Christian Democratic Party

Revision as of 07:07, 12 December 2023 by Pacitalia (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Christian Democratic Party
LeaderPaolo Demarco
ChairpersonFabio Guglielmo Serra
FoundedMay 20, 1936 (1936-05-20)
HeadquartersPiazza San Gabriele 120/4b, Timiocato, Capitale 1510AB
Youth wingYoung Christian Democrats
Women's wingChristian Democrat Women's League
IdeologyConservatism, Christian democracy
Political positionCentre-right to right-wing
Colours  Black
  Gold
Senato
20 / 100
Constazione
171 / 715
Website
www.dcp.org.pc
This article is about the Pacitalian political party. For other similarly named parties, see Christian Democratic Party (disambiguation) or Category:Christian democratic parties.

The Christian Democratic Party of Pacitalia (Christian Democrats, Pacitalian: Partito Pacitaliana Democrate Cristiane, PDC) is a centre-right, Christian democratic political party in Pacitalia.

Founded in 1936, the Christian Democratic Party was a fringe party for most of the twentieth century. As the Federation of Progressive Democrats began to dominate the political centre in the 1980s and 1990s, social conservatives, many of whom had previously supported the defunct Civil Party, switched their support to the Christian Democrats, helping it to grow into a more mainstream party and eventually enter Pacitalia's parliament at the 2000 election.

The party has yet to form government at the national level and it has never been part of a governing coalition. The Christian Democrats have typically been a "third party" (not the main opposition) in the Constazione and Senato over the past 20 years.

At the regional level, the Christian Democrats have held majority control of the Provencian regional council since 2018, and Cauda since 2021. They previously held plurality control of the Caudese council from 2018 to 2021. The party has held a plurality of seats on the regional councils in Beracanto and Trasteveria since 2018.

As of 2023, the Christian Democratic Party is currently the second-largest party by membership, behind the PSDC, and the largest by fundraising income.

Ideology

Ideologically, the Christian Democrats are a typical conservative party. The party's constitution describes it as explicitly rooted in Catholic values, but it is worth noting that Pacitalia's constitution bans religious political parties and, legally speaking, the party is secular.

While largely supportive of the concept of free markets, the party advocates for reasonable regulation of the private sector, to avoid the prospect of unfettered capitalism and greed, viewing these outcomes as immoral. The party generally supports progressive taxation, where wealthier people pay more tax and poorer people pay less or none at all — though does not favour explicit wealth taxes like those proposed by left-wing parties.

The party adheres to Christian social teachings, favouring state intervention where necessary, and policies that provide for the common good, such as a welfare state and social safety net. At the same time, Christian democrats in Pacitalia believe strongly in private property rights, individual responsibility, and self-determination as social norms.

The Christian Democrats have maintained traditional, conservative positions on numerous social issues. As of 2023, the party, as per its constitution, argues that marriage is a religious institution rather than a civil one. It continues to oppose same-sex marriage, abortion, contraception, and medically assisted dying. The constitution also states the party's opposition to women attending university, and children being born out of wedlock; though, in recent years, party leaders have said the language is outdated.

Former leader Vincenzo Promarche and his successor, Paolo Demarco, have staked out more moderate positions over the past decade, and said that debates around major social issues have been settled, in an attempt to assuage concerns the party would roll back certain rights if in power.

Despite the attempt to appeal to more moderate voters, the Christian Democrats faced criticism for nominating controversial billionaire Carmine Bello as their candidate for archonate in the 2016 and 2017 elections. Nevertheless, Bello, known for his devout Catholicism, brash communication style, and offensive remarks directed toward LGBTQ+ people and women, cultivated a wide base of support that the party had never managed on its own, and he was nearly elected.

The Christian Democrats' voting base tends to skew naturally towards practicing Christians, men, voters over 40, nuclear families, and people who identify as ethnically Pacitalian. Greco- and Romanian-Pacitalians, who are mostly Orthodox, largely vote for other parties, as they view the party as exclusively Catholic. The party draws almost all its support from rural areas and smaller cities and tends to do extremely poorly in major urban areas due to its socially conservative ideology.

