Community and kinship in Talahara
This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
Talahara's community and kinship structures are the fundamental social and economic building blocks of Talaharan culture and society. The most common familial structure is based on local kinship or community groupings; rather than patriarchal/matriarchal, extensive clan, or nuclear systems.
The template for Talaharan community and family structure comes from the traditional structures of the Kel Aman and Kel Hadar cultures. These two core cultures of the Talaharan nation each had distinct approaches to community structures which appear to have synthesized in the 18th century to form a common community structure along the coast and the foothills of the Adras Mountains. At the extremes, more traditional kinship associations have been maintained in Kel Aman communities on the coast and Kel Hadar communities in the mountains and desert. However, socio-political structures in the 19th and 20th centuries post-revolutionary era have predominantly promoted the synthesized Kel family structure.
As an element of the revolutionary program of the Talaharan Civil War, social and familial structures were rewritten and communities were reformed to promote social, political, and economic equity. This process is typically known as the Social Revolution, which spread through the country from the end of the Civil War to the turn of the century. The Social Revolution upturned traditional gender roles, clan/caste structures, and community governance structures. Further developments in the 20th and 21st centuries have altered perceptions and approaches to the integration and inclusion of marginalized groups.
Community
Community in Talahara refers to both general and specific structures in Talaharan life. Both definitions frequently correlate but are not necessarily inclusive. In general, non-directly familial social environments make up a general nexus of community. These communities are ordinarily tight-knit and provide a bulk of informal supports and forums for socialization. Distinguished from direct family by an absence of notable blood ties, communities nevertheless play major roles in defining lifestyles and socialization in Talahara.
In the specific sense, community refers to the communal political structure. Communes are the most local level of political organization, identified more generally with their constituents than by strict geographic boundaries. In addition to political representation, communes are the primary providers of social services and informal economic and labour union districting.
Political structures
As formal political structures, communes are groupings of roughly 4,000 people, represented by a council of ten members. Constitutionally, communes are individually the most powerful political entities in the country. In practice, communes have historically delegated a great deal of their power up the chain to Talahara's regions and the Supreme Legislative Council. Some communes are subdivided into ten districts or neighbourhoods of roughly 400 people, each of which elects a representative for the Communal Council. Others exist as a single unit that elects their Communal Councils from a pool of candidates.
Despite their constitutional power, Talaharan communes are relatively intimate and often closed settings. Public services, including policing are officially administered at the commune-level. As such, various institutions are attuned to the specific concerns of the communards. The Communal Council also appoints and administers basic court services and Black Guard military units. In dense urban areas, many of the services administered at the commune-level may be pooled between inter-communal organizations or even devolved upward to regions which may in turn pool resources into an inter-regional urban agglomeration. These cooperative agreements lead to a great degree of interconnectedness between communes, but legally any commune is able to withdraw from these agreements and self-administer at any time.
Socio-political alienation is known to be a matter of concern in some communes, whereby certain members of the community facing ostracization may be informally presented with barriers to accessing certain services, particularly if the members have a history of differences or confrontations with core members of the community. These experiences are more common in relatively autonomous or isolated communes, particularly in Talahara's south. Common sources of ostracization/alienation include diversity factors and criminality. Despite this, communal services are guaranteed to all persons within a commune, not merely citizens or workers.
Movement between communes is legally protected, but membership in a specific commune is prioritized first by geography and then by seniority of a household. As such, a group or individual who moves to the edge of a new commune need only register with the commune council to participate in the commune's politics, but may be subjected to a future change via rezoning of communal boundaries while a long-standing community household also located on a boundary would remain.