Themiclesian Marine Corps (according to November Magazine)

Themiclesian Marine Corps
房冗人, bjang-njung-njing
Emblem of the Themiclesian Marine Corps
Founded	17 February 1318 (1318-02-17)
Country	Themiclesia
Type	Naval infantry
Size	7672 active 4233 reserve
Part of	Ministry of Defence
Nickname(s)	metropolitans
Motto(s)	Merchant sons never fear! (ascribed)
Colors	lime
March	the navy don't march
Mascot(s)	penguin
Engagements	See list Battle of Clarkestown (892) Battle of Portcullia (1323) Battle of Tups (1352) First Maverican War (1767–1768) Second Maverican War (1791–1796) Raid on Rad (1791) Battle of Liang-la (1867) Pan-Septentrion War (1926–1949)

The Themiclesian Marine Corps (舫冗人, pjang-njung'-njing) is the naval infantry branch of the Themiclesian Navy (艦航, krams-gang).

Name and translation

Many Themiclesian institutions acquired their Tyrannian names when they were confronted with their counterparts, and the Themiclesian Marines are one such example. The Tyrannian Royal Marines, who fought them in 1791 during the Raid on Rad, gave them their present name. Before then, Rajian and Sylvan sources regularly called them the Exercitus Thimiensis, or in Tyrannian, the "Themiclesian Army". The term Exercitus Thimiensis was even used by Themiclesian diplomats. The term is no longer widely used due to possible confusion with the similarly-named Themiclesian Army. "Themiclesian Marine Corps" is the sanctioned translation of the Shinasthana pjang-njung-njing (舫冗人) since around 1800.

Themiclesians do not use pjang-njung-njing to translate "marine corps" in general; rather, the term shljui-prjang (水兵, lit. "naval army") is used. This is because, domestically, shljui-prjang refers to the lake-based naval infantry that was part of the militia system, which outdates the Navy by several centuries. This branch was abolished as an institution in 1834 and resurrected as the Inland Fleet, managed by the Navy. shljui-prjang being the more inutitive term, it is used to refer to translate foreign terms.

bjang (房) is a proper name for a cabin located in the stern of a ship and constrats with stjit (室), a cabin in the bow of a ship. Both pjang and stjit are compared to parts of terrestrial buildings. There is currently disagreement about the proper reading of bjang: the 3rd Regiment, formed in 1524 and the oldest extant unit, reads it as bjang, while the 4th and 5th Regiments, both dating to the Pan-Septentrion War, read it as pjang’ instead. Philologically, bjang is likely the correct reading, since it is homophonous with the root word bjang (房, lit. "rear chamber"), and also pjang’ means jib (the foremost triangular sail of a ship). Various theories have been forwarded to explain their confusion by individuals who "have good reason to distinguish them".

The word njung-njing (冗人) means "passenger". Currently, this term is still used to identify passengers on both ships and aircraft, but not passengers on road vehicles. The source of this name is uncontroversially linked to the archaic custom that all passengers on ships sailing beyond the coastline are required to bear arms for its defence, under the captain's direction.

History

Early centuries

Main article: Themiclesian Navy § History

During the 1st to 3rd centuries, much of the norhtwest coast was inhabited by native societies and not under Themiclesian control. Natives used water bodies expertly to evade attack, transport warriors, and sneak up on settlements, and naval combat in Themiclesia likely arose to counter such threats. In the 4th c., the royal court ordered coastal (both the Halu'an coast and the Inland Lake coast) prefectures to maintain naval militias. Such naval forces were precedented in Menghean military strategems, though their application seems concentrated on rivers and lakes. It seems plausible that some dedicated infantry units existed, since ships remained manoeuvable while they engaged; however, the distinction between crew and soldier was not clear. These coastal fleets were maintained, for the Inland Lake coast, up to the early 19th century and were part of the Themiclesian Army.

