Peerage of Themiclesia

The Peerage of Themiclesia or Baronage of Themiclesia is a system for organizing titles of nobility in Themiclesia. While the defining characteristic of a peer is participation in the House of Lords, most peers are not entitled to a seat. The Themiclesian nobility encompasses a broader set of titles of which the peerage is a subset.

Name and divisions

It has been remarked that the words "peerage" (邦君) and "baronage" (諸侯) must be dealt with separately in the historical context. While barons were created by the monarch as military or economic vassals, the patriarchs during the Hexarchy and early dynastic periods were semi-independent rulers, with a much broader ambit, with no subservience to the monarch. "The patriarchy is the monarch's passive acquiescence of their independent authority; the patriarchs are junior allies more than vassals," according to historian A. Gro. With the expansion of royal authority, patriarchs gradually undertook more fiscal obligations to the crown. The patriarchs were much more powerful than barons, and the latter were often levied by the king to pressure the former.

While it is common to refer to all higher Themiclesian noblemen as part of the Peerage of Themiclesia, this is an informal categorization of several legally-distinct sections of nobles, with differing entitlements. The Home Peerage consists of most peers, subject to some debate as to its definition and limits; all Home peers except baronets possess an automatic seat in the House of Lords of the Parliament of Kien-k'ang. The autonomous states Estoria, Heraclea, and Thurmia each have their own peerages, and members of these peerages are entitled to a seat in the upper houses of those states respectively, but not in the upper house of Kien-k'ang. The hereditary rulers of autonomous minorities are considered princes in their own right and not part of the peerages, unless given a title that way. Historically, Themiclesia granted honourary titles to other leaders within its sphere of influence; these titles are called the Imperial Peerage, of which only a few titles survive.

Home Peerage

Depending on the authority, there are either three or four ranks in the Home Peerage: from junior to senior baronets, barons, and chief barons, while dukes may or may not be considered Home peers. Writers who support a three-rank system believe that the definition of the word peerage means vassals to the Sovereign under his title as Duke of Tsinh, so other dukes and their barons must be considered separate peerages. Those who support a four-rank system believe that there is only one peerage in Themiclesia-proper, centred upon the Emepror, and the dukes are considered vassals to him under the imperial title rather than as Duke of Tsinh; thus, the peerages of Estoria and Heraclea are explicitly excluded from the Home Peerage, but everything else created after 543 is within it.

Baronets

Baronets (倫矦, run-gwa) occupy the lowest rank in the peerage. Etymologically, the word run means "rank, parity", meaning the baronet enjoyed the rank of a baron but did not the substance of a title—a fief. Nevertheless, there exist baronets who have actual fiefs, granted by royal favour. Baronets without fiefs are also called "exchequer barons" (內矦, nups-go), meaning that their titles were in "virtual baronies", imaginary places that actually drew on the exchequer.  

Amongst baronets, relative position is determined by the size of the real or virtual barony, revenues wherefrom standing in lieu of a geographic fief. There is no minimum or maximum number of households, though the smallest ever was 50, and the largest, 5,000. These were not real households, but the average household in terms of revenue, i.e. a baronet of 50 households would receive the revenues from 50 average households. The entitlement was determined by the crown before the Peerage Act of 1847; this law provided an initial entitlement of 300 households, reduced by 50 for each succession, though not to decrease beyond 50. Holders of the title were called qū (君) and had a monicker attached before it, if absent a real fief. In Tyrannian this is rendered as "Lord X", where X is the monicker of the peer.

Customarily, any civil servant who achieved Second Class in the civil service would be made a baronet. The title was inheritable, and the number of baroents grew during the long life of the current dynasty. The income provided by title was modest by aristocratic standards—an entitlement of 50 households enabled one to live a comfortable life, maintain a respectable residence, and retain a handful of servants, but not much else, and entitlements over 300 households were uncommon. The true privilege of the title came in positioning one's children in the civil service; the holder of the title could report to the Marshal of Peers (主爵中㷉, twa′-tsuk-trung-′uts) upon attaining the age of 30 for his initial appointment. While this entry was deemed less seemly than civic election by the gentry, it nevertheless produced a large quantity of successful administrators and politicians.

