Constitution of the Erish Federation

Constitution of the Erish Realm
Jurisdiction	Erishland
Date effective	3 January 1940
System	Parliamentary monarchy
Branches	3
Chambers	Semi-bicameral
Executive	Royal Cabinet
Judiciary	Supreme Court, Court of Assizes, Court of Cassation, lesser courts
Federalism	No, but Lands enjoy self-government
Entrenchments	2
Location	Folkthing Building
Author(s)	Constitutional Congress

The Constitution of the Erish Realm (Erish: Det Erischryk's Konstitution) is the supreme law of Erishland. It establishes the human rights guaranteed in Erishland and the framework of the national government. It was drafted during 1938 and early 1939 by the Constitutional Congress, ratified later that year by a referendum, and came into effect on 3 January 1940. The date of that national referendum, 2 April, is celebrated every year as Constitution Day.

The constitution establishes the Erish Realm as a parliamentary monarchy. It declares the personal, political, civil, and social rights that bind the state, and divides power between the legislative Folkthing, the courts which collectively comprise the judiciary, and the executive Office of the Kingdom. It also establishes that the state derives its authority from the popular will of all inhabitants of Erishland, not just the Erish people or citizens. In order to be amended, a proposed amendment must receive a two-thirds supermajority of the Folkthing in two consecutive terms and then the approval of the electorate in a national referendum.

The Erish constitution inherits some of its ideas, such as a form of rejection of fusion of powers, from the constitution of the historic Erish Republic. Nonetheless, the Constitutional Congress created the document with a desire to avoid its predecessor's flaws, which ultimately led to a dictatorship. Central principles of the constitution for this end include the supremacy and universality of rights, the spirit of the constitution binding the state, protection of the state against anti-democratic parties, and the accountability and collegiality of the executive.

Background

Premodern era (1600s-1842)

Beginning as early as the reign of Queen Liexne I during the mid-1600s, the absolute power of the Erish monarch began to wane. The Landenrad, established by Queen Liexne I as an advisory council on the governance of the Lands of the realm, gradually began to exercise more and more power. Democratic movements accelerated this trend during the 1800s. The first elected members of the Landenrad taking their seats in 1809, and by 1821, only a quarter of the Landrad was still appointed by the monarch. In spite of this trend, the monarch vigorously maintained their authority over matters of government against the Landenrad. When the Landenrad attempted to remove the Royal Cabinet by a vote of no confidence in 1830, Queen Liexne II, declared that the Landenrad had exceeded its authority, warned that "if elected dissolved the body for a new election, and appointed half of the Landenrad.

This act began a period of conflict between the monarchy and the pro-democratic factions represented by the elected members of the Landenrad (and in things at the Land level) and liberal and republican movements. Demonstrations became increasingly frequent and violent, culminating in the 1841 Holtstad Massacre, when the Royal Guard opened fire to quell a riot. This incident was presented in papers as an unjustified slaughter, and mass riots soon followed. Fearing the emerging Ottonian Federation would exploit the unrest, the Royal Cabinet advised Queen Liexne II to abdicate in the hopes that her departure would ease tensions. She did so, leaving the throne to King Aleiv IV, who reigned for only 13 days before the Republican League, a mass movement which had risen to prominence over the past decade, stormed the palace with the aid of a breakaway faction of the Royal Guard, and successfully threatened the King pronouncing the end of the monarchy, and the establishment of an Erish Republic.

Republican era (1843-1867)

Following the end of the monarchy, the Republican League set about the establishment of the Erish Republic. After a six-month long provisional government, the new state was established by the Constitution of the Erish Republic as a federal presidential republic with a bicameral Parliament.

Within the framework of what was hailed as one of the most democratic systems of the age, the two major parties which emerged, the Liberal and Nationalist parties, initially cooperated during the "golden era" between 1843 and 1849, and the first President, the Nationalist Herstol Hwardson, abided by the constitution. Starting with the second President, the Nationalist Tursch Borlavson, the system began to break down. Gridlock during the third Parliament led to the President pursuing policy through directives, starting a trend of executive law making which rapidly expanded. The Nationalists took both chambers of Parliament in 1852, and passed a series of institutional "reforms" which granted the President broad powers, and engineered the electoral system to favor the party.

The situation continued to deteriorate during the rest of the 1850s as Nationalist Parliaments and presidencies increasingly cemented the dominance of the party. However, two events are traditionally viewed in Erish history as beginning the downfall of the Republic:

• The leader of the upper house Nationalists and de facto leader of Parliament, Senator Eirik Werolvson, and the Nationalist President, Eudolv Geustavson, began fighting for control. This ended in the 1858 Werolvson Resolution, where Werolvson attempted to exercise confidence over the Cabinet as the Landenrad had thirty years earlier. In response, Werolvson and members of his faction were declared by Geustavson to be 'subvertors of the Republic', and were rounded up and executed. His successor, Micheil Hongelson, would ultimately take on more power than Werolvson ever wielded, but was a staunch loyalist to the President.
• Allamunnic minorities in Eudland, who had been facing increasing discrimination by the Land government, rioted in 1859. Though few lives were lost, the incident created the sentiment amongst the Nationalist leadership that the Allamunnic were or could be used as a fifth column, viewed by the President as a platform establishing the complete dominance of the Nationalist party.

