Greger Lange: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Greger Paul Lange''' ({{wp|IPA|/lænd͡ʒ/}}; 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882), sometimes {{wp|English language|estmerishized}} as '''Gregory Lange''', was a [[Geatland|Geatish]] {{wp|historian}}, {{wp|essayist}}, {{wp|journalist}} and {{wp|social theory|social theorist}}. He is best known for his three-volume ''[[History of the Euclean Peoples]]'', which is one of the most widely read and circulated commentaries on history in [[Kylaris|the world]]. Lange is most closely associated with the {{wp|great man theory}} of history. Lange asserted that the course of history was determined by the actions of a small group of influential leaders, whom he termed the [[Langean social stratification|leaders of men]]. His collected works and ideology are known as [[Langean theory]]. | '''Greger Paul Lange''' ({{wp|IPA|/lænd͡ʒ/}}; 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882), sometimes {{wp|English language|estmerishized}} as '''Gregory Lange''', was a [[Geatland|Geatish]] {{wp|historian}}, {{wp|essayist}}, {{wp|journalist}} and {{wp|social theory|social theorist}}. He is best known for his three-volume {{wp|magnum opus}} ''[[History of the Euclean Peoples]]'', which is one of the most widely read and circulated commentaries on history in [[Kylaris|the world]]. Lange is most closely associated with the {{wp|great man theory}} of history. Lange asserted that the course of history was determined by the actions of a small group of influential leaders, whom he termed the [[Langean social stratification|leaders of men]]. His collected works and ideology are known as [[Langean theory]]. | ||
Lange's writings center around his [[Langean social stratification|theory of social stratification]], which holds that societies naturally distinguish between leaders of men (statesmen, monarchs, military commanders), leaders among men (authors, thinkers, theorists) and ordinary men. Lange advocated a top-down understanding of history. He suggested that leaders of men determine the course of history, and that their actions determine the destiny of ordinary men rather than the other way around. Great men formed a subset of leaders whose actions, according to Lange, shaped human history most profoundly. In his ''History of the Euclean Peoples'', Lange | Lange's writings center around his [[Langean social stratification|theory of social stratification]], which holds that societies naturally distinguish between leaders of men (statesmen, monarchs, military commanders), leaders among men (authors, thinkers, theorists) and ordinary men. Lange advocated a top-down understanding of history. He suggested that leaders of men determine the course of history, and that their actions determine the destiny of ordinary men rather than the other way around. Great men formed a subset of leaders whose actions, according to Lange, shaped human history most profoundly. In his 1865 tract ''[[Von Bayrhoffer in Werania]]'', a commentary on [[Weranian Unification]], Lange examined the rise of [[Ulrich von Bayrhoffer]] as a case study of his social theory. In ''History of the Euclean Peoples'', published in 1877, Lange continued his analysis of the [[Euclea#History|history of Euclea]] through the lens of political figures, culminating in his analysis of the [[First Narozalic Civil War]] and [[Eduard Olsov]] | ||
In ''[[On Chaos and Order]]'', a companion {{wp|monograph}} to ''Von Bayrhoffer in Werania'', Lange argued that great men arose out of societal chaos and disorder. He developed [[Chaos-order spectrum|chaos-order spectrum]] of societal analysis, in which he argued that human societies sway between periods of social order brought about by great men and periods of social chaos. Lange believed that great men existed to "set society aright". In the same monograph, Lange observed that societies experiencing | In ''[[On Chaos and Order]]'', a companion {{wp|monograph}} to ''Von Bayrhoffer in Werania'', Lange argued that great men arose out of societal chaos and disorder. He developed [[Chaos-order spectrum|chaos-order spectrum]] of societal analysis, in which he argued that human societies sway between periods of social order brought about by great men and periods of social chaos. Lange believed that great men existed to "set society aright". In the same monograph, Lange observed that societies experiencing decline usually hasten their collapse by amplifying worsening social or economic conditions, a phenomenon he termed [[Collapse acceleration syndrome|collapse accelaration syndrome]]. In his essay [[The Last Solarians]], Lange analyzed the conditions following the collapse of the [[Eturia#Solarian Empire|Solarian Empire]] and the rise of the [[Verliquoian Empire]] according to his chaos-order spectrum. | ||
