Central Gateway Turtle Railroad
 | This article is incomplete, as it is a work-in-progress article being worked on by user SwedishTurtles. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
 | |
 CGTR #3723, a Hydrogold livery GE U25C in 1973 (enhanced). | |
| Reporting mark | CGTR (main locomotives/rolling stock), GTLW (locomotive manufacturing), GTLX (GTLW leasing units), TRTM (TurtleTram locomotives/rolling stock), GTCO (intermodal/cross-network), GTRC (locomotive/railcar leasing) |
|---|---|
| Locale | North America |
| Dates of operation | June 19, 1898–Present |
| Predecessor | List
|
| Track gauge | 4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge |
| Electrification | 12.5 kV 25 Hz AC, overhead line, third rail (TurtleTram trackage) |
| Headquarters | Fort Worth, TX |
| Website | cgtr |
The Central Gateway Turtle Railroad (Reporting marks CGTR, GTLW, GTLX, TRTM, GTCO) is a prominent Class I North American passenger and freight railroad, owned by the Gateway Turtle Company. Its operational footprint primarily covers the Southern, Eastern, and Central regions of the United States, with its headquarters located in Fort Worth, Texas. As a major Class I railroad, the Central Gateway Turtle Railroad assumes a critical role in transporting substantial freight volumes across its extensive network. Its intricate infrastructure and logistics system contribute to the effective movement of goods within the serviced regions.
History
Establishment of the Eastern Gateway Turtle Railroad
The Eastern Gateway Turtle Railroad was established on July 24th, 1874, following the merger of the Gateway Eastern Railway and the Turtle Northern Railway. This collaborative effort was a response to the economic uncertainties triggered by the Panic of 1873, and it sought to create a more robust and streamlined rail network.
Distinguished by its commitment to excellence, the EGTR rapidly gained prominence for delivering impeccable passenger and freight services across the Northeastern United States. The railroad became synonymous with reliability and efficiency, earning the trust of both passengers and businesses alike.
As the network expanded, the Eastern Gateway Turtle Railroad played a pivotal role in connecting communities and facilitating commerce. Its reputation for punctuality and top-notch services solidified its position as a go-to choice for transportation needs. The legacy of the Eastern Gateway Turtle Railroad extended far beyond its formation, leaving an indelible mark on the landscape of rail transportation in the late 19th century.
Queztal Central Merger
On June 19th, 1898, the Eastern Gateway Turtle Railroad would absorb the near-bankrupt Quetzal Central Lines, forming the Central Gateway Turtle Railroad. This would be a major event, as both railroads were rather large at this time, so the merger created a massive rail network.
Early Dieselization
Full Transition
Expansion and Accquisition
Monon Railroad
Ann Arbor Railroad
On September 27th, 1972, the CGTR-AA merger would be finalized, making the Ann Arbor Railroad the second Class I railroad absorbed by CGTR in the 1970s. The railroad's locomotives would be transferred and placed onto CGTR's roster, and the ownership of the tracks would be transferred to CGTR as well.
Central Railroad of New Jersey
Reading Company
Maine Central Railroad
Boston and Maine Railroad
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad
Delaware and Hudson Railway
Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad
Missouri Pacific Railroad
Illinois Central Railroad
Burlington Northern Railroad
Norfolk Southern Railway
Incidents
Gulfport Runaway Incident
CGTR #3723 sinking into a large lake after derailing near Gulfport, MS
CGTR #3723's brakes glowing red after the locomotive derailed near Gulfport, MS
Some of the hopper cars pulled by #3723 after derailing near Gulfport, MS
On the 21st of February, 1982, CGTR #3723 was hauling a 28 car iron ore train through the stormy weather near Gulfport, Mississippi. At around 4:38 AM, the locomotive was approaching a somewhat steep grade. The engineer increased the throttle, to keep the train going fast enough, and also applied the sander to account for the wet and slippery trackage. As the locomotive accelerated up the hill, the thunderstorm began to worsen. At about 4:45 AM, the thunderstorm would reach its most severe point, and the locomotive was struggling to continue to accelerate. The engineer would set the throttle to full, to attempt to overcome this. At approximately 4:56 AM, lightning would hit the locomotive, causing the cab to completely lose power. The locomotive by this time had reached the top of the hill, and was getting ready to go downhill. With the throttle being uncontrollable and already at max, the engineer attempted to stop the train by pulling the brakes. This slowed down the train momentarily, but because of the steep grade and high throttle, the train's brakes would eventually overheat and fail. The locomotive would barrel downhill, eventually going onto a relatively sharp curve in the tracks, causing the train to derail and fall into a lake. All members of the crew in the cab would be killed, however the crew members in the caboose would only experience some slight injuries.