Party leaders

Name Served from Served until Notes

Electoral performance

Constazione Repubblicana
Election Leader Electorate votes[a] Party list votes Electorate seats Party list seats Total seats Position Result
No. Share No. Share No. ± No. ± No. ±
2007 Marco Quirinamo 290,009 0.1% 3,943,181 1.5%
0 / 270
N/A[b]
6 / 445
N/A[b]
6 / 715
Increase 1 Increase 5th Opposition
2009 Vincenzo Promarche 16,579,390 5.8% 23,018,734 8.0%
17 / 270
Increase 17
36 / 445
Increase 30
53 / 715
Increase 47 Steady 5th Opposition
2011 Vincenzo Promarche 12,212,623 4.7% 15,219,383 5.8%
6 / 270
Decrease 11
26 / 445
Decrease 10
32 / 715
Decrease 21 Steady 5th Opposition
2014 Vincenzo Promarche 14,576,610 5.2% 20,048,178 6.9%
3 / 270
Decrease 3
31 / 445
Increase 5
34 / 715
Increase 2 Decrease 6th Opposition
2017 Vincenzo Promarche 18,528,261 5.6% 25,757,190 7.9%
7 / 270
Increase 4
35 / 445
Increase 4
42 / 715
Increase 8 Increase 5th Opposition
2020 Vincenzo Promarche 20,769,501 6.4% 18,462,067 5.7%
4 / 270
Decrease 3
25 / 445
Decrease 10
29 / 715
Decrease 13 Increase 3rd Opposition
2023 Paolo Demarco 79,541,224 23.5% 90,372,369 26.7%
52 / 270
Increase 48
119 / 445
Increase 94
171 / 715
Increase 142 Increase 2nd Opposition
Senato Repubblicana
Election Leader Votes[a] Seats Position Result
No. Share No. Change
2007 Marco Quirinamo 2,010,581 0.8%
0 / 96
Increase 0[c] Steady 7th Not seated
2009 Vincenzo Promarche 18,887,376 6.6%
7 / 96
Increase 7 Increase 6th Minority (opposition)
2011 Vincenzo Promarche 13,037,318 5.1%
6 / 96
Decrease 1 Increase 5th Majority (non-governing)
2014 Vincenzo Promarche 15,106,175 5.4%
4 / 96
Decrease 2 Steady 5th Majority (non-governing)
2017 Vincenzo Promarche 26,230,110 8.2%
3 / 96
Decrease 1 Decrease 6th Minority (opposition)
2020 Vincenzo Promarche 20,913,031 6.5%
2 / 100
Decrease 1[d] Increase 4th Minority (opposition)
2023 Paolo Demarco 76,383,134 22.8%
20 / 100
Increase 18 Increase 2nd Minority (opposition)
Archonate of the Pacitalian Republic
Election Candidate First-round votes Runoff election Result
No. Share Position No. Share Position
2007 Angelo Retuzzi 4,860,695 2.3% Steady 4th   Eliminated in first round
2010 No candidate (endorsed FPD's Dragomir Dobrogeanu)  
2016[e] Carmine Bello 84,103,228 22.5% Increase 1st 124,681,867 50.0% Steady 1st Won in runoff †
2017[e] Carmine Bello 53,365,537 18.4% Decrease 4th   Eliminated in first round
2023 Abeo Bamidele 108,705,106 38.0% Increase 1st 151,863,162 53.5% Increase 1st Elected
Notes
  1. 1.0 1.1 Total of first-preference votes only.
  2. 2.0 2.1 First election contested under the new proportional electoral system of the Second Republic. The previous election was a form of first-past-the-post (single-member plurality) voting and did not have "electorate" and "party list" totals; therefore, the only appropriate seat comparison to the prior election is an overall count.
  3. As part of the political reforms of the Second Republic, the size of Pacitalia's upper house was decreased from 100 seats to 96. The Christian Democrats were not seated in the Senate before the 2007 election, resulting in a notional net change of zero seats after the chamber was reduced in size.
  4. The size of the Senate was reverted to 100 seats for the 2020 election. The party's notional net seat decrease in a 100-seat chamber was one.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Election result was annulled due to the narrow margin of just 754 votes between the final two candidates, out of nearly 250 million valid votes cast. Voting irregularities and missing postal ballots that may have altered the final result were also noted during the tabulation process. The National Superior Court invalidated the election results as a precaution and officials re-ran the election in 2017.
References