Talaharan Civil War: Difference between revisions
m (→Isin'nada) |
m (→Isin'nada) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===''Isin'nada''=== | ===''Isin'nada''=== | ||
[[File:Abd el-Kader by Stanislaw Chlebowski.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Portrait of Tmassa Ziri Akli]] | |||
What is commonly referred to in international political theory as Messidorian syndicalism began as a Kel Adrar artisans' ideology known as ''isin'nada'' or "clan consciousness". Traditional Kel Adrar society divided families by their trades into clan castes. These castes formed extensive kinship groups for their members and were also said to be traditionally egalitarian. Mobility between clans was possible albeit rare. After the Izîlids came to power in Aɣmatia in 1513 CE, the clans were subordinated to local lords under a modified iqta system. Clans became more restrictive and mobility was effectively eliminated. Clans were largely alienated from other clans and from Azdarin freepersons in Aɣmatia. | What is commonly referred to in international political theory as Messidorian syndicalism began as a Kel Adrar artisans' ideology known as ''isin'nada'' or "clan consciousness". Traditional Kel Adrar society divided families by their trades into clan castes. These castes formed extensive kinship groups for their members and were also said to be traditionally egalitarian. Mobility between clans was possible albeit rare. After the Izîlids came to power in Aɣmatia in 1513 CE, the clans were subordinated to local lords under a modified iqta system. Clans became more restrictive and mobility was effectively eliminated. Clans were largely alienated from other clans and from Azdarin freepersons in Aɣmatia. | ||
Revision as of 03:03, 9 July 2021
This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
The Messidorian revolutions were a set of conflicts between 1799 and 1830 that established the constituent nations of the Messidor Union. They encompass the Aɣmatian revolution (1799) and the Merovian revolution (1824-1830). Both conflicts aimed at overthrowing authoritarian regimes and established precursor or foundational anarcho-socialist states. The ideology for both conflicts also stemmed from a subversive cultural and ideological exchange. Key figures among these movements were Ziri Akli (1762-1833) and Jean Estienne (1781-1848). The anarchist movements drew upon republican ideals from Merovia and anarcho-syndicalist organization from Aɣmatia.
Externally, the Messidorian revolutions created great upheaval. The Kingdom of Merovia was split into two halves: the monarchical Kingdom of Merovia in the west and the democratic Republic of Merovia in the east. The revolutions also had implications for other nascent and militant socialist movements around the globe. Tensions with monarchical neighbours were only tempered by the poor foreign relations of the Izîlids in Aɣmatia and the de Grissons dynasty in Merovia.
Both conflicts were fought initially with irregular warfare which advanced into large-scale conventional warfare. While Aɣmatia gained independence almost a quarter of a century prior to the outbreak of the Merovian revolution, material assistance from across the Periclean was limited. Socialist writers including Arthurista's Werner, Jhengtsang's Tsenpo, and Tsurushima's Kitakami Yukichi drew on the theory and lessons of the revolutions.
Historical context
The latter half of the 18th century saw the onset of the first wave of industrialization in Belisaria and western Scipia. This wave of change disrupted traditional economic roles and imperiled the status of many artisans. Clan crafters and guilders in Aɣmatia and Merovia, respectively, began to see their work devalued and wealth inequality was growing. The populations of these countries were also becoming displaced as people were corraled into growing cities and factory towns. Both the clan caste and peasant relationships between the commoners and the ruling classes in both countries also invested a majority of control with the rulers. Seeking enrichment and a modernist project of economic development, rulers in both countries emphasized the utility of mechanization and the production of products over the agrarian industry. Rural settlements began to suffer, as did the food supply.
While more relevant to Aɣmatia than Merovia, industrialization occurred unequally. Mining, manufacturing, and skilled fabrication were the first industries where hand labour was largely supplanted by initially crude mechanization. In both Aɣmatia than Merovia, the extension of mechanization to food production lagged. The massive migrations toward cities further divested agrarian communities from their means of production and actively diminished the food supply while populations continued to grow.
Regime changes contributed further to instability and challenges to the legitimacy of the ruling classes along traditional ideological lines. In the decade prior to the revolution in Aɣmatia, the Imxzninassan overthrew Malik Arkun ibn Hassan al-Izîli. The commander of the Imxzninassan, Syphax, had no claim to a divine purpose or enlightened guidance and ruled by force. In Merovia, the collapse of the Holy Audonian Empire and the elevation of the Kingdom of Merovia alienated a large portion of the Fabrian Catholic population. In both countries, traditional roles were upheaved, leaving many people uncertain and unconvinced of the legitimacy of their rulers.