The organizational ancestor of the Themiclesian Marines appeared in history together with the Themiclesian Navy in the early 800s. The state-operated fleet was organized to fight Hallian warriors, who raided the Columbian coast, to protect merchant ships, and to suppress piracy along the Halu'an, Columbian, and Meridian coasts. As the ships' crews were mostly impressed from oceanic fleets, the merchants and non-sailing individuals in them were organized as a sort of supplementary militia apart from the crew, which at this time were also expected to engage the enemy, as in customary to the domestic naval militia. While the militia was initially meant to augment the crew in battle, they were soon expected to do most of the fighting to protect the crew and keep the ship manoeuvrable. In the Battle of Clarkestown of 898 and in view of the merchant militia's background, the general leading the expedition ordered them to scout, which promptly compromised the whereabouts of the force and occasioned its complete extermination. Specifics of this battle are difficult to study, since only a few ships escaped the carnage that destroyed the entire force sent. In 1318, the Bureau of Passengers established permanent units in the merchant militia in Portcullia, officially cited as the founding date of the Marine Corps.

Modern period

The shift from the merchant militia of the 11th to 16th centuries to a professionalized institution around 1570 is considered to have brought the Marines into its modern age in practical terms. While there are great differences, historians have noted some parallels to the colonial armies that had been professional for two or three centuries. The entry of Sylva into the race for colonies in Meridia has prompted Themiclesia again to expand its fleet, which bifurcated into the North Sea Fleet (for the Halu'an Sea) and the South Sea Fleet (for the Meridian Ocean). The Admiralty devised an formula for calculating how many marines were required. Advocates of the formula stated that, since ships and marines both have fixed costs, expenditure on either can be mathematically optimized. Beneath the optimum, the likelihood of capture increases dramatically, while above the optimum, additional deployment carried diminishing returns. At the time, the cost of building each ship was quoted in rjew, technically a unit of timber, but which including the labour needed, on average, to make it a structural part of the vessel. If the vessel was lost, the loss was quantified as its current value, and each ship would become unsuited for battle in a given number of years after launch. Thus, the amount of marines needed was a function of the value of the fleet. In the late 1500s, one marine was required for each 80 rjew (c. 2.21 tons). Opponents of the formula asserted that it does not factor in any information about the enemies they are projected to face and, for that reason, must be inaccurate. Nevertheless, the court adopted the formula, and the size of the Marine Corps seems to have followed it very closely for the next two centuries, and its influence persisted despite abolition in 1799.

The adoption of the formula apparently had a radical effect on the way the force was organized. In the late 1500s, the induction to the Marines outpaced the number of applicants, who were guaranteed a trading license, which permitted them later to buy and sell goods overseas, for service. This, in effect, created an imperfect trading monopoly by former members of the naval service. However, the Secretary of State for Finance asserted to court in 1585 that commercial revenues would increase if the licensing system was abolished forthwith, and the court followed. Though proven correct, it also removed the only incentive to join the naval service as a marine, since salaries offered were uncompetitive. Only two years later, the number of enlistments dropped to zero (during the 1588 fiscal year); the government opened enlistment to the public in response. To prevent men from leaving, the government extended terms of service from 6 to 12, then to 18 years by the 1600s. The quickly-developing nature of naval warfare in the 1500s also demanded the government prioritize cannon foundries and shipbuilding, both expensive, rather than increasing salaries. Indeed, following the formula established, there was a trend to decrease salaries for both sailors and marines; however, sailors were considered skilled labourers under statute, so their salaries were ab initio three times that of an unskilled labourer.

Maverican War

Main article: Maverican Wars

Raid on Rad

Main article: Raid on Rad

Prairie War

As public opinion was unfavourable to the Prairie War, the government passed the the Special Conscription Act, 1935 to conscript organized men in other departments. The 1st and 2nd Regiments were sent to the Army's front this way, along with the Royal Engineers (consctruction teams in service to the monarchy), local policemen, fire brigades, and a litany of others. In view of a conjectural naval invasion to the west coast, the Marines were ordered to recruit in 1937, which progressed at a snail's pace as most able-bodied men were conscripted or on notice for it. Dayashinese immigrants feared regional discrimination, which was known to be rife in some Army units, so the Dayashinese Parliamentary Lobby encouraged them to join the Marines instead, where they would form an overwhelming majority; this has been called the "group-buy mentality" by some historians, where minorities could band up and negotiate a less hostile environment. In 1940, Dayashinese men accounted for over 90% of the entire enlistment and 75% of the force. A strong push for linguistic uniformity occurred, but Shinasthana as lingua franca was replaced by Dayashinese, creating the unusual situation where the operation language was that of the enemy state.

