preformed at their level of ability even when plagued by inadequate orders or disrupted supply chains. In the Two Basins, the [[Battle of Hamath|Battle of Hamath]] is considered the crowning moment of the Army; the quasi-official hagiographic work, ''Elephants of Karana, Thunders of Hatheria'' (1995), names it "the birthplace of modern Amayana armies". | The Thundering Elephant Army made a notable contribution to the Charnean war effort. It was said by several analysts{{Who}} that Amayana forces had to "learn on the job", but in the end the command staff acquired first-hand experience of managing a large-scale operational warfare, first in its kind since 1843, while its troops preformed at their level of ability even when plagued by inadequate orders or fragile and disrupted supply chains. In the Two Basins, the [[Battle of Hamath|Battle of Hamath]] is considered the crowning moment of the Army; the quasi-official hagiographic work, ''Elephants of Karana, Thunders of Hatheria'' (1995), names it "the birthplace of modern Amayana armies". | ||
The political impact of the participation is harder to ascertain for [[Itayana]]. Reports and interviews strongly imply that dispatch of many governorate officers and local armies aided centralization efforts in the Lower Karana; however, with the overall instability encountered in the Lower Karana and Imo Basins, it is argued | The political impact of the participation is harder to ascertain for [[Itayana]]. Reports and interviews strongly imply that dispatch of many governorate officers and local armies aided centralization efforts in the Lower Karana; however, with the overall instability encountered in the Lower Karana and Imo Basins, it is argued{{Who}} the Army deployment may not have played a significant role. Many officers of the Army formed high commands of [[Amayana National Army]] and [[Makgato#Miltiary|Makgato Defence Force]] by 2010, and were opposing each other in the Central Karana War. While same interviews indicate that it could be a reason for its overall stalemate outcome and the relative stability after the war, economic problems of [[Itayana Solar Autocracy|the Solar Autocracy]] and the heavy rainfall season of 2010 are believed to influence the outcome more directly. The presence of an informal, semi-official background communication between [[Yanbango]] and [[Yanomi]] and the loose status of the ISA-AMF border through the [[Trans-Karana Railroad]] can be considered its more concrete and undisputable outcomes. | ||
Perhaps the most notable political and philosophical impact was the emergence of [[Scipianism|Ur-Scipianism]] as political philosophy. The Battle of Hamath | Perhaps the most notable political and philosophical impact of the Army was the emergence of [[Scipianism|Ur-Scipianism]] as political philosophy. The Institute for Scipian Studies officially considers the Battle of Hamath as a binding moment for the Scipian Core, similarly lauded as the "birthplace of Scipianism" by independent scholars of it. As a notable current, the Scipianist philosophy slowly emerged in both [[Charnea]] and [[Itayana]] after the war. Charnean Scipianists entered the public view after the [[Muttay|Muttay Ajamhuryin]] in 2023, while its path in the Itayana mainstream was distinct between the factions. [[Amayana Makgato Federation]] adopted Scipianist thought as its de facto kernel ideology after the [[Central Karana War]]; in the Solar Autocracy, the current became a secular philosophical mainstream by the [[2016 Karana Unity Games]], endorsed by several prominent figures within the Autocracy and critically supported by the Solar Temple. | ||
[[Category:Ajax]] | [[Category:Ajax]] | ||
[[Category:Charnea]] | |||
[[Category:Itayana]] | [[Category:Itayana]] |
Latest revision as of 18:26, 2 November 2024
This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
Thundering Elephant Army | |
---|---|
Active | 1984 – 1987 |
Country | Itayana |
Allegiance | Charnea |
Branch | Army |
Type | Infantry (1984) Motorized Infantry (1985) |
Size | 33,770 (1984) 46,990 (1987) |
Garrison/HQ | Yanomi (general HQ) Airashe (logistical hub) Iyuna (field HQ, 1984-1985) Hamath (field HQ, 1985-1987) |
Engagements | Ninvite War Battle of Hamath al-Kija Campaign |
Decorations | Thundering Elephant Banner |
The Thundering Elephant Army was an expeditionary military unit sent by various governorates of Karana Basin to Charnea during the Ninvite War. Assembled and organized in 1984 from the forces of regional governors, it saw action in several major battles of the war, notably in the Battle of Hamath and al-Kija Campaign. The war experience aided in developing methods and raising cadres for the future iterations of Itayana military, while joint operations with the Charnean Army contributed to the rise of the Ur-Scipianist geopolitical and philosophical current, gaining traction throughout the Two Basins and the Ninva in the following decades.
