Partitions of Cuthland: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| data5 = [[Third Partition of Cuthland|Third Partition]], end of the [[Cuthish Revolutionary War]] | | data5 = [[Third Partition of Cuthland|Third Partition]], end of the [[Cuthish Revolutionary War]] | ||
| label6 = 1825 | | label6 = 1825 | ||
| data6 = [[Fourth Partition of Cuthland|Fourth Partition]], end of the [[ | | data6 = [[Fourth Partition of Cuthland|Fourth Partition]], end of the [[Peninsular War (Aurorum)|Peninsular War]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Partitions of Cuthland''' were a series of territorial concessions imposed on the [[First Cuthish Empire]] and its successor states during the 18th and early 19th centuries. | The '''Partitions of Cuthland''' were a series of territorial concessions imposed on the [[First Cuthish Empire]] and its successor states during the 18th and early 19th centuries. The partitions occurred in four stages, beginning with the [[First Partition of Cuthland|First Partition]] following the [[War of the Cuthish Succession]] in 1740 and ending with the [[Fourth Partition of Cuthland|Fourth Partition]] following the [[Peninsular War (Aurorum)|Peninsular War]] in 1825. Cuthland's partitions contributed to an extended era of decline known as the [[Century of Horrors]], resulting in the temporary loss of the nation's {{wp|Great power|great power}} status and provoking a period of sociopolitical upheaval sparked by the [[Cuthish Revolution]]. The [[Alhstead Wars]] of the mid-19th century partially reversed the territorial losses inflicted by the partitions, ultimately serving as one of the primary [[Causes of the Great War (Aurorum)|causes of the]] [[Great War (Aurorum)|Great War]]. | ||
Some historians propose the inclusion of | Some historians propose the inclusion of the [[Treaty of Lehpold]], which ended the [[Great War (Aurorum)|Great War]] and resulted in the cession of many Cuthish territories to neighboring states, as a [[Fifth Partition of Cuthland|fifth partition]]. This terminology has largely been promoted by [[Wilfred Drace]] of the [[University of Kingsham]], whose 1997 article ''[[The Five Partitions of Cuthland]]'' brought the theory into mainstream academic discussion. However, Drace's thesis has proven controversial and is not widely accepted in the academic community. | ||
==History== | ==History== |
Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 October 2021
Partitions of Cuthland | |
---|---|
Events depicted: | |
1715 | Beginning of the War of the Cuthish Succession |
1740 | First Partition, end of the War of the Cuthish Succession |
1778 | Second Partition, end of the First Cutho-Mascyllary War |
1800 | Third Partition, end of the Cuthish Revolutionary War |
1825 | Fourth Partition, end of the Peninsular War |
The Partitions of Cuthland were a series of territorial concessions imposed on the First Cuthish Empire and its successor states during the 18th and early 19th centuries. The partitions occurred in four stages, beginning with the First Partition following the War of the Cuthish Succession in 1740 and ending with the Fourth Partition following the Peninsular War in 1825. Cuthland's partitions contributed to an extended era of decline known as the Century of Horrors, resulting in the temporary loss of the nation's great power status and provoking a period of sociopolitical upheaval sparked by the Cuthish Revolution. The Alhstead Wars of the mid-19th century partially reversed the territorial losses inflicted by the partitions, ultimately serving as one of the primary causes of the Great War.
Some historians propose the inclusion of the Treaty of Lehpold, which ended the Great War and resulted in the cession of many Cuthish territories to neighboring states, as a fifth partition. This terminology has largely been promoted by Wilfred Drace of the University of Kingsham, whose 1997 article The Five Partitions of Cuthland brought the theory into mainstream academic discussion. However, Drace's thesis has proven controversial and is not widely accepted in the academic community.