PSW and D/ISOG infiltration

Starting when Dayashina declared war on Themiclesia, the IDA's Imperial Special Operations Group sought to infiltrate the Marines. The core object, as declassified D/ISOG papers show, was to cast doubt on the allegiances of the 100,000 or so Dayashinese-Themiclesians and terrorize the Themiclesian public behind the front, since some of the marines were used as rear-line troops. The Cabinet Office had, in 1937, heavily propagandized the immigrants enlistment as proof of a "defensive resolve that transcends ethnicity and language, affecting all that is human"; the Army further elaborated on this, in early 1939, with fliers dropped in Dayashinese camps to discredit their government's assertion of the war as a struggle between races. The infiltration concentrated on the Dayashinese-majority 4th and 5th Regiments.

To engender terror, Dayashinese operatives, mostly feigning as surrendering IDA soldiers, pretended to naturalize to Themiclesia; welcoming any opportunity to discredit Dayashinese unity, they were accepted heartily. They would then apply to join the Navy, which preferentially placed Dayashinese recruits (identified by their names) into the Marines. Infiltration in the 4th Regiment was particularly prolific, since it was assigned to guarding the temporary capital city at Blim-tsi, which was a coastal city with some naval armaments. Infiltrators then took advantage of the Marines armouries, which contained only light weaponry, to attack civic amenities and attempt assassination on the Emperor. Ultimately, attempts on the Emperor's life narrowly failed in two instances, and attacks on infrastructure were limited in their impact, since the Army's supply lines were diffuse. However, they did succeed in vexing the residents of Blim-tsi that a statute was passed to ban marines from the city.

Current roles

The Themiclesian Marines currently have four distinct roles, as defined by the Admiralty's White Paper on Naval Defence, 2003.

1. Protection of the Themiclesian fleet and naval installations from land-based and personnel threats;
2. Conversion of foreign naval and land assets in support of naval operations;
3. Defence of areas not assigned to the Army's military districts and Themiclesia's "small islands" in the Halu'an Sea; and
4. Certain diplomatic and ceremonial duties.

The fourth item is particularly diverse, and a considerable portion of the force is concerned with it. By historic custom, security personnel around most Themiclesian missions abroad are staffed by marines. Most missions travel with the Navy to their posting, so it was convenient for the Navy's soldiers to protect them. There seems otherwise to be no cause for this preference. There are exceptions to corroborate this: the missions to Dzhungestan and Maverica traditionally are guarded by the Capital Defence Force, since they reach their postings via land, not sea. One exceptional within the rule is Anglia and Lerchernt, where guards (in the embassy only) are staffed by gentlemen-at-arms. While at the beginning of the 20th century marines were actually selected for this duty, since the PSW the Foreign Office has trained its own agents instead, but they still wear the Marines' colours to circumvent legal issues. Historical records show that marines in foreign service were perpetually under martial law, meaning that the head of the mission, if a plenipotentiary, may execute them for any crime whatever until the abolition of capial punishment in 1853; thus, most marines feared foreign service.

Recruitment

During the Rjang (472–542) and Meng (543–752) dynasties, before the existence of a national navy, Themiclesian laws required all merchant chartering ships to trade abroad to be armed and defend the ship should it be attacked. This practice may be older, though firm textual evidence only attest to its existence in the Rjang dynasty. There is little to explain why the merchants, rather than sailors, should be required to bear arms, but according to later literature it was thought that the merchants' goods attracts hostility, so they ought to be (at least partly) responsible for repulsing it. If this was true, then the ships' crews may have insisted that the merchants protect their ships as much. A. A. Ascott believes that this was inevitable as the merchants would still be at a total loss if their transport were destroyed by hostile groups, and they were thus interested in defending the fleet as well. Some prominent trading guilds, especially those sponsored by aristocrats, had professional soldiers with the fleet. During the Rjang dynasty, aristocratic houses retained soldiers within quotas set forth by the government, but during the Meng dynasty this was suppressed, and it thus became incumbent on merchants to be armed. At any rate, most merchants were unable to afford such services and armed themselves. When the navy was founded, the government hired and sometimes impressed sailors from merchant fleets, and the merchants in them conveniently became troops. This contrasts with the prefectural militias' (lake) navies, which generally trained recruits to be naval infantrymen as much as cavalrymen and crossbowmen.