Beyond the traditional norms, however, the philosophical movement toward the recognition of a concept of human rights was also developing. Intellectuals across the world had already begun to engage with the concept of universal equality and humanity. Many of these intellectuals turned these theories into outrage and decried the injustice of the ruling classes that were held above the common people. Both Aɣmatia and Merovia were prime examples of how the ruling classes treated the commoners as disposable. Both countries also had strong humanistic intellectual movements which were able to mobilize the lower classes.
Ideological underpinnings
The social and economic theories that influenced both the revolutionary uprisings, and the organization of the societies that followed them, developed over the decades prior to the Messidorian revolutions. As an end result, the Messidor Union draws on features from several different intellectual and ideological elements but ultimately married them all together. The two primary elements are syndicalism and republicanism. A third element, Alençonism would also be important for the post-revolutionary political organization but was not as influential in revolutionary discourse in either Aɣmatia or Merovia prior to the revolutions.
Isin'nada
What is commonly referred to in international political theory as Messidorian syndicalism began as a Kel Adrar artisans' ideology known as isin'nada or "clan consciousness". Traditional Kel Adrar society divided families by their trades into clan castes. These castes formed extensive kinship groups for their members and were also said to be traditionally egalitarian. Mobility between clans was possible albeit rare. After the Izîlids came to power in Aɣmatia in 1513 CE, the clans were subordinated to local lords under a modified iqta system. Clans became more restrictive and mobility was effectively eliminated. Clans were largely alienated from other clans and from Azdarin freepersons in Aɣmatia.
The commonly acknowledged progenitor of isin'nada is Tmassa Ziri Akli. Akli was a Kel Adrar farmer who organized work stoppages in protest of corvées extracted by the local iqta'at. Akli corresponded with other rebellious clan leaders in tifinaɣ which few Gharib administrators could read. Akli compiled much of this correspondence and his own writings into a book titled Atm'isin'nada or "The Way of Clan Consciousness" in 1790 when he was twenty-eight years old. The central tenets of Akli's theories were that:
- all people are equal until they can demonstrate that they are worthy of sainthood,
- labourers and artisans are oppressed by their rulers and masters,
- collective action by the labourers and artisans is necessary to ameliorate their condition, and
- the rulers and masters are parasites on the products of the clans' labour and must ultimately be overthrown.
Hand-copied volumes of Atm'isin'nada were widely distributed among the clans and ultimately provoked widespread work disruptions. To those who were unfamiliar with the radical language of the revolution, the overthrow of the Imxzninassan seemed more like the restoration of an ancient tribal society rather than the emergence of a new social order. Ziri Akli's writings remained obscure in the rest of the world by virtue of their limited and discreet distribution and the obscure language and script they were written in. At some point after 1800, an Audonic translation of Atm'isin'nada of uncertain origin appeared in East Merovia. There, dissidents and intellectuals seized upon the materials and drew upon them to incite collective action in the guilds and peasant farms against the monarchy.
Republicanism
Aɣmatian revolution
Aɣmatian revolution | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Messidorian revolutions | |||||||
Hundreds are killed by the Imxzninassan at Avana | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Imxzninassan |
Inadan n Kel Adrar Nada Bnu Nada Xitr Nada Ɣuz Nada Znz | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Syphax † Fer Ali † File:Flag of Libya (1977–2011, 3-2).svg Arkun ibn Hassan al-Izîli |
File:Aɣmatia flag.png Ziri Akli Vermina Ɣas Sofon Ilx n Janub Tanakwa Asmun | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
25,000 professional soldiers 30,000 militia fighters |
100,000 clan warriors 300,000 rioters | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
5,000 wounded or killed in battle 6,000 to disease and famine | 8,000 wounded or killed in battle | ||||||
over 50,000 civilians to disease and famine |
Amxzninassa system
Kel Adrar clan organization
Material conditions
Period of civil unrest
March to Avana and massacre
Military action
Aftermath
Merovian revolution
Merovian revolution | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Messidorian revolutions | |||||||
Monarchists lament the capture of Louis XII | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Monarchists | Anarchists | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
File:Merovia flag.png Louis XII File:Flag of West Merovia.png Henry IV André de Lys Jean-Marie Marois † |
Le Renard Élise Faucon Jean Estienne | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
302 nobles 62,530 professional soldiers 30,000 levied soldiers 100,000 irregulars |
184,000 peasants 62,000 guilders 200,000 irregulars | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
189 nobles killed in battle or executed 43,000 soldiers wounded or killed in battle 35,000 militia wounded or killed in battle | 56,900 wounded or killed in battle | ||||||
over 100,000 civilians to disease and famine |