Nabiyan National Liberation Front: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
==Ideology== | ==Ideology== | ||
The ideology of the NLF has shifted across a number of years since its initial creation in 1934. As a political alliance of the Communist, Nationalist and Republican parties, the NLF represented a broad range of political ideals with the overall aim of achieving complete independence for the state of Nabiya. With the takeover of the group by the Communist party through {{wp|entryist}} tactics, the NLF came to embody a form of {{wp|marxism-leninism|revolutionary socialism}} which aimed to achieve a socialist state in Nabiya through violent revolution, first with the overthrow of colonial rule, and later the Senapti-led monarchy as well as violent struggle against {{wp|private ownership}} of land and property. | |||
With the NLF's initial failure to take power in the aftermath of Nabiyan independence, the group looked to organise itself as a parallel state to the Senapti government in the few territories it maintained control over. The NLF mainted its own standing army, bureaucracy and administrative system which were largelly formed with the aim of waging a {{wp|guerilla war}} against the Arani Empire, particularly within the southern regions of Karakh, Malakkad and Oranna where NLF influence was greatest post-independence. | |||
===Dhamdherism=== | |||
By the 1960s the groups's brand of revolutionary socialism evolved under the leadership of Gautami Dhamdhere who governed the NLF from 1967 to 1984. This new platform labelled Dhamdherism after the group's leader dominated party discourse throughout the latter half of the twentieth century. Dhamdherism looked to combine elements of revolutionary socialism with aspects of Nabiyan {{wp|nationalism}}, {{wp|accelerationism}} and {{wp|agrarian socialism}}. Additionally the ideological shift under Dhamdhere also led to greater restrictions on the political freedoms of those under NLF rule with the government utilising increasingly {{wp|authoritarian}} tactics to control its population and suppress dissent. Simultaneously, this period led to the development of a {{wp|cult of personality}} around Gautami Dhamdhere and the wider Dhamdhere political dynasty. | |||
Under Gautami Dhamdhere the NLF reached the height of its power post-independence due to the expansion of its conflict against the Empire as well as a serious intensification of agricultural and military production. Nevertheless this period also conicided with widespread political oppression millions of deaths and allegations of {{wp|genocide}} from some international observers. | |||
===Anarchism=== | |||
By the mid-1980s, Dhamdhere's political influence had began to wane with other more moderate candidates taking control of the NLF and reversing many of the more extreme aspects of Dhamdherist rule. These changes had the effect of fragmenting much of the centralised political control that the NLF exerted over its territories leading some territories to come under the control of independent councils or warlords. With the onset of the twenty-first century, this decentralised control was embraced by a new wave of NLF leaders who embraced a model of governance more closely aligned with {{wp|anarchism}} rather than the more authoritarian approach of Dhamdherist rule. | |||
Despite this shift towards anarcho-socialism, various different socialist ideologies continue to be promoted amongst the party leadership. | |||
==Administration== | ==Administration== | ||
==Leaders== | ==Leaders== |
Latest revision as of 12:33, 23 October 2024
This article is incomplete because it is pending further input from participants, or it is a work-in-progress by one author. Please comment on this article's talk page to share your input, comments and questions. Note: To contribute to this article, you may need to seek help from the author(s) of this page. |
Nabiyan National Liberation Front नबियान राष्ट्रीय मुक्ती आघाडी Nabiyāna rāṣṭrīya muktī āghāḍī | |
---|---|
Leader | Ravi Goyal |
Deputy Leader | Alia Bhagat |
Founded | 1934 |
Ideology | Revolutionary Socialism Anarchism Dhamdherism |
Political position | Far-left |
The Nabiyan National Liberation Front (Thrakur: नबियान राष्ट्रीय मुक्ती आघाड, Nabiyāna rāṣṭrīya muktī āghāḍī) or simply the NLF, is a revolutionary, socialist political party and rebel group operating within Nabiya. Formed by 1934 as a union of the Nabiyan Communist, Nationalist and Republican parties as an attempt to fight for Nabiyan independence against Rythene and Tyrnica the group has since evolved into a anarcho-socialist revolutionary group occupying areas of southern Nabiya and current engaged in an on-and-off conflict against the Senapati-led government of the Arani Empire.