Into the second half of the Dziai dynasty (762–1080), the increased frequency of conflicts with Hallian raiders along the Columbian coast began to disrupt the commercial activities of merchants. While merchants served in the navy, they were allowed to retain some goods to sell abroad. In an emergency, the admirals could confiscate these goods for military use, with or without compensation. Yet as naval voyages lengthened in duration and (in the 1000s) extended to Meridia, merchants became distraught at the thought of impressment, which would impair their ability to trade freely. To combat evasion of naval service, the court in 1004 made it illegal to trade aborad without a license. The navy was further allowed to confiscate unlicensed merchants' property. To acquire the license, an aspirant merchant had to complete a certain number of years in the naval service. This system proved popular with existing merchants, as it restricted the entry of new competitors and made impressment less likely for them. In 1004, the term of service was four years; then in 1020, adjusted to six years. This provided the government with a stable source of soldiers in the navy, as there was always a demand for new trading licenses; additionally, it also made collection of taxes more efficient. It also meant the government could pay marines a very low salary, since their primary reward was the trading license. As the coastline of Meridia was explored, naval service provided an opportunity for non-merchants to explore abroad for new commercial opportunities. While actual successes must have been few, the lure of riches from trading abroad induced a sufficient number to enter naval service that it was not reformed after the Dziai ended.

Equipment

Melée era

From the inception of naval infantry combat in Themiclesia, weapons and armour were modified to suit the highly restrictive geography of ships and the requirements of formations that moved upon them. While very large ships (up to 5,000 tons in displacement by most estimates) existed in the era of sail, such ships were uncommon and rarer still as warships. Armour designs therefore gave priority to mobility and survivability in water, while weapons were designed so that a soldier had sufficient variety on hand to deal with enemies at a distance and up close. The entire kit assumed minimal reliance on his line-mates, since large formations with multiple specialized components were not practical on a soldier's own ship, and even less so if boarding an enemy ship via nets or planks.

The basic weapon for ranged combat was the recurve bow before the gunpowder era; however, towards the end of the 14th century bows became rare. It appears the use of catapults have discouraged ships to stay in arrow range. In its place archaeologists have recovered slingshots and javalins. For person-to-person fighting, most Marines held either a pike or halbred; the halbred had two sides, one being the blade of an axe, and the other a blunt, hammer-like weapon that could be used to push enemy combatants off the edge of ships and planks, and the pike was longer than the halbred but had a smaller, elongated blade. Both had barbs that could be used as a reaching device if overborad. These two weapons were designed to be used jointly, and most were trained to use whichever was more convenient. Short-range combat was fulfilled with a sabre. This is the same sabre as cavalrymen used with a slightly longer grip for two-handed use, permitted swinging and slicing cuts; the blade was overall straight but had a slight inward curve for better "bite". Infantry, on the other hand, usually used swords, which were slightly longer and had two sharpened edges.

Armour heavily used leather, layered cloth, and bamboo. Cloth waxed to a canvas-like consistence reduced water absorbsion, which, with dozens of layers, weighed the wearer down. The last had resilient fibres that resisted traverse cuts well; the weakness of bamboo to cuts parallel to its grain was mitigated by weaving bamboo fibres and then treating it with lime, which made the fabric more pliable but retained its resistance to traverse cuts. Metal armour was present in the form of a mixture between scale and plate, but it was worn far more off ships than on them, since metal armour reduced agility. It seems the choice of armour depended on the weapons the enemy was expected to field. Metal helmets were, however, common; under the helmet was a cap made from leather and spacers, designed to make spread pressure across the head more evenly in the event of a head-on impact. In the 10th century, another helmet design from the Army's charioteers were co-opted; these had longer rims that reached the collars of neck armour, allowing impact to spread there and also protecting the neck area from both trauma and leision more effectively. These were the "Raccoon Helmets" that was themed after a raccoon's protruding facial features, with ears, eyes, and nose encouraging blows to glance off.

