Themiclesian nationalisms: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "'''Themiclesian nationalisms''', in scholarly discourse, are a set of ideas that past and present Themiclesians have used to define Themiclesia. Native concep...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Themiclesian nationalisms''', in scholarly discourse, are a set of ideas that past and present [[Themiclesia|Themiclesians]] have used to define Themiclesia. Native conceptions of Themiclesian identity, first originating within the [[Hexarchy]] and developed as a consequence of the [[Meng-Rjang Dynasty|Restoration of the Meng Dynasty]], were fluid and pluralistic. On an essentialist level, language and culture were main discriminants, and on a constructivist level, groups of individuals acquired various "Themiclesian" identities according to their political, military, and financial relationships with the royal court and each other. Some of these concepts are readily comparable to Menghean notions of nationality, while others are better explained as native innovations. In the 18th century, [[Camia|Camian]] and Casaterran notions of nationhood challenged traditional ones, and in the 19th national identity was combined with {{wp|romanticism}} of Themiclesia's past imperial projects in Columbia and Meridia, and consequently given political importance. | '''Themiclesian nationalisms''', in scholarly discourse, are a set of ideas that past and present [[Themiclesia|Themiclesians]] have used to define Themiclesia. Native conceptions of Themiclesian identity, first originating within the [[Hexarchy]] and developed as a consequence of the [[Meng-Rjang Dynasty|Restoration of the Meng Dynasty]], were fluid and pluralistic. On an essentialist level, language and culture were main discriminants, and on a constructivist level, groups of individuals acquired various "Themiclesian" identities according to their political, military, and financial relationships with the royal court and each other. Some of these concepts are readily comparable to Menghean notions of nationality, while others are better explained as native innovations. In the 18th century, [[Camia|Camian]] and Casaterran notions of nationhood challenged traditional ones, and in the 19th national identity was combined with {{wp|romanticism}} of Themiclesia's past imperial projects in Columbia and Meridia, and consequently given political importance. | ||
==See also== | |||
*[[Themiclesia]] | |||
[[Category:Themiclesia]][[Category:Septentrion]] | |||
Revision as of 16:20, 15 January 2020
Themiclesian nationalisms, in scholarly discourse, are a set of ideas that past and present Themiclesians have used to define Themiclesia. Native conceptions of Themiclesian identity, first originating within the Hexarchy and developed as a consequence of the Restoration of the Meng Dynasty, were fluid and pluralistic. On an essentialist level, language and culture were main discriminants, and on a constructivist level, groups of individuals acquired various "Themiclesian" identities according to their political, military, and financial relationships with the royal court and each other. Some of these concepts are readily comparable to Menghean notions of nationality, while others are better explained as native innovations. In the 18th century, Camian and Casaterran notions of nationhood challenged traditional ones, and in the 19th national identity was combined with romanticism of Themiclesia's past imperial projects in Columbia and Meridia, and consequently given political importance.