Barons

Barons (徹矦, r′it-gwa) rank higher than baronets and receive a symbolic fief. The word r′it means "to separate", meaning that the holder had a fief that was "separate" from royal power.

Barons originally took income from a geographical area. Unlike Casaterran counterparts, Themiclesian barons did not have manorial power over their baronies. Only the taxation revenues from the fief belonged to the barons, who was not permitted to interfere in its administration. Thus, they did not always lived at their fiefs and instead had the opportunity to participate in government. The size of the barony was decided by the crown until the Peerage Act of 1847. While they ranked higher than baronets, their income was not necessarily greater. The smallest fief granted was the Nuk Hamlet in Kien-k'ang, which had only four houses on it, and largest fief granted in the modern period was Sngrak-lang County, which counted 13,220 households in its 1708 census.  

Baronets who render some significant service to the state could be expected to be promoted to baron; military accomplishments motivated the majority of promotions. Generals were invariably made baronets upon commission, as this invested him in the survival of Themiclesia. The prime minister was either a baron or made one as soon as he was appointed. Cabinet ministers who have performed well could also be made an baron at the end of their tenures. When an emperor married, the empress' father would often be made baron, and her brothers baronets.

Like baronetcies, baronies can also be inherited and carried the same appointment privileges. Under the Peerage Act of 1847, which was passed in view of increasing government revenues, barons were granted the public land in their fiefs, which they would be responsible for running successfully.

Chief barons

The rank of chief baron (兄矦, smrang-gwa) developed from the practice for the highest-ranking nobles to establish his middling child as an relatively powerful baron both to placate and to police his other barons, because this meant he was not dependent solely upon his barons for military defence and actively contributed to it. Subsequently, chief barons became heritable titles in some contexts and ranked above ordinary barons. The royal family of Themiclesia continues this tradition, and the second-eldest son is typically created a chief baron upon coming of age.

Dukes

Dukes (伯, bryak) are powerful nobles of high rank, who formerly possessed palatine powers and could create barons and baronets as vassals to themselves. In canonical historiography, dukes are junior sovereigns in their own right but within a permanent alliance with the emperor, rather than vassals or servants to him. Indeed, the Emepror's main substantive title was the Duke of Tsinh, while "Emperor" was a style assumed after the restoration of the Menghean monarchy; only during the subsequent dynasties did the title of "Emperor" acquire more significance, mainly through conquest. The logic was that the title was not connected to a particular city and so appeared to legitimize conquest and downplay the element of subjugation by another city.

Dukedoms continued to exist beyond the restoration of the Meng dynasty in 542 and were not absorbed into the imperial demesne until the 8th century. Prior to their annexation, dukes could promulgate laws independently and ruled their territories through a ducal court that was not dissimilar in structure to the imperial court. Changes at the imperial court were often mirrored at ducal courts rapidly. Dukes could legally appoint their own chancellors, but even in the 6th century usually at the emperor's recommendation. After the annexation of the final dukedom of Pra (巴) in 877, dukedoms were purely honourary and no longer carried palatine powers; however, the power to ennoble was not completely abolished, such that dukes may create their descendants as chief barons, barons, and baronets.

While baronets, barons, and chief barons are also nobles and can exercise great power, their "proper" relationship with dukes, according to legalistic authors, is one between subject and ruler. Due to this understanding, many writers treated dukes and barons as two entirely different classes of nobles, though differences between them gradually blurred. Many of the prerogatives of dukes appear to have arisen out of a desire to emphasize their superiority to barons when imperial power grew at dukes' expense. There are currently 16 dukedoms in Themiclesia, accounting for less than 0.25% of titles in the Themiclesian peerages.

Princes

Princes (王, ghwang) was a title seldom used in Themiclesia proper but rather often for the leaders of minor ethnic groups under the Emperor. Princes are of the same rank as dukes.

Regional Peerages

Currently, the autonomous states of Estoria, Heraclea, and Thurmia each possess their own peerages. All three peerages consist of only baronets and barons.