There is disagreement over what they wore under their armour. Recent art and film tend to depict them wearing form-fitting crimson tunics and cream pants, which is implausible because crimson was a privileged colour, not permitted on individuals without rank. Form-fitting clothing were also exceptionally rare in Themiclesia before the modern era. It is most likely that the Marines did not have a uniform colour, or even uniform garments, since armour adequately identified affiliation. Nevertheless, the suspension belt worn under the armour (it ran diagonally across both shoulders and attached to a waist belt, which held onto greaves) suggests that something similar to ordinary Themiclesian clothing could have been worn to avoid abrasion, with long, wide sleeves and loose, billowy pants. Sleeves would have been drawn back or folded under gauntlets, and pants tied at the knee, if it was more convenient; written evidence shows that billowy pants were not only common on soldiers but all walks of life. Pieces of string were prepared in pockets and used to tie pants up, making tripping less frequent, when required. All evidence points towards sailors being barefoot onboard; the same is assumed for the Marines while onboard, since clogs slipped easily on the polished-wood decks of the day.

Gunpowder era

When gunpowder spread, boarding enemy ships became progressively less frequent. Themiclesian marines therefore receded in number and started to spend more time on land, manning naval fortifications and protecting the fleet in dock. In naval combat, where the gunpowder prepondered, they were one of the earlier adherents to hand-held firearms, only a century after ships were fitted with cannons. The argument was that the short range and inaccuracy of early firearms did not matter as much when the enemy had little cover and room to maneouvre on ships' decks.

The advent of firearms rendered most forms of armour, except the heaviest of plate, ineffective; however, that more engagements were shifting onto land allowed them to develop the medical apparatus that was only possible with territorial fortifications. Weaponry in this era generally followed Themiclesia's ability to supply them with modern firearms, though sidearms such as sabres were still retained. While essays were written arguing for an artillery department, the naval strategem did not include the Marines as a permanently land-based force.

In various campaigns in Njit-nom (now the north of Maverica), the Marines discovered that coating shoes in rubber increased their grip. Soaking these soles in rubber, common in Maverica, produced a much more resilient and comfortable sole; by the 1760s, most had their shoes regularly soled with rubber whenever available, and rubber was a commodity available on ships, since they were useful for stopping minor leaks. This fashion spread into other walks of Themiclesian society. The Army's shoe shop adopted the same technique with existing leather shoes in the 1800s, and this design survives into the modern age as the blue army shoe. When the Marines further learned to use old canvas to shell their shoes, wax was used to provide a water-resistent outer coat, offering protection against saline environments; this technique also found its way across the entire spectrum of military personnel very soon.

Currently

Cloud-streak Class (虔雲艇) landing platform dock

• The Cloud-streak Class landing platform dock was introduced in 2000.

Culture

Professionalism

Chang and Beecky (1984) asserts that some of the activities of the Themiclesian Marines in the 19th century were remarkably similar to trade guilds of the day. Craftsmen continued to migrate to major cities, particularly close to coast, after the restarting of trade with neighbouring states in 1796. Urban-dwelling craftsmen built on the medieval institution of trade guilds and, many becoming wealthy through enterprise, began to develop the sense of professional pride, which was not only founded on excellence in one's skill, but also the economic status that was based on it. Recruitment by abduction, which was more infamous than naval impressment, was terminated in 1798 after Parliament reduced the size of naval infantry component from 14 regiments to 6, one-third of its peak size of 18 regiments, in 1736. Reduced strength and a recovering economy allowed the government to raise naval pay by as much as 70% in the coming years, which generated the notion that marines were professional soldiers, a concept still foreign to Themiclesia at the time. Nevertheless, it seems Themiclesian society did not view being a soldier as a profession, since until the 1840s more than half of Themiclesian males were in militias; only after the Liberal policy to reduce regional militias (further to liberate internal confines) in 1847 did that notion gain credence. Chang and Beecky considers the measures the Marines have taken to assert professional pride, such as publishing their own weekly newspaper (which was often a single-sided edition) in imitation of trades news, to be "a bit of an act".