Organisation
History
Ideology
The ideology of the NLF has shifted across a number of years since its initial creation in 1934. As a political alliance of the Communist, Nationalist and Republican parties, the NLF represented a broad range of political ideals with the overall aim of achieving complete independence for the state of Nabiya. With the takeover of the group by the Communist party through entryist tactics, the NLF came to embody a form of revolutionary socialism which aimed to achieve a socialist state in Nabiya through violent revolution, first with the overthrow of colonial rule, and later the Senapti-led monarchy as well as violent struggle against private ownership of land and property.
With the NLF's initial failure to take power in the aftermath of Nabiyan independence, the group looked to organise itself as a parallel state to the Senapti government in the few territories it maintained control over. The NLF mainted its own standing army, bureaucracy and administrative system which were largelly formed with the aim of waging a guerilla war against the Arani Empire, particularly within the southern regions of Karakh, Malakkad and Oranna where NLF influence was greatest post-independence.
Dhamdherism
By the 1960s the groups's brand of revolutionary socialism evolved under the leadership of Gautami Dhamdhere who governed the NLF from 1967 to 1984. This new platform labelled Dhamdherism after the group's leader dominated party discourse throughout the latter half of the twentieth century. Dhamdherism looked to combine elements of revolutionary socialism with aspects of Nabiyan nationalism, accelerationism and agrarian socialism. Additionally the ideological shift under Dhamdhere also led to greater restrictions on the political freedoms of those under NLF rule with the government utilising increasingly authoritarian tactics to control its population and suppress dissent. Simultaneously, this period led to the development of a cult of personality around Gautami Dhamdhere and the wider Dhamdhere political dynasty.
Under Gautami Dhamdhere the NLF reached the height of its power post-independence due to the expansion of its conflict against the Empire as well as a serious intensification of agricultural and military production. Nevertheless this period also conicided with widespread political oppression millions of deaths and allegations of genocide from some international observers.
Anarchism
By the mid-1980s, Dhamdhere's political influence had began to wane with other more moderate candidates taking control of the NLF and reversing many of the more extreme aspects of Dhamdherist rule. These changes had the effect of fragmenting much of the centralised political control that the NLF exerted over its territories leading some territories to come under the control of independent councils or warlords. With the onset of the twenty-first century, this decentralised control was embraced by a new wave of NLF leaders who embraced a model of governance more closely aligned with anarchism rather than the more authoritarian approach of Dhamdherist rule.
Despite this shift towards anarcho-socialism, various different socialist ideologies continue to be promoted amongst the party leadership.
Administration
Leaders
The Leadership of the National Liberation Front has evolved over time with the type of leadership and method of election changing based on amendments to the party's constitution. Originally, the NLF had no designating leader and instead operated with a leadership council made up of all three independent party leaders. Each leader would share authority over the group with any decisions or amendments to the party's constitution requiring unanimous agreement between all three.
As the independence struggle deepened however this proved unworkable leading the constitution to be amended to include a rotating presidency. Under this system the President of the NLF would serve a 4-year term which would rotate between candidates from the Nationalist Party, Nabiyan Republican Party and Communist Party of Nabiya. This system of a rotating presidency existed between 1938 and 1952 when it was replaced by a system of election by committee from all parties in the coalition without any system of rotation. This amendment greatly benefitted the Communist party which by this point had gained almost complete control over the party committee and membership due to entryist tactics which largely displaced the influence of the Nationalist and Republican groups. Under the current system, the party presidency has evolved from periods of almost dictatorial control during the 1970s and 80s, to the more democratic system seen under the modern anarcho-socialist party today.