Husna: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Neo-Butari Benteng.png|275px|right|thumb|An artist's impression of a | [[File:Neo-Butari Benteng.png|275px|right|thumb|An artist's impression of a Neo-Tjesh civilisation era husna.]]A '''''husna''''' ({{wp|Old Aramaic|Old Hadrene}}: 𐤇𐤎𐤍𐤀 ''hsn'''; {{wp|Ottoman Turkish|Kayig}}: Ϧⲩⲥⲛⲁ, ''hüsna'' {{wp|English language|Estmerish}}: '''fortress''') was a large type of fortified settlements found throughout [[Kadaria]] and [[Nise]] beginning in the 25th century BCE through the 13th century CE. The benteng emerged with the [[Pali culture]], but became widespread over the island with the [[Butari civilization|Butari]] and [[Neo-Butari Empire|Neo-Butari Empires]] in the 4th century through 1200s CE. At the start of their history, bentengs were essentially city-states in their own right, controlling large amounts of people. Over the centuries, their economic and cultural power would wane as more centralized forms of governments rose. By the time of the Neo-Butari Empire in the 900s CE, the benteng had been reduced to little more than a noble estate. | ||
Despite their comparison to {{wp|castle|castles}} by [[Euclea|Euclean]] historians and anthropologists, the benteng was functionally quite different and there are some key difference between the two that make direct comparisons difficult. The biggest difference between the benteng and Euclean castle, was the entire population of a benteng would live within the confines of the fortress. The movement of the population in and out of a benteng was heavily monitored to ensure the benteng would always have a healthy male population for the defense of the city. Likewise, all economic activity of the benteng was structured around the military to ensure the survival of the benteng. Because of the inclusive nature of the benteng, strong cultural identities developed unique to each one. As Terangau centralized as a polity, these cultural identities have often become a source of tension, particularly between groups of people from historically rival bentengs. | Despite their comparison to {{wp|castle|castles}} by [[Euclea|Euclean]] historians and anthropologists, the benteng was functionally quite different and there are some key difference between the two that make direct comparisons difficult. The biggest difference between the benteng and Euclean castle, was the entire population of a benteng would live within the confines of the fortress. The movement of the population in and out of a benteng was heavily monitored to ensure the benteng would always have a healthy male population for the defense of the city. Likewise, all economic activity of the benteng was structured around the military to ensure the survival of the benteng. Because of the inclusive nature of the benteng, strong cultural identities developed unique to each one. As Terangau centralized as a polity, these cultural identities have often become a source of tension, particularly between groups of people from historically rival bentengs. |
Revision as of 23:46, 31 October 2020
A husna (Old Hadrene: 𐤇𐤎𐤍𐤀 hsn'; Kayig: Ϧⲩⲥⲛⲁ, hüsna Estmerish: fortress) was a large type of fortified settlements found throughout Kadaria and Nise beginning in the 25th century BCE through the 13th century CE. The benteng emerged with the Pali culture, but became widespread over the island with the Butari and Neo-Butari Empires in the 4th century through 1200s CE. At the start of their history, bentengs were essentially city-states in their own right, controlling large amounts of people. Over the centuries, their economic and cultural power would wane as more centralized forms of governments rose. By the time of the Neo-Butari Empire in the 900s CE, the benteng had been reduced to little more than a noble estate.
Despite their comparison to castles by Euclean historians and anthropologists, the benteng was functionally quite different and there are some key difference between the two that make direct comparisons difficult. The biggest difference between the benteng and Euclean castle, was the entire population of a benteng would live within the confines of the fortress. The movement of the population in and out of a benteng was heavily monitored to ensure the benteng would always have a healthy male population for the defense of the city. Likewise, all economic activity of the benteng was structured around the military to ensure the survival of the benteng. Because of the inclusive nature of the benteng, strong cultural identities developed unique to each one. As Terangau centralized as a polity, these cultural identities have often become a source of tension, particularly between groups of people from historically rival bentengs.
History
Origin
The origins of the benteng are muddled and several conflicting theories on their inception exist. The most widely accepted theory by Euclean anthropologists and archaeologists is early bentengs originating as small congregations of extended family groups, ranging in upwards of 30 households and having a population of anywhere from one hundred to five hundred people. In time, these family groups gradually expanded and incorporated more families, who commonly banded together to ease resource consumption and allocation, as well as common defense.
The first documented benteng comes from the 1000s BCE when a series of earthworks were constructed around the perimeter of the Pali city of Sintok. The earthworks stretched approximately 26 km from the perimeter of the city into its rural area. It is estimated that construction of this wall began in the 9th century BCE and was completed in the 7th century. By the 5th century, the original earthworks, which consisted of little more than ditches and 6 meter high walls, had expanded to a 12-meter high defensive wall and the ditches had been filled with trees. The defensive wall had expanded to include much of the rural area of Sintok, with all entry points having strong wooden gates. Several conflicts between Sintok and its neighbors eventually led to the removal of all but one of the gates, and in 307 BCE, the Dato of Sintok, Sugriwa III, issued an edict forbidding its inhabitants from leaving the city. By 250 BCE, 50 years after the Sintok Declaration, sixteen other bentengs are recorded to have be built. By the turn of the millennium, every major Pali city had been turned into a benteng.
