Yamabe Oshimaro: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|website = <!--{{URL|example.com}}--> | |website = <!--{{URL|example.com}}--> | ||
|module = | |module = | ||
}}'''Yamabe Oshimaro''' ({{wp|Japanese|Dayashinese}} | }}'''Yamabe Oshimaro''' ({{wp|Japanese|Dayashinese}}: 山部押麻呂／やまべのおしまろ, also Yamabe no Oshimaro, Nov. 30, 1919 – Dec. 2, 2000) was a [[Dayashina|Dayashinese]] soldier of the [[Pan-Septentrion War]] and author of several books relating to it. | ||
==Acquittal and conviction== | ==Acquittal and conviction== | ||
On Nov. 2, 1941, Yamabe was sent to the law side of the Royal Exchequer (中少內, trjung-stjawh-nups). The [[Themiclesian Navy]], statutorily a vestigial agency of finance, committed all allegations of treason and felony for trial at this court, which is ordinarily concerned with disputes in excise, customs, and {{wp|amercements}}. While the Navy possessed its own version of the {{wp|court-martial}}, held by its captains and the [[Tribune (Themiclesia)|naval tribunes]], its jurisdiction did not extend to crimes committed by its members in domestic territory. As the court was in {{wp|Legal year|vacation}}, his capture reached the newspapers, prompting his financially well-off parents in [[Dayashina]] to retain {{wp|serjeant-at-law}} Chao Ree, GC to represent him. | On Nov. 2, 1941, Yamabe was sent to the law side of the Royal Exchequer (中少內, trjung-stjawh-nups). The [[Themiclesian Navy]], statutorily a vestigial agency of finance, committed all allegations of treason and felony for trial at this court, which is ordinarily concerned with disputes in excise, customs, and {{wp|amercements}}. While the Navy possessed its own version of the {{wp|court-martial}}, held by its captains and the [[Tribune (Themiclesia)|naval tribunes]], its jurisdiction did not extend to crimes committed by its members in domestic territory. As the court was in {{wp|Legal year|vacation}}, his capture reached the newspapers, prompting his financially well-off parents in [[Dayashina]] to retain {{wp|serjeant-at-law}} Chao Ree (黎兆), GC to represent him. Chao Ree was a partner in Ree, Ree, and Ree (三黎士師所, ''sem-rii-dzrje-srjii-skrja’''), one of Themiclesia's most distinguished criminal defence firms at the time. | ||
He was formally arraigned on Feb. 10, 1942 and stood indicted on 17 murder charges, 24 assault charges, and high treason. Ree led the defence, with Yamabe absent, prior to trial; on the 22nd, he demurred to all murder and assault charges as "acts prescribed by a foreign lord". That is, on the grounds that neither were Themiclesian soldiers on trial in foreign states for acts against them, so Yamabe ought not be tried for these actions. On the following day, the public disorder charges were confessed. On Mar. 5, Yamabe appeared in court for the first time and entered a not guilty plea to the treason charge. Themiclesian law required all charges to be answered before the court proceeded to decide demurrers. The court first focused on the question of Yamabe's legal allegiance. | |||
The Navy's prosecutors argued that, since Yamabe did not claim the benefit of alien (the right of foreign subjects to be tried by the Foreign Office | The Navy's prosecutors argued that, since Yamabe did not claim the benefit of alien (the right of foreign subjects to be tried by the Foreign Office) when he was previously brought before a court for cheque fraud, he should be regarded and tried as a Themiclesian subject. Bjum Hwiar, barrister, argued on precedent that the failure to claim benefit does not form an acknowledgement of nationality. The Navy rejoined that Yamabe had joined the Marine Corps as a Themiclesian subject; however, Hwiar refuted that no law requires the Marine Corps's men to be Themiclesian, and his enlistment "certainly does not, legally, imply it." Hwiar further showed the court a long list of marines that were not Themiclesian subjects at enlistment, spanning 1410 – 1817, and a list of their subsequent enrollments in [[Domestic Records (Themiclesia)|household records]], years after enlistment. When the Navy argued these examples were obsolete, Hwiar said that the Navy recently promoted an officer who died in 1244 posthumously "for valour", demonstrating that facts centuries ago are still within the Navy's purview. On Mar. 31, the Navy was ordered to produce counter-arguments; the prosecutors pled {{wp|imparlance}}, which the court overruled then sustained the demurrer to murder and assault charges. | ||
