User:C0ZM0/Neocombs: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Neocombinationalists have historically sought to recontextualise the role the state is meant to play in upholding the [[Dual mandate principle|dual mandate principle]] and [[Public stewardship|public stewardship]] model. Learning from the apparent failures of the liberal pre-war period which inevitably led to the Great Depression and the collapse of the !Fordist model which dictated economic policy within the Global North after the war, Neocombinationalists advocated for the use of public resources to optimize market outcomes toward the benefit of all parties in society. [...] | Neocombinationalists have historically sought to recontextualise the role the state is meant to play in upholding the [[Dual mandate principle|dual mandate principle]] and [[Public stewardship|public stewardship]] model. Learning from the apparent failures of the liberal pre-war period which inevitably led to the Great Depression and the collapse of the !Fordist model which dictated economic policy within the Global North after the war, Neocombinationalists advocated for the use of public resources to optimize market outcomes toward the benefit of all parties in society. [...] | ||
== Political and Economic freedom== | ===Political and Economic freedom=== | ||
One of the core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is {{wp|self-ownership}}, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the {{wp|capability approach|real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action}}. | One of the core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is {{wp|self-ownership}}, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the {{wp|capability approach|real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action}}. | ||
Revision as of 13:53, 15 December 2024
infobox here
our dirty neolibs (they're kinda chiller doe)
Neocombinationalism, also known as XXX, or XXX, is a term historically used to refer to the resurgence and reinterpretation of Combinationalist political ideas that gained increased prominence within the Serial World, and particularly the advanced Global North during the latter half of the Silent War into the 21st century. Neocombinationalism was developed by Calesian Liberal thinkers reflecting on the apparent failures of the pre-war liberal economic model that largely lost prominence during the Long Peace as it got displaced by various Solidarist, Communist and !Fordist economic models during this period.
[...]
History
Alt Mont Pelerin and sheet
Philosophy and ideas
Neocombinationalists have historically sought to recontextualise the role the state is meant to play in upholding the dual mandate principle and public stewardship model. Learning from the apparent failures of the liberal pre-war period which inevitably led to the Great Depression and the collapse of the !Fordist model which dictated economic policy within the Global North after the war, Neocombinationalists advocated for the use of public resources to optimize market outcomes toward the benefit of all parties in society. [...]
Political and Economic freedom
One of the core guiding principles of Neocombinationalist philosophy is self-ownership, asserting that individuals as rationale sovereign actors in their own right should be free to dictate the course of their own lives. However, historical liberal thinkers recognise that in practice this is not the case due to to myriad of reasons, such as the presence of external institutions such as the state or slavery coercing individuals through force or differences of circumstance such as poverty which limit the real capacity for individuals to carry out independent action.
- Self-ownership principle
- Distributism
- Property-owning democracy
- Yeoman socialism
- free trade
- Internationalism
Economics
Traditions
Individual nation variants go here