Non-regionalism

As with the merchant militia prior to 1600, the Themiclesian Marines are a non-regional force, like most of the Navy and parts of the Air Force. Recruits since professionalization in the 1500s were placed into its units without regard for origin, though it is assumed that most recruits are from the coastal areas, where recruitment took place. The Navy has recruited foreign sailors, or even impressed them from formerly hostile fleets, to replenish its own crew, especially after engagements with large casualties. The same applies to the Marines, though in their case the subject of impressment would be normal civilians, rather than sailors. The Home Militia, on the other hand, strictly maintained regional segregation, replenishing a unit raised from one place with only those raised from the same place. Under interregional and occasionally foreign influence, the Navy's language evolved from a pidgin of various Shinasthana dialects into a creole including native terms and Sylvan, Tyrannian, and Hallian. Since the recruitment of Dayashinese-Themiclesians in 1938, Dayashinese has also been added to the mixture, though the lexifier still appears to be Shinasthana, with foreign being primarily jargon. According to the ethnic Dayashinese recruits, they joined the Marines partly in fear of regional discrimination, which was known to be strong in some militia units that composed of the Themiclesian Army.

Logo

The original branch seal, adopted in 1843, featured a dark blue field charged with a globe with orange longitudinal and red latitudinal lines, an outer ring with ruler markings, ovals in verdegris, silver, and gold, and the asterisms of the Great Dipper and the Boat. The globe represented navigation. The outer ring and ovals depict a traditional Themiclesian navigational instrument, whose functions were comparable to a sextant. The asterisms were key pointers for celestial navigation, the Great Dipper pointing to the north in the Northern Hemisphere, and the Boat to the south in the Southern. In 1872, the outer ring was added, with the Latinate translation added from sinister to dexter across the top, like the Tyrannian text today, reading Legio Navitarum Thimiensis ("Themiclesian Sailor Legion", roughly translated). Tyrannian was substituted in 1880. Notably, the Shinasthana text was only added in 1979; this is typical for Themiclesian unit sigils, which were adopted expressly for the purpose of identification by foreigners.

Unit names

The Themiclesian Marines have a very whimsical unit-naming tradition. This is in stark contrast with the constellation-driven naming scheme that the Themiclesian Navy has obeyed. Names can be acquired by voting within the formation, usually by voice rather than ballot, or by appelation from another group of people, whenever it is accepted by the unit itself.

Current units

• 3rd → 203rd Regiment—Star Chasers (追星), acquired by voice vote in 1948, in reference to the ancient traditions of celestial navigation that the Marines performed.
• 4th → 204th Regiment—Glory Seekers (榮益).
• 5th → 205th Regiment—Sharpshooters (循射, ljul-mljagh). However, "sharpshooter" was homophonous with "missed by a long shot" (夷射, lir-mljagh) in some dialects.

Former units

• 1st Regiment—Wobbly Light (搖光, a kind of auspicious celestial body), conscripted by the Themiclesian Army in 1935.
• 2nd Regiment—Circular Rainbow (繞虹, a kind of auspicious metereological phenomenon), as above.

Nickname

The only known nickname that was applied to the Marines as a whole is lok (毓), usually translated as "metropolitans" by Tyrannian authors. This term arose in the 18th century when Themiclesia lost control over most of her colonial forces and used marines as a substitute for land warfare virtually everywhere except metropolitan Themiclesia. This caused their number to skyrocket from around 7 regiments in 1650 to 18 regiments in 1720. The colonial forces that remained loyal to Themiclesia were acutely aware of their identity distinct from metropolitan Themiclesia but at the same time maintained some sort of cultural affinity with the latter. The word lok, which appears in phrases like lok-tsa′ (毓祖, "near ancestor") and lok-prjii′ (毓妣, "near ancestress") means a recent progenitor (great-grandfather or nearer). In an ancestor-venerating culture such as Themiclesia, this should be unrequited praise, but historical records indicate that it was perceived as an insult. Some analyses provide that the word was used ironically, in the sense of an ancestor abandoned by his offsprings, such as Camia and other colonies in Meridia. A. A. Ascott argues that, since ancestral spirits needed to be worshipped and served, it was an insult to compare soldiers to them. B. B. Banes assert that it would be inexplicable for the Maverican Colonial Army to insult one of their most important allies this way.