Background
With the onset of hostilities between Gharbaic population of Hatta and Charnean central government, several governorates of the former Karana Basin saw the opportunity to expand their knowledge in modern forms of warfare. As early as 1970, observers from 6th, 7th, 10th, 29th and 33rd governorates were dispatched there at the requests of their governorates. These missions eventually expanded into sending small units to aid the Charnean Army in combat by 1980. Additionally, when Charnea was embargoed by the Scipian nations in 1977, the governorates agreed to integrate and expand Karana railroad network, particularly the Aribango-Airashe Trans-Karana Railroad and the East Scipian Railroad. When the hostilities escalated into a large-scale uprising the ICA alone couldn't contain, the Charnean government used the connection to ask for military assistance in the form of expeditionary unit.
Organization of such unit met significant difficulties, especially after the initial planned division-sized contingent expanded into an infantry corps. All governorates of the Karana Basin answered the call and dispatched their units, partially fueled by the anti-Gharbaic sentiment going back to the Solar Realm, partially in hopes of acquiring first-hand experience to be used in potential future conflicts for unification. Altogether, this and the expansion of the Trans-Karana Railroad amounted to mobilizing the entire Karana Basin, done in a haphazard and disorganized fashion because of its divided political nature and lack of experience. The nascent industrial base of the Two Basins was also directed to supply any form of equipment it could make, contributing to its expansion, but most of the ammunition had to be drawn from warehouses and imported. Yanomi, capital of the 33rd Governorate, was chosen for Army's general headquarters, but Airashe of the 29th Governorate was its key logistical hub due to its position on the intersection of the Trans-Karana and East Scipian railroads. Army's field headquarters was at first stationed in the city of Iyuna; in 1985 it moved to the recently-cleared Hamath.
The unit was prepared by September 1983, but the rainfall season delayed its deployment until January 1984. Before the dispatch, the ceremony by the Solar Temple of Yanbango named the unit "Thundering Elephant Army", in honour of the shock force of the Second Realm campaigns from 1575 to 1625, blessed its banners' colours at the central altar of the Eternal Sun, and presented the banner of the original Thundering Elephant Banner.
Operations
At the cessation of hostilities in 1987, the unit was transferred to Airashe, where, on January 5th, 1988, it was disbanded in a ceremony attracting much of the city's population and various delegations from across the Two Basins. Its subdivisions returned to the original governorates, while shared units were split between the 6th and the 29th Governorates.
Composition and Equipment
The Army was formed from the forces of governorates of the Lower Karana (1st, 3rd, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th) and the Makgato Plateau (29th, 30th, 31st, 32nd, 33rd, 34th, 35th and 36th). Initially, each governorate sent one-to-three infantry battalions and either a pioneer command and/or an artillery battalion, while the larger governorates supplied available support units. Following the escalation of hostilities, governors mobilized additional units, mostly to train replacements for killed and wounded soldiers. Medical services command was expanded and the centralized signal command was established for enhanced coordination of the units.
Initially, the Army troops were issued Pattern 1965 automatic rifles, by that time a standard-issue weapon for line infantry, and a Pattern 1952 LMG as a squad machine gun, a belt-fed variant of Pattern 1944 machine gun. For company-grade fire support, 15mm Pattern 1952 HMG was used, a rechambered DShK machine gun. Heavier weapons included various 50, 81, and 120mm mortars. Later in war, the banner received AP-42 sub-machine guns and AK-54 assault rifles, proven to be useful in urban confines of Hamath, as well as various RPGs and ATGMs for tank defence and MANPADS for air defence. Infantry units also received portable radios from the ICA stocks and combat medical units were expanded, contributing to lessening casualty rates. However, non-combat support units suffered from the precarious supply situation owing to the embargoes imposed on Charnea, and oftentimes had to make do with leftovers from the ICA units.
Motorization was a significant component of combat capabilities in the Ninvite War. Karana basin did not have means to motorize troops, relying on foot infantry and cavalry units for initial offensives, but this proved to be unsuitable in the open spaces of the Ninva. Motorization and mechanization efforts began with the help of ICA by late 1984. Battle of Hamath showed usefulness of moto-mechanized units in achieving fast breakthroughs, but mechanization was sparse in the otherwise embargoed Charnea. Karanite governors had to employ obsolete T39-100 and T50-100 tanks purchased from Velikoslavia, additionally outfitting them with Kontakt-1 ERA blocks for somewhat better protection against ATGMs. After the Hamath, the Army received IBV-75 IFVs as well. Nevertheless, armoured and mechanized formations, consolidated under a specialized divisional command, were used sparingly, notably at the al-Kija Campaign.