Imperial Peerage

The Imperial Peerage, as defined by the Parliament of Kien-k'ang, consists of all barons whose baronies were not cismarine—"this side of the [Meh] sea" from Themiclesia's position. The Imperial Peerage excludes the patriarchies and principalities recognized under the Great Treaties of 792 and 802 that established Themiclesian rule over the Subcontinent, because these nobles submitted to Themiclesian power but were recognized to rule in their own right, rather than through a title held from the Themiclesian crown. The Imperial Peerage contains titles created on the Meh coast of Nukkumaa, in Agaulon, Camia, Solevant, and Norfeld, Maverica; however, at various times, title-holders either naturalized to these nationalities or resettled in Themiclesia. Themiclesian laws continue to recognize the validity of these titles as heritable styles, but their holders are not entitled to a seat in the House of Lords unless given explicit permission by the Emperor.

House of Lords

Main articles: House of Lords (Themiclesia) and Themiclesian politics in the 1800s

In the tulmult leading up to the Reform Bill of 1844, which established the House of Lords, Conservative magnates sought to retain a check on the legislative process as considerable portions of their supporters defected to the Reformist movement. In 1844, there were 189 barons and 578 baronets, who together would be too many to form a legislative chamber, and thus only barons received an automatic seat. Originally, it was proposed that baronets could hold elections amongst themselves, but the distribution of seats between the two ranks was contentious. Additionally, many baronets did not wish to be excluded from the new House of Commons, and they correctly predicted that their titles were great advantages in elections for at least a few decades since 1845.

In the seniority-based seating plan of the House of Lords, principally used during state openings and prorogations of parliament, patriarchs are entitled to a canopied seat next to the royal canopy throne, together facing east, due to symbolic status as the emperor's social equals. Otherwise, all chief barons and barons sat in benches flanking the throne. In actual debates, patriarchs rarely sit next to the throne, as the canopies made them "difficult to hear and cause all barons to turn to look at them in a rather awkward way." Rather, they usually took a seat in the benches.

Reforms

Abolition of fiefs

The most important of peerage reform laws in the 19th century is the Peerage Act of 1847, passed by the inaugural Liberal government. Formerly, each oridnary peer would have enjoyed a heritable fief, taxes whence becoming their income. Through the period of consolidation in the 9th century, peers' income was decreased to half then to an eighth of revenues, higher entitlements possible from royal grace.

Liberal thinkers in the 19th century believed this was a form of feudalism that, amongst other ill effects, reflected poorly on the country; moreover, in the 18th century, many peers used this automatic source of income to bribe civil servants and interfered in commerce. On a platform guaranteeing their income, a portion of the commons and crown lands in each fief was granted to replace his share in the local revenue. On the one hand, peers were enthusiastic to receive a parcel of land that they could privately run, rather than passively receiving revenues; on the other, this allowed for a saving in appointing household officials to peers, which was a façade of feudal tenure. New peers would receive public lands until the Peerage Act of 1874, by which point commons have largely disappeared: it was the dogma of the Liberals that the state had no interest in land, which should be given to potential entrepreneures.

Previously, a fief would also be renamed from a county or (in rarer cases) prefecture to state (邦, prong) to reflect its nominal status as alienated land. By the Act of 1847, their land would remain counties and prefectures. However, existing places called "states" retained this designation, though their administration is in all wise similar to counties or prefectures. Note that a peer's prong is not to be conflated with the palatine states or ethnic states in the east.

Personal rights

By tradition, a peer may not be arrested or tried without the assent of the monarch. He usually decided this with the advice of the Marshal of Peers. Additionally, assault or libel against peers was severely punished, as offences against social order. By the House of Lords Act of 1844, the power to arrest, detain, and try peers was vested in the House of Lords exclusively. The Penal Code of 1853, which abolished capital punishment, ended public prosecution of those who offended peers, though they still retained the right to launch private prosecutions. The Judicial Privilege Act of 1875 mandated peers to allow recovery of damages when sued by a commoner, though he may not be called as a witness or arrested for trial.

After the establishment of the House of Lords, peers obtained additional protection when Parliament was sitting. This was modelled on Casaterran parliamentary prerogatives against executive interferece and was separate from traditional immunities.

In the Civil and Military Service Segregation Act of 1915, peers and their families lost the privilege to obtain positions in the civil service. Since the Act also created the Consolidated Army, the sale of commissions was also terminated. While the law was momentous in its wording, its effects had been emergent for several decades.