Desperate for information, the Navy ordered agents to monitor Yamabe for incriminating evidence. Ree anticipated this and stationed solicitors at Yamabe's side. On Apr. 7, the court in vacation, solicitor Mak Hmin staged a conversation with Yamabe (with his knowledge). When session resumed, the Navy presented the staged conversation as evidence, and Ree demanded the immediate imprisonment of the prosecutors for contempt and dismissal of the case with prejudice, for the "inexcusable litigative conduct of the prosecution". The court expelling the prosecution, Ree also sued for their disbarrment. The Bar was galvanized by Ree and voted to disbar the prosecutors. With new prosecutors, the Navy pushed for {{wp|venire de novo}}, but Kung, barrister, argued the Navy was at fault and not entitled to a new trial. Kung further requested the indictment be "dismissed and for nothing utterly esteemed". The court overrued both and ordered the parties to join at issue. | |||
The new | The new prosecutor averred the Navy's "humiliation cannot be more complete" and that Ree's "abilities are already made famous", implying that Ree defended Yamabe for personal glory. Ree pushed for a third disbarrment on grounds of slander; however, the Bar was also growing weary of Ree's extremism and instead suspended the new prosecutor. During Yamabe's trial, the 4th and 5th Regiments have started a vigorous campaign to identify infiltrators. The campaign is estimated to have killed as many loyalists as infiltrators. The Admiralty ordered the 4th Regiment to make themselves available for jury duty for the treason trial. The prosecution moved that a jury should be summoned from Yamabe's regiment, which was indignant at his actions; however, Ree instead expounded the issue was one of law, not of fact, which in the Exchequer results in a trial by bench. The judges agreed and directed the Navy to accept this mode of trial. The Navy was later proven to have schemed of using the regiment's rage to secure a conviction. | ||
The prosecution argued that Yamabe, no matter his nationality, owed allegiance to the Themiclesian crown after he had surrendered to the [[Themiclesian Army]] and accepted the purse of 600 [[Auric catty (Themiclesia)|hmrjing]] to naturalize, even though he never formally petitioned to do so, as required. The defence countered that legal obligation is not a fact as such. They maintained that Yamabe did not owe allegiance when he surrendered, at best becoming stateless. The Navy then became concerned that Ree might make the argument ''all'' marines in the 4th and 5th Regiments that came to Themiclesia as prisoners were stateless. On May 15, parliament resumed sitting, and the Navy Secretary passed a bill to naturalize all members of the two regiments that were not yet naturalized. This did not retroactively apply to Yamabe, though his name was on the bill.<ref>Up to this point, those desiring naturalization submitted a peition to the Council of Ushers declaring their wish to become subjects of the Themiclesian crown, and an act of parliament would be passed (generally for hundreds at once) to recognize their citizenship. Yamabe joined the Marines without formally petitioning for citizenship, which he thought was automatically granted upon accepting the 600 hmrjing purse.</ref> Yamabe, however, was becoming restless, deprived of the chance to address the court. On May 18, during final statements, Yamabe asked to address the court personally. Ree gave him a very lengthy script that described him purely as a Dayashinese soldier, protected by the {{wp|Geneva Convention|Eisenmaat Convention}}; he initially followed the script but soon deviated from it, inserting statements that disparaged the Emperor, his court, and the country's future generally. The Court stopped and imprisoned him several times, but each time he was released, his statements grew more extreme. The Navy thought his tactics amounted to a {{wp|filibuster}}. | |||