Lange was hugely influential in the fields of history, {{wp|historiography}} and {{wp|sociology}} during the 20th century. He continues to be one of the most published historians and social thinkers of the 19th century. In modern times, his work is controversial and his legacy remains contested. Many of Lange's supporters, particularly those in the {{wp|conservativism|conservative tradition}}, laud his theories of innate social stratification. Critics argue that his {{wp|philosophy of history}} neglects key economic and social factors in its analysis, focusing instead on a simple-minded interpretation of historical cause and effect. Other critics contend that Lange's reverance for political strongmen fomented authoritarian ideologies like {{wp|fascism|functionalism}}. | Lange was hugely influential in the fields of history, {{wp|historiography}} and {{wp|sociology}} during the 20th century. He continues to be one of the most published historians and social thinkers of the 19th century. In modern times, his work is controversial and his legacy remains contested. Many of Lange's supporters, particularly those in the {{wp|conservativism|conservative tradition}}, laud his theories of innate social stratification. Critics argue that his {{wp|philosophy of history}} neglects key economic and social factors in its analysis, focusing instead on a simple-minded interpretation of historical cause and effect. Other critics contend that Lange's reverance for political strongmen fomented authoritarian ideologies like {{wp|fascism|functionalism}}. | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
===Military service and early journalism=== | ===Military service and early journalism=== | ||
===Life abroad=== | ===Life abroad=== | ||
==== | ===Study in Estmere=== | ||
==== | ===Werania and von Bayrhoffer=== | ||
=== | ===Return to Geatland and ''History of the Euclean Peoples''=== | ||
=== | ===Death=== | ||
==Personal life== | |||
==Theory of history== | |||
===Heroes and great men=== | |||
===Social stratification=== | |||
===Chaos-order spectrum=== | |||
===Collapse acceleration syndrome=== | |||
==Political beliefs== | |||
===Association with Leo von Heidenstam=== | |||
==Religion== | |||
==Legacy== |
Revision as of 21:57, 21 October 2020
Greger Lange | |
---|---|
Born | Greger Paul Lange 12 February 1809 |
Died | 19 April 1882 Blåstad, Geatland | (aged 73)
Nationality | Geatish |
Occupation | Writer, historian, social theorist |
Known for | |
Spouse(s) | Hannah Brubick |
Writing career | |
Alma mater | University of Blåstad |
Literary movement | Belle Époque literature |
Notable works |
Greger Paul Lange (/lænd͡ʒ/; 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882), sometimes estmerishized as Gregory Lange, was a Geatish historian, essayist, journalist and social theorist. He is best known for his three-volume magnum opus History of the Euclean Peoples, which is one of the most widely read and circulated commentaries on history in the world. Lange is most closely associated with the great man theory of history. Lange asserted that the course of history was determined by the actions of a small group of influential leaders, whom he termed the leaders of men. His collected works and ideology are known as Langean theory.
Lange's writings center around his theory of social stratification, which holds that societies naturally distinguish between leaders of men (statesmen, monarchs, military commanders), leaders among men (authors, thinkers, theorists) and ordinary men. Lange advocated a top-down understanding of history. He suggested that leaders of men determine the course of history, and that their actions determine the destiny of ordinary men rather than the other way around. Great men formed a subset of leaders whose actions, according to Lange, shaped human history most profoundly. In his 1865 tract Von Bayrhoffer in Werania, a commentary on Weranian Unification, Lange examined the rise of Ulrich von Bayrhoffer as a case study of his social theory. In History of the Euclean Peoples, published in 1877, Lange continued his analysis of the history of Euclea through the lens of political figures, culminating in his analysis of the First Narozalic Civil War and Eduard Olsov
In On Chaos and Order, a companion monograph to Von Bayrhoffer in Werania, Lange argued that great men arose out of societal chaos and disorder. He developed chaos-order spectrum of societal analysis, in which he argued that human societies sway between periods of social order brought about by great men and periods of social chaos. Lange believed that great men existed to "set society aright". In the same monograph, Lange observed that societies experiencing decline usually hasten their collapse by amplifying worsening social or economic conditions, a phenomenon he termed collapse accelaration syndrome. In his essay The Last Solarians, Lange analyzed the conditions following the collapse of the Solarian Empire and the rise of the Verliquoian Empire according to his chaos-order spectrum.
Lange was hugely influential in the fields of history, historiography and sociology during the 20th century. He continues to be one of the most published historians and social thinkers of the 19th century. In modern times, his work is controversial and his legacy remains contested. Many of Lange's supporters, particularly those in the conservative tradition, laud his theories of innate social stratification. Critics argue that his philosophy of history neglects key economic and social factors in its analysis, focusing instead on a simple-minded interpretation of historical cause and effect. Other critics contend that Lange's reverance for political strongmen fomented authoritarian ideologies like functionalism.