IIWiki:WikiProject Sunalaya/Assessment

The assessment department of the Sunalaya WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of IIWiki's Sunalaya articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The articles, after review, are to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Sunalaya articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

FAQ

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles.

2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?

Working on that!

3. Who can assess articles?

Anyone can review and change the rating of an article, with the expection of somebody assessing their own work.

4. Can I request that an Admin or Reviewer rate an article?

Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

5. Where can I get more comments about an article?

You can request a peer review of an article on the main page. You should get extra comments, but you may want to save them as that section may be wiped of old reviews on occasion.

6. What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can contact an Admin, and state your case, it is best to correlate your case with bullet points that match up with the review system below

7. What if I have a question not listed here?

Feel free to contact an Admin or Reviewer for further questions regarding assessments.

Quality scale

The quality scale is used to asses the quality of an individual article.

Class	Criteria	Checklist	Example
Gold-Class	Reserved for articles that are considered of high enough quality, size, and detail to be added to the Featured Articles list in the Sunalaya WikiProject main page		Jaguar III
Blue-Class	Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and has an above average amount of headers with large amounts of information, a large overview, an infobox (when applicable), images, and use of other templates (when applicable).	• Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has many headers each with large amounts of info • Has a large overview • Has infobox • Has images • Utilizes templates • Has no worse than minute grammar issues	Lindenholt
Green-Class	Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and have a standard amount of headers (comparable to Wikipedia articles) with moderate amounts of information, at least a moderate overview, an infobox (when applicable), images, and use of other templates (when applicable).	• Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has a standard amount of headers each with moderate amounts of info • Has a moderately sized overview • Has infobox • Has images • Utilizes templates • Has no worse than minor grammar issues	Empire of the Tao
Yellow-Class	Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and have at multiple headers with moderate amounts of information, at least a moderate overview, an infobox (when applicable), and images.	• Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has multiple headers each with moderate amounts of info • Has a moderately sized overview • Has infobox • Has images • Has no worse than minor grammar issues	UST Navy
Orange-Class	Articles which undisputedly meet IIWiki's criteria, and have at least one header with minor amounts of information, or a considerably large overview aswell a picture or Infobox	• Undisputedly meets IIWiki's criteria • Has at least one header with writing or a considerable overview • Implements infobox or pictures • Has no worse than moderate grammar issues	Osoikaze-class frigate
Red-Class	Articles which barely meet IIWiki's criteria, and should be considered a work in progress. e.g. a page which is just a stub overview	• Technically meets basic IIWiki standards OR • Complete article with considerable grammar issues • Has no links to other Sunalayan IIWiki pages	World War II
Maroon-Class	Articles which do not meet IIWiki's criteria, and should immediately be fixed. e.g. a page which is just an infobox and has no overview	• Does not meet basic IIWiki standards	None

Importance Scale

Top	Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia
High	Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid	Subject fills in more minor details
Low	Subject is mainly of specialist interest.

Requests for assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please go to the talk page of the article and inquire.