Cleanup
Houston Ammo Train Incident
A CGTR ammunition train derailing after ramming an oil tanker train in Houston, TX
A CGTR train after bursting into flames from ramming an oil tanker train in Houston, TX
A CGTR Locomotive after exploding from ramming an oil tanker train in Houston, TX
On the 20th of December, 1979, CGTR #3718 and CGTR #3709 were pulling an ammunition train for a contractor late at night. When the locomotives reached Houston, Texas, they would approach a yard primarily full of oil tankers. The locomotives were going approximately 35 MPH, but what the operators did not know was that due to a switch being flipped, the train was on the wrong track. The train would end up spotting a large oil tanker train containing mostly Procor cars on the track ahead, and attempted to brake, although they were too close to stop in time. The two locomotives would end up ramming the oil tankers, causing them all to detonate and start a large fire. The detonation of the oil tankers would trigger the explosion of the ammunition as well, and shortly after both locomotives would explode, along with the rest of the cargo.
Cleanup
A CGTR train after ramming another and bursting into flames being extinguished in Houston, TX
CGTR #3723 and #3721 arriving to help clean up the damaged train cars after they were rerailed
CGTR #3701 preparing to move damaged cars for repairs to be done on at the end of a yard
After the fires arising from the train cars and locomotives would be put out by the Houston Fire Department, all cars would be rerailed and placed into several trains in the yard. Roadswitchers CGTR #3721 and CGTR #3723 would arrive shortly to couple all of the trains and transport the damaged cars to another yard, where they would be repaired and placed back into service. CGTR #3709 and CGTR #3718 would be repaired and placed back into service as well, and would remain in service until they were retired in 2000.
Michigan Thundering Lapis Runaway
CGTR #77 Derailment
Intermodal
CGTR offers a variety of intermodal services, including trucks, vans, and off-road Maintenance of way vehicles.
Equipment
Locomotives
As of late 2023, CGTR rosters over 3,500 locomotives.
| Type | Quantity | Road Numbers | Notes | Image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMD F125 | 74 | 1-3, 14-25, 42-50, 300-349 | ||
| GE P32AC-DM | 35 | 4-13, 6900-6924 | ||
| EMD GP40FH-2 | 26 | 26-41, 6300-6309 | ||
| EMD F59PHI | 8 | 51-58 | ||
| MPI MP54AC | 13 | 62-74 | ||
| GTLW DAS25 | 2 | 75-76 | ||
| GTLW DAT45AB | 1 | 77 | ||
| GE ET44AC | 150 | 100-149, 9900-9999 | ||
| EMD SD70ACe-T4 | 50 | 200-249 | ||
| Wabtec FLXDrive | 90 | 400-459, 500-529 | ||
| GTLW GP20-GT | 6 | 600-605 | Rebuilt from Ex. GRR GP20s | |
| EMD SDP40F | 2 | 1874A, 1874C | ||
| EMD SDP40FB | 1 | 1874B | ||
| EMD SD70M | 2 | 1898A, 1898B | ||