Trial and degradation

While peers and princes may only be tried by the House of Lords after its establishment in 1845, peers have been deprived of their titles for crimes for many centuries. Generally, it is held that a peer must be clear of all criminal activity, and conviction of any crime was sufficient to deprive his title. The same can occur for princes, though their punishment was usually degradation to a peer for the first offence. In periods when governments sought income, even domestic scandals and other minor excuses were used to deprive titles. The average title in Themiclesia lasts around three to four generations before it is deprived for whatever reason. As princes and peers led households of considerable size, it was comparatively easy for them to be implicated in a crime, which need be committed by themselves personnally; their titles may be cancelled as long as they were involved in some way or failed to report it.

Forms of address

Main article: Forms of address in Themiclesia

Attire

Headdress

The traditional headdress of Themiclesian aristocrats is no longer regularly worn except in certain ceremonies at court, principally coronations and royal funerals. Headdresses were worn in state openings and prorogations of Parliament up to the start of the PSW.

The headdress of the peerage, similar in style to those of senior civil servants, consists of a coif, a fillet, and a coronet. The coif is fabric and was formerly secured to the head by strings tied onto the wearer's hair bun, but as this hairstyle went out of fashion in favour of Western styles in the 1780–1820s, it is now tied to the head by straps under the chin. Over the coif is worn a wooden fillet covered with silk; the design on the fillet is unregulated, and wearers can generally use any design seen fit, with some limits. A crimson fillet is worn by the sovereign, and a black fillet generally represents legal professionals or professors; white and black embroidery represents mourning attire.

The coronet consists of two separable parts: a circlet forms the base of the coronet and holds the arches under tension. A circadia emblem was added before the arches, originally as a special honour, but it has subsequently expanded to be generally used. The circlet and arches are regulated as follows:

	Coif	Fillet	Fillet ribbon	Circlet	Arches	Badge
Emperor	Crimson, embroidered	Scarlet	Scarlet	Gold wire, rubies, sapphires, and emeralds	3, gold	Gold, turquoise inset in shape of circadia
Empress			Green	Gold wire, rubies, sapphires, and emeralds
Duke	Vermillion, embroidered		Scarlet	Gold wire, rubies and sapphires
Chief Baron	Grey, embroidered	Purple	Grey	Gold wire, rubies		Gold, circadia chased
Baron	Grey, plain
Baronet

Clothing

While the Themiclesian court never adopted true uniforms like the Menghean court has, there exist certain regulations that regulate what each class of peers may wear. Traditionally, the quantity of fabrics used in court robes indicated relative seniority. The emperor, patriarchs, and princes palatine were supposed to wear court robes made from eight fathoms of fabric, though this was not often reflected in the final tailored product due to the inherent impossibility in using all of the alloted fabric. Chief barons, barons, and baronets were entitled to seven fathoms and two feet. Lesser nobles used six fathoms and five fathoms and two feet. All these robes were cut to form long trains that would have made daily wear impractical.

White robes were associated with funerals, and black robes with the legal profession.

	Mid-robe	Over-robe	Sash	Seal	Pouch
Emperor	Crimson, sleeves 8 spans, train 1 fathom	Black, sleeve 6 spans, train 1 fathom	Crimson	Jade	Scarlet, 204 mm × 204 mm (8.0 in × 8.0 in)
Empress		Crimson, sleeve 6 spans, train 1 fathom	Green	Jade	Green, 204 mm × 204 mm (8.0 in × 8.0 in)
Duke	Vermillion, sleeves 8 spans, train 1 fathom	Crimson, sleeve 6 spans, train 1 fathom	Scarlet	Gold	Scarlet, 180 mm × 180 mm (7.1 in × 7.1 in)
Chief Baron	Grey, embroidered	Purple	Grey	Gold wire, rubies	Gold, circadia chased
Baron	Grey, plain
Baronet

Major elevations to peerage

There have been two elevations en masse to the peerage in the 20th century, in consequence of major events.