The prosecutors asked the Court not to remand the defendant to confinement, so his "treasonable" statements could be heard. Ree, in the pit, could not argue against his client's freedom.<ref>Attorneys sat in a sub-level pit, before the bench, while not speaking.</ref> On Jun. 2, two marines of the 4th Regiment suddenly broke into the marshalsea in which Yamabe was held, without the Admiralty's permission, apparently intending to assassinate Yamabe. Unfortunately, Ree's solicitors were still with Yamabe and took a shot to the shoulder. The other testified that the two had spoken words indicating their intentions. Ree argued the Navy could not deny they have sent assassins to violate the court. He then asked the case be immediately dismissed due to the conduct of the prosecuting party. The Navy's prosecutors stated that this was an actual intrusion and had nothing to do with them. The Court, however, concurred with Ree, mindful of the prosecution's devious tactics before, and dismissed the case with prejudice, acquitting Yamabe of the charge of treason. | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 23 July 2019
Yamabe no Oshimaro | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Native name | 山部押麻呂 |
| Born | November 30, 1919 |
| Died | December 2, 1999 (aged 80) Nakaya, Dayashina |
| Buried | Onakata, Dayashina |
| Allegiance |  Dayashina |
| Service | Imperial Dayashinese Army (cover) Imperial Special Operations Group (actual) |
| Years of service | 1937 – 1960 |
| Rank | Major |
| Battles/wars | Pan-Septentrion War |
| Spouse(s) | 高町古真子 (Takamachi Komako, m. 1938) |
Yamabe Oshimaro (Dayashinese: 山部押麻呂／やまべのおしまろ, also Yamabe no Oshimaro, Nov. 30, 1919 – Dec. 2, 2000) was a Dayashinese soldier of the Pan-Septentrion War and author of several books relating to it.
Acquittal and conviction
On Nov. 2, 1941, Yamabe was sent to the law side of the Royal Exchequer (中少內, trjung-stjawh-nups). The Themiclesian Navy, statutorily a vestigial agency of finance, committed all allegations of treason and felony for trial at this court, which is ordinarily concerned with disputes in excise, customs, and amercements. While the Navy possessed its own version of the court-martial, held by its captains and the naval tribunes, its jurisdiction did not extend to crimes committed by its members in domestic territory. As the court was in vacation, his capture reached the newspapers, prompting his financially well-off parents in Dayashina to retain serjeant-at-law Chao Ree (黎兆), GC to represent him. Chao Ree was a partner in Ree, Ree, and Ree (三黎士師所, sem-rii-dzrje-srjii-skrja’), one of Themiclesia's most distinguished criminal defence firms at the time.
He was formally arraigned on Feb. 10, 1942 and stood indicted on 17 murder charges, 24 assault charges, and high treason. Ree led the defence, with Yamabe absent, prior to trial; on the 22nd, he demurred to all murder and assault charges as "acts prescribed by a foreign lord". That is, on the grounds that neither were Themiclesian soldiers on trial in foreign states for acts against them, so Yamabe ought not be tried for these actions. On the following day, the public disorder charges were confessed. On Mar. 5, Yamabe appeared in court for the first time and entered a not guilty plea to the treason charge. Themiclesian law required all charges to be answered before the court proceeded to decide demurrers. The court first focused on the question of Yamabe's legal allegiance.
The Navy's prosecutors argued that, since Yamabe did not claim the benefit of alien (the right of foreign subjects to be tried by the Foreign Office) when he was previously brought before a court for cheque fraud, he should be regarded and tried as a Themiclesian subject. Bjum Hwiar, barrister, argued on precedent that the failure to claim benefit does not form an acknowledgement of nationality. The Navy rejoined that Yamabe had joined the Marine Corps as a Themiclesian subject; however, Hwiar refuted that no law requires the Marine Corps's men to be Themiclesian, and his enlistment "certainly does not, legally, imply it." Hwiar further showed the court a long list of marines that were not Themiclesian subjects at enlistment, spanning 1410 – 1817, and a list of their subsequent enrollments in household records, years after enlistment. When the Navy argued these examples were obsolete, Hwiar said that the Navy recently promoted an officer who died in 1244 posthumously "for valour", demonstrating that facts centuries ago are still within the Navy's purview. On Mar. 31, the Navy was ordered to produce counter-arguments; the prosecutors pled imparlance, which the court overruled then sustained the demurrer to murder and assault charges.