In contrast, artillery units were used abundantly throughout the war. Initially, the 77mm Pattern 1936 field gun was the primary fire support weapon, lauded by its reliability and readily-available supply of shells from the Two Basins arsenals, while a heavier 144mm Pattern 1930 heavy field gun was used as an army-level asset. Karanite field artillery at the onset of hostilities was horse-towed, matching manoeuvrability of the foot infantry units, and was often used in massed formations. This organization was found to be susceptible to counter-battery fire but not much could be done until the army was at least partially motorized.
Lighter 77mm field guns were quickly complemented in direct fire support role by various means. Light anti-air emplacements, such as KaK-23 and KaK-57, were used as a company-level reinforcement, while 100mm MT-12 anti-tank guns and 152mm howitzers were added for specialized fire support. By the Battle of Hamath, assault gun units were introduced, accompanying infantry in attacks against fortified positions. Most notably, SU40-122 and SU45-100 assault guns outfitted with ERA were used at Hamath to great effect. Mechanized artillery was also introduced by that time; in particular, Velikoslaivian SPG44-152 SPGs was instantly liked by the army and inspired many field conversions featuring any gun present on site. But despite all efforts, 77mm field guns carried on their fire support missions until the very end of the war, often mounted on wheeled or tracked hulls for mobility.
Organization of the Army reflected changes in the overall thought as well. In 1986, it followed the traditional structure of Itayana Banners, corps-level formations from the times of the Second Realm slightly modified with the experience gained in the Agala War. Each banner was formed from two or three "wings" with various infantry battalions and field gun units attached to each wing, usually coming from the same or neighbouring governorates. The banner itself controlled logistics, heavy artillery, communications and allocation of various support units. The structure performed decently in the open-field massed offensives, but was found to be unwieldy in motorized offensive operations, redundant in defence, and occasionally introducing unnecessary friction between the wings.
By the late 1984, the Army was reorganized. Wings were reorganized into square divisions, named "Banners", with independent reconnaissance brigade and two triangular brigades. This later structure proved itself well in the 1985 campaigns, including the Battle of Hamath, and persisted until the end of hostilities. Following the war, the word "Banner" permanently shifted its meaning from corps to divisional level of organization across the Basins, while the word "Army" took the additional meaning of corps-level structure.
Impact
The Thundering Elephant Army made a notable contribution to the Charnean war effort. It was said by several analysts[who?] that Amayana forces had to "learn on the job", but in the end the command staff acquired first-hand experience of managing a large-scale operational warfare, first in its kind since 1843, while its troops preformed at their level of ability even when plagued by inadequate orders or fragile and disrupted supply chains. In the Two Basins, the Battle of Hamath is considered the crowning moment of the Army; the quasi-official hagiographic work, Elephants of Karana, Thunders of Hatheria (1995), names it "the birthplace of modern Amayana armies".
The political impact of the participation is harder to ascertain for Itayana. Reports and interviews strongly imply that dispatch of many governorate officers and local armies aided centralization efforts in the Lower Karana; however, with the overall instability encountered in the Lower Karana and Imo Basins, it is argued[who?] the Army deployment may not have played a significant role. Many officers of the Army formed high commands of Amayana National Army and Makgato Defence Force by 2010, and were opposing each other in the Central Karana War. While same interviews indicate that it could be a reason for its overall stalemate outcome and the relative stability after the war, economic problems of the Solar Autocracy and the heavy rainfall season of 2010 are believed to influence the outcome more directly. The presence of an informal, semi-official background communication between Yanbango and Yanomi and the loose status of the ISA-AMF border through the Trans-Karana Railroad can be considered its more concrete and undisputable outcomes.
Perhaps the most notable political and philosophical impact of the Army was the emergence of Ur-Scipianism as political philosophy. The Institute for Scipian Studies officially considers the Battle of Hamath as a binding moment for the Scipian Core, similarly lauded as the "birthplace of Scipianism" by independent scholars of it. As a notable current, the Scipianist philosophy slowly emerged in both Charnea and Itayana after the war. Charnean Scipianists entered the public view after the Muttay Ajamhuryin in 2023, while its path in the Itayana mainstream was distinct between the factions. Amayana Makgato Federation adopted Scipianist thought as its de facto kernel ideology after the Central Karana War; in the Solar Autocracy, the current became a secular philosophical mainstream by the 2016 Karana Unity Games, endorsed by several prominent figures within the Autocracy and critically supported by the Solar Temple.