| EMD SD45T-2 | 2 | 1971, 1972 | ||
| EMD GP39-2 | 1 | 1974 | ||
| GE C30-7 | 1 | 1975 | ||
| EMD GP50 | 1 | 1981 | ||
| GE C39-8 | 1 | 1985 | ||
| GE C40-8 | 1 | 1988 | ||
| EMD SD70 | 1 | 1991 | ||
| EMD SD70MAC | 1 | 1992 | ||
| GE C40-9W | 1 | 1997 | ||
| GE C44-9W | 1 | 1999 | ||
| RDG 2102 | 1 | 2102 | ||
| GE U36C | 1 | 3723 | rebuilt from GE U25C after a wreck and nicknamed the "Phoenix Resilient" | |
| Quetzal Central 4602 | 1 | 4602 | ||
| GTLW SD40-GTHH | 55 | 5000-5054 | Rebuilt from SD40-2s | |
| GTLW SD40-GTS | 39 | 5064-5102 | Rebuilt from SD40-2s | |
| GTLW SD40-GT | 64 | 5116-5179 | Rebuilt from SD40-2s | |
| EMD SW1504 | 24 | 5400-5423 | ||
| EMD MP15AC | 50 | 5500-5549 | ||
| GE B23-7 | 36 | 5700-5735 | ||
| EMD GP39-2 | 17 | 5800-5816 | ||
| GE C30-7 | 22 | 5900-5921 | ||
| GE B30-7 | 78 | 6000-6077 | ||
| GE B39-8 | 20 | 6100-6119 | ||
| EMD MP15T | 20 | 6200-6219 | ||
| GE C40-8 | 40 | 6400-6439 | ||
| EMD F59PH | 33 | 6500-6532 | ||
| EMD SD60M | 50 | 6600-6649 | ||
| GE C40-8W | 70 | 6700-6769 | ||
| GE C44-9W | 50 | 6800-6849 | ||
| GE AC4400CW | 645 | 7000-7644 | ||
| GE P42DC | 30 | 7700-7729 | ||
| GE AC6000CW | 50 | 7800-7849 | ||
| EMD SD70MAC | 30 | 7900-7929 | ||
| EMD GP20D | 35 | 8000-8034 | ||
| EMD SD9043MAC | 48 | 8100-8147 | ||
| EMD SD70ACe | 308 | 8200-8457 | ||
| GE ES44DC | 300 | 8500-8799 | ||
| GE ES44AC | 455 | 8800-9254 | ||
| GE ES44C4 | 553 | 9300-9852 |
Liveries
Classic Freight
Classic Passenger
Bluewashed
The Bluewashed scheme was a CGTR scheme used on freight and switching locomotives that was first seen in the mid 1960s and 1970s, appearing on the new GE U25Bs, EMD SW1500s, ALCO C630s, EMD SD39s, GE U33Bs, GE B36-7s, EMD F45s, EMD SD40-2 and EMD SD40T-2s, and being repainted onto the older ALCO HH1000s, EMD NW2s, Baldwin VO-660s, EMD BL2s, EMD SW9s, Baldwin RF-16s
Bluelined
The Bluelined scheme was a CGTR scheme used on passenger locomotives that was first seen in the late 1960s to 1970s, appearing on the new EMD FP45 in 1967, the new EMD F40PH in 1976, and being repainted onto the older EMD E7s, ALCO PA-2s, and EMD E8s, in the early 1970s. The scheme would remain on most of its locomotives until their retirements, as many of them were becoming outdated. The scheme would be replaced in
Hydrogold
Phase I
The Hydrogold scheme was a CGTR scheme used on mixed service, road switching, and transfer locomotives that was first seen in the early 1970s to 1990s, appearing on the new EMD MP15ACs, and being repainted onto the older EMD FP9s, ALCO FPA-2s, EMD FP7s, Baldwin AS-616s, ALCO C420s, ALCO C415s, Baldwin DT-6-6-2000s, FM H-20-44s, EMD GP40-2s, EMD GP9s, EMD GP18s, EMD GP30s, EMD GP39-2s, ALCO RS-3s, Baldwin AS-16s, FM H-24-66s, ALCO RSC-3s, Baldwin RS-12s, ALCO RSD-12s, ALCO RSD-15s, ALCO RS-11s, ALCO RS-36s, EMD DD35s, GE U25Bs, and GE U33Bs.