Desperate for information, the Navy ordered agents to monitor Yamabe for incriminating evidence. Ree anticipated this and stationed solicitors at Yamabe's side. On Apr. 7, the court in vacation, solicitor Mak Hmin staged a conversation with Yamabe (with his knowledge). When session resumed, the Navy presented the staged conversation as evidence, and Ree demanded the immediate imprisonment of the prosecutors for contempt and dismissal of the case with prejudice, for the "inexcusable litigative conduct of the prosecution". The court expelling the prosecution, Ree also sued for their disbarrment. The Bar was galvanized by Ree and voted to disbar the prosecutors. With new prosecutors, the Navy pushed for venire de novo, but Kung, barrister, argued the Navy was at fault and not entitled to a new trial. Kung further requested the indictment be "dismissed and for nothing utterly esteemed". The court overrued both and ordered the parties to join at issue.
The new prosecutor averred the Navy's "humiliation cannot be more complete" and that Ree's "abilities are already made famous", implying that Ree defended Yamabe for personal glory. Ree pushed for a third disbarrment on grounds of slander; however, the Bar was also growing weary of Ree's extremism and instead suspended the new prosecutor. During Yamabe's trial, the 4th and 5th Regiments have started a vigorous campaign to identify infiltrators. The campaign is estimated to have killed as many loyalists as infiltrators. The Admiralty ordered the 4th Regiment to make themselves available for jury duty for the treason trial. The prosecution moved that a jury should be summoned from Yamabe's regiment, which was indignant at his actions; however, Ree instead expounded the issue was one of law, not of fact, which in the Exchequer results in a trial by bench. The judges agreed and directed the Navy to accept this mode of trial. The Navy was later proven to have schemed of using the regiment's rage to secure a conviction.
The prosecution argued that Yamabe, no matter his nationality, owed allegiance to the Themiclesian crown after he had surrendered to the Themiclesian Army and accepted the purse of 600 hmrjing to naturalize, even though he never formally petitioned to do so, as required. The defence countered that legal obligation is not a fact as such. They maintained that Yamabe did not owe allegiance when he surrendered, at best becoming stateless. The Navy then became concerned that Ree might make the argument all marines in the 4th and 5th Regiments that came to Themiclesia as prisoners were stateless. On May 15, parliament resumed sitting, and the Navy Secretary passed a bill to naturalize all members of the two regiments that were not yet naturalized. This did not retroactively apply to Yamabe, though his name was on the bill.[1] Yamabe, however, was becoming restless, deprived of the chance to address the court. On May 18, during final statements, Yamabe asked to address the court personally. Ree gave him a very lengthy script that described him purely as a Dayashinese soldier, protected by the Eisenmaat Convention; he initially followed the script but soon deviated from it, inserting statements that disparaged the Emperor, his court, and the country's future generally. The Court stopped and imprisoned him several times, but each time he was released, his statements grew more extreme. The Navy thought his tactics amounted to a filibuster.
The prosecutors asked the Court not to remand the defendant to confinement, so his "treasonable" statements could be heard. Ree, in the pit, could not argue against his client's freedom.[2] On Jun. 2, two marines of the 4th Regiment suddenly broke into the marshalsea in which Yamabe was held, without the Admiralty's permission, apparently intending to assassinate Yamabe. Unfortunately, Ree's solicitors were still with Yamabe and took a shot to the shoulder. The other testified that the two had spoken words indicating their intentions. Ree argued the Navy could not deny they have sent assassins to violate the court. He then asked the case be immediately dismissed due to the conduct of the prosecuting party. The Navy's prosecutors stated that this was an actual intrusion and had nothing to do with them. The Court, however, concurred with Ree, mindful of the prosecution's devious tactics before, and dismissed the case with prejudice, acquitting Yamabe of the charge of treason.
Notes
- ↑ Up to this point, those desiring naturalization submitted a peition to the Council of Ushers declaring their wish to become subjects of the Themiclesian crown, and an act of parliament would be passed (generally for hundreds at once) to recognize their citizenship. Yamabe joined the Marines without formally petitioning for citizenship, which he thought was automatically granted upon accepting the 600 hmrjing purse.
- ↑ Attorneys sat in a sub-level pit, before the bench, while not speaking.