From the late 1850s until 1867, genuine Allamunnic riots alongside false-flag operations were used as the pretext for curbing civil liberties almost completely, suspending the 1860 election through an attached resolution to the national budget, and, ultimately, what has been viewed as an attempted ethnic cleansing of the Allamunns in Erishland. In the end, the Ottonian Federation invaded the country in 1867, dissolving the Republic.

Fundamental rights

Fundamental rights (Erish: grondrejten) are a core component of the Erish constitution. Most are found in Article I, a bill of rights that guarantees a set of personal, political, civil, and social rights which bind all institutions of the state. A right to habeas corpus is also acknowledged by Section 14a, which bars the Folkthing from creating laws which restrict it. The Supreme Court acts as the primary body protecting these rights, being granted the power of judicial review to strike down laws or executive policies which violate them. A certain subset of rights, personal rights and the right of Erish citizens to representative democratic government, have a constitutional complaint mechanism which allows citizens to appeal to the Supreme Court if other avenues of recourse fail. Those rights are constitutionally entrenched, and any amendment that serves to restrict them can be struck down by the Supreme Court.

Fundamental rights are framed as universal within the Erish constitution, applying to all people regardless of citizenship status (the only exception being non-consensual revocation of the citizenship of Erish citizens); the language of the rights to participate in government and secret ballots, however, restricts them to Erish citizens insofar as they apply to the Erish state. The language of universality was used in direct response to the abuses of rights during the Republican era. The Republican constitution's guarantees of rights nominally applied to citizens, but were implicitly supposed to apply to everyone. Under the Nationalist regime, they came to be interpreted as applying specifically to people of Erish ethnicity who held citizenship, a status which became increasingly restricted to fewer and fewer people. The constitutional (as well as legal) term describing Erish citizens, rykburger ("citizen of the realm"), is also consequently used instead of "Erish citizen" (erisch burger) to avoid any implication that citizenship or rights belong to a specific ethnic group.

Personal rights (Article I, Chapter 1)

Personal rights (Erish: personlik rejten) are the most fundamental rights under the Erish constitution, covering equality under the law, due process, and self-government. Alongside a specific part of the right to democratic government, they are constitutionally entrenched, and have a mechanism by which citizens can directly appeal to the Supreme Court if a violation of them has not been able to be redressed by any other court.

Personal rights include:

• Right to life, freedom, and dignity (Section 1): Within Erish constitutional doctrine, it is held that all rights under the constitution stem from these three rights, which are declared to be "sovereign, inborn, and supremely inviolable".
• Right to self-government (Section 2): The name for the right to "self-government" (selvstandigheid) comes from later on in the constitution, and encompasses three parts:
  • Right to the development of oneself and one's personality - This right is limited to the extent that it impedes the rights of others. It is often framed as a right to "pursue one's conception of goodness."
  • Prohibition of ownership of any person - As later explicated in another right, forced labor is only permitted as a criminal punishment issued by a court.
  • Freedom from arbitrary arrest or imprisonment - detention requires a warrant based upon evidence for the violation of a law, except when "there is reasonable cause to believe an immediate threat exists to the well-being of the surrounding community."
• Right to equality before the law (Section 3): Undue discrimination by the law upon the grounds of "sex, age, heritage, race, origin, nationality, residence, language, wealth, faith, or creed" is unconstitutional. What constitutes undue discrimination has been the subject of several cases, but one of the primary legal tests involves whether the discrimination in question constitute a substantive or "spiritual" abridgment of the other rights afforded by the constitution, and whether it serves to "negate otherwise extant discrimination".
• Right to due process (Sections 4-12): A person may only be deprived of their rights by a jury of their peers in accordance with the law, and which has been made according to certain constraints:
  • Presumption of innocence
  • Protection from trial for a serious crime without indictment by a grand jury - "Serious crimes" are a specific category of Erish national criminal law, and involve acts such as corruption, terrorism, or treason.
  • Speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of one's peers
  • The informing of the defendant as to the accusations and witnesses against them
  • Right of the defendant to representation and witnesses in their favor
  • Protection from self-incrimination
  • Protection from double jeopardy - A person cannot be retried for the same crime twice, "unless new evidence comes to light."
  • Prohibition of culpability for the actions of one's ancestors - This arose in response to one of the most notorious abuses of the Republican era: so-called "father trials" (faderprocess). Most typically used for political enemies of the ruling Nationalist party, an elder member of the household would be tried and convicted for a crime, typically "subversive activities", and the rest of the household would be detained on the grounds that they "had been made prone to subversion".
  • Prohibition of ex post facto laws
  • Prohibition of cruel, torturous, or degrading treatment
  • Prioritization of rehabilitation - It is mandated that criminal sentencing should prioritize rehabilitation over retribution when possible.