PaPø-35: Difference between revisions
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
The development of third generation {{wpl|main battle tanks}} the during the 1980s was expected to degrade the effectiveness of currently in-service anti-tank missiles to an unacceptable degree. At this time the best and primary means of neutralizing hostile armored threats available to the Trinovantan rapid deployment forces was the {{wpl|FV102_Striker|ATAL-24}} ATGM carrier. The current Trinovantan [[TAG-33]] had already demonstrated an exceptional resistance to current anti-tank missile systems, including the ATAL-24. Modern foreign designs such as the [[Notreceau|Notreceauen]] [[AVS 54]] and the [[Dniegua|Dnieguin]] [[Tarskvagn-124]] were believed to be similarly resistant to anti-tank missile threats. The expected proliferation of these vehicles, or other MBTs with similar capabilities, would thereby pose a significant risk to Trinovantan rapid deployment forces. | The development of third generation {{wpl|main battle tanks}} the during the 1980s was expected to degrade the effectiveness of currently in-service anti-tank missiles to an unacceptable degree. At this time the best and primary means of neutralizing hostile armored threats available to the Trinovantan rapid deployment forces was the {{wpl|FV102_Striker|ATAL-24}} ATGM carrier. The current Trinovantan [[TAG-33]] had already demonstrated an exceptional resistance to current anti-tank missile systems, including the ATAL-24. Modern foreign designs such as the [[Notreceau|Notreceauen]] [[AVS 54]] and the [[Dniegua|Dnieguin]] [[Tarskvagn-124]] were believed to be similarly resistant to anti-tank missile threats. The expected proliferation of these vehicles, or other MBTs with similar capabilities, would thereby pose a significant risk to Trinovantan rapid deployment forces. | ||
To address these concerns, a competition for a new anti-tank weapons system was initiated in 1987 to replace the ATAL-24. Requirements were simple; the weapon had to be able to defeat the armor of any current armored vehicle, it had to be capable of being paired to a airdrop capable vehicle, and it had to have a per-unit production cost that did not exceed 5 times the current cost of the {{wpl|Swingfire|GMS-23}} missile used on the ATAL-24. Several designs were submitted, using various methods to achieve the criteria set out by the competition such as large {{wpl|Tandem-charge|tandem HEAT}} warheads or {{wpl|top attack|top-attack}} flight profiles. However, the [[Global Defense|Global Defense Aerospace]] proposal utilized a novel approach, a {{wpl|hardened steel}} {{wpl|kinetic energy penetrator|penetrator}} mated to a high-output rocket. This weapon system, mounted on a new turret designed for Global Defense's | To address these concerns, a competition for a new anti-tank weapons system was initiated in 1987 to replace the ATAL-24. Requirements were simple; the weapon had to be able to defeat the armor of any current armored vehicle, it had to be capable of being paired to a airdrop capable vehicle, and it had to have a per-unit production cost that did not exceed 5 times the current cost of the {{wpl|Swingfire|GMS-23}} missile used on the ATAL-24. Several designs were submitted, using various methods to achieve the criteria set out by the competition such as large {{wpl|Tandem-charge|tandem HEAT}} warheads or {{wpl|top attack|top-attack}} flight profiles. However, the [[Global Defense|Global Defense Aerospace]] proposal utilized a novel approach, a {{wpl|hardened steel}} {{wpl|kinetic energy penetrator|penetrator}} mated to a high-output rocket. This weapon system, mounted on a new turret designed for Global Defense's recently developed TAG-35 airborne tank, would go on to win the program. | ||
=== Armament === | === Armament === | ||
The primary armament for the TAL-35 is Global Defense Aerospace's GMS-52 Hypersonic Anti-Tank missile. | The primary armament for the TAL-35 is Global Defense Aerospace's GMS-52 Hypersonic Anti-Tank missile. Instead of carrying a {{wpl|shaped charge}} like most contemporary ATGMs, the GMS-52's kill mechanism is a nearly two meter long high-hardness steel penetrator. As a result of this payload, the missile is significantly larger than most other ATGMs with a 162 millimeter diameter and a 2.8 meter overall length. The entire system weighs in excess of 80 kilograms. Guidance is provided via a simple laser seeker for {{wpl|Laser_guidance|semi-active laser homing}}. Propulsion is provided by a high-output {{wpl|solid fuel rocket}} fitted with a {{wpl|thrust vectoring}} nozzle for flight control. This rocket is capable of propelling the missile up to a maximum speed of 1500 meters per second in less than a second. The GMS-52 reaches its maximum range of 5000 meters four seconds after being fired. | ||