March Peerage

The March Peerage occurred on Mar. 10, 1936 to overcome the House of Lords' opposition to conscription, which the Government deemed necessary to fend off an impending invasion by Menghe but the Conservatives of the upper house believed was better addressed by diplomacy. 30 peers were created overnight, on March 10, from former Liberal MPs while Parliament was in session, and took their seats the following day. The Conservatives in the House of Commons neither supported nor opposed their party members in the other house, as the Commons Conservatives leader had reached a resolution with the Liberals to form a national-unity government in the lower house.

Juhani Sihvo

For his part in the defence of Themiclesia against Menghe and Dayashina, Field Marshall Juhani Sihvo was created the Baron of De (柿矦) on Jan. 1, 1947 by royal proclamation. The peerage was landless but did carry with it a seat in the House of Lords, which Juhani Sihvo never formally took. Though some were concerned the landlessness of the peerage would be considered insulting, the Hallian mission privately told the government that had the title come with income, Juhani Sihvo would not be permitted to take it at all.

Since Juhani Sihvo died without heirs, the title reverted to the crown according to the Peerage Act.

Yutaka Ueda

Yutaka Ueda was a Dayashinese general who led the country's invasion of Meridia during the earlier phase of the Pan-Septentrion War, wherein his efficacy garnered him the monicker "Lion of Meridia". In 1942, the Dayashinese government became increasingly harsh in its oppression of Meridian populations, and on this matter as well as others, Ueda was forced from office. When the tide of the war turned against Dayashina, Ueda proved instrumental in organizing a coup d'état that ousted the government which insisted on the war's destructive prosecution; in its place, a more dovish government came into power, paving the way for Dayashina's eventual surrender.

On Jan. 1, 1947, Lram Lwang's government proclaimed that Ueda's actions in ushering in a pro-peace government had shortened the war dramatically and likely saved countless human lives of many nationalities. Moreover, his role in organizing the peaceful reform of Dayashina was also found meriting of recognition. He was on the same day created the Baron of Dok-lang.

Ueda's creation as a Themiclesian peer was disputed by none less than Lram's home secretary, Lord Krem, given Ueda's involvement with Dayashina's Imperial Special Operation Group, which was responsible for no fewer than 40 known attempts on Emperor Q'in's life, 2 of which came close to fruition. However, Lram rebuffed that these plots were hatched only after Ueda had left the D/ISOG, and it would be appropriate and crucial for foreign policy in the moment to show strong support for Dayashina's reformers against the remnants of the Ascendancy Party, with clear international backing. When the Emperor was asked to ennoble Ueda, he expressed that he considered it only his duty to support the Government's policy, regardless what his personal experiences are.

In the ennoblement edict read to Ueda in 1947, the Emperor added a line saying the the title should be considered "gratitude from the Themiclesian nation for your actions most eminently characterized by integrity and humanity in the face of most extreme and testing danger, that shall last from generation to generation and never diminish in perpetuity." At the same time, Ueda was awarded the Principal Officer of the Order of Counsels, the first rank of the senior order of merit in Themiclesia. The only other recipients of this honour were members of the National Government that led Themiclesia through the war.

Unlike Juhani Sihvo's total absence from the House of Lords, Yutaka Ueda did occasionally sit in the house, where he became most involved as an advocate for the Dayashinese diaspora in Themiclesia and veteran's affairs. Upon his death in 1979, his title was succeeded by his son.

Victory Peerage

The Victory Peerage occurred on Jul. 1, 1952 for Themiclesia's wartime leaders in the Ministry or the Civil Service, on the eve of the 1952 general election, which the Conservatives were clearly losing. 21 peers were created on that day, as follows:

• Lram Long, Prime Minister, created the Lord of Ghor-ljang
• Brok-sui Tin, Foreign Secretary, created the Lord of Sarh
• Lord L′a′, Home Secretary, created the Lord of Sak-brjanh
• Lord Man, Secretary of State for Transport, created the Lord of Rui-rjum
• Nar Tok, Secretary of State for War, created the Lord of Brit-bong
• Pei-hi Ron, Secretary of State for Air, created the Lord of Tor-ngwadh
• Lord Kugh, Secretary to the Cabinet (civil servant), created the Lord of Grêgh
• Ham-lu Tip, Secretary to the Cabinet (civil servant), created the Lord of Bjonh

See also

• Themiclesia
• Themiclesian nobility