Early Benteng
Following the collapse of Pali culture at the turn of the millennium, the benteng became the primary political unit during the Warring States period of Terangauni history. Over the four centuries between the the collapse of the Pali and the subsequent rise of the Butari Empire, the intrusive nature of the benteng resulted in the formation of unique cultural identities specific to each individual benteng. Along side the development of unique culture endemic to each benteng, the inhabitants would become fiercely loyal to the lord of the benteng. This side effect is theorised to be the primary driving force for the widespread adoption of the benteng, as the loyalty of the inhabitants far surpassed those in ordinary towns and cities.
An early issue that quickly became apparent in early bentengs was overcrowding. The limited space, particularly for agricultural products, resulted in overpopulation to be a chronic issue for bentengs, especially as the island provided little room for expansion as the population of the bentengs increased. Two primary methods of population control were utilized, often simultaneously, were population expulsion and the use of contraceptives.
Population expulsion was a popular method employed by benteng lords. The most popular way of determining which families would be expelled was by lottery. The heads of every family, barring families of the aristocracy, would submit their clan names to the priestly caste. A seven-day long grace period was given out to ensure that all the names of the clans living in the benteng could be gathered. After the grace period, the population would gather in one of several public squares, often coordinated in such a manner as to align with the families living in proximity. The priests would then draw family names until a safe population threshold was reached. This number could vary between only three or four to upwards of eleven. In the benteng near modern-day Koang, it was reported that in 684 CE, 35 families were expelled due to overcrowding. Once the names were drawn, the selected families had another seven-day grace period to gather their belongings and leaving the benteng. Once leaving the benteng, they were considered "stateless."
Contraceptives were the other widely used methods. Prior to the introduction of agriculture from neighboring Dezevau, yams were a part of the regular diet of the pre-Pali Terangauni population. These yams were rich in phytoestrogens and sterols, both being natural contraceptives, and resulted in a very low birthrate for pre-Pali Terangau. When agriculture was introduced in the 25th century BCE, rice gradually supplanted yams as the grain of choice, and ultimately resulted in rapid population growth of the Terangauni. Communities which remained hunter-gatherers maintained low birthrates. It is currently believed that the contraceptive properties of the yams were discovered during the 1000s BCE, roughly coinciding with the development of the Sintok benteng. These yams were specifically grown for their contraceptive properties and most bentengs had one or two fields dedicated to their cultivation. Other contraceptives used and harvested were the quinine bush and giant boat-lip orchid.
The hierarchy of the benteng evolved simultaneously with the transition from walled settlements to fully fledged bentengs. At the top of the benteng hierarchy was the dato, or king, who ruled over the entirety of the benteng as both the supreme political and military leader. The dato was usually a hereditary position, but there are some bentengs where the position of dato was elected upon the death of the ruler. Beneath the dato was the ruling aristocracy. Unlike Euclean nobility, the aristocracy of a benteng were usually not wealthy landowners, but were instead influential merchant families. Because the benteng was effectively a closed community, trade was heavily regulated and only permitted in a limited capacity. The aristocratic class of a benteng arose out of this by being able to secure trade licenses, through pre-benteng family fortunes as traders or other means, giving them unparalleled power in benteng society. Priests are commonly the next rank in the benteng social hierarchy, although their exact importance in Pali and Butari bentengs is a topic of debate among academic circles. A growing number of scholars believe, because the badi temples were on private property and the priests were the ones chosen to hold expulsion lotteries, priests were actually just above slaves. Others argue that priests were still held highly, citing the importance of the priest caste in contemporaneous societies in both mainland Coius and Euclea, although no actual evidence has been found in archaeological sites in Terangau. The military strata is next, and is composed of professional soldiers instead of peasant levies. Despite being built around the military, the actual professional cadre of a benteng was relatively small, being only 15% of the total population. Because the defense of the benteng was paramount to its survival, the soldiers were given preferential access to most of the resources available. The caste was not hereditary, although by the rise of the Neo-Butari Empire, it had evolved into one. Landowners and smiths were below in importance, and controlled most of the resource allocation in the benteng. All metal, either mined or imported, were given to the forges and landowners were responsible for feeding and clothing the entire population of the benteng. Slaves were the lowest caste and performed all the non-specialized labor in the benteng, including construction and farming. Slaves were obtained through trade or through raids on stateless communities.
The political relations between early benteng were not unlike the city-states of contemporary civilizations. Smaller benteng often became subordinate to a powerful neighboring benteng. This show of subordination would either take the form of outright vassalization or through becoming a tributary state. Small bentengs often had shifting allegiances and paid tribute to one or more neighboring benteng. Some benteng, such as the Benteng of Butari, were able to form empires. In reality, these polities were more like federations, consisting of several kingdom-sized benteng swearing allegiance to a central authority, such as the Besadato of Bukari.