When travelling at its maximum speed the missile has a kinetic energy of 90 {{wpl|Joule|Megajoules}}, which is approximately 8 times greater than the {{wpl|muzzle energy}} of a modern {{wpl|APFSDS}} penetrator fired by a main battle tank. During testing, the GMS-52 demonstrated that it was capable of inflicting catastrophic damage to the most heavily armored vehicles in the Trinovantan military's inventory. It is projected to be capable of destroying any current or near-future armored threat. | |||
=== Protection === | === Protection === | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 26 September 2019
 | This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
| TAL-35 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | Airborne Tank Destroyer |
| Place of origin |  Trinovantum |
| Service history | |
| Used by | Trinovantum |
| Production history | |
| Designer | Global Defense Land Systems |
| Designed | 1990-1994 |
| Manufacturer | Global Defense Land Systems |
| Produced | 2004-Present |
| Specifications | |
| Weight | 20.1 tonnes (22.2 short tons; 19.8 long tons) |
| Length | 6.2 metres (20 ft 4 in) |
| Width | 2.69 metres (8 ft 10 in) |
| Height | 2.37 metres (7 ft 9 in) |
| Crew | 3 (commander, gunner, driver) |
| Armor | Welded Aluminium |
Main armament | 12 x Global Defense Aerospace GMS-52 Hypersonic Anti-Tank missiles |
Secondary armament | 1 x CAM-74 machine gun |
| Engine | 9.0L V6 turbo-diesel engine 552 hp |
| Power/weight | 28 hp/tonne |
| Suspension | torsion bar |
| Ground clearance | 410 millimetres (1 ft 4 in) |
| Fuel capacity | 570 L (150 US gal) |
Operational range | 483 km (300 mi) |
| Speed | 70 km/h (43 mph) |
The TAL-35 is a Trinovantan air-deployable Anti-tank missile carrier developed by Global Defense Land Systems to augment the anti-armor capabilities of Trinovantan rapid deployment forces. It uses the same chassis as the TAG-35 airborne tank and carries the unconventional GMS-52 kinetic Anti-Tank Guided Missile as its primary weapon.
Development
The development of third generation main battle tanks the during the 1980s was expected to degrade the effectiveness of currently in-service anti-tank missiles to an unacceptable degree. At this time the best and primary means of neutralizing hostile armored threats available to the Trinovantan rapid deployment forces was the ATAL-24 ATGM carrier. The current Trinovantan TAG-33 had already demonstrated an exceptional resistance to current anti-tank missile systems, including the ATAL-24. Modern foreign designs such as the Notreceauen AVS 54 and the Dnieguin Tarskvagn-124 were believed to be similarly resistant to anti-tank missile threats. The expected proliferation of these vehicles, or other MBTs with similar capabilities, would thereby pose a significant risk to Trinovantan rapid deployment forces.
To address these concerns, a competition for a new anti-tank weapons system was initiated in 1987 to replace the ATAL-24. Requirements were simple; the weapon had to be able to defeat the armor of any current armored vehicle, it had to be capable of being paired to a airdrop capable vehicle, and it had to have a per-unit production cost that did not exceed 5 times the current cost of the GMS-23 missile used on the ATAL-24. Several designs were submitted, using various methods to achieve the criteria set out by the competition such as large tandem HEAT warheads or top-attack flight profiles. However, the Global Defense Aerospace proposal utilized a novel approach, a hardened steel penetrator mated to a high-output rocket. This weapon system, mounted on a new turret designed for Global Defense's recently developed TAG-35 airborne tank, would go on to win the program.
Armament
The primary armament for the TAL-35 is Global Defense Aerospace's GMS-52 Hypersonic Anti-Tank missile. Instead of carrying a shaped charge like most contemporary ATGMs, the GMS-52's kill mechanism is a nearly two meter long high-hardness steel penetrator. As a result of this payload, the missile is significantly larger than most other ATGMs with a 162 millimeter diameter and a 2.8 meter overall length. The entire system weighs in excess of 80 kilograms. Guidance is provided via a simple laser seeker for semi-active laser homing. Propulsion is provided by a high-output solid fuel rocket fitted with a thrust vectoring nozzle for flight control. This rocket is capable of propelling the missile up to a maximum speed of 1500 meters per second in less than a second. The GMS-52 reaches its maximum range of 5000 meters four seconds after being fired.
When travelling at its maximum speed the missile has a kinetic energy of 90 Megajoules, which is approximately 8 times greater than the muzzle energy of a modern APFSDS penetrator fired by a main battle tank. During testing, the GMS-52 demonstrated that it was capable of inflicting catastrophic damage to the most heavily armored vehicles in the Trinovantan military's inventory. It is projected to be capable of destroying any current or near-future armored threat.