Oath

Due to the disruptions resulting from merger with the Loyalist Colonial Army in 1780, the marines were required by law to take an oath before the ship on which they served, before they were allowed to board the ship. The oath, originally established in 1784 for former members of the Orangists (a derogatory name for the Camian Loyalists), was made mandatory for all members of the force in 1785, under a consideration of fairness.

ＯＯＯ誓不惟橘黨人，不為厲，不說人以不法，若有違震死，孫子不藩。

[name] djêdh pje-gljui kwljit dang’ njing, pje gwjar rjadh, pje slhjudh njing le’ pje pjap, njak gwrje’ hwjei tjinh sjii’, sun tsje’ pje pjal.

[I, A.B.] swear [I am] not an Orangist, [that] I shall not be a disagreeable [person], [and] I shall not advocate to others illegal [things]. If there is deviation [then I shall] be struck dead [by lightning], [and my] posterity will not thrive.

In 1957, it was briefly considered in Parliament to abolish this oath, since the Camian Loyalists were no longer an active militia or political force demanding military action against Camia, but an early prorogation killed the proposal. Then, in 1968, the Human Rights Council found the oath in violation of the freedom of conscience, due process of the law, and nulla poena sine lege; two years later, the oath was rewritten to be politically neutral.

ＯＯＯ誓不惟黨人，不為厲，不說人以不法，若有違，論如法／免官暨論如法／廢。

[name] djêdh pje-gljui dang’ njing, pje gwjar rjais, pje slhjudh njing le’ pje pjap, njak gwrje’ hwjei, rjunh njak pjap / mrjan’ kwal kjik rjunh njak pjap / pjabh.

[I, A.B.] swear [I am] not in any fraternity of preceding dedication, [that] I shall not be a disagreeable [person], [and] I shall not advocate to others illegal [things]. If there is deviation [then I shall] be punished according to statute / [NCO] dismissed and punished according to statute / [officers] cashiered.

Motto

Themiclesian public bodies do not usually have mottos; however, individuals can. The Marines' motto is not an officially sanctioned one, though it was independently attested in history at least twice to be merchant sons never fear or merchant sons always well-spirited. Hallian and Sylvan sources record that the phrase was shouted as part of pre-battle rally, making it perhaps more a warcry than a motto in sensu stricto. An exhaustive search into the Marines' archives for this phrase returned only one result, written in 1434, describing the reason why seafaring merchants should be required to submit their "younger sons" for naval service:

賈於外，百難不懼，為持家計，茲以振其心乎久長。農子輾於內，粟乃蘖，賈子征於外，物乃通，利家之孝也。家齊，國乃興。國興，天下平。

kra gwrja ngwais, priak nal pje gwrjah, gwjars drje kra klips, dzje le tjins gje sjem ga kwje drjang. nong tsje' nrjan gwrja nups, sjok ne ngrjat, kra tsje' tjiang gwrja ngwais, mjet ne hlong, rjit kra tje hruh lar. kra dzi, kwek ne hjeng. kwek hjeng, t'in gra brjiang.

To trade overseas, not fearing a hundred challenges, is to support the family, and for that cause their hearts are always well-spirited. When a farmer's son wets seeds at home, so that it may sprout, and a merchant's son adventures beyond, so that merchandise may freely pass, it is piety to the family's interest. Only when the family is united, the state will prosper; when the state prospers, the world will be in tranquility.

What should be noted is the used of the word tjeng, here translated as "adventure", is multifunctional. On one hand, it can refer to any journey with a set destination, for virtually any purpose; on the other hand, it is also used to mean "expedition" in the military sense. When Themiclesia invaded Dzhungestan in 1926, the headquarters was called the East Expedition Headquarters (征東府, tjeng-tong-pja). In either case, lexical emphasis lies on the travelling, not the destination or the traveller's purport there. In the cited passage, some scholars believe that, while the commercial function of the (elder) "merchant sons" was explained, a pun was meant for the militarization of their younger siblings.

See also

• Themiclesia
• Deep Mission Troops
• Dayashina